Calorie Counting 101

18911131427

Replies

  • vismal
    vismal Posts: 2,463 Member
    crocky64 wrote: »
    I have been using scales since starting on MFP and its best ting I have done I also weigh liquid on the scales as 1g = 1 ml. For example 250 ml of water will = 200g no mater what the density wasn't sure at first but checked on line and seems to work well. I also have high blood pressure so keep an eye on my salt intake also cook almost everything from scratch so I know what's in my food. Chemicals in commercial food a labeled with different names so you can't be sure what's what hidden sugars are prob the worst.
    Sugars really can't hide. They have to put how much sugar is in a product right on the label.

  • keeshmarie369
    keeshmarie369 Posts: 3
    edited January 2015
    very helpful ☺️
  • crocky64
    crocky64 Posts: 93 Member
    Meant that they use different names yes they do have to put sugars down on the label but it's also the hidden sugars that occur naturally in fruit n stuff it's only added sugars that need to be labeled. Big bedmate going on here in the uk regarding ladling on food as it still isn't as clear as it should be.
  • vismal
    vismal Posts: 2,463 Member
    crocky64 wrote: »
    Meant that they use different names yes they do have to put sugars down on the label but it's also the hidden sugars that occur naturally in fruit n stuff it's only added sugars that need to be labeled. Big bedmate going on here in the uk regarding ladling on food as it still isn't as clear as it should be.
    In America they must list the total grams of sugar (naturally occurring or added) under the section labeled sugar. Is that not true in the UK?
  • Loved this post!!!!
    Just made my life 6372826382 times easier!!!
    Thanks @vismal‌ :smile:
    I have to agree with @crocky64‌ - hidden sugars is a massive pain in the bum here in the UK at the moment - fighting a losing battle sometimes!
  • What about not eating enough calories? I rarely eat lunch because I work at a bank. It is difficult for me to get upto even 1100 in a day and that's with the help of milk (which I hate). I also work out every night and I'm afraid to log it.
  • vismal
    vismal Posts: 2,463 Member
    What about not eating enough calories? I rarely eat lunch because I work at a bank. It is difficult for me to get upto even 1100 in a day and that's with the help of milk (which I hate). I also work out every night and I'm afraid to log it.
    Nut butter. It's literally the only answer needed to not eating enough calories. They make regular, honey, chocolate, honey pretzel (I literally just ate some), there's almond butter, cashew butter, nutella, the list goes on and on. The stuff is 200 or so calories a serving and not exactly filling. In addition, avocados, eggs, whole nuts, and cheese are also pretty heavy on calories.

  • crocky64
    crocky64 Posts: 93 Member
    no just total sugars and the have many different names as well. eg alpen light bar apple and sultana only shows sugar in total under carbs one bar contains 7.7g sugar we dont know % of natural or added not happy i can tell you. Reading through the ingredients i have spotted five different names for sugars that's not including the natural sugars from fruit and fruit juice i'm astounded no i have read this. all this and only 86 cals a bar
  • crocky64
    crocky64 Posts: 93 Member
    here is a list of some of the name they use:
    sucrose fructose glucose dextrose galactose lactose maltose invert sugar raw sugar
    turbinado sugar brown sugar confectioner's sugar granulated sugar corn syrup
    high-fructose corn syrup honey maple syrup molasses. this list is not all but some of the ones you will see most often
  • vismal
    vismal Posts: 2,463 Member
    crocky64 wrote: »
    no just total sugars and the have many different names as well. eg alpen light bar apple and sultana only shows sugar in total under carbs one bar contains 7.7g sugar we dont know % of natural or added not happy i can tell you. Reading through the ingredients i have spotted five different names for sugars that's not including the natural sugars from fruit and fruit juice i'm astounded no i have read this. all this and only 86 cals a bar
    I don't see why it matters if they are added or natural sugar so long as you know how many total grams of sugar you are eating. Honestly, it really doesn't even matter how many total grams of sugar you are eating providing you know how many total grams of carbs you are eating.

  • crocky64
    crocky64 Posts: 93 Member
    True it's just a bug I got about refined sugars and how they add them rant over lol
  • I'm confused about my weight loss I'm 252 pounds and I'm 6"1 I plug in all my stuff and it says I should consume 2750 calories a day to lose 2lbs a week. Isn't that wayyy too high or is it so my metabolism needs that much to burn fat or something?
  • vismal
    vismal Posts: 2,463 Member
    fktahoe wrote: »
    I'm confused about my weight loss I'm 252 pounds and I'm 6"1 I plug in all my stuff and it says I should consume 2750 calories a day to lose 2lbs a week. Isn't that wayyy too high or is it so my metabolism needs that much to burn fat or something?
    At 6'1 250 you should lose weight at 2750 calories. I'm not sure about 2lbs a week, but it's certainly possible. I am 6'1 200 and I lose about 1 lb a week when I eat 2500. I tend not to worry too much about the MFP recommendations. If you use it, and you lose weight, that's fine. If you don't, simply reduce your calories a little bit.

  • This is a great topic and so helpful really. A lot of common sense but sometimes good to see it written down to help you stick to your plan :]
  • crocky64
    crocky64 Posts: 93 Member
    Popcorn mmmm so many different things you can do with it just to fill that gap yum yum
  • See I'm
    vismal wrote: »
    fktahoe wrote: »
    I'm confused about my weight loss I'm 252 pounds and I'm 6"1 I plug in all my stuff and it says I should consume 2750 calories a day to lose 2lbs a week. Isn't that wayyy too high or is it so my metabolism needs that much to burn fat or something?
    At 6'1 250 you should lose weight at 2750 calories. I'm not sure about 2lbs a week, but it's certainly possible. I am 6'1 200 and I lose about 1 lb a week when I eat 2500. I tend not to worry too much about the MFP recommendations. If you use it, and you lose weight, that's fine. If you don't, simply reduce your calories a little bit.


    I got you thank you vismal,I mean I was thinking just reducing it down to under 2000 my friend weighed 230 and now weights 205 said he eats healthyAnd only has 1200-1800 calories a day but it's it better to consume more calories, I cut yes for a living, lift Logs all day , climb up trees, I put that I'm not very active so it would make my calories lower. Is that good or bad? Anybody have any other ideas to lose some weight without having to pay a gym membership. Maybe lose weight without barely exercising after work?

  • I have been counting calories for four weeks - eating very healthy and continuing to exercise 4-5 days a week. I lost four pounds the first week and maintained only the last three weeks. Fitness pal and my Fitbit keep saying I'm not eating enough most days but I have a really hard time believing that. My stats are showing I'm eating about 1/2 the amount of calories I burn so even with room for error I'm not eating too much. This is a pattern for me and when I usually give up. Any advice?
  • vismal
    vismal Posts: 2,463 Member
    fktahoe wrote: »
    See I'm
    vismal wrote: »
    fktahoe wrote: »
    I'm confused about my weight loss I'm 252 pounds and I'm 6"1 I plug in all my stuff and it says I should consume 2750 calories a day to lose 2lbs a week. Isn't that wayyy too high or is it so my metabolism needs that much to burn fat or something?
    At 6'1 250 you should lose weight at 2750 calories. I'm not sure about 2lbs a week, but it's certainly possible. I am 6'1 200 and I lose about 1 lb a week when I eat 2500. I tend not to worry too much about the MFP recommendations. If you use it, and you lose weight, that's fine. If you don't, simply reduce your calories a little bit.


    I got you thank you vismal,I mean I was thinking just reducing it down to under 2000 my friend weighed 230 and now weights 205 said he eats healthyAnd only has 1200-1800 calories a day but it's it better to consume more calories, I cut yes for a living, lift Logs all day , climb up trees, I put that I'm not very active so it would make my calories lower. Is that good or bad? Anybody have any other ideas to lose some weight without having to pay a gym membership. Maybe lose weight without barely exercising after work?
    With your kind of job, you are basically getting physical exercise every day, so I wouldn't worry about doing tons of extra exercise. You can lose weight simply by tracking calories. Where you start your calories isn't of great importance. Just be consistent with your logging and then you can adjust the calories up and down based on your actual results.
    tkrejcarek wrote: »
    I have been counting calories for four weeks - eating very healthy and continuing to exercise 4-5 days a week. I lost four pounds the first week and maintained only the last three weeks. Fitness pal and my Fitbit keep saying I'm not eating enough most days but I have a really hard time believing that. My stats are showing I'm eating about 1/2 the amount of calories I burn so even with room for error I'm not eating too much. This is a pattern for me and when I usually give up. Any advice?
    How closely are you counting. Are you doing all the things from the guide, most importantly weighing food? Do you have cheat or free days? Also, it's very possible that it's just water weight fluctuations messing with your scale weight.
  • I am very happy with my fitness pal I count everything and look at labels before I eat. I am little confused about the calorie part of things. When I add in my exercise it gives u the extra calories that u can eat. I was told not to eat back your extra points from exercising ie 1200 per day walking 260 gives me 1460 calories to eat. I am under between 500-700 calories per day with exercise Am I doing this right. Lost 19lbs since jan 5th
  • vismal
    vismal Posts: 2,463 Member
    I am very happy with my fitness pal I count everything and look at labels before I eat. I am little confused about the calorie part of things. When I add in my exercise it gives u the extra calories that u can eat. I was told not to eat back your extra points from exercising ie 1200 per day walking 260 gives me 1460 calories to eat. I am under between 500-700 calories per day with exercise Am I doing this right. Lost 19lbs since jan 5th
    Judging by your weight loss, I'd say you're doing fine. I don't worry so much about the calories MFP recommends. I just pick a number, eat that many for a few weeks, and adjust the number based on my results.

  • Thank you just wanted to make sure I wasn't doing it the wrong way.
  • genie172
    genie172 Posts: 11 Member
    Oops, first mistake but worked in my favour. Just realised ive been adding300 ml of milk per day which I use for my cereal. Just read the label and the calorie count alreaddy includes the milk. Most of the time wheni went over y calories it cos ive added this.
  • ori519
    ori519 Posts: 8 Member
    Great, great post! Thank you for all the helpful tips!
  • carakirkey
    carakirkey Posts: 199 Member
    How do you change the recommended calorie intake MFP sets? Its put me at 1200 calories, but my fitness trainer has said thats way too low (puts body into starvation mode) and I should aim for 1400-1500 calories a day
  • vismal
    vismal Posts: 2,463 Member
    carakirkey wrote: »
    How do you change the recommended calorie intake MFP sets? Its put me at 1200 calories, but my fitness trainer has said thats way too low (puts body into starvation mode) and I should aim for 1400-1500 calories a day
    You can change them by using custom goal found under the goals setting. Also, I'd fire your trainer if they feel like eating 1200 calories would put you into "starvation mode". That is completely inaccurate. Starvation mode in that sense is a total myth and has no science whatsoever to support it. I would agree that eating 1200 calories is probably to low for most people for a variety of reasons, starvation mode however is not one of them.
  • 1motorpsycho
    1motorpsycho Posts: 13 Member
    I wish it was easier for folks who are not familiar with metrics. Ex, listing tablespoons, cups, etc as options for volume. I feel like I am guessing without clearer options that I actually use when I cook.
  • mbushnellWA
    mbushnellWA Posts: 11 Member
    I wish it was easier for folks who are not familiar with metrics. Ex, listing tablespoons, cups, etc as options for volume. I feel like I am guessing without clearer options that I actually use when I cook.

    The problem with tablespoons etc is that it's too easy to be inaccurate - the level measuring spoon becomes rounded, and a standard eating utensil may be grossly different than a true measuring spoon. There's plenty of non metric based choices in the food logs. If you need to use US measurements because metric is unfamiliar (and metric is great - all based on factors of 10s, rather than weirdness like 4 cups in a quart but 3 teaspoons in a tablespoon), just use an accurate measuring device.

  • Cgargo
    Cgargo Posts: 1 Member
    Great information!!
  • iuhoosiergirl25
    iuhoosiergirl25 Posts: 3 Member
    Weighing food...overestimating calories...tracking condiments. ..these are all things that have made me successful. Some may think its insane to be so controlling but for me if I make this my "job" then I'm always successful. Thanks for this post!
  • vismal
    vismal Posts: 2,463 Member
    I wish it was easier for folks who are not familiar with metrics. Ex, listing tablespoons, cups, etc as options for volume. I feel like I am guessing without clearer options that I actually use when I cook.
    Unless you are measuring liquids, you should be using a scale. You can weigh in grams or in ounces, just know that an ounce is 28 grams. That's really all you need to know. For measuring liquid, just use a measuring cup.