Cyclist v Motorist

tristan299
tristan299 Posts: 2,537 Member
Went out for a ride today and had a car cut across the front of me. I made a gesture and he stopped, I jumped of my bike and we had a little exchange of words. My point is why do some car drivers believe that bikes should not be on the road or should be that close to the side that they ride in the drainage channel? I drive a Renault Grand Espace, a big 7 seater and make sure I am well out of the way of any cyclist I need to over take. So what if I have to wait 10, 20, 30 seconds, it's no big deal.

Please can I ask any non cyclist reading to please give us cyclist room on the roads, we have a much right to use the road as you do. :happy:
«13456710

Replies

  • caterpillardreams
    caterpillardreams Posts: 476 Member
    you are so right. I do not ride as much as I would like, Can not take my 3 little ones with me, but when I see a bike rider I take my time and give them room.
    Some people can be very rude and downright mean. They do not give a Crap about others and they will not change.
    I think that there should be more space for walkers and bike riders. I think if that were the case people would feel more safe riding and walking everywhere.
  • JenAndSome
    JenAndSome Posts: 1,893 Member
    I have no problem giving cyclists their space and generally show a lot of patience when I come up to cyclists on the road. However, I tend to lose that patience when I come across a group of riders who are holding up traffic and making it impossible for cars to pass for miles. If you have a car stuck behind you for more than a couple minutes the polite thing to do, in my opinion, would be to pull off the road and let them by. I think sharing the road is the responsibility of both sides.
  • BikerMan54
    BikerMan54 Posts: 210
    I always appreciate the drivers out there who give me room when I am on my bike. I always figure that those who don’t care about me and cut me off, etc., drive that way all the time. What I have learned is to ride as if I am invisible to other drivers. I also always make sure that I make contact before proceeding.
  • tdecel
    tdecel Posts: 48 Member
    Someone "riding a bicycle" is not necessarily a "cyclist" (people engaged in the serious sport of cycling). Unfortunately, there are way too many of the first kind that give serious and responsible riders a bad reputation. Riding through red lights, not stopping at stop signs, going against the flow of traffic, cutting in and out of bike lanes, etc etc. Many drivers can not differentiate the difference. It just not worth the fight to me anymore.
  • Nmt100
    Nmt100 Posts: 36 Member
    I think it is actually a minority of drivers, giving the majority a bad name. In fact I was having trouble getting out of my right turn onto a busy road on my commute home last night and someone actually stopped to let me across. I will probably decide all drivers hate cyclists again on Monday though when just one idiot completely disregards my safety!
  • tristan299
    tristan299 Posts: 2,537 Member
    I have no problem giving cyclists their space and generally show a lot of patience when I come up to cyclists on the road. However, I tend to lose that patience when I come across a group of riders who are holding up traffic and making it impossible for cars to pass for miles. If you have a car stuck behind you for more than a couple minutes the polite thing to do, in my opinion, would be to pull off the road and let them by. I think sharing the road is the responsibility of both sides.

    Hi Jen

    Totally agree with not holding up traffic, there was a bus behind me today on one of the country lanes I was on, pulled in at the first opportunity.

    Not sure if you were aware of this but the reason that some cyclist ride side by side is it is safer for them and also quicker (supposedly) for motorist to get by. Your only overtaking 1 bikes length not 2, however you do need more room on you right in the UK (or left more or less everywhere else).

    Sorry if that sound pompous or condescending, I don't mean it to just wanted you to know why it's done.

    Enjoy the rest of your weekend. :wink:
  • tristan299
    tristan299 Posts: 2,537 Member
    Someone "riding a bicycle" is not necessarily a "cyclist" (people engaged in the serious sport of cycling). Unfortunately, there are way too many of the first kind that give serious and responsible riders a bad reputation. Riding through red lights, not stopping at stop signs, going against the flow of traffic, cutting in and out of bike lanes, etc etc. Many drivers can not differentiate the difference. It just not worth the fight to me anymore.

    Good points buddy, maybe there should be some sort of cycling road test where you are granted a licence at the end of the test. If you are caught going through red lights riding on pavement or any other "cycling offence you have endorsements put on you licence, to many endorsements and you get fined and have to have a retest. Just a thought.
  • tristan299
    tristan299 Posts: 2,537 Member
    I think it is actually a minority of drivers, giving the majority a bad name. In fact I was having trouble getting out of my right turn onto a busy road on my commute home last night and someone actually stopped to let me across. I will probably decide all drivers hate cyclists again on Monday though when just one idiot completely disregards my safety!

    Totally correct NMT. It's always the minority that give the majority a bad name. I suppose I was just venting. I'm better now. lol
  • Cherimoose
    Cherimoose Posts: 5,208 Member
    If all cyclists wore a GoPro or similar camera, there would be more motorists willing to share the road. :bigsmile:
  • tristan299
    tristan299 Posts: 2,537 Member
    If all cyclists wore a GoPro or similar camera, there would be more motorists willing to share the road. :bigsmile:

    Just bid on one on ebay. See what happens
  • JoRocka
    JoRocka Posts: 17,525 Member
    because- pedal bikes like to claim as much right to the road as a fully registered vehicle.

    And they aren't.

    And then when they do things NOT for registered vehicles- they scream- we aren't cars.

    and they are often extremely rude about sharing the road and very condescending about how much better they are that they are on bikes.

    I ride a motorcycle- I'm aware of how dangerous being exposed on the road is- and even I get excessively annoyed with the entitled attitude of pedal bike folks.

    THAT'S why no one likes bicyclists.

    sorry... not sorry. noting personal- but the odds tip into the rude A hole camp more than the "polite" camp... much like when I tell people I ride a sport bike- everyone assumes I'm some flip flop wife beater stunting wanna be who lane splits at 120 through free way traffic.
    and even though I don't- there is a large percentage of sport riders who DO behave like that... so we all get lumped into and unless the majority STOP behaving like that- each of our respective groups has to suffer with the unwanted stigma.

    sorry mate- that's just the way it is.
  • Oh c'mon now, not all cyclists are as horrific as Lance Armstrong, lmao! I try to be patient and courteous to cyclists AND average bike riders (like me!), who might still be learning the rules of the road. Let's face it, they are taking the moral high road (IMHO) when choosing to ride>driving, they are doing the rest of us a favor by putting that much less CO2 into the atmosphere, and doing something for their health. Patience people, it's good for your heart. :)
  • tristan299
    tristan299 Posts: 2,537 Member
    because- pedal bikes like to claim as much right to the road as a fully registered vehicle.

    And they aren't.

    And then when they do things NOT for registered vehicles- they scream- we aren't cars.

    and they are often extremely rude about sharing the road and very condescending about how much better they are that they are on bikes.

    I ride a motorcycle- I'm aware of how dangerous being exposed on the road is- and even I get excessively annoyed with the entitled attitude of pedal bike folks.

    THAT'S why no one likes bicyclists.

    sorry... not sorry. noting personal- but the odds tip into the rude A hole camp more than the "polite" camp... much like when I tell people I ride a sport bike- everyone assumes I'm some flip flop wife beater stunting wanna be who lane splits at 120 through free way traffic.
    and even though I don't- there is a large percentage of sport riders who DO behave like that... so we all get lumped into and unless the majority STOP behaving like that- each of our respective groups has to suffer with the unwanted stigma.

    sorry mate- that's just the way it is.

    Everyone is entitled to their opinion mucker. Even if it is slightly, imo, motorist bias.
  • JenAndSome
    JenAndSome Posts: 1,893 Member
    I have no problem giving cyclists their space and generally show a lot of patience when I come up to cyclists on the road. However, I tend to lose that patience when I come across a group of riders who are holding up traffic and making it impossible for cars to pass for miles. If you have a car stuck behind you for more than a couple minutes the polite thing to do, in my opinion, would be to pull off the road and let them by. I think sharing the road is the responsibility of both sides.

    Hi Jen

    Totally agree with not holding up traffic, there was a bus behind me today on one of the country lanes I was on, pulled in at the first opportunity.

    Not sure if you were aware of this but the reason that some cyclist ride side by side is it is safer for them and also quicker (supposedly) for motorist to get by. Your only overtaking 1 bikes length not 2, however you do need more room on you right in the UK (or left more or less everywhere else).

    Sorry if that sound pompous or condescending, I don't mean it to just wanted you to know why it's done.

    Enjoy the rest of your weekend. :wink:

    I have no problem with a couple of cyclists riding side by side, and I assure you I really do treat them with patience and respect often encouraging my kiddos to wave at them and whatnot. What we run into in my neck of the woods are groups of 5-20+ that try to all ride together. That is when things start to get frustrating.

    You have a good weekend, too and stay safe out there.
  • scorpio516
    scorpio516 Posts: 955 Member
    because- pedal bikes like to claim as much right to the road as a fully registered vehicle.

    And they aren't.

    And then when they do things NOT for registered vehicles- they scream- we aren't cars.

    and they are often extremely rude about sharing the road and very condescending about how much better they are that they are on bikes.

    I ride a motorcycle- I'm aware of how dangerous being exposed on the road is- and even I get excessively annoyed with the entitled attitude of pedal bike folks.

    THAT'S why no one likes bicyclists.

    sorry... not sorry. noting personal- but the odds tip into the rude A hole camp more than the "polite" camp... much like when I tell people I ride a sport bike- everyone assumes I'm some flip flop wife beater stunting wanna be who lane splits at 120 through free way traffic.
    and even though I don't- there is a large percentage of sport riders who DO behave like that... so we all get lumped into and unless the majority STOP behaving like that- each of our respective groups has to suffer with the unwanted stigma.

    sorry mate- that's just the way it is.

    Sorry. Your wrong. According to most state's laws, including New Jersey, bicycles are vehicles. Every law that applies to vehicles applies to bicycles. Most laws that apply to motorcycles apply to bicycles.
    Bikes also get some special laws in NJ:
    They are not prohibited from driving on the sidewalk (even though it's stupid to do so)
    If they are over 17, they don't have to wear a helmet
    They can operate a vehicles 2 abreast (I'll assume even motorcycles can't do this)
    They don't have to have lights installed when it's not nighttime
  • segovm
    segovm Posts: 512 Member
    I think it's all just a matter of familiarity. Here in the US most people drive cars two blocks to the gym. In parts of Europe and Asia a lot more people walk and ride bikes.

    Personally, when I'm on the bike my main concern is to not get run over. I'll ride dead center middle of the lane for as long as needed at whatever speed I am going if that is the safest place for me to be.

    Fortunately, more often than not, the side of the road works great and in my city there are extensive dedicated bike trails that avoid cars and stop signs.

    I get how frustrating it is to drive behind a slow biker but folks in the cars don't have to dodge glass or pot holes to keep moving along safely. While it might look like I'm just being a jerk and slowing them down, I honestly hardly ever want a two ton SUV tailgating me as they blast their horn so it can be assumed we are both equally uncomfortable.

    I do notice that whenever there is an aggressive driver behind me I do end up going slower and taking more of the lane to ensure I have room to maneuver in case of a poorly planned passing attempt. It's survival of the fittest and I am going to win.
  • JoRocka
    JoRocka Posts: 17,525 Member
    Hu
    because- pedal bikes like to claim as much right to the road as a fully registered vehicle.

    And they aren't.

    And then when they do things NOT for registered vehicles- they scream- we aren't cars.

    and they are often extremely rude about sharing the road and very condescending about how much better they are that they are on bikes.

    I ride a motorcycle- I'm aware of how dangerous being exposed on the road is- and even I get excessively annoyed with the entitled attitude of pedal bike folks.

    THAT'S why no one likes bicyclists.

    sorry... not sorry. nothing personal- but the odds tip into the rude A hole camp more than the "polite" camp... much like when I tell people I ride a sport bike- everyone assumes I'm some flip flop wife beater stunting wanna be who lane splits at 120 through free way traffic.
    and even though I don't- there is a large percentage of sport riders who DO behave like that... so we all get lumped into and unless the majority STOP behaving like that- each of our respective groups has to suffer with the unwanted stigma.

    sorry mate- that's just the way it is.

    Everyone is entitled to their opinion mucker. Even if it is slightly, imo, motorist bias.

    No need to get cheeky. I'm suffer a similar stigma. And yes. I am indeed in titled to my opinion.

    Scorpio... I'm sorry I can't post you directly.. My phone doesn't like doing multiple posts like that.

    Well that was half my point. I didn't realize legally they are viewed as vehicles. But if they are they should be registered and licensed.
    And as you say they are vehicles they should abide by the laws then as vehicles. And like I said above they suffer the same issue I suffer.. The few that do not behave well give the rest a bad name. I just wish it was more consistent. In NY I thought it was completely illegal to do sidewalk riding but it seems they lane split and run lights at will.

    I honestly don't go out of my way to be rude to them. . Totally unsafe and not worth it. But I do get annoyed sometimes with them..same level of irritation as the old lady driving 55 on the turnpike Lol.

    And I'm apologizing in advance... My phone is really fussy with this window and editing is seriously a ten minute process. But i tried!
  • segovm
    segovm Posts: 512 Member
    Not to keep hitting the nail on the head over and over but the truth is that the problem is not in the drivers or the riders but in the government's failure to adapt the infrastructure to safely support both.
  • Gidzmo
    Gidzmo Posts: 906 Member
    Went out for a ride today and had a car cut across the front of me. I made a gesture and he stopped, I jumped of my bike and we had a little exchange of words. My point is why do some car drivers believe that bikes should not be on the road or should be that close to the side that they ride in the drainage channel? I drive a Renault Grand Espace, a big 7 seater and make sure I am well out of the way of any cyclist I need to overtake. So what if I have to wait 10, 20, 30 seconds, it's no big deal. Please can I ask any non-cyclist reading to please give us cyclist room on the roads, we have a much right to use the road as you do. :happy:

    Hello, Tristan! I don't have a problem with sharing the road with bicyclists. In fact, a recently-passed law here in CA mandates that I leave space for the bicyclist.

    I do, however, have a problem with cyclists who do not obey the rules of the road. And I have seen that all too often of late in my neighborhood (which, BTW, borders a school-zone). What have I seen?

    *Groups of cyclists in the middle of the street or riding against traffic (instead of riding single-file with the flow of traffic).
    *Riding on the sidewalk: no problem with this for a young child, but should not be done by anyone over the age of 10. Sidewalks are for pedestrians.
    *Earbuds/headphones: I'm not allowed to use either while driving. How is a cyclist supposed to hear the traffic?
  • GiddyupTim
    GiddyupTim Posts: 2,819 Member
    I think it is actually a minority of drivers, giving the majority a bad name. In fact I was having trouble getting out of my right turn onto a busy road on my commute home last night and someone actually stopped to let me across. I will probably decide all drivers hate cyclists again on Monday though when just one idiot completely disregards my safety!

    I actually must disagree with this. For every driver that passes me on the road and gives me a wide berth, there are five that will pass by within two feet of my handlebars. I mean, why not? I'll be dead, but the worst that will happen to them will be a scratch in the paint job.
    I do not know anybody who rides a bike a lot who has not had an accident with a car. As you might imagine with a car-versus-bike collision, many resulted in serious injury to the cyclist. Some of them might have been at fault themselves, but still...That is way too dangerous. Something must be done to make it safer.

    P.S. Many cyclists ride in the middle of the road as a means of self-protection, so that drivers won't try to squeeze by within inches of the bike, traveling entirely too fast.
  • d0v3r13
    d0v3r13 Posts: 61 Member
    rules of the road for cyclists: drive the same direction as traffic. stay in the bike lane, however if one is not available, ride as close to the side as possible. if it is unsafe to ride on the side then you should join the regular driving lane and become part of the flow of traffic even if this slow down traffic. obey all traffic signs, including lights, do not use the crosswalk signal. if making a left hand turn you are expected to enter traffic and use the same left turn lane as cars do. in the instance of an accident, you are considered a vehicle and have the same rights and responsibilities as them.

    how do i know these? because i was in an accident. in my case, i was following the rules of the road, while cycling and pulling a trailer behind me carrying my two children. i was taking my daughter to school. i entered the intersection on a green light, however the light changed very quickly from green to red giving me only enough time to cross halfway through the intersection. this was a very wide street (7 lanes wide). in most cases i would have stopped in the middle and waited out the crossing traffic but with the extended length from they trailor it was dangerous to do so and i was trapped in a very scary place. i made eye contact with all the cars nearby and everyone patiently waited for me to cross, however there was a utility van that was not stopped at the light and only saw that he had a green light, he didn't see me, despite the fact that all the cars were stopped at the intersection and i had a bright orange flag attached to the trailer, i was so focused on getting out of everyone's way that i didn't notice him coming til it was very much too late, and he hit my front tire, which threw me into the side of his van and then into the middle of the intersection. somehow my children were perfectly fine, just scared, and i only had a very slight tear in my shoulder and a hematoma on my leg. it was a terrifying experience. i followed the rules of the road, but i think it boils down to that i took them too literally. going on a green light is allowed, but its much safer to wait for the next green light especially on long intersections. anyway, because of the particular situation, the driver's insurance did end up claiming partial liability (thank God) so most of the expenses were covered. but since i was a cyclist and considered a vehicle i did have some liability due to being in the intersection on a red light, regardless of it being green when i entered.

    my concern is that the law and the streets are biased to cars. the transition from green to yellow to red is not enough time for a bike to safely cross, which makes it dangerous. most of that route did not have bike lanes and was at times a little scary because cars would blow right past me. i'm really thankful that nothing worse happened to me. it took a long time for me to heal mentally and emotionally from what happened and thankfully both kids are good and not traumatized. but i would love to see some serious reform in bike riding safety and in car driver's awareness of bikes. i am now extremely aware of all bikes and always do my best to ensure their safety.
  • tinkbaby101
    tinkbaby101 Posts: 180 Member
    Prior to actually biking, I used to think cyclists should stay off the road. :embarassed: I honestly felt like, until and unless they can maintain speed like a car, or accelerate like a car, they shouldn't be where the cars are.

    Actually cycling on the road, though, I can say that my opinion has changed. I try to stay on bike trails instead, anyway, because it's scary riding on the road (especially if there doesn't happen to be a bike lane).

    I saw one of the previous responders mentioned the rules of the road for a cyclist. Here's my question for any able to answer it (completely serious, because I just started biking a few weeks ago): We have expansive bike trails in my neighborhood. These bike trails lead directly to pedestrian crosswalks, when they intersect with main roads. Am I allowed to use the crosswalk signal?
  • RekindledRose
    RekindledRose Posts: 523 Member
    As previously stated, cyclists have the same rights on the roads as motorists, and when an alternative route is not available, they can even ride on the freeway! Yes it's true in the USA. I wish that people who rode against the traffic or broke traffic laws on their bikes would be held accountable, but that rarely happens.

    The reasons a lot of motorists are rude and dangerous towards cyclists are:

    1. They are ignorant of the laws or they just don't care
    2. They that their needs and desires are more important than other people's safety is
    3. They are distracted (again, see reason #1)
    4. They are just haters. They hate anyone out there doing something that in any way impede their schedules

    It's everyone's responsibility to know the laws, obey them, and to be courteous to their fellow human beings. I hope that everyone on MFP who rides a bike (or motorcycle) is extra careful of the cars out there and that everyone in their cars watches out for our pedal cyclist (as one responder so cutely called them).

    Have a wonderful weekend.
  • d0v3r13
    d0v3r13 Posts: 61 Member
    Prior to actually biking, I used to think cyclists should stay off the road. :embarassed: I honestly felt like, until and unless they can maintain speed like a car, or accelerate like a car, they shouldn't be where the cars are.

    Actually cycling on the road, though, I can say that my opinion has changed. I try to stay on bike trails instead, anyway, because it's scary riding on the road (especially if there doesn't happen to be a bike lane).

    I saw one of the previous responders mentioned the rules of the road for a cyclist. Here's my question for any able to answer it (completely serious, because I just started biking a few weeks ago): We have expansive bike trails in my neighborhood. These bike trails lead directly to pedestrian crosswalks, when they intersect with main roads. Am I allowed to use the crosswalk signal?

    honestly i'm still super confused by that one. i think if you are traveling in the crosswalk you are supposed to use the crosswalk signal. the first question i was asked when the fire men showed up is if the crosswalk signal was on or if i had used it. naturally i hadn't, because that's not how it works, but it made me nervous that they would put the blame more on me if i hadn't. luckily it had no bearing on my situation
  • ValerieMartini2Olives
    ValerieMartini2Olives Posts: 3,024 Member
    I stopped street riding for this very reason. I only ride on a biking/walking trail now.
  • LunaStar2008
    LunaStar2008 Posts: 155 Member
    I went on a bike ride the other day and got almost mowed off the street about 5-6 times. One truck driver (F-150) was so close he almost hit me with his side mirror on my shoulder and others were so close that their draft was made me sway with my balance. :frown: That made me consider not to ride alone or only on trails and destinated bike route (which limits my riding time or makes it boring due to doing the route over and over again to accumulate the miles/distance :grumble: :noway: ).
    I am not a beginner and consider my self very sturdy on the bike. So I joined a cycling group. As a group we are more visible and I feel it is safer. Motorists take their time to pass. As there is traffic we ride in a single file, but if the street is clear some of us ride side-by-side (sometimes you need that encouragement to keep up :tongue: ).
    As others stated, motorists need to be more considered, cyclists need to adhere to the traffic laws, the communities need to provide better infrastructures to allow more "bike commuters", and all need to be a little more patient towards each other. I also agree, that bicycle riders who are violating the law, should be "ticketed" or get a warning by law enforcement, because they endanger themselves and others. Every larger city in Germany has police officers on bike patrol for the inner city for pedestrian and bicycle violations. Maybe we should get something like this in the states as well. :smile:

    As far as I know, if you ride your bicycle while intoxicated it can cause your drivers license to be suspended.
  • seltzermint555
    seltzermint555 Posts: 10,740 Member
    The ONLY "excuse" I can think of - which is still not good enough - is that in SOME areas, like mine, there are barely ever any cyclists on the roads so some people may rarely or never see them, and/or may not even know that they have the 'right' to ride on streets. For example, we live near a business district with a 5 lane road and large sidewalks on both sides. Cyclists do have the right to ride on the sidewalk OR street there - not a lot of pedestrians using the sidewalks normally - but I think most citizens, if surveyed, would believe the sidewalks are for bicycles and cyclists shouldn't be on the road.

    My husband rides a lot, including on our city streets, but I mostly stick to our (quiet) neighborhood and local trails since I'm still not a super confident cyclist. But I understand cyclists have every right to use the road, too, and try to be courteous when I'm sharing the road with them.

    I know it is a different topic somewhat, but I also try to leave tons of space for motorcycle and scooter drivers as well. I see a LOT of people in my area (often with huge vans or SUVs) who get within seriously just a few feet of the motorcycle/scooters at stoplights and driving down the road. Scary!
  • segovm
    segovm Posts: 512 Member
    Most of the time when I am out I pedal my electric bike around. When human powered, it's way slower than my normal road bike but I ride it more because it's heavy and slow and thus a better workout. The nice thing with it though is if I need to, I can turn a little handle and get up to 30 mph pretty quick to scoot around people or speed through in traffic when the side of the road sucks.

    On a one lane road without a lot of safe passing spots, going 25-30 is just safer for folks on a bike and I still can't quit get my chubby self up that fast for long on pedals alone.
  • tristan299
    tristan299 Posts: 2,537 Member
    Not to keep hitting the nail on the head over and over but the truth is that the problem is not in the drivers or the riders but in the government's failure to adapt the infrastructure to safely support both.

    Spot on bud
  • tristan299
    tristan299 Posts: 2,537 Member
    Went out for a ride today and had a car cut across the front of me. I made a gesture and he stopped, I jumped of my bike and we had a little exchange of words. My point is why do some car drivers believe that bikes should not be on the road or should be that close to the side that they ride in the drainage channel? I drive a Renault Grand Espace, a big 7 seater and make sure I am well out of the way of any cyclist I need to overtake. So what if I have to wait 10, 20, 30 seconds, it's no big deal. Please can I ask any non-cyclist reading to please give us cyclist room on the roads, we have a much right to use the road as you do. :happy:

    Hello, Tristan! I don't have a problem with sharing the road with bicyclists. In fact, a recently-passed law here in CA mandates that I leave space for the bicyclist.

    I do, however, have a problem with cyclists who do not obey the rules of the road. And I have seen that all too often of late in my neighborhood (which, BTW, borders a school-zone). What have I seen?

    *Groups of cyclists in the middle of the street or riding against traffic (instead of riding single-file with the flow of traffic).
    *Riding on the sidewalk: no problem with this for a young child, but should not be done by anyone over the age of 10. Sidewalks are for pedestrians.
    *Earbuds/headphones: I'm not allowed to use either while driving. How is a cyclist supposed to hear the traffic?

    Mate i totally agree with you, We are all responsible for OUR behavior on the road. Chicken and egg scenario. Cyclist rides in the middle of the road so the motorist has to give him a wide birth because of an instance were the cyclist was "driven" into the kerb. Motorist drives close to the cyclist because the motorist was made to go out wider than he /she would have like due to a cyclist taking up half the road. And so the cycle continues. As for a whole group of cyclist taking up the road, well thats just bad manners and stupid. Hence why I only cycle on my own or with my son, If the whole family go (6 of us). We drive 50 miles to a family cycle trail.