1200 Calories

searsvls
searsvls Posts: 164 Member
edited November 12 in Health and Weight Loss
Does anyone else have a problem staying within this range? I even cut out wine! I am finding that I go over a couple of hundred calories (especially the past couple of nights). Just wondering...
«1

Replies

  • wkwebby
    wkwebby Posts: 807 Member
    Concentrate on getting your protein numbers instead of carbs. You'll find that you will be a lot less hungry and then will be able to make the 1200 calorie goal without too much issue.

    When I started out, I had this goal to get a 2lb/week loss. Now that I'm close to goal, I am at a calorie goal of 1600 (weight loss rate of 0.25lb/week). It was hard at first until I started upping my proteins to replace my carbs. The workouts also increased the calories for me allotted so that helped out loads.
  • Branstin
    Branstin Posts: 2,320 Member
    Why are you focusing on 1200 calories?
  • astrose00
    astrose00 Posts: 754 Member
    I eat 1200 calories and have no problems with going over that. I am very stingy with my calories. I'll have a half slice of cheese instead of a whole one. I eat egg whites and nonfat yogurt. I eat lean meats/fish. I never drink my calories. I eat a high protein diet with moderate fat. Carbs are usually only 30% of my diet. It's doable but you have to be diligent about it. I'm not suffering at all.
  • pinkteapot3
    pinkteapot3 Posts: 157 Member
    Most days I do 300 cals of exercise so eat 1,500 instead. One day a week I do 600 cals so get 1,800 and pizza for dinner. Keeps me going. :)

    Two days a week I don't exercise and do find 1,200 tough. For me it means no snacks at all. I have my usual diet of cereal for breakfast, a sandwich or soup and bread for lunch, and a healthy dinner (various). My meals come to about 1,200 so the 1,200 days mean no between-meal snacks or drinks other than water...
  • EWROBERTS25
    EWROBERTS25 Posts: 1 Member
    I'm not sure if 1200 is healthy for everyone, especially tall people. I am no nutritionist. However, I've been able to maintain 1200 really easily by spiralizing my vegetables for lunch and dinner. I've had spiralized pasta made of zucchini, broccoli, daikon radish, beets, sweet potato... The list goes on. I'm stuffed and usually have 300 calories left before the end of the day for a fun snack.
  • JM1481
    JM1481 Posts: 88 Member
    It's definitely doable, you just need to plan carefully. It takes a while to get used to. It helps a lot to make sure that you aren't only staying within your calories, but you are also meeting your nutritional requirements (that will keep you feeling more full.) That might mean a big change in what you normally eat.

    It's a learning curve for sure.
  • mscheftg
    mscheftg Posts: 485 Member
    Most people will tell you that 1200 calories is too low. In January, I had a goal of losing 10 pounds. I lost 13.5... now I'm not saying that this is typical. However, my caloric goal the first week was 1300 calories (I needed a jump start). Then I upped it to 1450 for 1.5-2 weeks. The last week, I went back down to 1300, but allowed myself to eat back my exercise calories. There were days that I wasn't hungry enough to eat all of my calories, so I didn't.

    If you are active, don't be afraid to eat more. My runner friends tell me that's the best part about running is that they actually get to eat!!
  • AmyRhubarb
    AmyRhubarb Posts: 6,890 Member
    The standard 1200 sucked for me, and wasn't sustainable. Like you have noticed, it generally leaves no wiggle room - no wine, no desserts, feeling guilty if you go out to dinner, holidays, vacations, etc. Ditch a glass of wine with dinner forever? No birthday cake ever? No thanks!

    Make sure you're eating back exercise cals (you'll still be in a deficit), or even better, reevaluate your settings. If you have less than 50lbs or so to lose, make sure your goal is no more than to lose 1 lb a week, or even half a pound. You'll get a higher calorie goal that is far easier to stick to, and you'll still lose - yeah, maybe a bit more slowly, but if it sticks isn't that better? Isn't the goal to keep it off? Weight loss isn't linear anyway - you may lose 2lbs some weeks, only 1/2 lb the next, but as long as you're making steady progress, it's all good.

    I had a 1200 calorie goal when I started. Upped it to 1400, then 1500, then 1600 - finally after stopping and restarting several times over, I did some more research and found that I do much better eating in between my BMR and my TDEE - so for the past three years+ my daily goal has been 2000 calories a day - I've reached goal weight and maintained the loss. I can still have a glass of wine with dinner if I want to, enjoy pizza and beer once in awhile, burgers, desserts, etc - it fits in my goals and my lifestyle, and I'm still keeping the weight off.

    Good luck!
  • peleroja
    peleroja Posts: 3,979 Member
    I lost all the weight I needed to on 1200 calories (and now maintain on about 1600), which wasn't even especially aggressive (only about a pound a week with a bit of exercise.)

    The trick to it, for me, was eliminating anything that wasn't fairly nutritionally dense. Lots of protein, enough fat, and as for carbs, pretty much just from vegetables and fruit (which are not calorie-dense but have lots of necessary micronutrients.) If I used 300 calories on a cookie I was inevitably starving later, but when I stuck to meat and vegetables with a decent proportion of fat, I was energetic and not hungry. It meant very little alcohol, very little starchy stuff, and almost nothing with added sugar, but it was effective for weight loss and I felt good. If you're the kind of person who craves chocolate or snacks, you might need to have a slightly higher goal (and slower weight loss or more exercise) in order to fit that into your day without being hungry, though, because 1200 calories is pretty tight and doesn't leave much room for stuff that just tastes good but isn't going to give you lasting energy or lots of vitamins and minerals.
  • jvt63
    jvt63 Posts: 89 Member
    I second Peleroja.
  • searsvls
    searsvls Posts: 164 Member
    Thanks for all of the responses. Y'all Rock!
  • The first week was very hard and I was starving. The second week I started exercising and it was easier. I think weight loss is very difficult and you will have to suffer until you reach your goal. After that it's maintenance and you can eat more. The sugar cravings were very strong the first week. The second was easier but I didn't stop sugar. I reduced my intake. Eating a small portion of my favorite candy for me kept me happy. Good luck!!
  • astrose00
    astrose00 Posts: 754 Member
    jvt63 wrote: »
    I second Peleroja.

    I second jvt63! lol
  • Shoechick5
    Shoechick5 Posts: 221 Member
    I refuse to do 1,200. It's too low to be sustainable for me and I'd rebel. I need to eat like a human and socialize. Plus seeing as this is long term and not a quick fix I won't be giving up my wine :) I stick to 1,450 and eat back my fitbit calories. Down 8.5 in January
  • segacs
    segacs Posts: 4,599 Member
    Step 1: Check if 1200 calories is really the right goal for you. What are your stats (height/weight/age/activity level?) How much weight are you trying to lose? It's very possible that 1200 is too low for you.

    Step 2: If you're 100% sure that 1200 calories is right for you (because you're small/light/short), then aim to have more lean protein and veggies, fewer empty carbs, and play with your days like jigsaw puzzles until you get the calories to fit. Experiment with fewer carbs and more healthy fats to feel fuller. And drink lots of water.
  • DirrtyH
    DirrtyH Posts: 664 Member
    I find even 1300 to be nearly impossible. I bumped my goal up to 1500 and then I don't worry about exercise calories. It's funny what a difference just 200 calories makes.
  • Jinxy23
    Jinxy23 Posts: 33 Member
    For me to lose a lbs a week due to working an office job, i would be on 1200 calories a day. However i just reduced the amount i wanted to loose, so i can still enjoy my food but shift that weight. (I'm currently 147 and 5ft 4in)
  • GoPerfectHealth
    GoPerfectHealth Posts: 254 Member
    Hi, have a 32 day streak on MFP and during that time I have typically stayed between 1200 and 1400 calories. 1200 is usually not enough for me. I am still trying to figure out how to spread out my food so I am not hungry.
  • searsvls
    searsvls Posts: 164 Member
    GoPerfectHealth, I agree with you. I think that I may aim for the 1400 range. It seems more practical for me. I am 5'9 and want to lose 2 lbs/wk. 1250 is what MFP is allowing me. I am cutting my exercise credits in half (I know-that topic seems like a permanent discussion on the threads). I may go back and aim for 1.5 pounds per week and see what it will allow me.
  • lcooper327
    lcooper327 Posts: 112 Member
    I think if you're 5'9" you can eat a lot more. You can also adjust your goals to a lb a week which will be more sustainable and a bit easier. Also, MFP recommendations are not the be all end all. You can definitely eat and track and make determinations based on the results.
  • segacs
    segacs Posts: 4,599 Member
    searsvls wrote: »
    I am 5'9 and want to lose 2 lbs/wk.

    Aha, we've identified the issue.

    Reset to 1lb/week. 2lbs/week is really only for very large people (usually men) with tons to lose.

    Think of it as a percentage of calories instead of an amount of calories. Your calorie goal should be at about a 20% deficit from the amount you burn each day. For most women, that's no more than 1lb/week unless your TDEE is higher than 2500 calories.
  • searsvls
    searsvls Posts: 164 Member
    Thanks for all of the advice. Because of y'all, I changed my goal to 1.5 and am now being given 1470 for the day. Sounds a lot better :)))
  • jvt63
    jvt63 Posts: 89 Member
    I'm 5'2" and less than 10 pounds from my goal weight. I'm also not lifting--yet. Want to lose more fat before I add muscle. So, 1200, most days, works for some of us shorties. That said, I worked out hard today and was hungrier than usual, so it's 1300 today. It's all about being flexible.
  • segacs
    segacs Posts: 4,599 Member
    jvt63 wrote: »
    I'm 5'2" and less than 10 pounds from my goal weight. I'm also not lifting--yet. Want to lose more fat before I add muscle. So, 1200, most days, works for some of us shorties. That said, I worked out hard today and was hungrier than usual, so it's 1300 today. It's all about being flexible.

    I'm not saying 1200 is wrong for all women. I'm saying that 2lbs/week is usually wrong for people. Unless their TDEE is really high (4000+), or unless they have a medical reason for needing to lose the weight very rapidly, it's usually too steep a deficit.

    If you're getting 1200 with a moderate goal -- and with 10 pounds to go until your goal weight, 0.5lbs/week is probably appropriate -- then go for it.

    Most people are impatient and want to see quick results. But the quicker you lose them, the more likely you are to regain them. Slow and steady wins.
  • mbender719
    mbender719 Posts: 17 Member
    I stay under 1200/cal a day, eating back some (but not all) of my exercise calories, and snacking throughout the day. I usually try to keep breakfast and lunch under 300 calories. My diary is open, add me if you want some meal planning ideas!
  • segacs
    segacs Posts: 4,599 Member
    searsvls wrote: »
    Thanks for all of the advice. Because of y'all, I changed my goal to 1.5 and am now being given 1470 for the day. Sounds a lot better :)))

    Woohoo. You might find 1lb/week to be even better for your goals. But start with this and see how you do.
  • julesxo
    julesxo Posts: 422 Member
    I eat around 1500 a day. A life without wine is not a life I want to live :wink:
  • MaryDrummer
    MaryDrummer Posts: 5 Member
    jvt63 wrote: »
    I'm 5'2" and less than 10 pounds from my goal weight. I'm also not lifting--yet. Want to lose more fat before I add muscle. So, 1200, most days, works for some of us shorties. That said, I worked out hard today and was hungrier than usual, so it's 1300 today. It's all about being flexible.

    You should be lifting anyway. You will build practically 0 muscle on 1,200 calories. To really build muscle, you need to be eating in a calorie surplus. Lifting weights on 1,200 calories will help you maintain the muscle you have and give you more definition when you lose the fat. All you are doing is removing the fat so you can see the muscle you already have!

    You've probably been losing fat at a lower rate without the strength training than you would have if you were doing strength training. Hit those weights asap lady! :smile:
  • segacs
    segacs Posts: 4,599 Member
    julesxo wrote: »
    I eat around 1500 a day. A life without wine is not a life I want to live :wink:

    ^ This. Ditto a life without chocolate. Or a life without beer. Or a life without ice cream.

    I eat 1325/day and fit all those things in on occasion... and chocolate almost every day.

    Then again, I'm 5'1" and relatively small, so 1325 is actually TDEE-20% for me. If I felt deprived or restricted, I'd eat more.
  • trina1049
    trina1049 Posts: 593 Member
    edited February 2015
    searsvls wrote: »
    GoPerfectHealth, I agree with you. I think that I may aim for the 1400 range. It seems more practical for me. I am 5'9 and want to lose 2 lbs/wk. 1250 is what MFP is allowing me. I am cutting my exercise credits in half (I know-that topic seems like a permanent discussion on the threads). I may go back and aim for 1.5 pounds per week and see what it will allow me.

    I'm 5'2.5," 65 years old and my calorie allowance is 1260 for a .5lb loss per week. At 5'9" you should eat way more than 1200 calories. Follow Segacs advice and reset for 1lb. per week. You must be starving. Eat back 1/2 to 2/3rds of your exercise calories. You have to nourish and fuel your body so that you can lose weight and maintain long term.

    Check out this web site for help in figuring out your BMR and TDEE; it may help you determining your calorie allowance. scoobysworkshop.com/calorie-calculator/http://
This discussion has been closed.