Sugerlevels under in Fooddiary, over in Reports?

ErikWennerberg
ErikWennerberg Posts: 24 Member
edited November 11 in Getting Started
Hi Guys
Didnt really know where to write so it ended up here.

I was wondering why Im green and under my sugargoal in the diary but when I take reports Im over ?

Is it calculated diffrently, shouldnt it be the same?

As usual I thank you guys in advance.

Replies

  • queenliz99
    queenliz99 Posts: 15,317 Member
    There are some wonky things on here. Percentages and round numbers are hard to get equal
  • ErikWennerberg
    ErikWennerberg Posts: 24 Member
    But its huge diffrences lol. I in my diary on the 22:nd I had 66 as a goal and I ate 57, which leaves 9 in the green.

    In my Report the dayly goal is set as 45 and shows I eaten 58. This would mean I have eaten 13 more then I should instead of 9 less.

    Yeah thats sure wonky :)
  • CyberTone
    CyberTone Posts: 7,337 Member
    I am speculating here...
    The Reports chart on the Web version shows the line for your daily goal without exercise, most likely the 45 number.
    If you added Cardiovascular exercise for the 22nd, most of your nutrient goals in your Daily Food Diary (except sodium and, I think, cholesterol) will increase proportionately with the added calories you got from logging those exercises, hence the 66 number.
    The difference between the 57 versus 58 is the mathematical rounding of the equations used in the different sections of the Web program.
  • ErikWennerberg
    ErikWennerberg Posts: 24 Member
    CyberTone wrote: »
    I am speculating here...
    The Reports chart on the Web version shows the line for your daily goal without exercise, most likely the 45 number.
    If you added Cardiovascular exercise for the 22nd, most of your nutrient goals in your Daily Food Diary (except sodium and, I think, cholesterol) will increase proportionately with the added calories you got from logging those exercises, hence the 66 number.
    The difference between the 57 versus 58 is the mathematical rounding of the equations used in the different sections of the Web program.

    Im gonna go ahead and guess you did lots better then I did in school didnt you. Thanks. Seem logical. So then Ill just pick one to follow and I will be good. Thanks
  • CyberTone
    CyberTone Posts: 7,337 Member
    CyberTone wrote: »
    I am speculating here...
    The Reports chart on the Web version shows the line for your daily goal without exercise, most likely the 45 number.
    If you added Cardiovascular exercise for the 22nd, most of your nutrient goals in your Daily Food Diary (except sodium and, I think, cholesterol) will increase proportionately with the added calories you got from logging those exercises, hence the 66 number.
    The difference between the 57 versus 58 is the mathematical rounding of the equations used in the different sections of the Web program.

    Im gonna go ahead and guess you did lots better then I did in school didnt you. Thanks. Seem logical. So then Ill just pick one to follow and I will be good. Thanks

    Thanks.

    In your Food Diary, either go back to a day that you did not log any exercise, or look at tomorrow's goals. Those are the base numbers you should follow. After you add Cardiovascular exercise, notice that not just the Calorie goal increases, but most of the macro- and micronutrient goals also increase. Also note that when you run a Report, the goal line only shows your base goal (no exercise increases) for macros and micros.
This discussion has been closed.