What is your actual TDEE?

12346»

Replies

  • It's one thing to have a calculator tell you, another to see the real results. :happy:

    Take the amount of calories you ate in a 28 day period, and add 3500 for each pound you lost during that period (or subtract 3500 for each pound gained) and divide that total by 28.

    Here are mine:

    Feb 1 - March 1 (29 days, started at 188 lbs)
    77630 eaten
    2 lbs lost (+7000 = 84630)
    TDEE = 2918 (84630 / 29)

    Sep 1 - Sep 29 (29 days, started at 178 lbs)
    76626 calories eaten
    1.8 lbs lost (+6300 = 82926)
    TDEE = 2859 (82926 / 29)

    What's your TDEE?

    what happens if you use this method but instead of the amount of calories you ate, you use the NET calories you ate...is that TDEE accurate as a net goal or not?
  • DebbieLyn63
    DebbieLyn63 Posts: 2,654 Member
    It's one thing to have a calculator tell you, another to see the real results. :happy:

    Take the amount of calories you ate in a 28 day period, and add 3500 for each pound you lost during that period (or subtract 3500 for each pound gained) and divide that total by 28.

    Here are mine:

    Feb 1 - March 1 (29 days, started at 188 lbs)
    77630 eaten
    2 lbs lost (+7000 = 84630)
    TDEE = 2918 (84630 / 29)

    Sep 1 - Sep 29 (29 days, started at 178 lbs)
    76626 calories eaten
    1.8 lbs lost (+6300 = 82926)
    TDEE = 2859 (82926 / 29)

    What's your TDEE?

    what happens if you use this method but instead of the amount of calories you ate, you use the NET calories you ate...is that TDEE accurate as a net goal or not?

    That would throw it completely off. This method is a simple calculation of calories in calories out. If you averaged 2000 cals per day eaten, and maintained your weight for a month, then your actual TDEE is 2000. It doesn't matter if you exercised or not, so net calories doesn't matter.
    Adding or subtracting the 3500 per pound gained or lost is simply bringing you to maintenance for the purpose of calculating your average intake.

    It is not nearly as complicated as some people are trying to make it out to be.

    Many of us have quite different actual TDEEs than the Scooby, or MFP calculators say we should have. My actual TDEE is only around 1600, whereas the online calculators try to put it well over 2000.
  • AsianSuperfly
    AsianSuperfly Posts: 73 Member
    Bumping for the read.
  • mrsamanda86
    mrsamanda86 Posts: 869 Member
    Thank you SO much for posting this liftallthepizzas!!! I just went back 60 days and did an average for each 30-day period and figured out my TDEE.
    11/09-12/08= 2156
    10/09-11/08=2192
    Which pretty much makes perfect sense to me seeing how I lost weight during that time which I would think would bring my TDEE down a bit in the process. So now I know, as long as my average is about 1600 cals/day I should keep losing roughly 1lb/week for now! I've been using MFP's way of counting and then eating back my exercise, mainly just because I like the whole "earning your exercise cals" but I think I might finally make the switch to just setting it at 1600 and doing like 1 calorie for logging my exercise(just so I can tell how many days I worked out when I look back). THANKS!
  • heybales
    heybales Posts: 18,842 Member
    Thank you SO much for posting this liftallthepizzas!!! I just went back 60 days and did an average for each 30-day period and figured out my TDEE.
    11/09-12/08= 2156
    10/09-11/08=2192
    Which pretty much makes perfect sense to me seeing how I lost weight during that time which I would think would bring my TDEE down a bit in the process. So now I know, as long as my average is about 1600 cals/day I should keep losing roughly 1lb/week for now! I've been using MFP's way of counting and then eating back my exercise, mainly just because I like the whole "earning your exercise cals" but I think I might finally make the switch to just setting it at 1600 and doing like 1 calorie for logging my exercise(just so I can tell how many days I worked out when I look back). THANKS!

    If you go to that method, with only 20 lbs to go, that makes the deficit almost 30% - rather a lot for so little left to lose.

    Be better at 20-15% deficit off TDEE.

    If you keep doing the MFP method, sounds like already at the 1 lb weekly loss goal, at 10 lbs left, best for change to 1/2 lb loss weekly.

    Less to lose, slower you should try to go, or just setting your self up for a fight against your body and benefiting from exercise done.
  • mrsamanda86
    mrsamanda86 Posts: 869 Member
    Thank you SO much for posting this liftallthepizzas!!! I just went back 60 days and did an average for each 30-day period and figured out my TDEE.
    11/09-12/08= 2156
    10/09-11/08=2192
    Which pretty much makes perfect sense to me seeing how I lost weight during that time which I would think would bring my TDEE down a bit in the process. So now I know, as long as my average is about 1600 cals/day I should keep losing roughly 1lb/week for now! I've been using MFP's way of counting and then eating back my exercise, mainly just because I like the whole "earning your exercise cals" but I think I might finally make the switch to just setting it at 1600 and doing like 1 calorie for logging my exercise(just so I can tell how many days I worked out when I look back). THANKS!

    If you go to that method, with only 20 lbs to go, that makes the deficit almost 30% - rather a lot for so little left to lose.

    Be better at 20-15% deficit off TDEE.

    If you keep doing the MFP method, sounds like already at the 1 lb weekly loss goal, at 10 lbs left, best for change to 1/2 lb loss weekly.

    Less to lose, slower you should try to go, or just setting your self up for a fight against your body and benefiting from exercise done.
    Did I somehow do the math wrong(very possible)?
    2100/10=210 210*8=1680 Wouldn't 1680 be 20%?

