Deadlifts and Overhead press
Replies
-
Conventional Deadlifts are superior to RDLs because RDL is an assistance lift, not a main lift. It's like comparing chin-ups and curls, sure they both work biceps, but you get a hell of a lot more out of a chin-up. A conventional Deadlift will work more muscle groups, and lead to more strength and power gains than an RDL. and RDL is great for glute/hamstring assistance work, but not as a replacement for a conventional Deadlift.
As for OHP, I've never heard about it causing problems when done properly. I've heard it fixes shoulder problems, but unless you're doing it wrong, I don't really see how it would injure you.
This trainer pretty much sounds clueless.0 -
You know, shoulders are complex and sometimes shockingly delicate joints. I've torn both of my rotator cuffs in the past (in non-lifting circumstances) but I do standing OHP with a barbell in large part because I find the bar gives me stability and forces me to push up evenly on both sides in a way that dumbells don't. I think the main reason beginning strength programs focus on the OHP is because, although form is important, it isn't all that complicated and because when strength is your goal big numbers and constant progression are key. That's easier to achieve with the OHP than with an arnold press or similar. Still, do what works for you, absolutely.
His complaints about the deadlift on the other hand I do have some issues with:
There's nothing wrong with Romanian deadlifts, but the limited range of motion compared to conventional focuses on the hamstrings and glutes almost exclusively. They're great at that, but recruit almost no effort from the quads or adductors that you get from the lower portion of the conventional. If we're talking strictly about strain on tendons, I'd be surprised if stopping at the bottom of a Romanian deadlift and starting back up really results in less strain than starting from a dead stop. I know that's one of the arguments against partial-depth squats, they actually put more stress on your joints than going to full depth because of the effort involved in stopping the weight in that position.
Touch and go deadlifts, where you complete the full range of motion from a conventional deadlift without resetting at the bottom seem to introduce more problems than resetting for each rep. It's too easy to let your form slip on the eccentric phase. I mean, technically, the eccentric phase isn't a part of the exercise, but if you aren't dropping the bar from the top like a competition lifter then you have to maintain your posture perfectly and be sure not to release any of the tension in your core before pulling again. Watch video of even very experienced lifters and see how many really manage that. Personally, I need a one or two second pause on the ground between reps to gasp for air and reset my grip if nothing else.
You're right that stiff-legged deadlifts aren't really a part of this conversation but they aren't a 'stretch'. They're a lower back exercise. Despite the similar general motion to deadlifts, the form is different and they belong in a conversation with good mornings or back extensions not conventional or romanian deadlifts.
I heart this post. Everything I wanted to say and more.
I too have a criminally effed up shoulder and have found the Barbell OHP to be a better exercise for me than dumbbell presses (which I gave up after continually feeling "twinges"). It's most likely personal to the lifter and their (if any) anatomical foibles. If you can derive benefit from a pressing variant, still continue to keep getting stronger and (most importantly) don't injure yourself, then stick with it.
OP: As for the Deads. Touch and go is ok if your form is perfect and you're using something submaximal (ie a challenging warmup for reps, or something for speedwork), but good luck with touch-and-go when you're pulling near your maximum! As the above poster says, you need to get everything set and braced again for the next pull.
Perhaps the trainer wants to keep you lifting sub-maximally so wants you to stick with touch-and-go for reps or RDL? We also don't know what particular kinks in your DL form you may have that this trainer may have picked up on. Perhaps he's misguidedly trying to save you from yourself rather than fixing your form? Maybe he doesn't even know what good form is? Too many things could be going on here (as well as him whoring for extra training sessions...)0 -
I have recently fallen in love with the OHP. Love it!0
-
As for OHP, I've never heard about it causing problems when done properly. I've heard it fixes shoulder problems, but unless you're doing it wrong, I don't really see how it would injure you.
This has been my experience. Coupled with TGU's and Windmills, I now have a healthy (as it'll ever get) shoulder again. It always tweaks my antennae when someone says it messes up your shoulders since my (admittedly n=1) experience has been the opposite.
But then I acknowledge other people's shoulder problems may not be my shoulder problems....0 -
Does anyone have any tips for the standing shoulder press? How do I make it so that my lower back isn't stressed? Do I just lower the weight? Tighten my back?
Any lifting movement beyond isolation machines should begin with taking a deep breath, getting your spine in the position you want, and pushing as much tension as you can manage into your core. People talk about "breathing into your belly" to describe this. It creates a ton of intraabdominal pressure that helps keep your spine in position throughout the repetition. This is what weight lifting belts are for. It gives you something to push against, which increases that pressure.
agreed with the tightening of your core. a weight lifting belt is great. i like the small 2" belt for a lot of movements. holding your breath for the entire reps is also good.
also, bring the barbell all the way back down. don't do half reps. the overhead press is more than an exercise. it is a movement. your body was designed for full ranges of motion. keep your legs strong and taut through the movement, and the lower back arched and the chest up.0 -
This content has been removed.
-
Seated dumbell shoulder press all the way! But thats just me, if standing overhead press works best for you then do it.
^^ THIS. I prefer standing overhead for my entire body (legs, core etc) to be engaged in the workout, but when I wanna just concentrate on the shoulders seated shoulder press is for me. It all depends what your goal is and what works for you. Deadlifts: Agree on that. Just imagine racking the weight and then unracking every time you did a squat, bent over row or bench press. Thats a lot of unnecessary stress on your joints relieving itself of weight, then adding it back quickly. Have you noticed any pain from doing it that way so far?
It also depends on the OHP. Are you bringing the bar behind the neck or in front? I always lower the bar in front of my face, not behind the head. Because I have shoulder issues going too heavy behind the head really stresses my shoulder joint out. If I didnt have injured shoulders who knows it if would even bother me? I just dont know. All I know is what works and doesnt work for me.
Which brings me to the point of your community fitness trainer. He probably doesnt like stronglifts cause its a program he views as sucking for him?. Stronglifts: Its not for everyone, but lots of people have enjoyed success and happiness doing it. So from that perspective, it doesnt suck, its awesome.0 -
I just read a really interesting article about the thoracic/lumbar region (T11/T12?) locking completely in certain movements- locked- completely not move-able and loaded- this happens in a few exercises- the snatch- clean and press- push press- over head press- you see the trend here.
I'll try to find the write up- it was well written and it was pertaining to the broken back accident with the snatch a week or so ago.
His theory was that the guys' back already had an issue- but regardless- it had to do with the fact that that area is FULLY loaded- compressed and rigid during these movements.
Now- with proper form- it's possible to perform them- but that doesn't mean there isn't an opening for injury- that's a side effect of lifting heavy things. Like someone said- it's a risk driving a car that you may be in a catastrophic accident. If you don't' like dem odds- don't drive the car- same with lifting weights.
As far as the dead lift is concerned- it's just two different things. It is neither right or wrong. It's just two different things.
One- you release a certain amount of body tension when you let the weight come to full rest on the floor- this is why the first pull is harder than a second pull.
It is what it is- I think it's more important to understand what's going on and use it in your training rather than saying THIS WAY IS BETTER. Because that's dependent on goals.... It's like saying a hammer is better than a screwdriver- well inheirently they aren't. Sure a hammer is better for nails- but that doesn't mean a screw driver is a bad tool.
They are tools. That's all. Tools. know what the tools are in your tool bag- and how to use them and what purpose they serve.0 -
However, he did say that the overhead press is a dangerous exercise, mainly because it forces your bones into a locked position, which is unnatural, and may lead to rotator cuff injuries; it is really bad for your shoulders. I don't remember his exact words, and I may be waaayyy off regarding what he said, but the main point is that some people may do the overhead press their entire lives and not have any injuries (like Mehdi - creator of Stronglifts), but for others it isn't the same. He says that I should replace the overhead press with dumbbell shoulder press (standing shoulder press, not seated I'm assuming, else it wouldn't be a compound exercise)? He says that overhead press is not superior to dumbbell shoulder press in any way, and that is a fact.
As he is wont to do Mark Rippetoe covers this in some detail in Starting Strength. Here is an abbreviated version of him addressing the issue of supposed shoulder injury caused by the press.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mark-rippetoe/the-overhead-press_b_4550676.html
TL:DR: "The press simply cannot impinge your shoulders."0 -
You know, shoulders are complex and sometimes shockingly delicate joints. I've torn both of my rotator cuffs in the past (in non-lifting circumstances) but I do standing OHP with a barbell in large part because I find the bar gives me stability and forces me to push up evenly on both sides in a way that dumbells don't. I think the main reason beginning strength programs focus on the OHP is because, although form is important, it isn't all that complicated and because when strength is your goal big numbers and constant progression are key. That's easier to achieve with the OHP than with an arnold press or similar. Still, do what works for you, absolutely.
His complaints about the deadlift on the other hand I do have some issues with:
There's nothing wrong with Romanian deadlifts, but the limited range of motion compared to conventional focuses on the hamstrings and glutes almost exclusively. They're great at that, but recruit almost no effort from the quads or adductors that you get from the lower portion of the conventional. If we're talking strictly about strain on tendons, I'd be surprised if stopping at the bottom of a Romanian deadlift and starting back up really results in less strain than starting from a dead stop. I know that's one of the arguments against partial-depth squats, they actually put more stress on your joints than going to full depth because of the effort involved in stopping the weight in that position.
Touch and go deadlifts, where you complete the full range of motion from a conventional deadlift without resetting at the bottom seem to introduce more problems than resetting for each rep. It's too easy to let your form slip on the eccentric phase. I mean, technically, the eccentric phase isn't a part of the exercise, but if you aren't dropping the bar from the top like a competition lifter then you have to maintain your posture perfectly and be sure not to release any of the tension in your core before pulling again. Watch video of even very experienced lifters and see how many really manage that. Personally, I need a one or two second pause on the ground between reps to gasp for air and reset my grip if nothing else.
You're right that stiff-legged deadlifts aren't really a part of this conversation but they aren't a 'stretch'. They're a lower back exercise. Despite the similar general motion to deadlifts, the form is different and they belong in a conversation with good mornings or back extensions not conventional or romanian deadlifts.
I heart this post. Everything I wanted to say and more.
I too have a criminally effed up shoulder and have found the Barbell OHP to be a better exercise for me than dumbbell presses (which I gave up after continually feeling "twinges"). It's most likely personal to the lifter and their (if any) anatomical foibles. If you can derive benefit from a pressing variant, still continue to keep getting stronger and (most importantly) don't injure yourself, then stick with it.
OP: As for the Deads. Touch and go is ok if your form is perfect and you're using something submaximal (ie a challenging warmup for reps, or something for speedwork), but good luck with touch-and-go when you're pulling near your maximum! As the above poster says, you need to get everything set and braced again for the next pull.
Perhaps the trainer wants to keep you lifting sub-maximally so wants you to stick with touch-and-go for reps or RDL? We also don't know what particular kinks in your DL form you may have that this trainer may have picked up on. Perhaps he's misguidedly trying to save you from yourself rather than fixing your form? Maybe he doesn't even know what good form is? Too many things could be going on here (as well as him whoring for extra training sessions...)
Double bumps for these two posts.
I guess before you can really find an answer that suits you, you need to ask your trainer what his goal is for you and if it differs from your actual needs. A lot of this is perspective and everyone is different in likes/dislikes and abilities. I'm sure he has his best concerns for you, but a lot of trainers have a bias on exercises and programs.
Personally, I'm ok with the RDL from the ground. I only do touch and goes on warm-ups with lighter weights. As for OHP, it's all in form and stability. I struggle with it so I'm putting myself at risk of injuring myself. So it's back to seated OHP vs. standing OHP.0 -
I prefer barbell OHP to dumbbells, but I do both. I also have pre-existing limited shoulder mobility, but I seem to do just fine on both movements.
As far as deadlifts, I do touch and go if I'm at a reasonable weight, probably... 70-80% max weight? If I'm trying for more like 90-100% max weight, I do complete stops and lift again. Now, my stop is not 5 minutes, more like 3 seconds, but it's hard to have a fluid motion for deadlifts when you are near max weight, and I find it near impossible to do deadlifts without touching the floor at all. That just doesn't make sense to me.
That being said, I have a degree in teacher education. And we all know that in America, that's about worthless.0 -
However, he did say that the overhead press is a dangerous exercise, mainly because it forces your bones into a locked position, which is unnatural, and may lead to rotator cuff injuries; it is really bad for your shoulders. I don't remember his exact words, and I may be waaayyy off regarding what he said, but the main point is that some people may do the overhead press their entire lives and not have any injuries (like Mehdi - creator of Stronglifts), but for others it isn't the same.0
-
I am 45 years old, used to bench 3 sets of 12 @ 100 pounds and OHP was my favourite exercise. I also used to be pretty good at handstands and walk overs and enjoyed working on my handstand push-ups. Now that I am in my forties, and after shoulder surgery, I can do none of these any more.
I love Strong Lifts and have read the book several times.
Ten years ago I was the OHP and chest press queen.
I will never do another OHP again though. I have paid dearly for continually and repeatedly impinging my supraspinatus.
My surgeon has even scraped some of the bone off my acrimony process (the bone at the top of my shoulder which sandwiches the rotator cuff muscles between it and the humorous) in the hopes that I will not impinge my rotator cuff muscle again. The shoulder is a very complicated joint.
Also see this:
http://www.t-nation.com/free_online_article/most_recent/shoulder_shocker
If you must OHP do it right!!!! Make sure you put as much effort into your pulls, deadlifts and rows as you do you presses. I'll say it again, my goal is to develop strong deltoids but I will not do OHP again.
And at the end of this post I will admit that I am biased. But I have been going to physiotherapy for over six years, I've had shoulder surgery, and a frozen shoulder. The long process has been painful and it interferes with quality of life. I'm just grateful I didn't suffer from depression throughout it all.
So there's my strong opinion:)0 -
However, he did say that the overhead press is a dangerous exercise, mainly because it forces your bones into a locked position, which is unnatural, and may lead to rotator cuff injuries; it is really bad for your shoulders. I don't remember his exact words, and I may be waaayyy off regarding what he said, but the main point is that some people may do the overhead press their entire lives and not have any injuries (like Mehdi - creator of Stronglifts), but for others it isn't the same.
And I don't know how you test for this "allergy". You could have an MRI, but that would not image your shoulder in movement.0 -
Conventional: what I'm doing right now - resting the bar on the ground after each rep
Romanian: the same as what I'm doing right now, except, that I don't rest the bar on the ground after each rep; the bar should only go down to about mid-shin
Stiff-legged: your kness stay straight the entire time - seems like more of a stretch than an actual weight lifting exercise - there's no point for me to do this0 -
Sorry, but you have not happened upon a lifting yoda at your community gym. You're better off sticking to the deadlift and the overhead press. But do what you like.0
-
This guy knows what he's talking about though. He told me the kinseology aspect of his reasoning.
0 -
I think the people having problems with the OHP are just trying to push to much weight. It is a full body lift and people dont like that they cant push the weight like they can with the seated DB press.
When I first started it I hated it because even the bar was heavy when I tried to maintain proper form. Went from doing 30lbs DB's in each hand with the seated shoulder press to just a bare bar with the OHP. Stuck with it and the strength gains came quickly. Great lift for the entire core and hits the shoulders just fine.0 -
However, he did say that the overhead press is a dangerous exercise, mainly because it forces your bones into a locked position, which is unnatural, and may lead to rotator cuff injuries; it is really bad for your shoulders. I don't remember his exact words, and I may be waaayyy off regarding what he said, but the main point is that some people may do the overhead press their entire lives and not have any injuries (like Mehdi - creator of Stronglifts), but for others it isn't the same.
And I don't know how you test for this "allergy". You could have an MRI, but that would not image your shoulder in movement.0 -
In conclusion: should I replace overhead press with standing dumbbell shoulder press & should I stop resting the barbell on the floor after each rep while doing deadlifts?
Good topic, the problem here is the problem with a lot of physical fitness related topics. There are a lot of reputable people and organizations with varying opinions. I think it comes down to what works best for you, and gets you the results you want with the least wear and tear. Lets be honest our bodies wont last forever and no matter how perfect your form or how careful you are the pains are gonna come. Here is my opinion.
Standing dumbbell/ barbell press: This is me all the way. I strive for a standing form that not only hits the shoulders but involves my abs and my back greatly, something i have not been able to obtain while sitting.
Deadlifts: I agree with your trainer, the intent (as i was taught) is to have the muscles engaged through the whole range of motion of said exercise. Leaving the weight on the ground does nothing for your muscles, however when i do deadlifts I ensure the plates touch the ground and immediately go back up. Ultimately I do this so that I know I am going through the complete range of motion.
I live by the principle that if there is an area of the "range of motion" that the muscles aren't engaged, than it shouldn't be a part of the "range of motion" (some exceptions of course).0 -
In conclusion: should I replace overhead press with standing dumbbell shoulder press & should I stop resting the barbell on the floor after each rep while doing deadlifts?
Good topic, the problem here is the problem with a lot of physical fitness related topics. There are a lot of reputable people and organizations with varying opinions. I think it comes down to what works best for you, and gets you the results you want with the least wear and tear. Lets be honest our bodies wont last forever and no matter how perfect your form or how careful you are the pains are gonna come. Here is my opinion.
Standing dumbbell/ barbell press: This is me all the way. I strive for a standing form that not only hits the shoulders but involves my abs and my back greatly, something i have not been able to obtain while sitting.
Deadlifts: I agree with your trainer, the intent (as i was taught) is to have the muscles engaged through the whole range of motion of said exercise. Leaving the weight on the ground does nothing for your muscles, however when i do deadlifts I ensure the plates touch the ground and immediately go back up. Ultimately I do this so that I know I am going through the complete range of motion.
I live by the principle that if there is an area of the "range of motion" that the muscles aren't engaged, than it shouldn't be a part of the "range of motion" (some exceptions of course).0 -
Okay, not gonna worry about what he says, because he says that every program will lead to process regardless. Therefore, I'm sticking with it. However, he did say that the overhead press is a dangerous exercise, mainly because it forces your bones into a locked position, which is unnatural, and may lead to rotator cuff injuries; it is really bad for your shoulders. I don't remember his exact words, and I may be waaayyy off regarding what he said, but the main point is that some people may do the overhead press their entire lives and not have any injuries (like Mehdi - creator of Stronglifts), but for others it isn't the same. He says that I should replace the overhead press with dumbbell shoulder press (standing shoulder press, not seated I'm assuming, else it wouldn't be a compound exercise)? He says that overhead press is not superior to dumbbell shoulder press in any way, and that is a fact.
I may not be understanding what your are saying. He says the overhead press is dangerous, but then tells you to do standing dumbbell shoulder presses because the barbell overhead press is not superior to the standing dumbbell shoulder press? That's a mouthful. Anyway, regardless, I don't know if this area has been studied in great depth. One self-admittedly limited study at least found this:
This very limited study showed this for similar exercises: "We compared 4 shoulder press exercises: seated military press, standing military press, seated dumbbell press, and standing dumbbell press. This study demonstrated that combining 2 common instability-inducing strategies in shoulder presses the (standing + dumbbells) increased deltoid muscle activation. This was despite the fact that the resistance-trained volunteers lifted the least weight in this exercise. Our findings suggest that standing dumbbell presses may be more beneficial for muscular development of the deltoid muscles than more stable alternatives, however, if mechanical power output is a higher priority, more stable alternatives may be preferable. Furthermore, both standing instead of seated body position and dumbbells instead of barbell as the loading modality increased the stability requirement compared with seated and barbell execution, and we suggest to include these factors in periodized resistance training programs, which may reduce the risk of injuries and provide variation for athletes and others engaging in resistance training. Furthermore, as many sports require standing position and independent arm move- ments (pitching, smashing, and serving), we suggest, according the principle of training specificity, that these instability- inducing variables may be beneficial. Finally, in shoulder rehabilitation, standing shoulder presses may be a viable choice as higher muscle activation can be attained with lower external load."
http://romanoroberts.com.mx/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Effects_of_Body_Position_and_Loading_Modality_on.10.pdf
So, in just comparing the standing versions, according to this limited study, you may be able to move more weight with a standing barbell version if that's your thing, but the standing dumbbell version has more stability requirements if that's your thing.0 -
Re-assessed...... Dead-Lift, Dead weight, from the floor to the floor, makes sense.
My question is overall whats the preferred method regarding the deadlift? I touch pause then right back up, i have seen it done without touching the ground, i have seen it done with as much as a three to five second pause (this one more often).0 -
Read through quickly and didn't see much in-depth explanation about the proper technique for OHP. Deads have been well-explained.
This breaks down what's in Starting Strength quite well, everything from position of the bar across the palm to lock-out position, as well as videos of Rip himself coaching the press: http://getthisstrength.com/main-lifts/overhead-press-form0 -
Good god this is why I hate trainers. Not the fine, smart, professional PTs ere on MFP, but the broscience morons like this dimwit.
The guy is an idiot. He doesn't know what he's talking about. Your first red flag is him crapping all over SL 5x5 as a valid strength building routine. A person can certainly say it's not what they want to do, maybe they don't like building functional strength or whatever, but to say it's no good shows his lack of real knowledge. Then on top of that, him not understanding the practical benefits to the standing OHP or why it's superior to seated dumbbell presses just makes him an imbecile of the highest order.
Now ask me how I really feel.0 -
So I think I'm going to stop overhead pressing, and instead replace it with standing dumbbell shoulder press. Does anyone have any tips for the standing shoulder press? How do I make it so that my lower back isn't stressed? Do I just lower the weight? Tighten my back?
Okay you really shouldn't get rid of the overhead press just because you're doing it wrong. There are plenty of YouTube videos that will go over proper form on the overhead press and how to protect your spine. What you need is practice and training. Lighten the weight, work on your form. Mastering the overhead press properly isn't something that you do fast. There are way too many nuances to it.
Of course its just my opinion. But I wouldn't get rid of it just because I wasn't getting it right yet and it's difficult.0 -
After some research, I've identified all the deadlift forms:
Conventional: what I'm doing right now - resting the bar on the ground after each rep
Romanian: the same as what I'm doing right now, except, that I don't rest the bar on the ground after each rep; the bar should only go down to about mid-shin
Stiff-legged: your kness stay straight the entire time - seems like more of a stretch than an actual weight lifting exercise - there's no point for me to do this
So... this leaves the conventional deadlift and the romanian deadlift. Which one is better? My personal trainer seems to say that the romanian deadlift is better.
I like that you're doing research on the different forms that's good. You did miss a couple: Sumos and Jeffersons. I love the deadlift and I practice all forms.
You're asking the wrong questions though. No form is better, they work your muscles differently. Knowing which ones from experience will work hamstrings vs quads more or which ones put more stress on your lower back or adductors and why would be good to learn. There's a lot to know with the deadlift.
There's also how you grab the weight, alternating grips or using the trap bar vs straight bar that will stress your muscles differently.
And yes there's different reasons and schools of thought on how/when/if the bar touches the ground. There are basically 3 choices in most cases: weight doesn't touch, weight taps rapidly, weight drops and resets. In my experience all 3 are valid depending on your goals, how heavy the weight is and which form is being used.
So IMO you need to broaden your knowledge and experience way beyond this trainer if you want to seriously apply the deadlift. I think it's the best exercise there is and really learning/using it will lean you up and build muscle faster than almost anything else.0 -
Re-assessed...... Dead-Lift, Dead weight, from the floor to the floor, makes sense.
My question is overall whats the preferred method regarding the deadlift? I touch pause then right back up, i have seen it done without touching the ground, i have seen it done with as much as a three to five second pause (this one more often).
it's entirely up to you.
for heavy weights (when i'm at or close to my max) i let it rest on the ground, and while still holding the barbell i raise my butt in the air and drop it down to reset and pull again. i want full range of motion. i find that the touch and go way of dead lifting is easier on lighter weights, around 50% of my max.0 -
This guy is a moron and is also wrong. Every powerlifter in the world will tell you he is wrong.
Do not be fooled by his illusions, he'll talk a good game to try to fill your ears with crap that sounds like it makes sense, but it's all just hot air.
The biggest reason, the absolutely biggest reason (after my nutrition of course) I got so muscular after only 6 months coming from having little to no muscle at all is because of big compound lifts, this includes the deadlift and overhead press. Not only are they ridiculously good mass builders, but they actually strengthened my joints. My hips don't pop and crack anymore, and my double-jointed shoulders stay in place throughout all my lifts, whereas when I was starting they would regularly creak around and push forward or backwards.
Those lifts are essential, unless you have health-based reasons for not doing them, everyone should have them in their lifting repertoire. You need to lose that trainer, he doesn't know what he's talking about and is only doing more harm than good.
Remember, in the lifting world, 99% of the time when someone decries an exercise, says it's dangerous, or has no benefits, they are usually talking about how they screwed it up and screwed up themselves.
The guy at my gym who always tells me not to do hyperextensions? He actually hyperextended his back when he did it, which you're not supposed to do, and injured himself.
My friend who always refers to deadlifts as snap-city? Slipped a disc because he always rounded his lower back.
The dude who says he hates leg days while spotting me for my squats because he thinks it ruins your knees? When I saw him squat he leaned too far forward and rounded his lower back.
Without fail, people that tell you not to do accredited, useful exercises, are people that failed to do them properly, and instead of fixing their issues, instead of assigning blame to themselves and remedying the issue, decided to blame the lift instead.
So not only is he an idiot, he's probably also a narcissist, don't follow him home.
He might eat you.
Well said. You are 110% correct.0 -
IMO there's nothing wrong with OHP - I've been doing it for 9 months. If you prefer to go with your trainers recommendation and do dumbells presses then there's nothing wrong with them either.
As to dead lifts, it sounds like your trainer is recommending either Romanian or stiff legged deadlifts - I wouldn't say these are better (I do normal deadlifts (with no problems btw) and Romanian as an assistance exercise).
I'm just not sure why you've selected a programme and then want to pick holes in it. Either do Stronglifts or do a programme your trainer has made for you. If you're looking for the scientific reasons behind each exercise either do your own research by reading scientific papers/books/articles or pick a trusted programme where someone has done all that studying for you - I know which one I'd choose.0
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.4K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.2K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 426 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.7K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions