We are pleased to announce that on March 4, 2025, an updated Rich Text Editor will be introduced in the MyFitnessPal Community. To learn more about the upcoming changes, please click here. We look forward to sharing this new feature with you!

Tracking Calories Burned?

MsCyone
MsCyone Posts: 223 Member
edited September 2024 in Health and Weight Loss
How do you get an accurate calorie burn for various exercises, the mfp site or a heart rate monitor?

Replies

  • hpsnickers1
    hpsnickers1 Posts: 2,783 Member
    An HRM will give you a more accurate reading depending on the HRM quality. I bought a Timex and learned it wasn't accurate at all. So - I invested in a Polar. It's definitely accurate. I think the numbers on the MFP site are just general numbers.
  • msamcoates
    msamcoates Posts: 261 Member
    I think a heart rate monitor is more effective than this site. Each individual is different in burning calories and this site gives you a generic amount of calories burned.
  • Kath712
    Kath712 Posts: 1,263 Member
    Using the heart rate monitor has been an eye-opening experience for me. I was using the #'s that the MFP database gave me for circuit training. Turns out, MFP was estimating high (I was burning ~200 calories, when MFP told me I burned ~250). On the flip side, though, my stationary bike was giving me low numbers (I was burning ~ 160 calories in 24 minutes, when the bike told me ~120). So, I would highly recommend an HRM for accurate numbers!
  • Sandeee
    Sandeee Posts: 53 Member
    MFP is close, but a HRM is best! I use Polar for accurate counts.
  • jmijares
    jmijares Posts: 11
    An HRM will give you a more accurate reading depending on the HRM quality. I bought a Timex and learned it wasn't accurate at all. So - I invested in a Polar. It's definitely accurate. I think the numbers on the MFP site are just general numbers.

    I second the use of Polar. I've been using their HRMs for many years. They use a lot more variables when calculating calories.

    I'd recommend getting one of their basic models.
  • deannarey13
    deannarey13 Posts: 452
    MFP is close, but a HRM is best! I use Polar for accurate counts.

    I agree. I use Polar as well. Love it.
  • Natural
    Natural Posts: 461 Member
    HRM is the way to go. everyone should own one. i prefer the one with the chest strap.
  • kiuney
    kiuney Posts: 68
    Agree! Polar HRM's are great. I bought mine in 2004 and am still using it. I have noticed that the estimates on MFP for calories burned are significantly higher than what my HRM says.
  • cobygrey
    cobygrey Posts: 270 Member
    HRM is the way to go. everyone should own one. i prefer the one with the chest strap.

    HRM with the chest strap is the best. I bought my on Amazon.com for about $40. Timex Zone trainer with chest strap.
This discussion has been closed.

Categories