We are pleased to announce that as of March 4, 2025, an updated Rich Text Editor has been introduced in the MyFitnessPal Community. To learn more about the changes, please click here. We look forward to sharing this new feature with you!

Food scale

JengaJess
JengaJess Posts: 109 Member
edited February 18 in Food and Nutrition
So I just recently got a food scale. Woo!
I realized I've actually been underestimating some the food I've been eating. Especially canned beans and pasta! Unfortunately, it's the opposite for cheese :(
But I guess I'm just a little confused. Let's take the can of chick peas I used the other day. A serving size is 1/2 cup (130g). When I was using cup measurements, this was about 1/3 of the can. I used my food scale, and 130gs ended up being almost half the can!
But the estimated amount of servings in the can is about 3... I only got about 2 servings out of the can. Same thing with a can of black beans.
Is this because I'm draining them? Or is my food scale off? Or are nutritional labels just plain silly?
I bought this food scale to really help me lose this last 10 lbs and help me with my biggest problem, portion control. I don't want to end up over eating because I might be misunderstanding or misinterpreting.
Any help/ suggestions?

Replies

  • tavenne323
    tavenne323 Posts: 332 Member
    I've always been told to go with weight rather than volume when measuring non-liquid foods.
  • Elsie_Brownraisin
    Elsie_Brownraisin Posts: 786 Member
    I'd go off the scale weight, I'm British and don't get the hang of cups etc, so go in gms instead.

    I think food labels are often weird though. Like sneaky chocolate bars that say '150 cals' that only apply to half a bar. Or per 100g when the yogurt pot is 140g. If I don't eat the whole container, I weigh it. Lots of things on the database have 1g as a serving, so just multiply it by what you've eaten.

    I recently bought an electronic scale and have found I've been short changing myself on my old scales.

    Edit to add - you can add 'drained' to the description too for a lot of tinned stuff.
  • kwedman488
    kwedman488 Posts: 132 Member
    ALWAYS go by grams if you can; my only exception is to use oz for meats, and I only use measuring cups for liquids like milk because it is a measure of volume while grams is a measure of weight/mass. So for example you use a 1/2 cup measuring cup to measure out your oatmeal, you will find that instead of measuring out the 40g that it says is 1/2 cup or 1 serving, you will find that that measuring cup actually picked up between 60-70g, which is actually 3/4 cup to almost an entire cup. So if you always weigh by grams then you will be spot on, irregardless I how many servings they say there are-it's just an estimate.
  • When I got my food scale, boy, was I surprised. In my case, I've been OVERESTIMATING my food... by a lot.
  • I think food labels are often weird though. Like sneaky chocolate bars that say '150 cals' that only apply to half a bar.
    Those food labels are made by the devil himself.
  • FatFreeFrolicking
    FatFreeFrolicking Posts: 4,252 Member
    ALWAYS go by grams if you can; my only exception is to use oz for meats, and I only use measuring cups for liquids like milk because it is a measure of volume while grams is a measure of weight/mass. So for example you use a 1/2 cup measuring cup to measure out your oatmeal, you will find that instead of measuring out the 40g that it says is 1/2 cup or 1 serving, you will find that that measuring cup actually picked up between 60-70g, which is actually 3/4 cup to almost an entire cup. So if you always weigh by grams then you will be spot on, irregardless I how many servings they say there are-it's just an estimate.

    This.
  • JengaJess
    JengaJess Posts: 109 Member
    Thanks, everyone! Very helpful info, as usual.
    I guess I've just been depriving myself of beans for the past few months. I'll start going by grams from now on, as well.
    When I got my food scale, boy, was I surprised. In my case, I've been OVERESTIMATING my food... by a lot.

    For the most part, I've been under estimating because I've been SO terrified of over estimating.
    But 1 oz of cheese... man that is NOT a lot of cheese. I've been way over estimating what that looks like.
  • MelodyandBarbells
    MelodyandBarbells Posts: 7,724 Member
    I think food labels are often weird though. Like sneaky chocolate bars that say '150 cals' that only apply to half a bar.
    Those food labels are made by the devil himself.

    :laugh: you made me think of a friend from several years ago that didn't know the popcorn bag was three servings. "It's only 150 calories such a low calorie snack" (!!!)
This discussion has been closed.