The graph seems wrong!

maggleberrypie
maggleberrypie Posts: 29 Member
edited November 18 in Health and Weight Loss
Since the update, I can't seem to use the graph properly :-( I used to eat a slight deficit/exercise more and the graph would tell me how many calories under I am for the week (if I wanted a treat and to still lose weight I could work it into my weekly plan). However, I now find that if I don't exercise, the figure for calories under is very low but as soon as I insert some exercise (even if it's only 200 calories burned) then that figure shoots up to the thousands. It doesn't make sense! I don't know where I stand anymore.

Does anyone else have this problem?

I'm now having to take the figure given for calories for the week and use a separate calculator to work out minus my exercise.

E.g. It says I've eaten 9300 calories this week which is around 1328 calories a day. But I've also burned 2000+ calories in the week so that figure should either be lower or my calories under should be higher/at least consistent!

Replies

  • alexanderjrocks
    alexanderjrocks Posts: 4 Member
    Yeah it doesn't make any sense. All the other "new" graphs work ok. But the weekly average one isn't as good as the old one. IMO
  • Sued0nim
    Sued0nim Posts: 17,456 Member
    So they've broken the most useful feature

    Not updating ...ever
  • maggleberrypie
    maggleberrypie Posts: 29 Member
    rabbitjb wrote: »
    So they've broken the most useful feature

    Not updating ...ever
    alexanderjrocks wrote: »
    Yeah it doesn't make any sense. All the other "new" graphs work ok. But the weekly average one isn't as good as the old one. IMO

    Useless! I guess I'll have to keep tracking and re-calculating myself
  • weavingtheweb
    weavingtheweb Posts: 135 Member
    Are you checking the net calories tab, that one shows the correct numbers for me?
This discussion has been closed.

Categories