We are pleased to announce that as of March 4, 2025, an updated Rich Text Editor has been introduced in the MyFitnessPal Community. To learn more about the changes, please click here. We look forward to sharing this new feature with you!

Sugar - possibly the easiest thing to cut back on for weight loss!

1356739

Replies

  • Posts: 5,609 Member
    tigersword wrote: »
    How can you suggest that without knowing what anyone is eating? The problem here is you're very much overgeneralizing. Are you aware that the biggest macro increase in our food supply is actually fat over the last 100 years? According to USDA data, carbohydrate consumption has been basically flat (a few highs and lows, but we're actually eating a few grams less of total carbs today than we were in 1909,) while fat intake has increased by roughly 500 calories in that same time span.

    What does that mean? It means the average American is over consuming calories, but could also stand to cut back on fat, not just sugar. We eat too much food. To create a deficit, we need to eat less food. Period.

    Yep that's why I used the word possibly instead of definitely

  • Posts: 3,886 Member
    edited December 2014
    ana3067 wrote: »

    I used to eat like 3 pomegranates in a day (although I spit out the hard part of the seeds), so considering 1 pomegranate can be like 250+ grams when I spit out the seeds... damn I probably did over-eat by 500+ calories when I'd pig out on pomegranates lol.

    Moral of the story, if you cut down on calorie-dense foods you will have an easier time losing weight. Has nothing to do with sugar on its own!
    I could very happily eat 3 pomegranates a day. They're my favorites. The only reason I don't is that they're wicked expensive where I live.

    I think we agree on the main idea -- for lots of people, it's effective to pinpoint your areas of excess and reduce them. Or reduce everything, but that seems more daunting to me. There's nothing inherent about sugar that links it to weight gain/loss.

  • Posts: 7,041 Member

    The circle is now complete - you guys never disappoint - you have literally just made my evening. Muah x

    I promised myself an extra glass of red when you appeared! Cheers dude!

    You got the bingo this time.
  • Posts: 13 Member
    I'm all for cutting down on sugar and sugary foods. If you are having trouble in restricting the amount of sweet foods that you are having on a daily basis, and you find yourself self-sabotaging a lot, it may benefit you, as it did me.
    It's still early days on my lifestyle, but I found that having one week without sugary sweets have helped me put the sugar on the back burner and into a bit more perspective. I am still having sweets, but the time off has helped me to have only some of the sweets, not all of the sweets.
    I find that eating sugary foods in the morning (I'm talking to you, Cocoa Pops for breakfast!), then I am a walking belly, needing to feed like all. day. long. If I have a treat (usually a cupcake!) after a meal filled with steamed vegetables, I don't have the extreme sugar spike, and am fine for the rest of the day.
    I do recognise, though, that I have a tough time letting sweets live in my cupboards or fridge, instead of in my tum. To change things up for me, I am making a point of eating healthily, and while I am still having treats, I am trying to keep them confined to work, rather than bringing them into the house just now. This is part of all kinds of behaviour mods that are assisting me to re-build my relationship with food.
    For some people, avoiding processed sugary foods until they are a bit less reliant (*IF* they are reliant, and that part is based entirely on their life and lifestyle.) may be a good idea. I think that an objective look at feeding habits and their effects can benefit anyone, and perhaps it would help to look at it as a change that might help someone, and should be talked about openly, instead of just derailing a potentially important conversation.
  • Posts: 15,149 Member
    So do I - I like sugar. I'm just aware it provides nothing to me but energy.

    Also cut back this statement is not the same as eliminate or cut out - you do know that don't you?
    Nope, I'm too blonde.
    1k664z67uilh.gif
  • Posts: 5,609 Member
    Liftng4Lis wrote: »
    Nope, I'm too blonde.
    1k664z67uilh.gif

    I absolutely adore that film!

    And sorry - didn't mean to be mean (it was the extra glass of red)
  • This content has been removed.
  • Posts: 5,609 Member
    MrM27 wrote: »
    I hope everyone in this thread enjoys running around in circles and back peddling.

    Who's back pedaled?
  • Posts: 489 Member
    I did cut sugar - and fat - and portions and calories.... So no, sugar isn't the devil, but it does add to calories so I can see why cutting out as much as possible would be desirable if you want to lose weight.
    With that said, I still eat whatever I want - just in moderation. Moderation was what I needed to lose weight, not eliminating any food as evil.
  • Posts: 9,151 Member

    The circle is now complete - you guys never disappoint - you have literally just made my evening. Muah x

    I promised myself an extra glass of red when you appeared! Cheers dude!
    If you want to talk to these people so badly, just PM them instead of starting baiting threads in the hopes they will show up. Of course, that is if you/they haven't blocked each other.

    OT: If people want to cut back on sugar, go for it. It's not for me.
  • Posts: 5,609 Member
    zyxst wrote: »
    If you want to talk to these people so badly, just PM them instead of starting baiting threads in the hopes they will show up. Of course, that is if you/they haven't blocked each other.

    OT: If people want to cut back on sugar, go for it. It's not for me.

  • Posts: 5,609 Member
    Serious thread!

    Just certain people you always want at the party!
  • This content has been removed.
  • Posts: 5,609 Member
    MrM27 wrote: »

    Keep fishing.

    Caught 4, I think that's me for the evening! it's late this side of the pond!

    Have a good evening dude!

  • Posts: 865 Member
    lemurcat12 wrote: »

    That's subjective.

    It's ironic (or not) that the anti-sugar people seem to be the most obsessed with it. Wonder if there's something about making something forbidden fruit that makes it irresistible. Hmm, what a strange, unheard-of idea, don't know what the genesis of it might be.

    I see what you did there...! ;)
  • Posts: 5,575 Member

    I see what you did there...! ;)

    4zf56xqvzays.gif
  • This content has been removed.
  • Posts: 15,487 Member
    ana3067 wrote: »
    Actually, it's much easier to simply cut back on all foods and still eat everything you love. .

    I like to eat pretty good. But I do like a treat every now and then! If it was not meant to be eaten why cook it.. Like brownies, chocolate chip cookies, apple pie, chex mix!

    I have to have a delicious treat..

    I actually will have one and savor it so much than I did before.

  • Posts: 26,368 Member
    The problem with cutting sugar is... what happens when you reintroduce it? Will you be able to eat it in moderation? That's the main issue really...
  • Posts: 5,623 Member

    Yes but some calorie dense food provide more of your micro nutrients.

    No one is suggesting don't have a candy bar a day - but if two candy bars put you into a surplus, it's better to cut back one candy bar than to still have two and to cut your calories from food which provide minerals and vitamins needed for a healthy diet.

    except if I want to eat 2 chocolate bars, it doesn't put me into a surplus because I can either simply eat to maintenance or I can eat less of other foods. It's called eating to one's caloric goals. Because I eat everything in moderation, I don't bother tracking micronutrients. Chocolate provides both iron and calcium. Seems fine to me.
  • Posts: 5,623 Member

    So do I - I like sugar. I'm just aware it provides nothing to me but energy.

    Also cut back this statement is not the same as eliminate or cut out - you do know that don't you?

    Sugar provides energy and enjoyment. Just like all other foods. Ergo I do not discriminate between foods based on sugar content.

    baby-sinclair-too-much-sugar-o.gif
  • Posts: 5,623 Member
    AliceDark wrote: »
    I could very happily eat 3 pomegranates a day. They're my favorites. The only reason I don't is that they're wicked expensive where I live.

    I think we agree on the main idea -- for lots of people, it's effective to pinpoint your areas of excess and reduce them. Or reduce everything, but that seems more daunting to me. There's nothing inherent about sugar that links it to weight gain/loss.
    Pretty sure they are expensive here too, but it's like... do I want money, or do I want pomegranates??? Although they also give me canker sores :(

    Yep, reduce food intake to lose weight. You can reduce it however you like, although just because you reduce fat or reduce sugar or reduce carbs in general doesn't mean that it was that micro/macro that made you gain weight or made you lose weight.
  • Posts: 5,623 Member
    gia07 wrote: »

    I like to eat pretty good. But I do like a treat every now and then! If it was not meant to be eaten why cook it.. Like brownies, chocolate chip cookies, apple pie, chex mix!

    I have to have a delicious treat..

    I actually will have one and savor it so much than I did before.

    mmm I haven't made brownies in ages, partially because I've not found a good protein brownie recipe but also because being GF can make baking delicious chewy fudgy desserts a pain :(
  • Posts: 30,886 Member

    I see what you did there...! ;)

    Heh. >:)

  • Posts: 168 Member
    I lost 90lbs eating sugar. I easily have 90 more to go, I hit major plateaus and suffered from night time binge eating to a point where I had to save 600-700 for my late cravings which were painfully uncontrollable. I got frustrated and have moved in a different direction trying to put my body in ketosis. I put my macros at 5% carbs pretty much eliminating sugar. So far the weight loss is pretty impressive but that's mostly water right now, the bigger picture item is that the late night craving have completely gone away. Do I see doing this forever? Probably not but it is manageable and if it helps me reach my goals it's totally worth it. Keep in mind most of my daily carbs came from fruit and veg, brown rice, pasta not crappy stuff. The amount of carbs in a banana and two apples which I had daily would put me over 5% easily.
  • Posts: 7,574 Member
    ana3067 wrote: »

    mmm I haven't made brownies in ages, partially because I've not found a good protein brownie recipe but also because being GF can make baking delicious chewy fudgy desserts a pain :(

    Gluten free pantry (company) has an amazing brownie mix.
  • Posts: 193 Member
    edited December 2014
    ana3067 wrote: »

    mmm I haven't made brownies in ages, partially because I've not found a good protein brownie recipe but also because being GF can make baking delicious chewy fudgy desserts a pain :(

    We make delicious GF walnut brownies. Walnuts, sugar, chocolate, egg, a little vanilla, salt and leavening. Lots of omega-3. They're good for the kid to eat, but when I eat them, I eat fewer calories overall, so I haven't made them in forever.
  • Posts: 600 Member
    I use the 'babycakes' brownie recipe. marthastewart.com/316354/allergen-free-brownies
  • This content has been removed.
  • Posts: 3,498 Member
    I pretty much agree with the OP.

    Highly refined or processed foods which contain concentrated forms of sugar (particularly when combined with fat in equal ratios) are highly palatable (so easier to over consume) calorie dense but lack volume and satiety (so easier to exceed your TDEE) and usually nutrient sparse (making it easier to become nutrient deficient.)

    Shifting the focus of your eating to incorporate more whole food and less of them is a no brainer when it comes to dieting.

    A standard and easy piece of advice to new dieters is to reduce consumption of soda. That's not a coincidence.

    I am a little surprised at how controversial this subject seems to be.
This discussion has been closed.