WAIT is my whole life a lie?!
neekmichelle922
Posts: 71 Member
i read here and people are agreeing with the fact that diet is everything and exersize doesn't factor/matter at all in weight loss!? I get that exercise is nothing without proper diet but it must count for somethingggg!
0
Replies
-
neekmichelle922 wrote: »i read here and people are agreeing with the fact that diet is everything and exersize doesn't factor/matter at all in weight loss!? I get that exercise is nothing without proper diet but it must count for somethingggg!
Of course it does. Diet is most important for weight loss, but exercise is important for fitness. It's also useful for creating more of a calorie deficit.0 -
You've misread.
Go read that whole thread again ... you'll see that most of us agree that exercise is part of the CO in CICO.0 -
-
neekmichelle922 wrote: »
It's a long thread, and there's a lot of arguing... just stay out. Suffice it to say that diet is how you lose weight, and exercise is one tool to use while you are doing that.
also, for more helpful information, read the first post in this thread: http://www.myfitnesspal.com/topics/show/1235566-so-you-re-new-here0 -
The only thing absolutely required for weight loss to occur is a calorie deficit, which can be accomplished with no exercise at all. So yes, technically exercise doesn't matter for weight loss.0
-
Eating less than you burn makes you lose weight. You don't have to exercise to eat less than you burn, ergo you don't NEED to exercise to lose weight. However, exercising means you burn more, so can eat more and still lose weight, plus exercise is good for fitness and health, beyond losing weight0
-
I exercise to create a larger deficit, so I can eat more.
But I lost the majority of my weight with zero exercise. I was less than sedentary0 -
christinev297 wrote: »I exercise to create a larger deficit, so I can eat more.
But I lost the majority of my weight with zero exercise. I was less than sedentary
Wait, you died?0 -
christinev297 wrote: »I exercise to create a larger deficit, so I can eat more.
But I lost the majority of my weight with zero exercise. I was less than sedentary
Wait, you died?
haha no! I was averaging 2000-2500 steps a day, on a good day!
0 -
Alatariel75 wrote: »Eating less than you burn makes you lose weight. You don't have to exercise to eat less than you burn, ergo you don't NEED to exercise to lose weight. However, exercising means you burn more, so can eat more and still lose weight, plus exercise is good for fitness and health, beyond losing weight
+1
0 -
christinev297 wrote: »christinev297 wrote: »I exercise to create a larger deficit, so I can eat more.
But I lost the majority of my weight with zero exercise. I was less than sedentary
Wait, you died?
haha no! I was averaging 2000-2500 steps a day, on a good day!
It was a joke, you said you were 'less than sedentary' which is impossible.0 -
christinev297 wrote: »christinev297 wrote: »I exercise to create a larger deficit, so I can eat more.
But I lost the majority of my weight with zero exercise. I was less than sedentary
Wait, you died?
haha no! I was averaging 2000-2500 steps a day, on a good day!
It was a joke, you said you were 'less than sedentary' which is impossible.
Yeah true. I'm just really ashamed at how little I moved.
0 -
This content has been removed.
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.8K Introduce Yourself
- 43.9K Getting Started
- 260.3K Health and Weight Loss
- 176K Food and Nutrition
- 47.5K Recipes
- 232.6K Fitness and Exercise
- 431 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.6K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153.1K Motivation and Support
- 8.1K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.4K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.8K MyFitnessPal Information
- 15 News and Announcements
- 1.2K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions