Fitness Trackers?
jennilsf
Posts: 57 Member
What is you favorite wearable fitness tracker, and why? Does anyone have one with a hr monitor built in? Mapping capability? Links to a scale?
Currently, I'm using separate devices to track food, read my HR, map the path I took, calculate calories and steps, and then weigh myself. I would like to get something that is more all-in-one for Christmas, and I need a new scale (would love one that links up!), but I'm wondering if I should I just wait for the Fitbit Charge HR or the Surge to come out. Something compatible with MFP would be awesome.
What do you use?
Currently, I'm using separate devices to track food, read my HR, map the path I took, calculate calories and steps, and then weigh myself. I would like to get something that is more all-in-one for Christmas, and I need a new scale (would love one that links up!), but I'm wondering if I should I just wait for the Fitbit Charge HR or the Surge to come out. Something compatible with MFP would be awesome.
What do you use?
0
Replies
-
I use a fitbit but don't sync it to MFP. I use my iPhone and Nike+ running to track my running mileage, pace, etc. I use MFP for exercise and food tracking. I really enjoy the fitbit flex but am definately thinking about upgrading to the Charge HR when it become available. Either that or I am thinking about getting a Garmin with wireless HR monitor. Not sure yet and in no rush to change what I am doing....0
-
Heart rate monitors are designed for steady state cardio....so they won't be built into current activity trackers. Polar Loops....you buy the activity tracker (separately) that connects to their HRM for cardio workouts.
I have a FitBit One that I use during the day, it tracks sleep. If your cardio workout is step based the calorie estimate for FitBit One isn't too bad. I wear a Polar Ft4 for non-step based cardio (every so often)....I can add calories in addition to my FitBit (if I want).
I'm not sure if the FitBit Charge HR would be worth it to me. Based upon HRM's limitations....I would wait for reviews.0 -
That's anothr question I have- some people don't sync theirs to MFP. Any reason?I use a fitbit but don't sync it to MFP. I use my iPhone and Nike+ running to track my running mileage, pace, etc. I use MFP for exercise and food tracking. I really enjoy the fitbit flex but am definately thinking about upgrading to the Charge HR when it become available. Either that or I am thinking about getting a Garmin with wireless HR monitor. Not sure yet and in no rush to change what I am doing....
What do you like about the Garmin HR, that it has the HR, or are there other functions you like?
0 -
When it comes to smart scales, check out my thoughts on those HERE. I'm a big fan of the Fitbit software, and their integration with MFP is some of the best. If that is the route you go, then one of their trackers would be ideal.
Since you mention a HRM and taking that data with you- the Fitbit Charge HR will be a great option when it comes out. Being that most people don't want a separate HR strap, the Charge HR will make it easier for most. But it does have its limitations, and will have to deal with the headaches you have using an optical monitor (chest straps are more robust, typically).
One of my favorite combinations would be the Garmin Vivosmart with a heart rate monitor. It offers some neat features (notifications, etc) and the battery lasts a solid week. My vivosmart review from some time ago is RIGHT HERE.
Hope this helps! - Ari0 -
Awesome, thanks Ari!0
-
That's anothr question I have- some people don't sync theirs to MFP. Any reason?I use a fitbit but don't sync it to MFP. I use my iPhone and Nike+ running to track my running mileage, pace, etc. I use MFP for exercise and food tracking. I really enjoy the fitbit flex but am definately thinking about upgrading to the Charge HR when it become available. Either that or I am thinking about getting a Garmin with wireless HR monitor. Not sure yet and in no rush to change what I am doing....
What do you like about the Garmin HR, that it has the HR, or are there other functions you like?
I have a Garmin 15 which is an activity tracker and a HRM. I like it because I can look at all the details of my exercise on Garmin Connect and it really gives some great feedback. The reason I don't link Garmin to MFP is there are too many variables unaccounted for in the C.O. portion of CICO to get an accurate number. (lifting weights,HIIT Cardio etc..) I use the TDEE method from IIFYM to set my macros---Hope this helps0 -
I have a watch with a heart rate monitor in it, I don't like it cause it doesn't work half the time. So I just bought a Garmin Vivofit with the heart rate band, I like the band a lot better works great when I'm on the bike, I have five zones to train in and the calorie count is more accurate. I sync everything to my tablet. The one thing I didn't like was, I have an Android and my operating version wasn't new enough to get the Garmin app. I needed a 4.3 or better version plus a 4.0 bluetooth. my phone is outdated and I couldn't even get a firm ware update, So I bought a tablet that had the operating platform I needed. So far I'm really liking this.0
-
Heart rate monitors are designed for steady state cardio....so they won't be built into current activity trackers.
HEart Rate Monitors are designed for Heart Rate Monitoring. As far as calorie approximation is concerned you're nearly correct. The algorithms for calorie estimation are at their most accurate when one is training in the aerobic zone with minimal HR transition.
It's not as monochrome as you're fond of making it.0 -
I would like to get something that is more all-in-one for Christmas
A couple of Garmin GPS tracking watches now have pedometer capability as well, I think Polar and Suunto make one that has the same.
Clearly they're all coming at it from the more complex technology perspective, so integrating a pedometer is a lot easier than adding a GPS to a pedometer.
Personally I don't see the point in a step counter, so I use a Garmin 310XT GPS with HRM.
Notwithstanding all of that I'd personally suggest looking at dcrainmaker.com for his reviews of what's out there.0 -
Look at the new Polar M400 and check out the review from dcrainmaker. A great device that does much more than just activity tracking.0
-
-
Ok, great! I'll check those out. Thinking the Fitbit Charge HR might be enough of my criteria to be ok. Going to look harder at the Garmin since that's come up several times here. I've been looking at some sites- one that uses a bar graph visual to compare, and some that are set up like consumer reports, but I worry about how much of those reviews are just sponsored by a brand which puts that particular one in the best light. Figured you guys would be a better gauge. Thanks so much, again, to everyone adding input.
This is a good point also- I have an Android and hadn't even considered compatibility there. But I have a newer version, so maybe it won't be an issue. I wish I was more tech-savvy! LOL I love gadgets, but theres so many variables and new stuff constantly coming out to keep in mind.Pedalforever wrote: »I have a watch with a heart rate monitor in it, I don't like it cause it doesn't work half the time. So I just bought a Garmin Vivofit with the heart rate band, I like the band a lot better works great when I'm on the bike, I have five zones to train in and the calorie count is more accurate. I sync everything to my tablet. The one thing I didn't like was, I have an Android and my operating version wasn't new enough to get the Garmin app. I needed a 4.3 or better version plus a 4.0 bluetooth. my phone is outdated and I couldn't even get a firm ware update, So I bought a tablet that had the operating platform I needed. So far I'm really liking this.
0 -
indianwin2001 wrote: »
Here is the comparison tool from dcrainmaker:
http://www.dcrainmaker.com/product-comparison-calculator?type=watch&ids=31280,37200#results
What really sets them apart for me is the navigation tool in the M400 (finding your way back home when running through wilderness); the custom workouts and interval modes in the M400 and the M400 has an altimeter, great for hiking.
Stef.0 -
I love my SHINE...doesn't do all that some do, but it does exactly what I need it to do....mainly motivate me to move more each and every day. I love that it's waterproof, doesn't need to be charged, and it is actually pretty...looks like fine jewelry.0
-
I just got a TomTom Cardio runner. It has Gps, HRM, pace count, and time. I like it. It was hard trying to find one that did GPS and HRM. I like it because it syncs with MapMyRun (which then sync to MFP for me). It's pretty pricey though
0 -
Ooh! That one sounds like something I'd like! Might be worth the spend.I just got a TomTom Cardio runner. It has Gps, HRM, pace count, and time. I like it. It was hard trying to find one that did GPS and HRM. I like it because it syncs with MapMyRun (which then sync to MFP for me). It's pretty pricey though 0 -
check out the Microsoft Band... I've been using one for a couple of weeks now. Heart rate, GPS, stepcount and wireless connectivity to your smart phone. Automatically uploads workout data to MFP. also tells you when you get a message, tells the weather and does all sorts of fun extras. all displayed on a touchscreen on the band itself. Batter life isn't great but I find that charging mine in the car on my way to work keeps it full and I don't miss anything.
Love it0 -
I'm waiting for the Jawbone Up3 out next month. It's the result of their BodyMedia acquisition, and will have BodyMedia sensors plus additional functionality. Apparently not all of the functionality will be operational out of the box, but more, like 24 hour heart rate monitoring, will be coming through firmware updates.
Be careful of wrist-worn heart rate monitoring which uses light pulse technology (like .the new Fitbits) .. If you have dark skin, or you aren't comfortable wearing the band tight enough to exclude ambient light, then it won't be remotely accurate.
The Up3 uses bioimpedence instead, which hopefully won't have the same problems. Also, it's waterproof up to 10 meters.0 -
I am also looking for a good fitness tracker. I would like to sync it with MFP. I am looking specifically for one that counts steps, monitors HR (to at least give me a good idea), and works to help me as I am in the gym to more accurately count my calories. I am seeing some great information. When does the new Fitbit Charge HR coming out?0
-
I am also looking for a good fitness tracker. I would like to sync it with MFP. I am looking specifically for one that counts steps, monitors HR (to at least give me a good idea), and works to help me as I am in the gym to more accurately count my calories. I am seeing some great information. When does the new Fitbit Charge HR coming out?
The Microsoft Band does all of those things and more. I couldn't be happier with it
0 -
I was very interested in the Microsoft band because it had so many sensors, especially the HR monitor which apparently can replace a chest band. Three things kept me away from it. It's not shower-proof, it has a very short battery life, and reviews unanimously criticized its comfort. Hopefully the manufacturers who have licensed Microsoft's band technology will make us some new versions to choose from.
For now my plan is to wait a few weeks for the Jawbone Up 3. Its sensor technology is very interesting. However, I am not holding my breath for them to release new features through software. It will be great if they do, but I have been burned by promises like that before. A gadget is only worth buying if it does what you need out of the box.0 -
Do these thing count calories as well as heart rate and whatever else they do?0
-
SnuggleSmacks wrote: »I'm waiting for the Jawbone Up3 out next month. It's the result of their BodyMedia acquisition, and will have BodyMedia sensors plus additional functionality. Apparently not all of the functionality will be operational out of the box, but more, like 24 hour heart rate monitoring, will be coming through firmware updates.
Be careful of wrist-worn heart rate monitoring which uses light pulse technology (like .the new Fitbits) .. If you have dark skin, or you aren't comfortable wearing the band tight enough to exclude ambient light, then it won't be remotely accurate.
The Up3 uses bioimpedence instead, which hopefully won't have the same problems. Also, it's waterproof up to 10 meters.
Nice- could be worn swimming?
0 -
SnuggleSmacks wrote: »I'm waiting for the Jawbone Up3 out next month. It's the result of their BodyMedia acquisition, and will have BodyMedia sensors plus additional functionality. Apparently not all of the functionality will be operational out of the box, but more, like 24 hour heart rate monitoring, will be coming through firmware updates.
Be careful of wrist-worn heart rate monitoring which uses light pulse technology (like .the new Fitbits) .. If you have dark skin, or you aren't comfortable wearing the band tight enough to exclude ambient light, then it won't be remotely accurate.
The Up3 uses bioimpedence instead, which hopefully won't have the same problems. Also, it's waterproof up to 10 meters.
Nice- could be worn swimming?
The Up3 is good up to 10 meters, so it can even be worn for some light diving.
0 -
donnysoule wrote: »I am also looking for a good fitness tracker. I would like to sync it with MFP. I am looking specifically for one that counts steps, monitors HR (to at least give me a good idea), and works to help me as I am in the gym to more accurately count my calories. I am seeing some great information. When does the new Fitbit Charge HR coming out?
The Microsoft Band does all of those things and more. I couldn't be happier with it
I've got the Microsoft Band, too. A fan so far
0 -
donnysoule wrote: »I am also looking for a good fitness tracker. I would like to sync it with MFP. I am looking specifically for one that counts steps, monitors HR (to at least give me a good idea), and works to help me as I am in the gym to more accurately count my calories. I am seeing some great information. When does the new Fitbit Charge HR coming out?
The Microsoft Band does all of those things and more. I couldn't be happier with it
I've got the Microsoft Band, too. A fan so far
How accurate are you finding the Band? Have you tried comparing the HR with an actual HRM?
0 -
I was reading about the Basis Peak and MS Band. I think the Peak samples your heart rate 34 times a second and the Band samples it 1 time a second in workout mode. Not sure on this, but for the 24 hour sampling, I think the Band only samples your hr for 9 minutes out of an hour unless you force it or are in workout mode.
Anyway, the blog I read that compared them both against a chest strap hr monitor showed both to lag behind for peak efforts, with the Band being so far off that it was worthless for that purpose. However, using it to adjust estimating your calorie burn is probably going to give you a more accurate picture.
Honestly though, these trackers are so you know how much food you can eat. Most of us are probably not so fine tuned that it really matters, even if these trackers were accurate. You'll serve yourself just as well assuming a baseline amount of calories used for your daily activity outside of working out and then add in your workouts on top of that. I mean, all these things do is poorly count your steps and no doubt even with adjustments from the hr monitor, you're still just guessing. That's even assuming you count your calories accurately for any of it to matter anyway.0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.4K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.2K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 426 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.7K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions