Is it bad to eat most of your calories at the end of the day?
yogsothoth
Posts: 7
I have a budget of 1550 calories. I usually don't eat anything in the morning, and for lunch at work I will normally have just a couple hundred calories between carrots, nuts, and nonfat yogurt.
I usually get home for dinner with the vast majority of my 1550 calories still remaining... So, I have a big dinner! Am I causing myself problems with this eating pattern?
My losses have been reasonable so far, by the way, but it has only been a couple of weeks.
Thanks for the input.
I usually get home for dinner with the vast majority of my 1550 calories still remaining... So, I have a big dinner! Am I causing myself problems with this eating pattern?
My losses have been reasonable so far, by the way, but it has only been a couple of weeks.
Thanks for the input.
0
Replies
-
I'm the same way. I eat a low-calorie frozen dinner for lunch at work (4 days a week). Then I usually have something healthy and homemade for dinner and eat snacks the rest of the evening. I'm actually having trouble, though, as I've found myself still needing to eat as many as 1000 calories after dinner (although I guess I could count some of that snacking as part of dinner). I find it easier to eat less at work, where I don't have a fridge full of food, and I'd rather eat snacks later than eat earlier and have to go to bed feeling hungry because I've eaten all my calories for the day.
In terms of weight loss, it shouldn't matter. Whether you eat 100-calorie nibbles from the moment you get up until the moment you go to bed, 1550 calories all at once, or 3 meals and a few snacks over the course of the day, the total number of calories consumed is what will determine whether you lose, maintain, or gain. However, I guess going without food for long periods could affect one's energy levels and mood. Also, hunger and late-night eating can drive people to eat calorie-dense foods that might not be the healthiest choices in other respects, so you'd have to be careful of that.0 -
If it's working for you and you're happy with it, it's not bad.
We all set our own goals and do our own thing in our own way.
The question isn't whether we are happy with it. The question is: Are you?
0 -
If it dosnt cause you to binge or negatiy impact your day, mood, productivity.... It is fine.0
-
It's not bad, as long as you are not suffering from it in some other way during the day (as others said). It's sort of like intermittent fasting, that some people prefer.0
-
As far as weight loss, there is no difference. But your lack of calories when you should be most active can make you feel tired and unmotivated.0
-
I do the same. I generally like to have no more than 450 calories for breakfast/lunch. Then 700-800 for dinner, and snacks in the evening if I can still afford it.
Works well for me.0 -
More than half of my daily calories are eaten at dinner, I have a small breakfast, small lunch and most of my snacks at night and it has done me no harm.0
-
I do this every day. I'll have around 600 - 800 during the day and another 2000 or so between about 8pm and midnight because i generally get home late from work and stay up later. I've lost somewhere around 175 pounds so far doing this.0
-
I eat 700 at lunch and 1500 before. Bed most days.0
-
Thanks, everyone! I'll just keep counting and not worry about the timing.0
-
It hasn't done me any harm. I'm only 2 pounds away from goal, and I am NOT hungry in the AM and eating breakfast only makes me ravenous for the rest of the day, so I go with my natural evening ways while counting calories and exercising. Do what's natural for you while staying within your calories and getting some exercise, and you should be fine.0
-
As far as weight loss, there is no difference. But your lack of calories when you should be most active can make you feel tired and unmotivated.
I feel the word "can" and "may" are ones you should refrain from using when giving someone an absolute answer. If you want to advise the op on the possible consequences that's fine, but don't say "you should do X,Y,Z because if you don't A,B,C "can/may" happen."
If you do you are advising an absolute action hinged on a possible, not absolute, consequence. It just makes you look less objective and because of that less reliable.0 -
ThePhoenixIsRising wrote: »As far as weight loss, there is no difference. But your lack of calories when you should be most active can make you feel tired and unmotivated.
I feel the word "can" and "may" are ones you should refrain from using when giving someone an absolute answer. If you want to advise the op on the possible consequences that's fine, but don't say "you should do X,Y,Z because if you don't A,B,C "can/may" happen."
If you do you are advising an absolute action hinged on a possible, not absolute, consequence. It just makes you look less objective and because of that less reliable.
This was supposed to go in the other thread you responded to.0 -
I find that I tend the most calories in the meal before I work out. Having a sedentary job, I tend to eat the most at dinner on weeknights and work out after. Similarly, on the weekends, I eat and exercise earlier in the day.
I try not to skip meals, but if I am not hungry, I will only have a small snack or glass of milk and save the calories for when I actually need them.0 -
ThePhoenixIsRising wrote: »As far as weight loss, there is no difference. But your lack of calories when you should be most active can make you feel tired and unmotivated.
I feel the word "can" and "may" are ones you should refrain from using when giving someone an absolute answer. If you want to advise the op on the possible consequences that's fine, but don't say "you should do X,Y,Z because if you don't A,B,C "can/may" happen."
If you do you are advising an absolute action hinged on a possible, not absolute, consequence. It just makes you look less objective and because of that less reliable.
Sorry, you lost me. Almost the entirety of medicine and physiology is based around probabilities of something happening. If you smoke 2 packs of cigarettes per day, it does not mean you will get lung cancer and not everyone who gets lung cancer was a smoker.
If you do not consume calories early in the day, it may lead to cellular energy issues. While we all think of this as muscle weakness, the majority of the early symptoms involve the brain and include difficulty concentrating, problems with memory, confusion and irritability. If you don´t eat breakfast, does that mean that these symptoms will occur? No, but it increases the likelihood. Does it mean it will happen every day? No, but it will happen more frequently than if you ate breakfast.
Telling people to eat breakfast to avoid some symptoms is the same as telling someone to quit smoking. There are no absolutes when it comes to physiology, but you are changing the odds of something bad happening. And with skipping breakfast, the symptoms are minor quality of life issues that most people would not even attribute to calories. A co-worker annoys you? You can´t remember where you left your car keys? You dont´feel like going for a walk at lunch? You have trouble concentrating during a business meeting? My belief is a lot of what people contribute to ´having a bad day´ can come back to nutrition.0 -
yogsothoth wrote: »I have a budget of 1550 calories. I usually don't eat anything in the morning, and for lunch at work I will normally have just a couple hundred calories between carrots, nuts, and nonfat yogurt.
I usually get home for dinner with the vast majority of my 1550 calories still remaining... So, I have a big dinner! Am I causing myself problems with this eating pattern?
My losses have been reasonable so far, by the way, but it has only been a couple of weeks.
Thanks for the input.
It seems to be working for you. Many do what you do. You have been given some good thoughts on your questions. No two people are alike for sure when it comes to dieting in all aspects. If you find you are having an health issues or lack of weight loss you mind look to see if your fat/protein levels are high enough.
0 -
Count me in (pardon the pun)! I was never a breakfast eater, and I rarely eat lunch-- I have some vegetables around 3 pm every day. I've been doing this for the past 11 months, and have lost 96 lbs. so far (30 more to go). It works for me; I've never felt better. I enjoy my dinner, and am able to make smarter food choices by concentrating on only one meal per day. If it works for you, great. If it doesn't, that's great, too. Each to his/her own!0
-
It makes not difference. So unless you need to calorie load (well carb load) for a tough workout it doesn't matter.
Depending on how reliant on carbs you are in your diet, will depend on whether you feel fatigued during the day or not.
If you are not feeling fatigued then keep doing what you're doing if it's working for you!0 -
It makes no difference when you eat the calories, so long as you're in a deficit.0
-
ThePhoenixIsRising wrote: »As far as weight loss, there is no difference. But your lack of calories when you should be most active can make you feel tired and unmotivated.
I feel the word "can" and "may" are ones you should refrain from using when giving someone an absolute answer. If you want to advise the op on the possible consequences that's fine, but don't say "you should do X,Y,Z because if you don't A,B,C "can/may" happen."
If you do you are advising an absolute action hinged on a possible, not absolute, consequence. It just makes you look less objective and because of that less reliable.
Sorry, you lost me. Almost the entirety of medicine and physiology is based around probabilities of something happening. If you smoke 2 packs of cigarettes per day, it does not mean you will get lung cancer and not everyone who gets lung cancer was a smoker.
If you do not consume calories early in the day, it may lead to cellular energy issues. While we all think of this as muscle weakness, the majority of the early symptoms involve the brain and include difficulty concentrating, problems with memory, confusion and irritability. If you don´t eat breakfast, does that mean that these symptoms will occur? No, but it increases the likelihood. Does it mean it will happen every day? No, but it will happen more frequently than if you ate breakfast.
Telling people to eat breakfast to avoid some symptoms is the same as telling someone to quit smoking. There are no absolutes when it comes to physiology, but you are changing the odds of something bad happening. And with skipping breakfast, the symptoms are minor quality of life issues that most people would not even attribute to calories. A co-worker annoys you? You can´t remember where you left your car keys? You dont´feel like going for a walk at lunch? You have trouble concentrating during a business meeting? My belief is a lot of what people contribute to ´having a bad day´ can come back to nutrition.
?
Isn't this why we produce ketones for energy?
If you are on a diet of medium to high carbs and you are reliant on the glucose to fuel your brain then the glucose drop will cause this (over a short term period).
If you regularly do not eat breakfast or your diet is low in carbs your body will be efficient in converting adipose tissue into ketones for energy and will 'part' fuel your brain along with glucose and lactate!
I think the best advise is if your body needs glucose in the morning and you are hungry then eat breakfast. If your body doesn't need glucose and your fueling primarily on ketones and you are not hungry - then skip breakfast, it makes no difference to your ability to function.
0 -
yogsothoth wrote: »I have a budget of 1550 calories. I usually don't eat anything in the morning, and for lunch at work I will normally have just a couple hundred calories between carrots, nuts, and nonfat yogurt.
I usually get home for dinner with the vast majority of my 1550 calories still remaining... So, I have a big dinner! Am I causing myself problems with this eating pattern?
My losses have been reasonable so far, by the way, but it has only been a couple of weeks.
Thanks for the input.
Find what works for you and stick with it.
0 -
ThePhoenixIsRising wrote: »As far as weight loss, there is no difference. But your lack of calories when you should be most active can make you feel tired and unmotivated.
I feel the word "can" and "may" are ones you should refrain from using when giving someone an absolute answer. If you want to advise the op on the possible consequences that's fine, but don't say "you should do X,Y,Z because if you don't A,B,C "can/may" happen."
If you do you are advising an absolute action hinged on a possible, not absolute, consequence. It just makes you look less objective and because of that less reliable.
Sorry, you lost me. Almost the entirety of medicine and physiology is based around probabilities of something happening. If you smoke 2 packs of cigarettes per day, it does not mean you will get lung cancer and not everyone who gets lung cancer was a smoker.
If you do not consume calories early in the day, it may lead to cellular energy issues. While we all think of this as muscle weakness, the majority of the early symptoms involve the brain and include difficulty concentrating, problems with memory, confusion and irritability. If you don´t eat breakfast, does that mean that these symptoms will occur? No, but it increases the likelihood. Does it mean it will happen every day? No, but it will happen more frequently than if you ate breakfast.
Telling people to eat breakfast to avoid some symptoms is the same as telling someone to quit smoking. There are no absolutes when it comes to physiology, but you are changing the odds of something bad happening. And with skipping breakfast, the symptoms are minor quality of life issues that most people would not even attribute to calories. A co-worker annoys you? You can´t remember where you left your car keys? You dont´feel like going for a walk at lunch? You have trouble concentrating during a business meeting? My belief is a lot of what people contribute to ´having a bad day´ can come back to nutrition.
What about the people who have switched to an IF lifestyle that note the quality of life issues are temporary, lasting only a few days to a week while their body adjusts to the new rhythm?
0 -
As a Type 2 diabetic, skipping meals throughout the day is very much discouraged. Before the onset of this problem, I would never eat breakfast and usually skipped lunch at work and I would consume far too many calories in one meal and/or graze all night until I went to bed. Try a non fat yogurt and/or toast or oatmeal for breakfast to get you going and to give you a boost in energy and mental sharpness. Bring some almonds and fruit with you for lunch and keep it lite so you don't get tired by a heavy lunch at work. Enjoy your meal at the end of the day and keep it balanced, portions controlled, and add lots of color and flavors. Grab a snack before retiring. for the fun of it. And always drink a lot of water and keep hydrated, especially if you are not eating during the day. And always enjoy your food.0
-
WilliamNeal2 wrote: »As a Type 2 diabetic, skipping meals throughout the day is very much discouraged. Before the onset of this problem, I would never eat breakfast and usually skipped lunch at work and I would consume far too many calories in one meal and/or graze all night until I went to bed. Try a non fat yogurt and/or toast or oatmeal for breakfast to get you going and to give you a boost in energy and mental sharpness. Bring some almonds and fruit with you for lunch and keep it lite so you don't get tired by a heavy lunch at work. Enjoy your meal at the end of the day and keep it balanced, portions controlled, and add lots of color and flavors. Grab a snack before retiring. for the fun of it. And always drink a lot of water and keep hydrated, especially if you are not eating during the day. And always enjoy your food.
Due to your diabetes meal timing is more important. However, your eating schedule was not the cause of your diabetes. Usually the causal factors that are pointed to for type 2 diabetes are over consumption of calories with a high ratio of carbs especially simple sugars, not eating food mainly at the end of the day while eating an appropriate amount of calories with a good balance of carbs, protein and fat.
In terms of weight loss, if the calories are the same when you eat is not important. If this eating pattern works for the OP to maintain compliance with the calorie goal, then sticking with this would be fine for weight loss, and weight loss would be beneficial for overall health.0 -
Bad? No. But studies have shown that you'll have more weight loss if you eat about half your calories for breakfast. (Big breakfast, medium lunch, small dinner.)
See the last half of this post for the studies:
http://www.myfitnesspal.com/blog/MKEgal/view/2014-06-10-some-studies-about-weight-loss-667818
I had never been a big breakfast person, but once I learned that, I started changing how I eat.
0 -
Thanks, everyone. I'll stick with my routine for now but if I hit a rough patch I might try introducing breakfast as some have suggested.
Under this routine, I actually find there are many nights when I come in well under my calorie goal. If I have 1000-1200 calories left in the evening, I may well get full well before I've eaten all that I am due. So I guess the next question is how few calories are TOO few calories... But I'll do some reading before I ask that question here.
0 -
yogsothoth wrote: »Thanks, everyone. I'll stick with my routine for now but if I hit a rough patch I might try introducing breakfast as some have suggested.
Under this routine, I actually find there are many nights when I come in well under my calorie goal. If I have 1000-1200 calories left in the evening, I may well get full well before I've eaten all that I am due. So I guess the next question is how few calories are TOO few calories... But I'll do some reading before I ask that question here.
Then eat more peanut butter and fat. It's pretty easy to eat 1000 calories in a sitting when you eat calorie-dense food. Eat a Mars Bar or two or something.0 -
I haven't had time to read the other replies yet. But for me personally. ... I usually have dinner at around 4:30, and no I'm not a pensioner
I just can't stand the thought of going to bed with a full gut of food. My other reason is to go without food longer til the next meal 0 -
The other reason to eat your bigger meals earlier in the day, as mentioned above... if you are hungry at 3am-6am, you will not know it. If you are hungry at 9am-11am, you will know it and will be more likely to eat.
TLDR - be hungry when you are sleeping, not awake.0 -
yogsothoth wrote: »I have a budget of 1550 calories. I usually don't eat anything in the morning, and for lunch at work I will normally have just a couple hundred calories between carrots, nuts, and nonfat yogurt.
I usually get home for dinner with the vast majority of my 1550 calories still remaining... So, I have a big dinner! Am I causing myself problems with this eating pattern?
My losses have been reasonable so far, by the way, but it has only been a couple of weeks.
Thanks for the input.
I have always eaten most of my calories in the evening. I can work out, work all day, and head into the evening having consumed only 200-400 calories and feeling just fine. Whatever you're most comfortable with. But if you're concerned, swap something out for a higher-calorie food.0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.4K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.2K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 426 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.7K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions