Why do YOU diet?
Options
Replies
-
I don't understand the obsession on this site with the word diet. If you are restricting calories with the desire to lose weight, you are on a diet. Is calling it something else helpful?
On 1 hand that's true, but on the other hand I'm not "restricting" anything - I'm trying to eat healthier foods. The fact that they happen to have less calories & I've lost some weight is fantastic, but overall health is my goal. I'm 50 years old & all the #'s on my bloodwork are now right in the middle of where they need to be (if not a little to the side of center that's a little better). My LDL (bad) cholesterol has come down from 129 to 97 while my HDL (good) cholesterol has gone up. My resting pulse rate ranges from 48-53 & my blood pressure ranges from 110-120/65-75. My last stress test showed no blockages & it took 9 1/2 minutes to reach the target heart rate - my doctor told me the vast majority of men my age hit the target rate within the 1st 30 seconds. This is all giving me the best chance to live a longer, healthier life & that's what it's all about...........0 -
You're not restricting calories?I don't understand the obsession on this site with the word diet. If you are restricting calories with the desire to lose weight, you are on a diet. Is calling it something else helpful?
On 1 hand that's true, but on the other hand I'm not "restricting" anything - I'm trying to eat healthier foods. The fact that they happen to have less calories & I've lost some weight is fantastic, but overall health is my goal. I'm 50 years old & all the #'s on my bloodwork are now right in the middle of where they need to be (if not a little to the side of center that's a little better). My LDL (bad) cholesterol has come down from 129 to 97 while my HDL (good) cholesterol has gone up. My resting pulse rate ranges from 48-53 & my blood pressure ranges from 110-120/65-75. My last stress test showed no blockages & it took 9 1/2 minutes to reach the target heart rate - my doctor told me the vast majority of men my age hit the target rate within the 1st 30 seconds. This is all giving me the best chance to live a longer, healthier life & that's what it's all about...........0 -
I don't "diet" ... I'm making a change for life, and it's not temporary. That's why the whole notion of not depriving myself of something that is so popular around here is something I take to heart. I don't want to fail again. I don't want to look at pizza longingly wishing I wasn't stuck eating carrots and celery sticks. This is not "punishment" (as I've heard recently), I'm teaching myself to eat proper portions of things I enjoy, or to make them in a manner that is not as bad (a little less cheese, turkey instead of beef). I'm doing it because 1) I want to be around for my daughters, and 2) I'm not healthy. I'm in the obese range for BMI, and I know it's doing nothing for my health issues.0
-
No such thing as a "diet"...if it's not sustainable it's not worth doing. What and how we eat is just a what we do. I don't short term "diet", but I have a long term, sustainable diet that consists of eating according to my fitness goals. It's not temporary but lifelong. It's lifelong because its sustainable and not a short term "diet".0
-
You're not restricting calories?I don't understand the obsession on this site with the word diet. If you are restricting calories with the desire to lose weight, you are on a diet. Is calling it something else helpful?
On 1 hand that's true, but on the other hand I'm not "restricting" anything - I'm trying to eat healthier foods. The fact that they happen to have less calories & I've lost some weight is fantastic, but overall health is my goal. I'm 50 years old & all the #'s on my bloodwork are now right in the middle of where they need to be (if not a little to the side of center that's a little better). My LDL (bad) cholesterol has come down from 129 to 97 while my HDL (good) cholesterol has gone up. My resting pulse rate ranges from 48-53 & my blood pressure ranges from 110-120/65-75. My last stress test showed no blockages & it took 9 1/2 minutes to reach the target heart rate - my doctor told me the vast majority of men my age hit the target rate within the 1st 30 seconds. This is all giving me the best chance to live a longer, healthier life & that's what it's all about...........
Not intentionally as a means to lose weight. The food I'm eating has fewer calories than the fast food/junk food I was eating a lot of, so my calories ARE lower. My goal has been to eat better, & for the most part I have not been going hungry (other than the occasional day where I feel like I must have a tapeworm)......
ETA: I HAVE done the "diet" calorie restriction thing before & it has never worked for me in the long term, I never fail to fall off the wagon in a big way. The only way I can do this (& it's been working for close to 2 years now) is to be more aware of what I'm eating & how often/how much I "treat" myself. Instead of it being whenever I feel like it I only do so every so often. The key for me is to still eat foods I like, but to concentrate on the healthier foods that I like. It has become so much easier to do over time. YMMV, this is what worked for me. Like everything else, everybody is different & my way may not work for somebody else just as their ways may not work for me. As long as we all reach whatever goals we set it doesn't really matter what we call it.........0 -
I refuse to diet. I am on a lifelong healthy, versatile, moderating eating plan. I will never diet again.0
-
I don't diet. I've tried just about every diet known to man. It's a failure (at least) for me, because I'm not going to do it forever. I need something real. Something *I* can live with. I like food. It's not my passion. It's not the end all be all for me, but I enjoy what I eat and drink, and I don't want to be eating nuts and twigs for the rest of my life in order to be "healthy and/or thin". Instead, I eat/drink whatever I want, as long as the proper portions fit. I knew I wouldn't be able to stick with something if I had to completely cut out Mountain Dew, pizza, chocolate, or other things that I liked. Being able to work things in that I enjoy, along with things that are healthy, and good for my body has been a lot easier than feeling deprived. It's not *always* 100% easy by any means, and there are ups and downs, just like any thing else, but for me, this is what works, and I can definitely live happily and healthy this way.0
-
I've never understood it either. Counting calories (and limiting them consciously) and weighing, and measuring.... that's a diet.I don't understand the obsession on this site with the word diet. If you are restricting calories with the desire to lose weight, you are on a diet. Is calling it something else helpful?
Yep, anything that involves me eating less cheese and pie is a 'diet' (in that sense of the word).
Especially as (I'm not referring to anyone here and may include myself) so few people to manage that 'lifestyle change' in the long term. Much the same way as a 'diet'.
As I said, not applying this to anyone, just in relation to the proportion of people who lose weight and keep it off. Myself included - Weight Watchers and Slimming World alike. My lifestyle somtimes involves treating my body like cr*p. My relationship with food and body has drastically improved since using MFP, but yes, I deliberately eat less than my body requires to maintain my weight. I am banting.0 -
You're not restricting calories?I don't understand the obsession on this site with the word diet. If you are restricting calories with the desire to lose weight, you are on a diet. Is calling it something else helpful?
On 1 hand that's true, but on the other hand I'm not "restricting" anything - I'm trying to eat healthier foods. The fact that they happen to have less calories & I've lost some weight is fantastic, but overall health is my goal. I'm 50 years old & all the #'s on my bloodwork are now right in the middle of where they need to be (if not a little to the side of center that's a little better). My LDL (bad) cholesterol has come down from 129 to 97 while my HDL (good) cholesterol has gone up. My resting pulse rate ranges from 48-53 & my blood pressure ranges from 110-120/65-75. My last stress test showed no blockages & it took 9 1/2 minutes to reach the target heart rate - my doctor told me the vast majority of men my age hit the target rate within the 1st 30 seconds. This is all giving me the best chance to live a longer, healthier life & that's what it's all about...........
Not intentionally as a means to lose weight. The food I'm eating has fewer calories than the fast food/junk food I was eating a lot of, so my calories ARE lower. My goal has been to eat better, & for the most part I have not been going hungry (other than the occasional day where I feel like I must have a tapeworm)......
ETA: I HAVE done the "diet" calorie restriction thing before & it has never worked for me in the long term, I never fail to fall off the wagon in a big way. The only way I can do this (& it's been working for close to 2 years now) is to be more aware of what I'm eating & how often/how much I "treat" myself. Instead of it being whenever I feel like it I only do so every so often. The key for me is to still eat foods I like, but to concentrate on the healthier foods that I like. It has become so much easier to do over time. YMMV, this is what worked for me. Like everything else, everybody is different & my way may not work for somebody else just as their ways may not work for me. As long as we all reach whatever goals we set it doesn't really matter what we call it.........
These responses fascinate me. I have a couple of questions, if you would please indulge me.
1. If you are not restricting anything and therefore not on a diet, why did you feel the need to respond to my post about a diet? Diet means restriction - be it calories only, fat, carbs, junk food, whatever - with the intent of losing weight. If weight loss was never your goal, what has your argument to do with my post?
2. Why are you logging food on MFP, with a calorie goal, and a ticker showing your weight loss, if weight loss is not a goal for you?0 -
I don't understand the obsession on this site with the word diet. If you are restricting calories with the desire to lose weight, you are on a diet. Is calling it something else helpful?
I agree with this.
My last diet (verb) was reducing my calories by about 500 per day until I reached a goal weight. Then I stopped dieting and began maintaining by eating a reasonable amount of calories for my age, weight, and activity level.
I didn't really change my diet (noun) other than to pay more attention to my macronutrient/micronutrient percentages and try to get more protein overall. I have always eaten in a relatively balanced manner.
Throughout the verbs (diet and maintaining) I have also incorporated a regular workout plan, which I would call a lifestyle change because I did not do that prior to my desire to be healthier.0 -
In answer to OP - I tried Weight Watchers and Slimming World and they didn't work because I couldn't eat like that in the long term (e.g. red and green days - 1 proteiny, 1 carby) and I hadn't looked at why I ate so much (depression and really, really liking dairy products).
The reduction in calories was too much as well, I was always hungry. I have a much smaller gap between my deficit and maintainence calories now.
Those diets also relied on a lot of sad foods - desserts involving quark, or curries that consisted of chicken boob, veg stock and some spices.0 -
All the foods I like are considered "unhealthy" and "bad", but I know I won't be able to cut them out of my diet for life.
I am a steak and potatoes kind of girl, so this is very hard for me when a normal meal for me is easily half of my calorie allowance.
I also like chips and dip, and brownies and cake. I want to be able to eat what I want when I want it, so the long term answer to me is increasing the amount I exercise... rather than forever being stuck at say 1600 calories a day.
So, I'm trying to do things that I can see myself sticking to long term. I've come to the conclusion that cutting out foods and weight lifting are not things I can see myself sticking to for the rest of my life. The only exercises I have enjoyed in the past were your basic calisthenics and running, so these things I know I can stick to. Lifting weights bores me to tears. And having a 'normal' serving of something.... can't see me sticking to that for the rest of my life. I can see myself sticking to running five days a week while happily eating half a large pizza for dinner............................
I don't know what I'm trying to say or what I'm trying to do, but I do know that I really want to lose the weight. I figure that once I get down to where I want, I would just keep up with my calories and exercise accordingly (not a diet then, right?).
Dieting is so difficult for me. It's funny that I would rather spend hours on a treadmill than choosing to not have that 1/2 lb Texas BBQ burger......
Honestly, that's how I lost the 30 or so pounds I've lost so far. I've just kept up with the amount of calories I've stuffed my face with and burned off anything past my allowance given to me by MFP.
I know that my way is generally unhealthy (I read that eating too much causes premature aging of the cells), and that it may not work in the long run... but until I am treated of my binge eating disorder, I can't see the weight coming off any other way.0 -
You're not restricting calories?I don't understand the obsession on this site with the word diet. If you are restricting calories with the desire to lose weight, you are on a diet. Is calling it something else helpful?
On 1 hand that's true, but on the other hand I'm not "restricting" anything - I'm trying to eat healthier foods. The fact that they happen to have less calories & I've lost some weight is fantastic, but overall health is my goal. I'm 50 years old & all the #'s on my bloodwork are now right in the middle of where they need to be (if not a little to the side of center that's a little better). My LDL (bad) cholesterol has come down from 129 to 97 while my HDL (good) cholesterol has gone up. My resting pulse rate ranges from 48-53 & my blood pressure ranges from 110-120/65-75. My last stress test showed no blockages & it took 9 1/2 minutes to reach the target heart rate - my doctor told me the vast majority of men my age hit the target rate within the 1st 30 seconds. This is all giving me the best chance to live a longer, healthier life & that's what it's all about...........
Not intentionally as a means to lose weight. The food I'm eating has fewer calories than the fast food/junk food I was eating a lot of, so my calories ARE lower. My goal has been to eat better, & for the most part I have not been going hungry (other than the occasional day where I feel like I must have a tapeworm)......
ETA: I HAVE done the "diet" calorie restriction thing before & it has never worked for me in the long term, I never fail to fall off the wagon in a big way. The only way I can do this (& it's been working for close to 2 years now) is to be more aware of what I'm eating & how often/how much I "treat" myself. Instead of it being whenever I feel like it I only do so every so often. The key for me is to still eat foods I like, but to concentrate on the healthier foods that I like. It has become so much easier to do over time. YMMV, this is what worked for me. Like everything else, everybody is different & my way may not work for somebody else just as their ways may not work for me. As long as we all reach whatever goals we set it doesn't really matter what we call it.........
These responses fascinate me. I have a couple of questions, if you would please indulge me.
1. If you are not restricting anything and therefore not on a diet, why did you feel the need to respond to my post about a diet? Diet means restriction - be it calories only, fat, carbs, junk food, whatever - with the intent of losing weight. If weight loss was never your goal, what has your argument to do with my post?
2. Why are you logging food on MFP, with a calorie goal, and a ticker showing your weight loss, if weight loss is not a goal for you?
1. My apologies, I didn't realize that only people officially on a "diet" could respond. I also wasn't "arguing" anything, I was bringing another viewpoint to the conversation. For some people a straight up diet works, for others it doesn't, some people watch/change what they're eating for reasons other than weight loss. Overall health is just as important as weight loss itself, if not more so. I felt that my response applied to your post to show why somebody might watch what they're eating without a primary goal of weight loss, thereby not considering it to be a diet. For me, the change in lifestyle is the ultimate goal.....
2. I'm logging my foods more to see the macros than the calories, because I think that these things are what will have the biggest effect on things like my sodium levels, sugar levels, cholesterol, etc. Although weight loss isn't my primary goal, it's been a nice side benefit & I am proud of it. If weight loss were my primary goal I'd be weighing exact portions & all of that stuff, but it's not so I'm not. ....0 -
You're not restricting calories?I don't understand the obsession on this site with the word diet. If you are restricting calories with the desire to lose weight, you are on a diet. Is calling it something else helpful?
On 1 hand that's true, but on the other hand I'm not "restricting" anything - I'm trying to eat healthier foods. The fact that they happen to have less calories & I've lost some weight is fantastic, but overall health is my goal. I'm 50 years old & all the #'s on my bloodwork are now right in the middle of where they need to be (if not a little to the side of center that's a little better). My LDL (bad) cholesterol has come down from 129 to 97 while my HDL (good) cholesterol has gone up. My resting pulse rate ranges from 48-53 & my blood pressure ranges from 110-120/65-75. My last stress test showed no blockages & it took 9 1/2 minutes to reach the target heart rate - my doctor told me the vast majority of men my age hit the target rate within the 1st 30 seconds. This is all giving me the best chance to live a longer, healthier life & that's what it's all about...........
Not intentionally as a means to lose weight. The food I'm eating has fewer calories than the fast food/junk food I was eating a lot of, so my calories ARE lower. My goal has been to eat better, & for the most part I have not been going hungry (other than the occasional day where I feel like I must have a tapeworm)......
ETA: I HAVE done the "diet" calorie restriction thing before & it has never worked for me in the long term, I never fail to fall off the wagon in a big way. The only way I can do this (& it's been working for close to 2 years now) is to be more aware of what I'm eating & how often/how much I "treat" myself. Instead of it being whenever I feel like it I only do so every so often. The key for me is to still eat foods I like, but to concentrate on the healthier foods that I like. It has become so much easier to do over time. YMMV, this is what worked for me. Like everything else, everybody is different & my way may not work for somebody else just as their ways may not work for me. As long as we all reach whatever goals we set it doesn't really matter what we call it.........
These responses fascinate me. I have a couple of questions, if you would please indulge me.
1. If you are not restricting anything and therefore not on a diet, why did you feel the need to respond to my post about a diet? Diet means restriction - be it calories only, fat, carbs, junk food, whatever - with the intent of losing weight. If weight loss was never your goal, what has your argument to do with my post?
2. Why are you logging food on MFP, with a calorie goal, and a ticker showing your weight loss, if weight loss is not a goal for you?
1. My apologies, I didn't realize that only people officially on a "diet" could respond. I also wasn't "arguing" anything, I was bringing another viewpoint to the conversation. For some people a straight up diet works, for others it doesn't, some people watch/change what they're eating for reasons other than weight loss. Overall health is just as important as weight loss itself, if not more so. I felt that my response applied to your post to show why somebody might watch what they're eating without a primary goal of weight loss, thereby not considering it to be a diet. For me, the change in lifestyle is the ultimate goal.....
2. I'm logging my foods more to see the macros than the calories, because I think that these things are what will have the biggest effect on things like my sodium levels, sugar levels, cholesterol, etc. Although weight loss isn't my primary goal, it's been a nice side benefit & I am proud of it. If weight loss were my primary goal I'd be weighing exact portions & all of that stuff, but it's not so I'm not. ....
No need to apologize. It's an open forum so anyone can repond. I was just curious.0 -
people get hung up on the word diet. i get it.
but in the context you're using it in I think you are referring to "fad diet". cause everyone has a "diet" even if its fast food everyday all day. that's their diet.
I've tried many "fad diets" like others have posted. they all worked. every.single.one. i lost weight, reached a certain point and was at a weight loss for all of 5 minutes before gaining it all back.
what I've learned is basically you need to eat a caloric deficit to lose weight. period. however you need to choose a way to do this that you can do for the foreseeable future.
for me its not just about weightloss but overall health so i make sure to have a balanced range of foods with plenty of fruits and veggies that all fit into my caloric count.0 -
In answer to OP - I tried Weight Watchers and Slimming World and they didn't work because I couldn't eat like that in the long term (e.g. red and green days - 1 proteiny, 1 carby) and I hadn't looked at why I ate so much (depression and really, really liking dairy products).
The reduction in calories was too much as well, I was always hungry. I have a much smaller gap between my deficit and maintainence calories now.
Those diets also relied on a lot of sad foods - desserts involving quark, or curries that consisted of chicken boob, veg stock and some spices.
Actual LOLz. Desserts involving quark are a tragedy
I've done the works. Atkins, WW, SW, VLCD, Slim Fast, IF and Ive bounced from one to the next til I thought what the bloody hell am I doing here. MFP helps me sensibly learn to manage my portions and still enjoy foods I like, if I want something 'bad' i eat less of it or exercise more or something gives somewhere else. Still early days for me yet but Im content doing what Im doing. I havent thought what I will do once I reach a point where I am happy but Im reading a bit about TDEE atm0 -
I am a chubba wubba.....0
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 391.4K Introduce Yourself
- 43.5K Getting Started
- 259.6K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.6K Food and Nutrition
- 47.3K Recipes
- 232.3K Fitness and Exercise
- 387 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.4K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 152.7K Motivation and Support
- 7.8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.2K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.2K MyFitnessPal Information
- 22 News and Announcements
- 916 Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.3K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions