Activity trackers

bethanyplummerxo
bethanyplummerxo Posts: 10 Member
edited November 18 in Fitness and Exercise
im looking for a reasonably price fitness tracker. So far I'm stuck between the Jawbone UP or the Misfit Flash. Help?!

Replies

  • DaveAkeman
    DaveAkeman Posts: 296 Member
    I use a cell phone app. If you've got a smart phone, and keep it in your pocket most of the day, it works well. Regular old-school pedometers are very cheap, too.

    'Course, if you're looking for one of the newfangled thingers . . . my wife has a Fitbit Flex, and likes it a lot. I don't know if that's in the 'reasonably priced' category, though. I know there are cheaper Fitbits that you can clip onto your belt or put into your pocket. (I do really like the Fitbit site and account)
  • editorgrrl
    editorgrrl Posts: 7,060 Member
    im looking for a reasonably price fitness tracker. So far I'm stuck between the Jawbone UP or the Misfit Flash. Help?!

    I had a Jawbone UP24. Their customer service is horrible.

    I've never heard off the Misfit Flash. Does it sync with MFP? Fitbits do. You can learn more in the Fitbit group: http://community.myfitnesspal.com/en/group/1290-fitbit-users
  • 1triciakae
    1triciakae Posts: 41 Member
    I had the jawbone up24 and I broke out in a rash on the underside of my wrist. The buttons appear to be made of some type of metal. If you google it there are a lot of people that have had similar problems. Then mine broke after having it for 3 months.
    I now have a fitbit charge. It is a little pricier but I absolutely love it.
  • Cronniss
    Cronniss Posts: 108 Member
    im looking for a reasonably price fitness tracker. So far I'm stuck between the Jawbone UP or the Misfit Flash. Help?!

    What is it that you're looking for in a fitness tracker? What do you need it to track?

    Different fitness trackers specialize in tracking different points of data. Narrowing down what's most important to you, including how it's worn and how the data is presented, is important in deciding which tracker you pick.

    It had taken me a while, but I finally decided on the Polar A300 as it fulfills my particular needs. You mentioned "reasonably priced," so that is a consideration as well when deciding on trackers.

    I know that between the Jawbone Up & the Misfit Flash, you can find Ups prior to Up 3 on sale, and the Flash goes for about $50. If you're looking to go swimming, the Flash is water proof, the Up isn't (none of them are). Also, the Up requires recharging, whereas the Flash has a battery...so it doesn't need to be recharged at all. Plus, the Flash has a dot display that doubles as a watch display, while the Up communicates through either an app or vibration. In addition, the Flash can be worn on your: wrist, shoe, piece of clothing, etc.; while the Up is meant to be worn on your wrist only.

    Again, it depends on what you're looking for in fitness trackers. If you need anything more, just give a holler. ;)

    89019335.png
    (Quote from "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" by Douglas Adams.)
  • bethanyplummerxo
    bethanyplummerxo Posts: 10 Member
    Cronniss wrote: »
    im looking for a reasonably price fitness tracker. So far I'm stuck between the Jawbone UP or the Misfit Flash. Help?!

    What is it that you're looking for in a fitness tracker? What do you need it to track?

    Different fitness trackers specialize in tracking different points of data. Narrowing down what's most important to you, including how it's worn and how the data is presented, is important in deciding which tracker you pick.

    It had taken me a while, but I finally decided on the Polar A300 as it fulfills my particular needs. You mentioned "reasonably priced," so that is a consideration as well when deciding on trackers.

    I know that between the Jawbone Up & the Misfit Flash, you can find Ups prior to Up 3 on sale, and the Flash goes for about $50. If you're looking to go swimming, the Flash is water proof, the Up isn't (none of them are). Also, the Up requires recharging, whereas the Flash has a battery...so it doesn't need to be recharged at all. Plus, the Flash has a dot display that doubles as a watch display, while the Up communicates through either an app or vibration. In addition, the Flash can be worn on your: wrist, shoe, piece of clothing, etc.; while the Up is meant to be worn on your wrist only.

    Again, it depends on what you're looking for in fitness trackers. If you need anything more, just give a holler. ;)

    89019335.png
    (Quote from "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" by Douglas Adams.)

    I'm mostly just looking to track fitness and to make sure I'm getting the most out of my gym routine. Flash definitely sounds like it would be better for that kind of thing.
    I looked at some Polars and I prefer the job they do but I don't want something that chunky! I'd like to wear it all the time.

    Thanks :)
  • JamesScapes
    JamesScapes Posts: 14 Member
    For tracking mileage, pace and time running or biking, Strava is a great free app that is available for iPhone or Android. I use that in conjunction with Fitocracy for keeping a total record of my entire exercise regimen all together.
  • brianpperkins
    brianpperkins Posts: 6,124 Member
    Cronniss wrote: »
    im looking for a reasonably price fitness tracker. So far I'm stuck between the Jawbone UP or the Misfit Flash. Help?!

    What is it that you're looking for in a fitness tracker? What do you need it to track?

    Different fitness trackers specialize in tracking different points of data. Narrowing down what's most important to you, including how it's worn and how the data is presented, is important in deciding which tracker you pick.

    It had taken me a while, but I finally decided on the Polar A300 as it fulfills my particular needs. You mentioned "reasonably priced," so that is a consideration as well when deciding on trackers.

    I know that between the Jawbone Up & the Misfit Flash, you can find Ups prior to Up 3 on sale, and the Flash goes for about $50. If you're looking to go swimming, the Flash is water proof, the Up isn't (none of them are). Also, the Up requires recharging, whereas the Flash has a battery...so it doesn't need to be recharged at all. Plus, the Flash has a dot display that doubles as a watch display, while the Up communicates through either an app or vibration. In addition, the Flash can be worn on your: wrist, shoe, piece of clothing, etc.; while the Up is meant to be worn on your wrist only.

    Again, it depends on what you're looking for in fitness trackers. If you need anything more, just give a holler. ;)

    89019335.png
    (Quote from "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" by Douglas Adams.)

    I'm mostly just looking to track fitness and to make sure I'm getting the most out of my gym routine. Flash definitely sounds like it would be better for that kind of thing.
    I looked at some Polars and I prefer the job they do but I don't want something that chunky! I'd like to wear it all the time.

    Thanks :)

    So "chunky" is more of a discriminator than best suited to your activities?

    As for activities, exactly what do you do? It matters when deciding on an activity tracker. Some only count steps and are useless for anything else. Certain ones are better suited to cycling and/or swimming than others. None are accurate for lifting.
  • Vinwah26
    Vinwah26 Posts: 19 Member

    I have the Garmin Vivofit.
    It cost around $80aud but it is the baseline product of the fitness tracking bands.
    It is water resistant upto 50m apparently not game to try and test it's limits however in the shower is fine.
    You can get band packs to change the colours blue purple teal black grey red. You get a large and a small band in the box. A bluetooth USB connector for computers.
    It measures steps calories burnt distance goals time date and HR if you get the HRM strap which is sold in a bundle pack or separate.

    I recommend getting a more advanced one if you want other features.
    This doesn't have backlit display so you need a light on to see it. No alarm or vibrations.
    It has a red line indicator if you a stationary for 1hr and every 15 min after this a red dot apears untill you move again.

    I'm happy with my purchase i even bought one for the Missus too.
  • FitPhillygirl
    FitPhillygirl Posts: 7,124 Member
    I just received my Garmin Vivofit 2 with HRM yesterday for $130. So far I like it a lot. It Syncs automatically now after the update that was done when I first programmed it. It goes into sleep mode automatically too if I forget to press the button at night. The Vivofit 2 does have a backlight to see the display in the dark. It also has a lock on the band to hold it securely in place. I love that it is water proof and has a one year battery life because I never have to remove it like I did with my Fitbit. I got the black one, but the band can be changed with a different color. I used the HRS strap on my run yesterday and it matched what my Polar FT 7 listed as my calorie burn.
  • bethanyplummerxo
    bethanyplummerxo Posts: 10 Member
    Cronniss wrote: »
    im looking for a reasonably price fitness tracker. So far I'm stuck between the Jawbone UP or the Misfit Flash. Help?!

    What is it that you're looking for in a fitness tracker? What do you need it to track?

    Different fitness trackers specialize in tracking different points of data. Narrowing down what's most important to you, including how it's worn and how the data is presented, is important in deciding which tracker you pick.

    It had taken me a while, but I finally decided on the Polar A300 as it fulfills my particular needs. You mentioned "reasonably priced," so that is a consideration as well when deciding on trackers.

    I know that between the Jawbone Up & the Misfit Flash, you can find Ups prior to Up 3 on sale, and the Flash goes for about $50. If you're looking to go swimming, the Flash is water proof, the Up isn't (none of them are). Also, the Up requires recharging, whereas the Flash has a battery...so it doesn't need to be recharged at all. Plus, the Flash has a dot display that doubles as a watch display, while the Up communicates through either an app or vibration. In addition, the Flash can be worn on your: wrist, shoe, piece of clothing, etc.; while the Up is meant to be worn on your wrist only.

    Again, it depends on what you're looking for in fitness trackers. If you need anything more, just give a holler. ;)

    89019335.png
    (Quote from "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" by Douglas Adams.)

    I'm mostly just looking to track fitness and to make sure I'm getting the most out of my gym routine. Flash definitely sounds like it would be better for that kind of thing.
    I looked at some Polars and I prefer the job they do but I don't want something that chunky! I'd like to wear it all the time.

    Thanks :)

    So "chunky" is more of a discriminator than best suited to your activities?

    As for activities, exactly what do you do? It matters when deciding on an activity tracker. Some only count steps and are useless for anything else. Certain ones are better suited to cycling and/or swimming than others. None are accurate for lifting.

    I don't expect any to be accurate for lifting, so I probably wouldn't take it to the gym. I mostly jog and cycle.
  • brianpperkins
    brianpperkins Posts: 6,124 Member
    Cronniss wrote: »
    im looking for a reasonably price fitness tracker. So far I'm stuck between the Jawbone UP or the Misfit Flash. Help?!

    What is it that you're looking for in a fitness tracker? What do you need it to track?

    Different fitness trackers specialize in tracking different points of data. Narrowing down what's most important to you, including how it's worn and how the data is presented, is important in deciding which tracker you pick.

    It had taken me a while, but I finally decided on the Polar A300 as it fulfills my particular needs. You mentioned "reasonably priced," so that is a consideration as well when deciding on trackers.

    I know that between the Jawbone Up & the Misfit Flash, you can find Ups prior to Up 3 on sale, and the Flash goes for about $50. If you're looking to go swimming, the Flash is water proof, the Up isn't (none of them are). Also, the Up requires recharging, whereas the Flash has a battery...so it doesn't need to be recharged at all. Plus, the Flash has a dot display that doubles as a watch display, while the Up communicates through either an app or vibration. In addition, the Flash can be worn on your: wrist, shoe, piece of clothing, etc.; while the Up is meant to be worn on your wrist only.

    Again, it depends on what you're looking for in fitness trackers. If you need anything more, just give a holler. ;)

    89019335.png
    (Quote from "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" by Douglas Adams.)

    I'm mostly just looking to track fitness and to make sure I'm getting the most out of my gym routine. Flash definitely sounds like it would be better for that kind of thing.
    I looked at some Polars and I prefer the job they do but I don't want something that chunky! I'd like to wear it all the time.

    Thanks :)

    So "chunky" is more of a discriminator than best suited to your activities?

    As for activities, exactly what do you do? It matters when deciding on an activity tracker. Some only count steps and are useless for anything else. Certain ones are better suited to cycling and/or swimming than others. None are accurate for lifting.

    I don't expect any to be accurate for lifting, so I probably wouldn't take it to the gym. I mostly jog and cycle.

    For accuracy on a bike (outdoor) you'll need something with GPS for distance and possibly HR integration ... step based trackers simply aren't designed for that activity. If you're cycling indoors Wahoo makes a cadence tracker that you can hook to your shoe and it then communicates with their app on a phone ... higher end indoor cycles provide power data which provides more accurate caloric data than cadence/HR.

    For running, GPS works best for outdoor tracking. Some devices have the capability to calibrate their readings to distances run on a treadmill for better accuracy from indoor sessions.
  • rainbowbow
    rainbowbow Posts: 7,490 Member
    I have been looking into a bunch of them and i've settled on the Garmin vivosmart (mostly for aesthetic reasons).
  • Azexas
    Azexas Posts: 4,334 Member
    edited May 2015
    Cronniss wrote: »
    im looking for a reasonably price fitness tracker. So far I'm stuck between the Jawbone UP or the Misfit Flash. Help?!

    What is it that you're looking for in a fitness tracker? What do you need it to track?

    Different fitness trackers specialize in tracking different points of data. Narrowing down what's most important to you, including how it's worn and how the data is presented, is important in deciding which tracker you pick.

    It had taken me a while, but I finally decided on the Polar A300 as it fulfills my particular needs. You mentioned "reasonably priced," so that is a consideration as well when deciding on trackers.

    I know that between the Jawbone Up & the Misfit Flash, you can find Ups prior to Up 3 on sale, and the Flash goes for about $50. If you're looking to go swimming, the Flash is water proof, the Up isn't (none of them are). Also, the Up requires recharging, whereas the Flash has a battery...so it doesn't need to be recharged at all. Plus, the Flash has a dot display that doubles as a watch display, while the Up communicates through either an app or vibration. In addition, the Flash can be worn on your: wrist, shoe, piece of clothing, etc.; while the Up is meant to be worn on your wrist only.

    Again, it depends on what you're looking for in fitness trackers. If you need anything more, just give a holler. ;)

    89019335.png
    (Quote from "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" by Douglas Adams.)

    I'm mostly just looking to track fitness and to make sure I'm getting the most out of my gym routine. Flash definitely sounds like it would be better for that kind of thing.
    I looked at some Polars and I prefer the job they do but I don't want something that chunky! I'd like to wear it all the time.

    Thanks :)

    So "chunky" is more of a discriminator than best suited to your activities?

    As for activities, exactly what do you do? It matters when deciding on an activity tracker. Some only count steps and are useless for anything else. Certain ones are better suited to cycling and/or swimming than others. None are accurate for lifting.

    I don't expect any to be accurate for lifting, so I probably wouldn't take it to the gym. I mostly jog and cycle.

    You could go the fitness tracker route like the jawbone or fitbit route which you could wear 24/7 or the HRM route where you would wear it while your doing your cardio activity. I think the HRM would be more accurate than a fitness tracker for cycling. Your hands wouldn't be moving on the bike so I don't think the fitness band would pick it up.

    FWIW- I had a polar ft4 for a long time and I never noticed the chest strap under the clothes I was wearing.
  • rainbowbow
    rainbowbow Posts: 7,490 Member
    Troutsy wrote: »
    Cronniss wrote: »
    im looking for a reasonably price fitness tracker. So far I'm stuck between the Jawbone UP or the Misfit Flash. Help?!

    What is it that you're looking for in a fitness tracker? What do you need it to track?

    Different fitness trackers specialize in tracking different points of data. Narrowing down what's most important to you, including how it's worn and how the data is presented, is important in deciding which tracker you pick.

    It had taken me a while, but I finally decided on the Polar A300 as it fulfills my particular needs. You mentioned "reasonably priced," so that is a consideration as well when deciding on trackers.

    I know that between the Jawbone Up & the Misfit Flash, you can find Ups prior to Up 3 on sale, and the Flash goes for about $50. If you're looking to go swimming, the Flash is water proof, the Up isn't (none of them are). Also, the Up requires recharging, whereas the Flash has a battery...so it doesn't need to be recharged at all. Plus, the Flash has a dot display that doubles as a watch display, while the Up communicates through either an app or vibration. In addition, the Flash can be worn on your: wrist, shoe, piece of clothing, etc.; while the Up is meant to be worn on your wrist only.

    Again, it depends on what you're looking for in fitness trackers. If you need anything more, just give a holler. ;)

    89019335.png
    (Quote from "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" by Douglas Adams.)

    I'm mostly just looking to track fitness and to make sure I'm getting the most out of my gym routine. Flash definitely sounds like it would be better for that kind of thing.
    I looked at some Polars and I prefer the job they do but I don't want something that chunky! I'd like to wear it all the time.

    Thanks :)

    So "chunky" is more of a discriminator than best suited to your activities?

    As for activities, exactly what do you do? It matters when deciding on an activity tracker. Some only count steps and are useless for anything else. Certain ones are better suited to cycling and/or swimming than others. None are accurate for lifting.

    I don't expect any to be accurate for lifting, so I probably wouldn't take it to the gym. I mostly jog and cycle.

    You could go the fitness tracker route like the jawbone or fitbit route which you could wear 24/7 or the HRM route where you would wear it while your doing your cardio activity. I think the HRM would be more accurate than a fitness tracker for cycling. Your hands wouldn't be moving on the bike so I don't think the fitness band would pick it up.

    atleast for the garmin vivofit and vivosmart they have a seperate chest strap that can be worn that automatically connects with your bands.
  • brianpperkins
    brianpperkins Posts: 6,124 Member
    Troutsy wrote: »
    Cronniss wrote: »
    im looking for a reasonably price fitness tracker. So far I'm stuck between the Jawbone UP or the Misfit Flash. Help?!

    What is it that you're looking for in a fitness tracker? What do you need it to track?

    Different fitness trackers specialize in tracking different points of data. Narrowing down what's most important to you, including how it's worn and how the data is presented, is important in deciding which tracker you pick.

    It had taken me a while, but I finally decided on the Polar A300 as it fulfills my particular needs. You mentioned "reasonably priced," so that is a consideration as well when deciding on trackers.

    I know that between the Jawbone Up & the Misfit Flash, you can find Ups prior to Up 3 on sale, and the Flash goes for about $50. If you're looking to go swimming, the Flash is water proof, the Up isn't (none of them are). Also, the Up requires recharging, whereas the Flash has a battery...so it doesn't need to be recharged at all. Plus, the Flash has a dot display that doubles as a watch display, while the Up communicates through either an app or vibration. In addition, the Flash can be worn on your: wrist, shoe, piece of clothing, etc.; while the Up is meant to be worn on your wrist only.

    Again, it depends on what you're looking for in fitness trackers. If you need anything more, just give a holler. ;)

    89019335.png
    (Quote from "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" by Douglas Adams.)

    I'm mostly just looking to track fitness and to make sure I'm getting the most out of my gym routine. Flash definitely sounds like it would be better for that kind of thing.
    I looked at some Polars and I prefer the job they do but I don't want something that chunky! I'd like to wear it all the time.

    Thanks :)

    So "chunky" is more of a discriminator than best suited to your activities?

    As for activities, exactly what do you do? It matters when deciding on an activity tracker. Some only count steps and are useless for anything else. Certain ones are better suited to cycling and/or swimming than others. None are accurate for lifting.

    I don't expect any to be accurate for lifting, so I probably wouldn't take it to the gym. I mostly jog and cycle.

    You could go the fitness tracker route like the jawbone or fitbit route which you could wear 24/7 or the HRM route where you would wear it while your doing your cardio activity. I think the HRM would be more accurate than a fitness tracker for cycling. Your hands wouldn't be moving on the bike so I don't think the fitness band would pick it up.

    FWIW- I had a polar ft4 for a long time and I never noticed the chest strap under the clothes I was wearing.

    Even if the tracker detected the movement ... cycling is not taking steps so the data is incorrect. It comes down to picking the right device for the right activity. Step trackers track steps ... and not all steps are created equal ... running nets about twice as many calories per mile as walking.
  • editorgrrl
    editorgrrl Posts: 7,060 Member
    Troutsy wrote: »
    You could go the fitness tracker route like the jawbone or fitbit route which you could wear 24/7 or the HRM route where you would wear it while your doing your cardio activity. I think the HRM would be more accurate than a fitness tracker for cycling. Your hands wouldn't be moving on the bike so I don't think the fitness band would pick it up.

    Yes, you need to decide if you want an activity tracker (which you wear 24/7 to calculate your TDEE) or a heart rate monitor (HRM) which is only for steady cardio (like biking or jogging).

    Activity trackers like Fitbit track step-based activity. Non-step exercise (like swimming or biking) needs to be logged either in Fitbit (that's what I do) or in MFP. Exercise logged in MFP overwrites your Fitbit burn during that time.

    Only the Fitbit Surge (the most expensive model) can track biking: https://blog.fitbit.com/bike-tracking-now-available-on-fitbit-surge/
  • pinkraynedropjacki
    pinkraynedropjacki Posts: 3,027 Member
    Garmin Forerunner 15. Steps, GPS, HR,sleep, distance.......watch...... waterproof.
  • professionalHobbyist
    professionalHobbyist Posts: 1,316 Member
    Garmin Vivo Smart

    I like being able to read text messages and see who is calling me while I am working out to determine if I need to reply or let it wait
  • brianpperkins
    brianpperkins Posts: 6,124 Member
    And the confirmation bias of MFP continues with the typical "I have a (insert device here) and love it" type posts.
  • tiggerlove
    tiggerlove Posts: 225 Member
    you can get the H7 from polar and use it with the app Digifit or you get the A300 which is waterproof if you want to go swimming..it let you know if ur sitting to long and it tracks your sleep. The only downsize is the strap but it's easy to get use to.
  • TravelinGal7147
    TravelinGal7147 Posts: 50 Member
    im looking for a reasonably price fitness tracker. So far I'm stuck between the Jawbone UP or the Misfit Flash. Help?!
    Hi I have the MisfitShine and it is syncing nicely with MFP. I love it because it is waterproof and one of y big exercises is aquaaerobics. I wear it as a wristband and leave it on all of the time. It also measures sleep. For me because of water proof and because it is worn all of the time it is a better choice than fitbit which I often would forget to put on and it is not waterproof. The Shine is a little more costly than the Flash but for me was worth it.
  • editorgrrl
    editorgrrl Posts: 7,060 Member
    edited May 2015
    For me because of water proof and because it is worn all of the time it is a better choice than fitbit which I often would forget to put on and it is not waterproof.

    Fitbit makes several models, four of which are worn on the wrist. They're not waterproof, though: http://help.fitbit.com/articles/en_US/Help_article/Can-I-swim-or-shower-with-my-tracker

    I had a Jawbone UP24, but it died. It says it's "shower-resistant," so I wore it in the shower every day. Customer service said that means you could wear it in a brief shower at the gym once a week: https://jawbone.com/up/faq
  • boomhower1820
    boomhower1820 Posts: 86 Member
    I had an UP24 and it was OK. I particularly liked the sleep tracking. It lacked some features like HR tracking I wanted for my workouts. I supplemented it with a Polar H7 HRM but that was a failure. I currently use a vivosmart with HRM and absolutely love it. Only negative is it's sleep tracking isn't as good but it's positives far outweigh that negative.
  • 10inprogress
    10inprogress Posts: 89 Member
    im looking for a reasonably price fitness tracker. So far I'm stuck between the Jawbone UP or the Misfit Flash. Help?!
    Hi I have the MisfitShine and it is syncing nicely with MFP. I love it because it is waterproof and one of y big exercises is aquaaerobics. I wear it as a wristband and leave it on all of the time. It also measures sleep. For me because of water proof and because it is worn all of the time it is a better choice than fitbit which I often would forget to put on and it is not waterproof. The Shine is a little more costly than the Flash but for me was worth it.

    So much this. I had a Fitbit Zip which would constantly end up on my last pair of pants and consequently in the wash until it finally gave out. I've had zero cares with my Shine as it's proven to be durable, waterproof, and since its on my wrist I never have a chance to forget it. Plus the interface on the app is far better IMO. Any which way you go, good luck!
  • SezxyStef
    SezxyStef Posts: 15,267 Member
    I have the Jawbone...never got a rash but heard that the 24 and new 2 was giving folks a rash.

    I found their customer service wonderful.

    I like it...it tracker my daily movement and activity (active timer) and it tracks my sleep. No HRM but the new Up3 has one however it hasn't had great reviews...

    I have a Fitbit Zip as well and didn't find it accurate. I shovelled for 90 mins (not constant but pretty much) and it gave me 6 mins of "active" minutes....

    I like the app easy to use....

    It's not waterproof but I do wear it all the time except during bathing and swimming. Keep in mind the Up and Up24 has been discontinued so you can't buy them from Jawbone any longer only amazon or what is left in the stores.

    mine is black...goes with everything
  • zaddic
    zaddic Posts: 1 Member
    I have an Up Move. Connects to my cell phone, has a battery and I use the wrist band to track my sleep at night. Using the wrist band keeps me from leaving on my jeans and letting it go through the wash.
  • bethanyplummerxo
    bethanyplummerxo Posts: 10 Member
    Thanks so much for your advice everyone. Think I've settled on the idea of a Polar, just not sure which! I've read a lot of good reviews and been recommended the brand a couple of times.
  • jopapgh
    jopapgh Posts: 19 Member
    More money, but take a look at the Garmin VivoActive watch. It's a combination activity tracker (steps, sleep, phone notifications including texts) and a GPS watch.

    Slim profile, long battery life and uses GPS for running, biking and walking. Can be used in the water to track swimming.

    Also, tight integration with MFP.

    And yes, I do own one.
  • Cronniss
    Cronniss Posts: 108 Member
    edited June 2015
    Thanks so much for your advice everyone. Think I've settled on the idea of a Polar, just not sure which! I've read a lot of good reviews and been recommended the brand a couple of times.

    Then it comes down to what you'll be doing. Polar was what I had come down to choosing, myself, and went thru the process if picking out the one that suited me best.

    At first I was going to go with the Loop. It's their "basic" activity tracker. It'll count steps, calories burned, tell you when to move if sitting too long, track sleep, can use the H6/7 HRM, waterproof, works with MFP.

    I chose to go with the A300. As it is geared more towards swimming that the Loop is, which is something that I will be using. It also has a better display for your activity than the Loop. (Although the Loop looks sleeker.)

    The M400 is essentially the same thing as the A300, but with GPS. (Also, the M400 only comes in 2 colors, whereas with the A300 you can change out the band strap with one of 6 colors.) The M400 is also geared more towards running and cycling than the A300 is, while the A300 is more for swimming.

    Then there is the V800. This is advertised as being a "multisport training device for ambitious triathletes, runners and endurance athletes."

    Then there's the FT series. (Which I didn't look into.) For more information on their products, you can go to Polar's Products Page.

    Personally, I'm very happy with the A300 & H7 HRM strap. Both are very comfortable for me to wear, and neither bother me when I sleep. (Yes, I wear the H7 HRM when I sleep. I'm using it to see if I can find indications of nocturnal seizures. Usually I wake up during one, but not always. However, whenever I have one I can always feel my heart racing; or at least that's what it feels like. And already I can see that I'll be able to tell if I have a seizure, because the readouts show that my avg heart rate while sleeping is around 58 bpm. So a good, hard spike for an extended time will be an indicator that I had a seizure.)

    Anyway, I hope this info helps you. (Sorry for going off on a tangent. o:) )
This discussion has been closed.