why were people so skinny in the 70s?

17810121349

Replies

  • EmilyEmpowered
    EmilyEmpowered Posts: 650 Member
    :laugh:
    Had no interest in eating when tripping on acid, now when smoking pot I ate many treats, but we did a lot of walking to get that next quarter bag...
  • harleygroomer
    harleygroomer Posts: 373 Member
    LOTS OF DRUGS
  • eric_sg61
    eric_sg61 Posts: 2,925 Member
    No video games, kids played outside, people worked more labor intensive jobs, and cocaine is a helluva drug.
  • skadoosh33
    skadoosh33 Posts: 353 Member
    I agree - I keep hearing about all the overweight kids but I don't see it much myself. I have 4 kids ranging in age from 4 to 20 so I see lots of children of all ages and I don't find that they are very heavy at all. There is maybe 1 or 2 "fat" kids in each class that I notice. This is about the same as when I was their ages. None of my kids had an issue with being overweight... they did have issues with being underweight but we work on that. I also find that they have lots of very positive physical activity at their schools and much better playgrounds than we did when we were their age. Gym class and recess seem to be much more positive experiences for my kids than it was for me growing up in the 70's. - this is the positive side of more supervision and more organized activities. There are pros and cons to it really.

    There are lots of fat kids. When we lived in FL my kids were called the skinny kids because most were overweight or obese. And I've had an 8 year old patient who was 186lbs and mom was proud. It's poor parenting. Now we live in Denver,Co the healthiest state and aren't as many.
  • TheVimFuego
    TheVimFuego Posts: 2,412 Member
    Muscle wastage, my Granny is tiny.
  • skadoosh33
    skadoosh33 Posts: 353 Member
    It's worth a mention that diet pills were far less regulated and far more common, too, as were crash diets, self-medicating with booze and prescriptions (yes, they can make you eat too, but a lot depends on user mindset), smoking like chimneys, etc. My mom also said bulimia was eeeeverywhere when she was in high school in the 60s and that when Twiggy came in with a super-thin body ideal it got worse.

    What about kids? I don't think diet pills & crash diets were a major factor for kids..
    look around.... so many over weight kids today !!
    look at pics from the 70's - kids were more average weight, or even on the thin side.

    70's kids = More exercise calories burned. Less calories consumed.
    I really think the overweight kids thing is seriously exaggerated. My daughter's school bus stop has about 15 kids, and only 1 of them is overweight. I work in retail, and I see very few overweight kids. Obesity is a problem, but it's actually been declining for a couple years now, the media just continues to sensationalize it.

    Childhood obesity is still on the rise and you see it more in certain areas. It is also more common in lower income families. There are 2020 goals to reduce this.
  • skadoosh33
    skadoosh33 Posts: 353 Member
    No more mothers at home. No more home cooked meals. All fast food now that both parents work.

    then there was way too much pressure on mom to keep everyone eating correctly. everyone should know how to eat healthy. if your wife doesnt cook you dinner, it doesnt mean you can eat ice cream and gummy bears instead :(

    No, it was because the mothers had all day to prepare healthy meals. Now there is no time in the average household, families don't eat together and just grab something quick. They go to Chic-fil-a and think it is healthy.
  • rainbow198
    rainbow198 Posts: 2,245 Member
    Disco baby! People were out dancing and shaking their groove thang (and doing other things at the club lol) and not on the computers and phones all day and night.
  • xmysterix
    xmysterix Posts: 114 Member
    PPs: yeah, kids have a very different life now, but I mentioned that in the post I made before the one about pills.

    One of the biggest factors with childhood obesity rates is how the poverty-level population eats. In the previous eras, poor meant going without food. Now it means eating nutritionally substandard, calorie-dense, cheap factory food. There are less fresh vegetable vendors (even major chains) in low-SES neighborhoods, higher costs in the stores that do offer healthier foods, often less ability to get to the store (disability, no money for car or transit, etc) and a higher density of fast food joints with $1 value meals. So, many malnourished poor folk now are obese, rather than wasting away. 21st century 1st world poverty means rising rates of overweight/obesity. So if you're privileged enough to have 'net and a computer, you probably wouldn't see many obese kids at your bus stop. Look a few neighborhoods over and you'll find a lot more.
  • NerdyTXChick
    NerdyTXChick Posts: 155 Member
    I was a kid in the 70's, and I remember eating plenty of processed foods, along with sugar, simple carbs and high fat foods. I remember bringing chips and twinkies in my lunch, along with my old school PB&J (on white bread) and a grape soda. We had popcorn with butter every Sunday night for supper, and sugary cereal for breakfast (with whole milk). We ate a lot of hamburger meat, tuna from a can, and Spam was a pretty common occurrence. No one had heard of low fat food.

    My Mom did try to make us eat healthy by sneaking bell peppers into everything (I can't eat them to this day), but other than that our veggies came out of a can. Basically, we ate everything that we consider 'bad' today. I'm by no means saying we should go back to this way of eating, just that this is what I remember, and none of us were overweight.

    We were definitely more active than most people are now. There was only so much you could watch on TV those days, and most families only had the one. I remember spending a lot of time walking around the neighborhood with my friends after supper.

    So what's the answer? We ate a bunch of crap but were less sedentary? I don't know, but I suspect it's probably far more complex than that.
  • tammymusic1
    tammymusic1 Posts: 243 Member
    1. No Internet.
    2. No video games.
    3. Home cooked meals (from scratch)
    4. Kids played outside after school.
    5. Parents didn't drive kids everywhere, we rode our bikes or walked.
    YUP all of this
  • RonW956
    RonW956 Posts: 105 Member
    I was a kid in the 70's, and I remember eating plenty of processed foods, along with sugar, simple carbs and high fat foods. I remember bringing chips and twinkies in my lunch, along with my old school PB&J (on white bread) and a grape soda. We had popcorn with butter every Sunday night for supper, and sugary cereal for breakfast (with whole milk). We ate a lot of hamburger meat, tuna from a can, and Spam was a pretty common occurrence. No one had heard of low fat food.

    My Mom did try to make us eat healthy by sneaking bell peppers into everything (I can't eat them to this day), but other than that our veggies came out of a can. Basically, we ate everything that we consider 'bad' today. I'm by no means saying we should go back to this way of eating, just that this is what I remember, and none of us were overweight.

    We were definitely more active than most people are now. There was only so much you could watch on TV those days, and most families only had the one. I remember spending a lot of time walking around the neighborhood with my friends after supper.

    So what's the answer? We ate a bunch of crap but were less sedentary? I don't know, but I suspect it's probably far more complex than that.


    I was a kid in the 70's myself. we had fast food & junk food/pizza/soda....all that stuff however I think it was because we were more active outside than todays generation. Kids played more outside back then then they do today, back then we didnt have Xbox or smart phones. Nowadays we can't even use the "I couldnt find a payphone" excuse when coming home late...
  • stealthq
    stealthq Posts: 4,298 Member
    Thinking they ate much less processed food at the time too.

    **snort**

    No. Unless you mean quantity as opposed to % of diet, because clearly people tended to eat less.

    Betty Crocker and the like were rocking in the 70s. Portion size was much smaller, though.
  • mike_ny
    mike_ny Posts: 351 Member
    Disco, cocaine, peer pressure, tight fitting low cut fashions, super thin post-twiggy models, post World War II parents, fast food was a new trend (it was a treat and not an every day thing), kids would be bicycle riding, playing basketball, or just playing outside almost every day after school, only a few TV channels and no videos, no video games (unless you count pong and space invaders) , no internet besides very basic message boards, and the President's physical fitness test that all students were forced to take publicly and we're ranked in amongst their peers.

    They may have been the continuation of the free love days, but there were still lots of social pressures for both drop outs and mainstream people to keep up their physical appearances in their peer groups. And most people were a lot more active than people today. Overweight people were often stigmatized and left out of a lot of social circles. Unlike today with high obesity rates with overweight people in almost all social circles, being fat in those days made you the one fat kid or heavy person in a crowd. There were still overweight people and even obese people, but it was a lot harder to fit in and being overweight was definitely not the norm like is is in so many communities today.
  • ereck44
    ereck44 Posts: 1,170 Member
    Thinking they ate much less processed food at the time too.

    **snort**

    No. Unless you mean quantity as opposed to % of diet, because clearly people tended to eat less.

    Betty Crocker and the like were rocking in the 70s. Portion size was much smaller, though.
    yeah, I remember eating some frozen dinners at least once a week because my mother didn't like to cook, but there wasn't a large selection. It was predicted that in the future all food would either be frozen or powdered form and reconstituted.
  • Sabine_Stroehm
    Sabine_Stroehm Posts: 19,263 Member
    They ate (real) food and moved some.

    yes, we ate some frozen foods, but even then, NOTHING compared to today.
  • Disco Duh!! :drinker:

    Ha Love this^^^^
  • bergamese
    bergamese Posts: 36 Member
    Because back in the ancient history of the 1970s, prehistoric man ate like the Paleo diet.
  • yarwell
    yarwell Posts: 10,477 Member
    So I'm trying to figure out why people were so skinny about 40 years ago vs today....here are some reasons i can think of and i want to know yours

    there was only one McDonalds in the UK
  • piperdown44
    piperdown44 Posts: 958 Member
    Less stuff to do inside as a kid.

    I grew up in a rural area. Bus got to school at 7:25 am but school didn't start until 8. We were out playing on the school yard until then. Recess was 25 minutes long and twice day. Lunch was 50 minutes and we scarfed the food down so we had about 40 mins to play. All the kids came in red faced and sweaty. Everyone had to go and participate in gym class.
    Lunch at school was all prepared from scratch. Mmmm, I can still remember the rolls the lunch ladies made!
    Mom fried a lot of stuff. She was born in '30 on a farm and that's just the way she was taught to cook.
    Chores around the farm, after school activities that were sponsored AND paid for by the school and riding the bikes everywhere to play with friends.
    We had 3 tv stations and at that time most all the programming was geared toward adults. Saturday morning was cartoon time (and special) that ended at 11am. If you had a baseball game or swimming lessons on Saturday morning it was a bummer.

    I have to tell my boys to turn off the tv/xbox/computer and go out side with them to get them to do physical activities.

    One of my irritations is that schools have shortened recess down to 15 minutes and the kids get a whopping 10 mins for play after lunch. Plus everything costs! Schools used to sponsor all athletic activities (confirmed with friends from other states but not saying they all did back then) with only a small 'activity fee', which when I graduated high school was $60 for the year.
    Now I'm spending well over four numbers for my boys just to play sports, even through the county.

    Personal opinion is that we were much more physically active in the 70's than now.