Bacon question

earlnabby
earlnabby Posts: 8,171 Member
edited November 2024 in Food and Nutrition
Are the calories given for bacon for cooked or raw? I ask this because the last couple of mornings I have had a breakfast of 2 slices of bacon and 3 oz of hashbrowns, cooked in some of the fat from the bacon. If the bacon calories are raw, I don't have to log extra fat in my diary because it is already in the bacon count. If it is cooked, I will need to add about 2 tsp of fat.

Replies

  • RodaRose
    RodaRose Posts: 9,562 Member
    Raw. You are right. You do not have to log the second time.
  • _runnerbean_
    _runnerbean_ Posts: 640 Member
    A lot of the liquid that comes out of the rasher when you cook it is water. I wouldn't add extra calories unless you added additional oil to the pan before cooking. Maybe check the pack of bacon against the MFP calories to compare.
  • dbmata
    dbmata Posts: 12,950 Member
    earlnabby wrote: »
    Are the calories given for bacon for cooked or raw? I ask this because the last couple of mornings I have had a breakfast of 2 slices of bacon and 3 oz of hashbrowns, cooked in some of the fat from the bacon. If the bacon calories are raw, I don't have to log extra fat in my diary because it is already in the bacon count. If it is cooked, I will need to add about 2 tsp of fat.

    Depends, if you are using the USDA entry, it is raw.
    Unless you're using the cooked entry.

    Then all the added ones? It's a crap shoot.
  • earlnabby
    earlnabby Posts: 8,171 Member
    dbmata wrote: »
    earlnabby wrote: »
    Are the calories given for bacon for cooked or raw? I ask this because the last couple of mornings I have had a breakfast of 2 slices of bacon and 3 oz of hashbrowns, cooked in some of the fat from the bacon. If the bacon calories are raw, I don't have to log extra fat in my diary because it is already in the bacon count. If it is cooked, I will need to add about 2 tsp of fat.

    Depends, if you are using the USDA entry, it is raw.
    Unless you're using the cooked entry.

    Then all the added ones? It's a crap shoot.

    I am using the info off the back of the package, which someone else entered into the MFP database since it is a larger (maybe even national) brand.

  • acheben
    acheben Posts: 476 Member
    On my package of Hormel Black Label Bacon, it shows 90cals for two slices of pan fried bacon.
  • dbmata
    dbmata Posts: 12,950 Member
    earlnabby wrote: »
    dbmata wrote: »
    earlnabby wrote: »
    Are the calories given for bacon for cooked or raw? I ask this because the last couple of mornings I have had a breakfast of 2 slices of bacon and 3 oz of hashbrowns, cooked in some of the fat from the bacon. If the bacon calories are raw, I don't have to log extra fat in my diary because it is already in the bacon count. If it is cooked, I will need to add about 2 tsp of fat.

    Depends, if you are using the USDA entry, it is raw.
    Unless you're using the cooked entry.

    Then all the added ones? It's a crap shoot.

    I am using the info off the back of the package, which someone else entered into the MFP database since it is a larger (maybe even national) brand.
    Then it depends on the label.

    I've seen some state raw, some state cooked. If cooked, the label will state cooked explicitly, otherwise assume it's raw.
  • williams969
    williams969 Posts: 2,528 Member
    Here's a great tip I got from a wise MFP'er if you like to use bacon grease for cooking:

    Use the "Pork - cured, bacon, raw" database entry (obviously you'll need to weigh raw). Now the bacon grease is automatically logged and you can save and use it "calorie free" for future cooking, as the calories are "pre-accounted".

    I mean, don't go nuts and save up a pint of it and eat it with a spoon (ha!). But feel free to then use your drippings for the rest of your meals for the next day or so--your calories are covered.
  • earlnabby
    earlnabby Posts: 8,171 Member
    edited January 2015
    Boo. I checked the package and it is 80 calories pan fried for 2 slices so I need to add in a little fat. Going forward, I will do the raw one even though the calories are more than double.
  • glevinso
    glevinso Posts: 1,895 Member
    All of the bacon packages I ever see say the calories are for "pan fried slices".
  • dbmata
    dbmata Posts: 12,950 Member
    glevinso wrote: »
    All of the bacon packages I ever see say the calories are for "pan fried slices".

    Good to know, I haven't bought packaged bacon since what, 2011?
  • pattyjoshockley
    pattyjoshockley Posts: 53 Member
    mmmmm BACON. I love to put two crumbled strips of bacon on my salad. It adds so much flavor and is so satisfying. I know it's high fat, but it is a regular part of my diet that works for me.
  • snowflake930
    snowflake930 Posts: 2,188 Member
    mmmmm BACON. I love to put two crumbled strips of bacon on my salad. It adds so much flavor and is so satisfying. I know it's high fat, but it is a regular part of my diet that works for me.

    ^^Well worth the calories, IMHO. Gave turkey bacon a try............once..........not enough of a saving to make the change. The real thing is so much better so I just make it fit into my daily calorie total.
  • glevinso
    glevinso Posts: 1,895 Member
    mmmmm BACON. I love to put two crumbled strips of bacon on my salad. It adds so much flavor and is so satisfying. I know it's high fat, but it is a regular part of my diet that works for me.

    ^^Well worth the calories, IMHO. Gave turkey bacon a try............once..........not enough of a saving to make the change. The real thing is so much better so I just make it fit into my daily calorie total.


    Eww. Turkey "bacon" is nothing of the sort. It really tastes bad. Chemically. Hard to describe. Just eat real bacon and enjoy it.
  • Bacon tends to be demonized, but if you are able to buy the nitrate-free kind then it's really not bad for you. I actually have a ceramic crock in my fridge that I keep all my bacon fat in so I can make refried beans with it, or add it to homemade gravy for flavor, etc. It's got a stainless steel mesh filter under the lid, so I just drain the pan right into it every time. I got it off of amazon. Highly recommend it!
  • dbmata
    dbmata Posts: 12,950 Member
    lamb neck bacon is pretty good, but you have to make it yourself.
  • runner475
    runner475 Posts: 1,236 Member
    edited January 2015
    CATCAT77 wrote: »
    turkey bacon is just plain nasty. like my grammy used to say make ya want to lick a cat's *kitten* to get the nasty taste out.

    Aww!!! why?! I love me some Turkey Bacon.

    **I buy it from local butcher @ farmer's market. **
  • spoonyspork
    spoonyspork Posts: 238 Member
    Found this thread trying to figure this out for myself... though this still doesn't really answer the question!

    The bacon I use is lower sodium and also claims 'lower' calories. The serving says 60 calories for 2 slices (weight which I can't recall atm) - pan fried. I weighed them raw after cutting them in half and one half slice weighed more than the serving size, so I weighed the whole package and divided it by how many servings it said it had and worked out to exactly two slices per serving according to the raw weight of the one... so I assumed the 'pan fried' part was correct.

    I then baked two slices. Weighed the finished product... half the weight of a serving size pan fried weight. So then are the serving sizes assuming pan-frying will take out a certain amount of fat? When I bake them I swear it seems more fat is retained (I just cook them in a flat pan and don't drain off the fat, and they're much more soft and chewy than pan fried), but it weighs less than what the box says a serving size weighs.

    So I still have no idea how many calories I actually get eating bacon this way, though I just put it in as one serving.

    Same vein: when making breakfast muffins, I cut one slice in half and line the muffin tin with it by making a 'cross' with the two half slices, then put in the egg and bake it. So NO fat is drained off: all of it ends up cooking into the egg -- so is that one slice of bacon more calories than advertised?

    Yes I know it sounds obsessive, but I'm just super curious about that, and don't want to be eating too *little* since I eat pretty close to the minimum most days (not worried about it being too much for the same reason -- just really really curious!)

    (also actually love turkey bacon, so long as it's not the pre-cooked stuff. Totally different from pig bacon but just as good IMHO. So I have two totally different kinds of bacon cravings)
  • earlnabby
    earlnabby Posts: 8,171 Member
    Found this thread trying to figure this out for myself... though this still doesn't really answer the question!

    The bacon I use is lower sodium and also claims 'lower' calories. The serving says 60 calories for 2 slices (weight which I can't recall atm) - pan fried. I weighed them raw after cutting them in half and one half slice weighed more than the serving size, so I weighed the whole package and divided it by how many servings it said it had and worked out to exactly two slices per serving according to the raw weight of the one... so I assumed the 'pan fried' part was correct.

    I then baked two slices. Weighed the finished product... half the weight of a serving size pan fried weight. So then are the serving sizes assuming pan-frying will take out a certain amount of fat? When I bake them I swear it seems more fat is retained (I just cook them in a flat pan and don't drain off the fat, and they're much more soft and chewy than pan fried), but it weighs less than what the box says a serving size weighs.

    So I still have no idea how many calories I actually get eating bacon this way, though I just put it in as one serving.

    Same vein: when making breakfast muffins, I cut one slice in half and line the muffin tin with it by making a 'cross' with the two half slices, then put in the egg and bake it. So NO fat is drained off: all of it ends up cooking into the egg -- so is that one slice of bacon more calories than advertised?

    Yes I know it sounds obsessive, but I'm just super curious about that, and don't want to be eating too *little* since I eat pretty close to the minimum most days (not worried about it being too much for the same reason -- just really really curious!)

    (also actually love turkey bacon, so long as it's not the pre-cooked stuff. Totally different from pig bacon but just as good IMHO. So I have two totally different kinds of bacon cravings)

    basically yes, when the serving says "pan fried" they are assuming a certain amount of fat and water is being cooked off. No, this will not be exact because different people like their bacon more crispy than others. The crispier it is, the fewer calories.

    If the entire slice is being used with no fat being drained off, look up the "raw" entry in the database and use that. It will be a little more than double the calories of the pan fried entry.

  • jasonmh630
    jasonmh630 Posts: 2,850 Member
    Mine always says pan fried on it... Plus, the entry for Wright bacon says pan fried too. But just to be safe, I usually add an entry for 1 tbsp of "Animal Fat - Bacon".
  • spoonyspork
    spoonyspork Posts: 238 Member
    ^right, that's what I assume too... except, when I bake it, it's not at all crispy, yet still weighs WAY less than the box says two pan fried slices should!

    I guess I could fry up two slices and find out. Darn: more bacon to eat! :D
  • earlnabby
    earlnabby Posts: 8,171 Member
    ^right, that's what I assume too... except, when I bake it, it's not at all crispy, yet still weighs WAY less than the box says two pan fried slices should!

    I guess I could fry up two slices and find out. Darn: more bacon to eat! :D

    I would weigh the bacon before cooking and look up the calories using the database. Look for "Pork - Cured, bacon, raw". There is an entry for 100 g which will let you calculate what you started with. Then weigh it after and see how much weight was lost.
  • Francl27
    Francl27 Posts: 26,371 Member
    Mine says pan fried too, which is a major PITA, so I just log the number of slices without weighing it, which I hate doing.
  • randomtai
    randomtai Posts: 9,003 Member
    dbmata wrote: »
    lamb neck bacon is pretty good, but you have to make it yourself.

    That sounds gross. :sick:
  • spoonyspork
    spoonyspork Posts: 238 Member
    Hrm... well in this case, it has lower sodium and is also a 'lean' cut of bacon, so I'd guess it has less calories raw to begin with? There doesn't seem to be an entry (checked usda) for 'lean' bacon though.

    (there IS a 'low sodium' one, which is 2g less in weight per slice and therefor slightly fewer calories raw)

    Going to have to read some more labels and see what different kinds list as weight for a serving of 'pan-fried' bacon, it seems!

  • dbmata
    dbmata Posts: 12,950 Member
    randomtai wrote: »
    dbmata wrote: »
    lamb neck bacon is pretty good, but you have to make it yourself.

    That sounds gross. :sick:

    No.
  • randomtai
    randomtai Posts: 9,003 Member
    dbmata wrote: »
    randomtai wrote: »
    dbmata wrote: »
    lamb neck bacon is pretty good, but you have to make it yourself.

    That sounds gross. :sick:

    No.

    Yes.
  • dbmata
    dbmata Posts: 12,950 Member
    Only if one does not like lamb, or cured meats.
This discussion has been closed.