Accurate Calorie Counting
TFG_em
Posts: 174 Member
I've been heavily relying on MFP's search options to look up food, as well as to calculate calories burned during my workouts. I noticed that the machines at the gym are calculating a very different number than MFP does. What is the best/most accurate way to calculate calories burned? Does anyone know of a website or app that is really accurate?
0
Replies
-
I ignore the calorie burn estimates on machines. They aren't accurate because of the assumptions made in calculating them and nobody burns the same number of calories every workout session. It's a better idea for you to create a calorie deficit, do the best workout you can, and weigh yourself at least once a week.0
-
From what I've read in the forums, it seems that most of the folks who eat back their exercise calories only eat back about half of them. Whether they are using the MFP estimates or other sources, I can't say. Many say to simply set your activity level correctly rather than sedentary and ignore exercise calories. You can still log exercise for your record, just manually put it in as 1 calorie.0
-
You could also try a heart rate monitor for your cardio...nothing is 100% accurate, but its a heck of a lot more accurate than MFP's crazy numbers.0
-
Has anyone tried the BodyMedia (just got bought by Jawbone) device to track calories?0
-
OP the machines are not correct...manufacturers admit that the calorie burns are at least 20% higher than what they actually should be...
MFP is off for some people...worked perfectly for me.
HRM is good only if you have one with a chest strap and you are doing steady state cardio
There is no real way of tracking calorie burns outside a controlled environment...suggestion typically is to eat back 50-75% of MFP exercise calories and adjust as necessary.0 -
I posted here because I was specifically curious, if anyone was using it, how they would rate the calorie tracking accuracy of of the device.
Thanks for the suggestion, I will open up a new thread a bit later today .0 -
I second eating back less of the calories, if you aren't a fan of HRM (like me).
Best of luck.0 -
There's no such thing as accurate calorie counting.
Pick 1 method of estimating, use it consistently for a month, then compare expected results to actual results. If they aren't reasonably close, tweak slightly and compare again in another month.0 -
I track my calories eaten and I do post my workouts and the burn from my hrm, it is very closet to what mfp comes up with. I don't eat back my calories though.0
-
I find that MFP's calculation is actually quite a bit higher than the gym machines. If I used the MFP figures, I'd have burned between 562 and 715 calorie today on the stationary bike (depending on how I enter the effort level); yet at the gym, it was 350 on the bike.
I'd rather err on the low side than the high side and be burning more calories than I record, rather than err on the high side, get some huge number and eat them all back So I just enter what I see at the gym. Works for me. The alleged "calories burned" are just guideposts and indicators, anyway.
0 -
-
Thanks for the input! I appreciate the advice.0
-
This content has been removed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.6K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.3K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.5K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 431 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.6K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.8K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions