Same food but different cal? Which one to choose?
Wingg_
Posts: 395 Member
I'm kind of confused with the calories available because for example boiled(in water) skinless boneless chicken breast for 100g some state 156cal while the other is 115 cal which one should I choose? I know it may not sound like there's a much different but if I eat it everyday it builds up can it can make a huge difference as I'm trying to figure out my maintenance calorie intake now. I would appreciate your help!
0
Replies
-
yes i find a lot of calories on here are different. if its for a lot of calories i always try to find the nutritional information myself online. if i look online and still cant find anything i either go for the higher number just to be safe or i add the different numbers together, divide by two and use that.0
-
Some may include rib meat while others are just breast. I would check it against the pkging or the FDA data base.0
-
I find the info myself online then find an entry that matches. for real food (ie, fresh produce with no ingredients) I try and use the MFP entries, not the ones entered by a member. if I can't find one that matches the data I find on line, I put it in myself.0
-
Well, to start with meat should be weighed raw, there's too much variance in cooking methods for a cooked version to be correct. Generally the entry without an * will be the more accurate because it isn't user entered.0
-
Well, to start with meat should be weighed raw, there's too much variance in cooking methods for a cooked version to be correct. Generally the entry without an * will be the more accurate because it isn't user entered.
So I'm supposed to weigh the meat raw even if the entry says it's boiled?0 -
Well, to start with meat should be weighed raw, there's too much variance in cooking methods for a cooked version to be correct. Generally the entry without an * will be the more accurate because it isn't user entered.
So I'm supposed to weigh the meat raw even if the entry says it's boiled?0 -
yes i find a lot of calories on here are different. if its for a lot of calories i always try to find the nutritional information myself online. if i look online and still cant find anything i either go for the higher number just to be safe or i add the different numbers together, divide by two and use that.
I do exactly the same thing. I think sometimes people start to see weight creep on because they accidentally underestimate the calories they are consuming...0 -
I googled all my foods and added them myself because the MFP database is terrible "1/4 piece of chicken breast with sauce" What the hell is that supposed to be anyway!?0
-
What the staff here really needs to do is clean up that database some... Sometimes I go to nutritiondata.self.com to check, since their database is a bit more accurate overall.0
-
just a reason for them to start charging a fee.
i go with the highest number of confirmations0 -
Well, to start with meat should be weighed raw, there's too much variance in cooking methods for a cooked version to be correct. Generally the entry without an * will be the more accurate because it isn't user entered.
So I'm supposed to weigh the meat raw even if the entry says it's boiled?
You can go with whatever you want but most of those types of entries were made by users so you use them at your peril.0 -
Thanks for all the advices!!0
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.4K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.2K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 426 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.7K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions