Advice on activity monitoring device
JRKWebb
Posts: 27
Hi all,
Long time MFP user but first time posting. MFP helped me get the body I wanted by making me aware of the importance of monitoring my food. I want to take this accuracy further however and I'm now seeking an activity monitoring device to do so. Currently, I have my activity set to lightly active and log any substantive exercise. This seems to work relatively well as lightly active adds +250 calories a day or so to sedentary. This can be achieved by about 40 minutes brisk walking and other daily activity like cooking in the kitchen for 20 minutes. How some people aren't doing this daily is beyond me!
Anyway, I would like more accuracy, particularly regarding my weight training sessions. I add the default MFP exercise into my diary but some days I lift, doing heavy olympic lifts like snatches, front squats and power cleans, I know I'm burning more than this but have no way to truly log it. Therefore, I want an activity tracker. With the holiday season approaching, I have narrowed it down to the following and could use some MFP user input:
Fitbit Force: Seems to be well recommended and the auto sync with MFP seems nifty. Put off however by lack of waterproof (I swim once a week) and I'm not sure if it can track my weightlifting. Other than that, it's the forerunner.
Jawbone Up: Heard ok things but cheapest of the bunch and waterproof. Also MFP syncable.
Polar Loop: Seems really good for the price. Waterproof, accurate and can work in tandem with a Polar HRM, offering the complete package. it's a real shame about the lack of MFP integration however. I'm wondering if any Loop users here can offer suggestions on how to use it with MFP? Would it work just as well as a Fitbit or Jawbone if I reset my activity to sedentary and simply periodically, at least once a day, input my total calories burned according to Loop. I assume Loop has the display to allow easy visibility of calories burned like the Force?
Bodymedia core 2: heard a lot of hype about this but not sure why? Also no sign of any immediate release means unless it can do something radically different, I don't really want to wait.
Any user advice would be great to help me choose the perfect holiday gift!
Long time MFP user but first time posting. MFP helped me get the body I wanted by making me aware of the importance of monitoring my food. I want to take this accuracy further however and I'm now seeking an activity monitoring device to do so. Currently, I have my activity set to lightly active and log any substantive exercise. This seems to work relatively well as lightly active adds +250 calories a day or so to sedentary. This can be achieved by about 40 minutes brisk walking and other daily activity like cooking in the kitchen for 20 minutes. How some people aren't doing this daily is beyond me!
Anyway, I would like more accuracy, particularly regarding my weight training sessions. I add the default MFP exercise into my diary but some days I lift, doing heavy olympic lifts like snatches, front squats and power cleans, I know I'm burning more than this but have no way to truly log it. Therefore, I want an activity tracker. With the holiday season approaching, I have narrowed it down to the following and could use some MFP user input:
Fitbit Force: Seems to be well recommended and the auto sync with MFP seems nifty. Put off however by lack of waterproof (I swim once a week) and I'm not sure if it can track my weightlifting. Other than that, it's the forerunner.
Jawbone Up: Heard ok things but cheapest of the bunch and waterproof. Also MFP syncable.
Polar Loop: Seems really good for the price. Waterproof, accurate and can work in tandem with a Polar HRM, offering the complete package. it's a real shame about the lack of MFP integration however. I'm wondering if any Loop users here can offer suggestions on how to use it with MFP? Would it work just as well as a Fitbit or Jawbone if I reset my activity to sedentary and simply periodically, at least once a day, input my total calories burned according to Loop. I assume Loop has the display to allow easy visibility of calories burned like the Force?
Bodymedia core 2: heard a lot of hype about this but not sure why? Also no sign of any immediate release means unless it can do something radically different, I don't really want to wait.
Any user advice would be great to help me choose the perfect holiday gift!
0
Replies
-
Bump, I will be purchasing one soon0
-
there is no activty tracker that will work for weight training sessions. They dont work that way.
I have the Fitbit One and its best for step based activities. I use a Polar FT60 HRM for fitness because most of my sessions are circuit like (fast paced where my heart rate is high).
I dont think the Fitbit Force is water proof, I think its water resistant though (may get damaged when swimming). The Flex is water proof.
I dont know about the others you mention as I have not used them.0 -
there is no activty tracker that will work for weight training sessions. They dont work that way.
I have the Fitbit One and its best for step based activities. I use a Polar FT60 HRM for fitness because most of my sessions are circuit like (fast paced where my heart rate is high).
I dont think the Fitbit Force is water proof, I think its water resistant though (may get damaged when swimming). The Flex is water proof.
I dont know about the others you mention as I have not used them.
I second this. The BodyMedia and the Jawbone are the same tech as the Fitbit. Very fun but nothing a decent pedometer doesn't do, in essence. I hear the Polar Loop has some problems but I don't know much about it.
If you've been logging a long time and have seen results, you probably know more about your burn than these devices ever will. But if you like the added motivation you get from wearing something that you know is counting your NEAT up, they're great. And it sounds like you might based on your comments about moving from sedentary to lightly active to see more calorie burn. But I don't know of anything that accurately tracks calories burned in resistance exercises.0 -
Would a HRM not be able to assess my exertion during weight training however that an activity band alone could not. Are there also any Fitbit compatible HRMs?0
-
Would a HRM not be able to assess my exertion during weight training however that an activity band alone could not. Are there also any Fitbit compatible HRMs?
Fitbit and other such devices do not measure your heartrate (maybe the body media does...) so its not comparable to a heart rate monitor.
A heart rate monitor will measure your heart rate while you are wearing it but it is not accurate (or as accurate as it can be) while weight lifting unless you are in a steady state of elevated heart beats. Most weight lifters that I know (myself included) that lift heavy, have a short set in which the heart is pumping but not for a really long time and take recovery breaks between sets which can be twice as long as the time that you were lifting. This causes your heart rate to go back down again. A HRM will give you a calorie burn but it wont be accurate. As you know, the calorie burn when lifting is not just while you are lifting weights, its also in the long recovery period after a weight training session. A HRM wont and cant measure that.
Unless you are doing a circuit type of weight training session, nothing out there right now will give you an accurate cal burn.
If you want to have more accuracy for the rest of your day though, the Fitbit would be a great option. I love mine and hope that the only time I ever have to be without it is the day that I have mastered my fitness and weight.0 -
Thanks luckydays. Based on the advice, i think I will order the Fitbit Force and ship to the UK (not available here yet). Waterproof would be nice but isn't essential and it seems that waiting for the Bodymedia Core 2 is a bit pointless with no release date even announced.0
-
The Bodymedia is NOT the same tech as the Fitbit. It has a lot more sensors and is medically tested. Have a look at their website.there is no activty tracker that will work for weight training sessions. They dont work that way.
I have the Fitbit One and its best for step based activities. I use a Polar FT60 HRM for fitness because most of my sessions are circuit like (fast paced where my heart rate is high).
I dont think the Fitbit Force is water proof, I think its water resistant though (may get damaged when swimming). The Flex is water proof.
I dont know about the others you mention as I have not used them.
I second this. The BodyMedia and the Jawbone are the same tech as the Fitbit. Very fun but nothing a decent pedometer doesn't do, in essence. I hear the Polar Loop has some problems but I don't know much about it.
If you've been logging a long time and have seen results, you probably know more about your burn than these devices ever will. But if you like the added motivation you get from wearing something that you know is counting your NEAT up, they're great. And it sounds like you might based on your comments about moving from sedentary to lightly active to see more calorie burn. But I don't know of anything that accurately tracks calories burned in resistance exercises.
Incidentally in the UK, unless you have a bank account with a US address , you can't register with Bodymedi. You have to use kifit. Ask me if you need more info on this
If you do a search, you'll find lots of other posts. Here is a recent one:
http://www.myfitnesspal.com/topics/show/967979-fitbit-vs-bodymedia-fit?page=4#posts-178298180 -
Remember you may have to pay import taxes.Thanks luckydays. Based on the advice, i think I will order the Fitbit Force and ship to the UK (not available here yet). Waterproof would be nice but isn't essential and it seems that waiting for the Bodymedia Core 2 is a bit pointless with no release date even announced.0 -
It seems then the Fitbit Force is the most sensible solution!0
-
Not as accurate as Bodymedia/ kifit. Ok for stepping activity but not all activity. I meant you'll pay Import tax on the Fit it Force.It seems then the Fitbit Force is the most sensible solution!0 -
Not as accurate as Bodymedia/ kifit. Ok for stepping activity but not all activity. I meant you'll pay Import tax on the Fit it Force.It seems then the Fitbit Force is the most sensible solution!
It seems though that no device can achieve an accurate burn for my weightlifting sadly. Apparently the Force is less accurate in the sense it underestimates activity but this isn't a huge issue for me. I would prefer underestimation to over estimation. Also the Force is a little more subtle than the Bodymedia, I think I may go mad wearing an actual band after a while!
Also it seems like an imported Fitbit is easier to set up with my existing tools like MFP which is of course key.0 -
Sorry to keep contradicting you but kifit/ Bodymedia fit will link to MFP too. Agree about the subtlety issue though.
Not as accurate as Bodymedia/ kifit. Ok for stepping activity but not all activity. I meant you'll pay Import tax on the Fit it Force.It seems then the Fitbit Force is the most sensible solution!
It seems though that no device can achieve an accurate burn for my weightlifting sadly. Apparently the Force is less accurate in the sense it underestimates activity but this isn't a huge issue for me. I would prefer underestimation to over estimation. Also the Force is a little more subtle than the Bodymedia, I think I may go mad wearing an actual band after a while!
Also it seems like an imported Fitbit is easier to set up with my existing tools like MFP which is of course key.0 -
Of course they market their skin sensors as adding important data. Yet time and again people who wear both find what I did-- very similar readings.
The Bodymedia is NOT the same tech as the Fitbit. It has a lot more sensors and is medically tested. Have a look at their website.
It's telling to me that all the activity monitors that came to follow skip the skin sensors, even the Polar Loop, from a company that already is doing on-skin sensing in most of their products. You'd think if the skin sensor was so important you'd see it in Fitbits, Jawbone Ups, MIsfit Shines, Amiigos, Fitbugs, Withings Pulse and Nike Fuelband.0 -
One last question regarding the Force. Apparently its only mobile compatible with iPhone 4s and up. I have an iPhone 4. Is it still possible to integrate with MFP? If so how does it function?0
-
It also has an on-device display that shows your stats and it synchs to your PC wirelessly, when it's within 15' or so. So the mobile app/synch is icing but not really necessary. There is a web browser app that has more than the mobile app.
It does synch to MFP regardless. MFP sends your meal totals to the Fitbit displays (calories, macros, etc.) and Fitbit also sends your activity/burn totals to MFP, so if you follow the MFP eating plan, you get a 'Fitbit adjustment' of more calories to eat the days you're more active than you entered you are in your settings. The meal synching seems to happen within seconds of logging here. You get graphs on the Fitbit site of how your burn compares to your intake and that sort of thing. You will have to log your lifting manually somewhere.0 -
Great, so full MFP integration with an iPhone 4 and the only thing I lose out on is Fitbit's own mobile app? I think I'm definitely sold on the Force, it seems to compliment most if not all of the features I was looking for. MFP integration probably being the most important as I'm a self-confessed MFP addict.0
-
I use a Polar FT7 Heart Rate monitor to keep track of Calories Burned when I work out. I am anxiously awaiting the release of the Amiigo fitness band. This device not only keeps track of movements, but learns what you do. So after the training period, it will know if you did a push up, an arm curl, a bike ride, a run etc. It also has a heart rate monitor, social media integration, is water proof and all important, has an Android App.
Check out the Amiigo before you buy anything0 -
The fitbit web site syncs with the app so you can still view the app on your phone and input food data- you just can't sync the fitbit with your phone- yo'll need to use a PC.Great, so full MFP integration with an iPhone 4 and the only thing I lose out on is Fitbit's own mobile app? I think I'm definitely sold on the Force, it seems to compliment most if not all of the features I was looking for. MFP integration probably being the most important as I'm a self-confessed MFP addict.0 -
Maybe the reason other gadgets don't have this is because it means it has to be worn tight against the skin. Many people don't want to do this. I got very different readings from my fitbit and BMF- they weren't similar at all.
Of course they market their skin sensors as adding important data. Yet time and again people who wear both find what I did-- very similar readings.
The Bodymedia is NOT the same tech as the Fitbit. It has a lot more sensors and is medically tested. Have a look at their website.
It's telling to me that all the activity monitors that came to follow skip the skin sensors, even the Polar Loop, from a company that already is doing on-skin sensing in most of their products. You'd think if the skin sensor was so important you'd see it in Fitbits, Jawbone Ups, MIsfit Shines, Amiigos, Fitbugs, Withings Pulse and Nike Fuelband.0 -
It seems though that no device can achieve an accurate burn for my weightlifting sadly.
I know it isn't 100% accurate, but my Bodymedia estimates an hour of weightlifting at about 240 calories. Online calculators end up being similar (about 270 calories/hour). So it may not be 100%, but the fitbit estimates nothing. Bodymedia can tell when I'm dancing (belly dance so not a lot of footwork), fitbit cannot.
I bought a fitbit to compare and promptly sold it (or am selling it. It's on ebay right now). I think it's good for people who do a lot of step based exercise, otherwise I'd go with the Bodymedia.0 -
I have an iPhone 4 and the fitbit flex does sort of sync to it. Not throughout the day but once I sync flex with computer it updates my phone so when I am in my house my phone stays synced. It isn't helpful if you want to check it throughout the day but I don't monitor it that closely because I can look at the display on the flex to see about where I stand. At first I was annoyed but after a week or so I realized i didn't really need to monitor every minute of the day
I love my flex!! 0 -
Great, so full MFP integration with an iPhone 4 and the only thing I lose out on is Fitbit's own mobile app? I think I'm definitely sold on the Force, it seems to compliment most if not all of the features I was looking for. MFP integration probably being the most important as I'm a self-confessed MFP addict.
You should go to the Fitbit web site now and make an account and hook MFP up to it so you can see how it works. You can use the site without the device. If you want to see how it'll work with steps data you could manually enter a value, just to see the charts and stuff.
It looks like the Amiigo DOES include the skin sensors the BMF has. I stand corrected on several fronts!0 -
I actually use the Flex and the Polar Loop together. I love the Polar Loop. One of the things I don't like about it is that it does not integrate with MFP. The second thing is that it does not work with Android phones yet. It works with the heart rate transmitter and really helps get an accurate daily calorie count. I thought of getting the force but I wanted to be able to use whatever device I bought with my heart transmitter. I do believe the Force is water resistant to 30 meters like the Flex but don't remember. The Flex is my third Fitbit product and they all have been very helpful and delivered the desired result. I also still use my FT60 as well but now that I am getting accustomed to the Loop I will probably stop using the FT60. If Polar ever integrates with MFP I will stop using the Flex. They will be adding more functionality to the Loop as time goes on including support for Android.0
-
The Force specs say 'water resistant, do not submerge', I believe.
The Amiigo sure is hard to get info on. It still says 'coming Fall 2013' what few sites mention it. I can't even find what 'select Android devices' it'll work with. It looks like they're still working on getting the devices out to their Indiegogo investors, which to me means 'beta testing'.0 -
I have had the Fitbit Force for about 2 weeks now and love it. I did have the Flex and sold it to a friend after ai got the Force. I loved the Flex as well, but you can't beat Force's display and immediate feedback. It also stays chardes a day or 2 longer thatn the Flex. I think that you can't swim with the Force, like you could with the Flex, so you'll just have to a log that manually it if you want to keep track. But I like to say just, because you didn't log it, doesn't mean it doesn't count . . .I usually remind myself about this when it it comes to food I don't want to log :laugh:
I have a Polar heart rate monitor as well, but I've never worn it all day as i do with the Force. I'm sure you'll love it.0 -
I think that's the main thing for going with the Force, its subtle. Anything bigger, even more so anything band like and I begin to feel a bit too-human guinea pig..0
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.4K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.2K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 426 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.7K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions