No s*x in the Fitness Room?

Options
1356

Replies

  • zaxx1953
    zaxx1953 Posts: 389 Member
    Options
    I can think of one position that would be insanely high in Cals burned, but i'm old, and unless the woman I am with is under 120lbs....I am not going to try it.


    Maybe like 110 and under....I am not that man anymore.

    Also, yes, 45 mins is way too long MOST times for it to be considered good sex. Just because I can't finish doesn't mean it's good.
  • breathebelievejen
    breathebelievejen Posts: 83 Member
    Options
    dougpconnell219 wrote: »
    breathebelievejen wrote: »
    I don't think about the calories burned but I've noticed it always gives my fitbit active minutes a big boost :smiley:

    I get a couple hundred steps, if I wear it on the proper arm.

    LMAO :wink:
    I keep my fitbit on my bra so unfortunately it doesn't even get to record all the action

  • gamesandgains
    gamesandgains Posts: 640 Member
    Options
    dougpconnell219 wrote: »
    Unfortunately, I have no spotter. :\

    Those feels, man. I know them.
  • Sabine_Stroehm
    Sabine_Stroehm Posts: 19,263 Member
    edited February 2015
    Options
    SEX as in the calorie burn? That's just built into my lifestyle. :)
  • Riffraft1960
    Riffraft1960 Posts: 1,984 Member
    Options
    what is this "sex" that you all speak of?
  • gamesandgains
    gamesandgains Posts: 640 Member
    Options
    Codilee87 wrote: »
    DopeItUp wrote: »
    90 seconds of lying on your back doesn't really qualify as a workout, sorry.

    Sounds like you have a real exciting nightlife - your girlfriend must be SO pleased

    LOL!!!

  • yopeeps025
    yopeeps025 Posts: 8,680 Member
    Options
    zaxx1953 wrote: »
    I can think of one position that would be insanely high in Cals burned, but i'm old, and unless the woman I am with is under 120lbs....I am not going to try it.


    Maybe like 110 and under....I am not that man anymore.

    Also, yes, 45 mins is way too long MOST times for it to be considered good sex. Just because I can't finish doesn't mean it's good.

    Get yo muscle up sir.
  • cdlee05
    cdlee05 Posts: 718 Member
    Options
    I swear I've seen people say it gets logged as "Walking the Dog". I dunno, try a HRM next time. My 2 minute intervals are usually not worth tracking.
  • obscuremusicreference
    obscuremusicreference Posts: 1,320 Member
    Options
    dougpconnell219 wrote: »
    Unfortunately, I have no spotter. :\

    1jiyw2bzjmry.jpg
  • Katiebear_81
    Katiebear_81 Posts: 719 Member
    Options
    dougpconnell219 wrote: »
    breathebelievejen wrote: »
    I don't think about the calories burned but I've noticed it always gives my fitbit active minutes a big boost :smiley:

    I get a couple hundred steps, if I wear it on the proper arm.


    AHAHAHAHAHA!!! This is awesome.
  • zaxx1953
    zaxx1953 Posts: 389 Member
    Options
    yopeeps025 wrote: »
    zaxx1953 wrote: »
    I can think of one position that would be insanely high in Cals burned, but i'm old, and unless the woman I am with is under 120lbs....I am not going to try it.


    Maybe like 110 and under....I am not that man anymore.

    Also, yes, 45 mins is way too long MOST times for it to be considered good sex. Just because I can't finish doesn't mean it's good.

    Get yo muscle up sir.

    With a raincoat, it isn't the muscle I would be worried staying up in that scenario tbh.

  • walkerssc
    walkerssc Posts: 3 Member
    Options
    sunglasses_and_ocean_waves wrote: »
    dougpconnell219 wrote: »
    Unfortunately, I have no spatter. :\

    I laughed so hard
  • dpwellman
    dpwellman Posts: 3,271 Member
    Options
    Is it primarily isometric or isotonic?
  • yopeeps025
    yopeeps025 Posts: 8,680 Member
    Options
    zaxx1953 wrote: »
    yopeeps025 wrote: »
    zaxx1953 wrote: »
    I can think of one position that would be insanely high in Cals burned, but i'm old, and unless the woman I am with is under 120lbs....I am not going to try it.


    Maybe like 110 and under....I am not that man anymore.

    Also, yes, 45 mins is way too long MOST times for it to be considered good sex. Just because I can't finish doesn't mean it's good.

    Get yo muscle up sir.

    With a raincoat, it isn't the muscle I would be worried staying up in that scenario tbh.

    Well unfortunately you got to use the raincoat sometimes. You don't want to get sick do you?
  • ew_david
    ew_david Posts: 3,473 Member
    Options
    I have not had sex in my fitness room. Should I give it a try?
  • Khukhullatus
    Khukhullatus Posts: 361 Member
    Options
    LucyAndKay wrote: »
    Sooooo, am I the only one who tried to search s*x in Cardio? :)))))
    I swear to God I am not sick in the head or desperate but... Still... It's a valid workout :)))

    I was reading about this in . . . I want to say men's health. Anyways, they basically said it wasn't a workout. Even if your sexual encounter is hours long, the part of it that is truly . . . a sort of pounding away, aerobic style activity is usually relatively short. At least, if you aren't skipping all the good stuff.
  • donnawtm
    donnawtm Posts: 35 Member
    Options


    Darkhawk1969 wrote: »
    well l know jizz is logged in the food section ;)

    This made me chuckle!
    And a little concerned, is it many calories?
  • Sabine_Stroehm
    Sabine_Stroehm Posts: 19,263 Member
    Options
    _dracarys_ wrote: »
    I have not had sex in my fitness room. Should I give it a try?

    Does it burn more calories if it's in a fitness room.
  • yesimpson
    yesimpson Posts: 1,372 Member
    Options
    Riffraft1960 wrote: »
    what is this "sex" that you all speak of?

    Hahaha I've been without for so long I can't remember whether I'd consider it worth logging or not. It's all a distant blurry memory...
  • dpwellman
    dpwellman Posts: 3,271 Member
    Options
    yesimpson wrote: »
    It's all a distant blurry memory...
    I think it still is. . .

Categories