    I wanted to stick to losing 1 pound a week until I get down to 130(I'm 140 right now) and then just do half a pound a week for the last 10.
  • melaniecheeks
    melaniecheeks Posts: 6,349 Member
    I think this expects a degree of accuracy which just isn't possible. Your scales aren't that accurate, your calories eaten will not be exact, the 3500 is an approximation.
  • heybales
    heybales Posts: 18,842 Member
    Thank you SO much for posting this liftallthepizzas!!! I just went back 60 days and did an average for each 30-day period and figured out my TDEE.
    11/09-12/08= 2156
    10/09-11/08=2192
    Which pretty much makes perfect sense to me seeing how I lost weight during that time which I would think would bring my TDEE down a bit in the process. So now I know, as long as my average is about 1600 cals/day I should keep losing roughly 1lb/week for now! I've been using MFP's way of counting and then eating back my exercise, mainly just because I like the whole "earning your exercise cals" but I think I might finally make the switch to just setting it at 1600 and doing like 1 calorie for logging my exercise(just so I can tell how many days I worked out when I look back). THANKS!

    If you go to that method, with only 20 lbs to go, that makes the deficit almost 30% - rather a lot for so little left to lose.

    Be better at 20-15% deficit off TDEE.

    If you keep doing the MFP method, sounds like already at the 1 lb weekly loss goal, at 10 lbs left, best for change to 1/2 lb loss weekly.

    Less to lose, slower you should try to go, or just setting your self up for a fight against your body and benefiting from exercise done.
    Did I somehow do the math wrong(very possible)?
    2100/10=210 210*8=1680 Wouldn't 1680 be 20%?

    I wanted to stick to losing 1 pound a week until I get down to 130(I'm 140 right now) and then just do half a pound a week for the last 10.

    I used what you gave rounded - 1600 / 2200 = 73% of TDEE eaten, meaning deficit is 27%.

    Yes, rounding down to 2100 and up to 1680 makes 20%.

    Easier way - TDEE x 0.8 = eaten (that's 20%, or 0.2 off 100%, or 1)
  • mrsamanda86
    mrsamanda86 Posts: 869 Member
    Thank you SO much for posting this liftallthepizzas!!! I just went back 60 days and did an average for each 30-day period and figured out my TDEE.
    11/09-12/08= 2156
    10/09-11/08=2192
    Which pretty much makes perfect sense to me seeing how I lost weight during that time which I would think would bring my TDEE down a bit in the process. So now I know, as long as my average is about 1600 cals/day I should keep losing roughly 1lb/week for now! I've been using MFP's way of counting and then eating back my exercise, mainly just because I like the whole "earning your exercise cals" but I think I might finally make the switch to just setting it at 1600 and doing like 1 calorie for logging my exercise(just so I can tell how many days I worked out when I look back). THANKS!

    If you go to that method, with only 20 lbs to go, that makes the deficit almost 30% - rather a lot for so little left to lose.

    Be better at 20-15% deficit off TDEE.

    If you keep doing the MFP method, sounds like already at the 1 lb weekly loss goal, at 10 lbs left, best for change to 1/2 lb loss weekly.

    Less to lose, slower you should try to go, or just setting your self up for a fight against your body and benefiting from exercise done.
    Did I somehow do the math wrong(very possible)?
    2100/10=210 210*8=1680 Wouldn't 1680 be 20%?

    I wanted to stick to losing 1 pound a week until I get down to 130(I'm 140 right now) and then just do half a pound a week for the last 10.

    I used what you gave rounded - 1600 / 2200 = 73% of TDEE eaten, meaning deficit is 27%.

    Yes, rounding down to 2100 and up to 1680 makes 20%.

    Easier way - TDEE x 0.8 = eaten (that's 20%, or 0.2 off 100%, or 1)

    Thank you for taking the time to respond! I rounded down to 2100 mainly just because I figure it'll drop again by the end of the month.
    I also went back to check what my overall averages on intake were for the past two months, and the first month I lost 5.8 pounds with an intake of 1516. The second month I lost exactly 6 pounds with an intake of 1456 a day. I upped my daily goal to 1600 for now, and so I'm thinking that should slow down the loss a bit right there and then, as long as this all goes well, next month I'll up it a bit more to slow down the loss.
  • PixieAdele
    PixieAdele Posts: 102 Member
    Bump for future ref. thanks
  • QuietBloom
    QuietBloom Posts: 5,413 Member
    When I first participated in this thread, I was confused. I thought we were not including calories burned through exercise. I have now used the Scooby calculator and my TDEE-15% is 2118. This IS more than I have been eating, but not by a lot. I am hoping that the extra fuel will help my workouts be more productive. Since I have actually very little if any to lose, I'm not afraid to up my cals and see what happens and make adjustments as needed at the end of a month.

    Thanks for this thread! *thumbs up*
  • LiftAllThePizzas
    LiftAllThePizzas Posts: 17,857 Member
    I think this expects a degree of accuracy which just isn't possible. Your scales aren't that accurate, your calories eaten will not be exact, the 3500 is an approximation.
    If your approximations are consistent then your resulting number will be a lot more useful (and calibrated to your particular inaccuracies) than some number generated on an online calculator. I don't think anyone expects it to be accurate to 27 digits.
  • MinimalistShoeAddict
    MinimalistShoeAddict Posts: 1,946 Member
    The math is even easier for those who are in maintenance mode.

    For example, right now my weight is exactly the same as it was on January 1st.

    Therefore my average TDEE = my average daily caloric intake from 1/1/13 through 12/17/13
  • briniepoo
    briniepoo Posts: 73 Member
    bump