We are pleased to announce that as of March 4, 2025, an updated Rich Text Editor has been introduced in the MyFitnessPal Community. To learn more about the changes, please click here. We look forward to sharing this new feature with you!

Polar Ft4 sports watch?

workout_ninja
workout_ninja Posts: 524 Member
edited November 2024 in Fitness and Exercise
I have a garmin forerunner 10 for my running, but now that i am more committed to the gym and weight lifting, should i get the Polar FT4 sports watch? Is it accurate for weight lifting. I hate how MFP tells me that 38 minutes of strength training is only 134 calories. I feel like Ive been working so much harder than 134 calories worth!! Can anyone recommend this or another way of getting a more accurate calorie burn?

Replies

  • MeanderingMammal
    MeanderingMammal Posts: 7,866 Member
    Is it accurate for weight lifting.

    No. There are a good dozen or so threads in this forum on the topic so it should be fairly easy to find the various reasons why it would be a waste of money.
  • pattyjoshockley
    pattyjoshockley Posts: 53 Member
    edited November 2014
    I would like to know the answer to this too W-ninja. I use my garmin forerunner 110 to track my heart rate during all workouts. The calorie burn it gives seems very high. I dont' trust it. I would like to have a clear picture of calories in/out. I track all my food so I think I have a pretty good number for calories in, but really don't know how many calories I burn in a day. I've looked at all the sites and have some numbers written down of what my BMR, TDEE and such are supposed to be.

    My experience has been that if I eat more than 1200 calories a day consistently I don't lose weight. My BMR is supposed to be 1543. I use that as my high range for days when I just really feel hungry. My TDEE is supposedly 2354. That's a lot of food for me. Eating at that amount got me fat.

    Would a better fitness tracker give an accurate answer for calories burned? I'd love to know and would buy it for sure.
This discussion has been closed.