Do calories burnt change the fitter you become?

drad81
drad81 Posts: 28 Member
edited September 24 in Fitness and Exercise
Hi All,

This may seem like a silly question to most but I was wondering, does becoming fitter mean that you burn less calories?

I have noticed that my daily bike ride along the same route has be come a lot easier to do. It still takes the same time to complete as I power up hills faster then coast at a reduced speed keeping my average speed the same as before. Am I actually buring less calories becuase the ride is easier or am I still expending the same amount of energy?

Thanks

Daniel

Replies

  • MissingMinnesota
    MissingMinnesota Posts: 7,486 Member
    Yes the healthier you become, lower weight, better cardiovascular system the harder it is to get your heart rate up so you will need to work harder to burn the calories you burn at the begining.
  • BUMP!
  • ashlee2407
    ashlee2407 Posts: 65 Member
    I was wondering that too..seeing people doing TurboFire, just like me, but burning way less...must be b/c I have some lbs on them! :) Thanks!
  • TrainingWithTonya
    TrainingWithTonya Posts: 1,741 Member
    Well, according to physics, moving the same weight the same distance will require the same amount of energy. Unfortunately, physics isn't always right. Just like you can get better gas mileage out of your car by keeping it tuned up, you can get better Calorie Mileage out of your body by "tuning it up" with exercise. While that is great health wise in that it means your body is working more efficiently, it does mean less of a calorie burn from the same workout because your body may not have to recruit as many muscle fibers to do the job.
  • Cina04
    Cina04 Posts: 609
    I was wondering that too..seeing people doing TurboFire, just like me, but burning way less...must be b/c I have some lbs on them! :) Thanks!

    I was going to comment on your workout today syaing you make my cal burn for the Fire 55 I did look like nothing!

    When I was heavier I was burning more cals and now that I'm getting closer to my goal weight I have to push even harder!
  • drad81
    drad81 Posts: 28 Member
    So as I adjust my weight in mfp it will automatically adjust my calories burnt right?
  • Lyadeia
    Lyadeia Posts: 4,603 Member
    So as I adjust my weight in mfp it will automatically adjust my calories burnt right?

    I have noticed that it does this for me, but this is why I want to invest in a really good HRM with a chest strap or a bodybugg. The reason being, I increase the intensity of the same workout each time I do it so I don't do the same amount of work each time...that means that I should not see the decrease in calories burned. For example, when doing something like an Insanity workout, as I progress fitness-wise I push myself harder to lower myself further during push-ups or jump higher during the plyometric moves. I also like to run in place faster than before.

    For now I use the MFP calculations, but I think that when we increase the intensity each time we workout the calories burned should not go down. It's only by doing the same workout the same way that the calorie count reduces, which is why we are told to have variety in our workouts "so our bodies don't get used to it" (I'm sure you have heard that before) and to always wokr at increasing the intensity every time.
  • bes1e
    bes1e Posts: 1 Member
    Hi,

    I've just come across your question re "does becoming fitter mean burning less calories?" well.....i've just been having this coversation with my cousin who's a personal trainer. We both have good heart rate monitors and i take part in his body blast class on a thursday morning (which he partakes in). The class is intensive cardio followed by core etc and lasts 1 hour. Although i'm 34 and my cousin (Dan) is 26 he seems to burn average 400 more calories than me? even though he's a PT i've always had better levels of fitness than him although he seems to be able to push his heart rate up to near on his max. I however can only reach 161 which is a good 20 odd beats off my max (and thats not really using the 220-age formula)

    So...same excercises at the same pace and reps etc. 1 fit 34 year old and one (less fit) 26 year old personal trainer. I will eaither need to check my heart rate monitor or Dan will have to up his gain (or does he???)

    Interesting.
  • Lesley2901
    Lesley2901 Posts: 372 Member
    So as I adjust my weight in mfp it will automatically adjust my calories burnt right?

    Yes. As your weight goes down MFP adjusts down your calorie burn (I like the weight loss just hate losing the calories lol)
  • erickirb
    erickirb Posts: 12,294 Member
    Yes the healthier you become, lower weight, better cardiovascular system the harder it is to get your heart rate up so you will need to work harder to burn the calories you burn at the begining.

    This. But also your V02 Max increases as you become more fit, which means at the same HR and same weight you will burn more cals. Most HRMs assume a V02 Max and do not allow you to adjust as you become more fit, making it appear that you are burning less cals when you might or might not be really burning less.
  • cPT_Helice
    cPT_Helice Posts: 403
    Well, according to physics, moving the same weight the same distance will require the same amount of energy. Unfortunately, physics isn't always right. Just like you can get better gas mileage out of your car by keeping it tuned up, you can get better Calorie Mileage out of your body by "tuning it up" with exercise. While that is great health wise in that it means your body is working more efficiently, it does mean less of a calorie burn from the same workout because your body may not have to recruit as many muscle fibers to do the job.

    Nice way to put it! Yes!
  • Emilit_uk
    Emilit_uk Posts: 87
    Yep, annoying isn't it? The smaller and fitter you are, the less the payoff! running a mile for Mr/Mrs Average is supposed to burn 100 calories, at my height and weight it burns about 79!
  • kristy0516
    kristy0516 Posts: 1 Member
    I am not sure about the fitness level and calories burned when it comes to do fitness classes. I believe a lot has to do with what you put into it. And how many of your muscles you activate. I am also a group exercise instructor. My fitness level is significantly higher than many of my participants'. When I compare calorie burn, I typically burn quite a bit more. When I take a comparable class from another instructor, I burn a bit less. I think when we instruct, we do moves with more enthusiasm and precision. Bigger motions to help participant see, etc. I think that might account for some of the 400 cal. Age has something to do with it too. I think HRMs figure age/expected lean mass into the configurations. Men under 30 have more testosterone so should have more muscle (generalization, not specific to the individual, but that is what HRM formulas use, generalities...) Just some ideas.
  • kwin91
    kwin91 Posts: 128
    yes to this, and it also changes your BMR in case you wanted to know:)
  • TheAncientMariner
    TheAncientMariner Posts: 444 Member
    Well, according to physics, moving the same weight the same distance will require the same amount of energy. Unfortunately, physics isn't always right. Just like you can get better gas mileage out of your car by keeping it tuned up, you can get better Calorie Mileage out of your body by "tuning it up" with exercise. While that is great health wise in that it means your body is working more efficiently, it does mean less of a calorie burn from the same workout because your body may not have to recruit as many muscle fibers to do the job.

    I agree, but the physics IS right. However, as you said, you are basically giving yourself a stronger engine with which to do it. The energy required is still the same, but the engine doing the work is a little different. A 30 mile daily commute at 50mph burns the same amount of gas, but if you want to consume more fuel you simply speed up to 60 :)
  • scottb81
    scottb81 Posts: 2,538 Member
    Becoming more fit allows you to burn MORE calories because you can do more work without increasing the perceived effort.
  • wellbert
    wellbert Posts: 3,924 Member
    Yep, annoying isn't it? The smaller and fitter you are, the less the payoff! running a mile for Mr/Mrs Average is supposed to burn 100 calories, at my height and weight it burns about 79!

    Gain about 40 lbs of fat and you too and burn 100+ calories in the same time. ;)
  • Emilit_uk
    Emilit_uk Posts: 87
    Yep, annoying isn't it? The smaller and fitter you are, the less the payoff! running a mile for Mr/Mrs Average is supposed to burn 100 calories, at my height and weight it burns about 79!

    Gain about 40 lbs of fat and you too and burn 100+ calories in the same time. ;)

    Lol, OK, point taken! :-)
This discussion has been closed.