It Makes No Sense! Please Explain!

SlenderClassyElegant wrote: »

I am so frustrated. Can somebody explain this: I'm still trying to figure out how you can lose weight with My Fitness Pal if every time you exercise, you are awarded the chance to consume more calories (it gives you more calories in your "Remaining" column.) All I do then is eat more calories because I think I am allowed to consume more. Obviously I'm missing something here.

Thats why i dont log exercise. Because it's not accurate and should be negligable while calorie counting

rabbitjb said it well, but just to give you another explanation, because it can be hard to grasp - Your basic intake is based on the activity level you entered when you set up your profile. That activity is just for your ordinary life at home and work, not counting exercise. The energy (calories) you need to fuel exercise is not counted in that basic number.

So if you're going to exercise, you need more fuel, so that your body has the energy it needs for everything you do. You "earn" more calories by doing exercise. That total number will still be at a level that will have you losing weight, according to the number of pounds per week you said you wanted to lose.

Based on your height, weight, gender and age, MFP determined an average calorie amount you need to maintain your current weight. Then you picked a weight loss goal for each week (.5 to 2 pounds). MFP then uses that goal to subtract the proper amount of calories (250 - 1000) from your maintenance calorie goal and determine your weight loss calorie goal. It takes 3500 calories to lose or gain 1 pound so if you divide that by 7 days, it's a 500 calorie per day deficit (to lose) or surplus (to gain) each pound.

For example: if your maintenance calorie goal is 2000 calories, and you tell MFP you want to lose 1 pound per week, MFP is going to give you a daily calorie goal of 1500 calories (2000 - 500 = 1500).

Not everyone can or wants to exercise, so MFP is set up so a person can lose weight without it. But you can so you run 3 miles and burn 300 calories. MFP then gives you back those 300 calories so that you maintain the 500 calorie daily deficit you need to lose 1 pound per week.

jemhh wrote: »

BMR = calories needed to keep you alive and doing nothing ("coma calories")
NEAT = non-exercise activity thermogenesis calories (calories it takes to live a normal life such as making dinner, washing dishes, opening mail,etc.)

Your MFP goal is equal to BMR + NEAT - the number of calories needed to create a deficit that gives you the weekly weight loss goal of your choosing.

That means that you can do absolutely no exercise and if you've filled out your MFP profile correctly, you'll lose weight.

It also means that if you do exercise, you can eat the exercise calories and still lose weight because the deficit is still in there.

So what's the difference between neat and tdee? Same thing right?

I always extremely underestimate my exercise calories, if I go for a run I put it in as a walk... HRM in Zumba class says I burned 500 calories I put it in as 300, and anytime I weight train I put it in as low moderate effort calisthenics, I'm still losing more than predicted so it's working for me.

rabbitjb wrote: »

ChuckeeCheezit wrote: »

SlenderClassyElegant wrote: »

I am so frustrated. Can somebody explain this: I'm still trying to figure out how you can lose weight with My Fitness Pal if every time you exercise, you are awarded the chance to consume more calories (it gives you more calories in your "Remaining" column.) All I do then is eat more calories because I think I am allowed to consume more. Obviously I'm missing something here.

Thats why i dont log exercise. Because it's not accurate and should be negligable while calorie counting

That's bollocks ...I eat 300-600 calories from exercise dependent on what I've burned (fitbit / HRM and self knowledge over time) lost over 50lbs and in maintenance

Ha that's ridiculous I burnt 800 cals at the gym on Sunday, via hrm I ate back half my cals giving me still a net total of only 1000 cals in that day!! Which is super low but I couldn't eat anymore, so yesterday no exercise and 200 over my allowance, which I'm OK with as had some to play with, I've lost 5lbs in 2 weeks doing this, exercise cals should be eaten

Kalikel wrote: »

Ask five people about this and you'll get five different answers.

If you don't lose when you eat extra from the exercise, then try eating maybe half of those back. Different people have different experiences, so you have to play around with it and see what works for you.

If I'm hungry, I eat more. If I'm not, I don't. I started that because I didn't want to have my life ruled by numbers, but I now try really hard to focus on what I'll do when I'm done losing weight. I don't plan to be weighing out raisins for the rest of my life, so I focus on eating when hungry more than "I must eat this percentage of the exercise calories."

But everyone has their own way and they're all the correct way.

I like this. Most reasonable, reassuring comment so far.