We are pleased to announce that as of March 4, 2025, an updated Rich Text Editor has been introduced in the MyFitnessPal Community. To learn more about the changes, please click here. We look forward to sharing this new feature with you!
Map My Walk

Kgerber777
Posts: 105 Member
I was just wondering if anyone else uses this app? When I use this app I feel like it says I burned a lot more calories than if I had used my treadmill (to tell me the speed I walked) and then entered the info via MFP. Just wondering if I am the only one? it may also be the treadmill I use not displaying an accredit speed (it is older so not out of the question)?
0
Replies
-
I do when I walk outside in the Summer - I really liked it because I got to challenge myself to beat my own time. Plus, with the accuracy of GPS nowadays, I'd go with the app.
0 -
I find it easier to walk/run faster on the ground than on the treadmill. I don't exactly know why.0
-
It takes elevation change in to account. I find it to be pretty accurate. I've been using it almost 2 years.0
-
I use Runkeeper to map my walks and hikes.0
-
Elevation0
-
I've been tracking my calories burned using a pedometer for years, and then tried Map My Hike (or walk, whatever), and felt that it overestimated my calories burned by A LOT, like over twice as many. I don't sync the app with MFP, I enter my exercise separately, and almost always enter about 1/3 of the calories the Map My XXX calculates.0
-
thanks for the info0
-
I use Mapmyrun, and i think it's the same thing. I hardly run anyways, I always walk, and you can use it for both.
I like it overall but it's frustrating that I walk in a straight line, yet it shows I'm walking in a wavy or zigazag-type pattern, which I know adds more calories to it. It synchs my workout to MFP, but I usually delete it and reenter it with a lower speed. For example when I walk fast, it's about 4 mph, but it says I walked 5 mph, which I know is not true. So I enter the minutes and the speed I know is correct.
But overall I still use it because I don't know of any other that would be better.0 -
I do much the same - I do wonder if Map My Walk calculates on my weight/height and whether MFP does too.
-For example, I walked to work this morning 4.1km in 41 minutes (3.7 miles per hour)
The route is up and down hills and I am carrying a fair bit of weight
MMW says I burnt 437 calories - seems high
If I search MFP I find Walking brisk pace for 41 mins @ 3.5mph = 301 calories
I hope MMW is right!0 -
I use MapMyRun (or mapometer) .co.uk for a couple of years, mainly to get the distance rather than calorie burn as I find them a little on the high side. However I suppose they are as accurate as any other method of calculation! I work on 80-100 cals per mile for running and 60-70 cals per mile for walking, both depending on how much effort I feel I've put in, how much I've sweated etc.0
-
I use MapMyHike to track distance, but use a HRM to track calories burned. The app does overestimate calories burned by quite a bit, at least for me. This is true for walking/hiking and also for cycling.0
-
I also use it and have found that there is a big discrepancy between MMW and MFP. I hope that MMW is accurate (It will make me feel a lot better). Sometimes I adjust the calories burned, but for the most part, I just let it sync with MFP.0
-
I use MMW to calculate speed, time and distance. I let it sync with MFP, and the calories burned seem way to high. I take the info, (s, t ,d) and plug it in to get MFP calories burned and then delete the 'synced' amount from MMW0
-
Kgerber777 wrote: »I was just wondering if anyone else uses this app? When I use this app I feel like it says I burned a lot more calories than if I had used my treadmill (to tell me the speed I walked) and then entered the info via MFP. Just wondering if I am the only one? it may also be the treadmill I use not displaying an accredit speed (it is older so not out of the question)?
All the MapMyFitness apps are inaccurate. If you email them they will send you a complicated way to recalibrate it, but they obviously haven't done anything to correct it.
Get a pedometer instead for steps or use an activity tracker, although activity trackers are pretty optimistic about how much you burn as well. The technology is still not really there.0 -
I thought this to be the case at first too. I started wearing my HRM when I went on the walks and found out that they were pretty darn close! Only about 5 calories plus or minus for difference.0
-
I use my hrm.0
-
I use mapmyrun, I just override the calories before I finish my entry. I don't want to eat my calories, or have them looking at me as an option lol, tried that, didn't work for me. Anyway, I just put a flat 10 calories per half hour, just a silly number, but a number. I find it tracks pretty accurately, I've not noticed the zigzag thing.0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 391.6K Introduce Yourself
- 44K Getting Started
- 259.7K Health and Weight Loss
- 176.1K Food and Nutrition
- 47.3K Recipes
- 232.3K Fitness and Exercise
- 393 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 152.7K Motivation and Support
- 7.8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 4K MyFitnessPal Information
- 16 News and Announcements
- 1.2K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.3K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions