Do I REALLY need a HRM (Heart Rate Monitor)?????
amandavictoria80
Posts: 734 Member
I am really confused about whether I need a HRM or not.
I know for sure that when I am working out, I am definitely in my Fat Burning Zone with my heart rate because I tested with the heart rate monitor on my elliptical. Therefore, do I REALLY need one? How important is it to weight loose?
I always just assumed as long as I am sweating a lot during the workout and it is not too easy but is also not too hard, I should be in the perfect zone. Is this right?
The thing is, I need to know that a HRM is a very important factor in order to bring myself to spend $100 on one.
PLEASE HELP!!! THANKS!
***** BY THE WAY..............
I tried a SportLine HRM watch and it did not work out well. I had to stop during my workout to press a button for twenty seconds and nothing happened except it switched mode on me. I don't have any time to stop during my workout to get a heart rate.
Do other HRM's automatically get your heart rate? Or do you still need to press a button every once and while? I was looking at the 'Polar F6'.
I know for sure that when I am working out, I am definitely in my Fat Burning Zone with my heart rate because I tested with the heart rate monitor on my elliptical. Therefore, do I REALLY need one? How important is it to weight loose?
I always just assumed as long as I am sweating a lot during the workout and it is not too easy but is also not too hard, I should be in the perfect zone. Is this right?
The thing is, I need to know that a HRM is a very important factor in order to bring myself to spend $100 on one.
PLEASE HELP!!! THANKS!
***** BY THE WAY..............
I tried a SportLine HRM watch and it did not work out well. I had to stop during my workout to press a button for twenty seconds and nothing happened except it switched mode on me. I don't have any time to stop during my workout to get a heart rate.
Do other HRM's automatically get your heart rate? Or do you still need to press a button every once and while? I was looking at the 'Polar F6'.
0
Replies
-
I want to hear the answer to this. I want one to figure out how much I burn at zumba.0
-
At this point in time I will not get one and I'll tell you why. I don't want my exercise to be about burning calories. I want to focus on making my heart stronger, replacing lost muscle, increasing my stamina and moving in such a way as to feel great about myself.
I know myself, if I get a HRM it will become all about burning the calories and I will become obsessive about it (this coming from a woman who sadly weighs herself 5-10 times a day).
So I personally don't feel that I need one at this time. I reserve the right to change my mind... but for now, I honestly feel that getting one would cause more harm than good for ME.0 -
I can be sweating for 10 minutes, and have a heart rate of only 95-99 -- definitely NOT in the zone. Due to my HRM, I know I need to push it a little harder to get up to 110-115. The HRM definitely helps me optimize my workouts.
I have the Polar FT60 (cost about $180) and I just have to have the HRM in the heart rate display mode, instead of time display.0 -
I dunno... Some people swear by them, but I get by just fine without any sort of monitors. Just have count out your pulse while you're working out once or twice to see where it's at, and then remember how much that feels... Any calculations involving your heart rate depends on so many other factors as well that the exact BPM of your heart isn't really necessary.0
-
It realy depends. some people have great success with them. But I have been doing well just using the estimate that MFP provides. I think as you get closer to your goal it can help you really focus in on your calorie range, especially when the weight loss slows down.0
-
I don't know about the rest, but I seem to be getting by just fine without one. I can't justify spending 100 bucks on an ugly watch. They look complicated. Right now, I can go by what MFP tells me, and I haven't plateaued yet, so I'm cool with it.
I think when you start NEEDING to eat your exercise calories back, it would be an investment worth having.0 -
ME too!!0
-
Do you need one? Absolutely not. Like you said, you can get your perceived rate of exertion just by your breathes, your pulse, etc (I can't go by sweat because I sweat like a pig regardless of how hard I'm working out and its a false indicator).
Are they a "nice to have" if you are looking for a new gadget or a reward? Absolutely. I love my HRM because I know with a bit more certainty the calories I'm burning. I can't lie to myself about how hard I'm really working. I can bump up my HR doing intervals, etc. But then again, I'm a data nerd so I just really like it. Do I NEED it? Nope. In fact, I went for 4 months without when the battery died in my old one (after 5 years).
If you want to buy one, I say it's definitely worth it. If you are on a tight budget and don't feel you need one, I'd say forgo it for now.
FYI - do not go cheap with just the watch. You need to get one with a chest strap or it is worse than useless IMHO --- I like Polar brand - the F6 of F7F.0 -
I love love LOVE mine. Not because I obsess over calories burned, but because I feel like it helps me be more efficient about my workouts. I love knowing that I'm working as hard as is safe for me.
I have a Polar FT4 and I think it's fantastic. It cost me $71 on Amazon.0 -
Speaking as a complete gadget, technology, and numbers freak, I can tell you - NO, you definitely don't NEED one to succeed.0
-
I have New Balance N4 which I got at Target for around $60 - very user friendly and accurate - very happy with it. I had a Polar and returned it - it was defective right out of the box. Also with Polar, when the battery needs to be changed you need to ship it back to them to change it or you void your warranty0
-
It realy depends. some people have great success with them. But I have been doing well just using the estimate that MFP provides. I think as you get closer to your goal it can help you really focus in on your calorie range, especially when the weight loss slows down.0
-
Need is a sketchy concept. I finally bit the bullet and purchased one (Polar FT7 from Amazon.com at about $90 and waited it out for the free shipping). If you're using gym equipment that has monitoring and calorie burn tracking, then that's better than nothing. Gym machines are good for a close approximation for calorie burn and all that, but a heart monitor his better. The Polar FT7 (don't know about the 6) will constantly display your heart rate, calories burned, or elapsed work out time during a work out (and you can switch between the three during your work out). I usually let mine on heart rate for the work out itself, but then look at the cals burned at the end to put in here (the calorie burns this site gives you tend to be WAY more than your actual burn in my experience, like the eliptical trainer database option told me I was burning like 900 cals for 45 mins, where the hrm said it was only like 600, that's a HUGE difference). Depending on how close you have to be on eating back exercise cals (like I only have about 100 cals wiggle room between where I'm eating too little and I've eaten back all of the cals), depends on how accurate a read you need. I know I did okay using the gym equipment readouts (they're usually within about 50 cals of what my hrm tells me I burned), but I've started doing a lot of strength training, so the hrm helps my tracking a lot for that.0
-
I have one and honestly I don't like to workout without it. It tells you how hard you're working and if you need to push it. Tells you exactly what percentage of your calories you burned are from fat. It's a great tool that lets you know how you are doing. I highly recommend it. I suppose is a personal choice, but you won't regret it. Oh, by the way, you burn the more calories from fat when you do a combination of weight training and cardio!!0
-
No, I don't think its necessary. But.. it can be a great asset.0
-
At this point in time I will not get one and I'll tell you why. I don't my exercise to be about burning calories. I want to focus on making my heart stronger, replacing lost muscle, increasing my stamina and moving in such a way as to feel great about myself.
I know myself, if I get a HRM it will become all about burning the calories and I will become obsessive about it (this coming from a woman who sadly weighs herself 5-10 times a day).
So I personally don't feel that I need one at this time. I reserve the right to change my mind... but for now, I honestly feel that getting one would cause more harm than good for ME.
While I agree that working out should be about overall fitness, not just calories and weight I think you should reconsider using a HRM if you want to see how your heart is doing.
I use one to see my recovery times and I love to see how stronger it's gotten over the past few months.
The HRM does a great job of telling me if I'm working my heart at max capacity, when to slow down, when to speed up, and how long it goes back to normal after an intense workout. I don't really care about calories either, but my workouts allow me to burn between 800-1400 per 45 minutes, so I can't complain. But I went from having a resting heart rate of 110 (working hard just to lay in bed) to 53 (athletic level).
I say it's an amazing investment if you are looking into overall fitness. I love science and technology. So far I've found the right exercise program (Crossfit) for me, and with the right tools (Google Calendar, HRM with chest strap, OMRON Fat Loss Monitor) it's easier for me to log what I'm doing and better predict my results. It takes the guessing out it when you monitor your work better.
And it's nice to see the accurate calorie count at the end as well.0 -
Personally, I LOVE mine. I have a sportline one actually, but its one with a chest strap, it is much more accurate and no pushing buttons or anything.
The only reason I could really see as to why you *should* have one is if you are looking to burn X amount of calories a day. It is the most accurate way to tell how many you have burned. Now if you really dont care how many calories you are burning, then you definitely do not need one.
It has helped me better log my calories burned, before my HRM, 30 mins on my elliptical machine, the display would tell me I burned around 500 calories. So I was logging that as my calories burned and eating back some of those calories. Once I tested it out with my HRM, doing the same intensity for 30mins on the elliptical I actually only burned about 270.0 -
I absolutely LOVE, LOVE, LOVE my Polar. It gives me a much more accurate reading on my calorie burn which is so helpful when putting in my MFP stats. It motivates me when I start getting tired during a workout too. I'm an instructor and I wear it every day. Love it.0
-
You don't need one, but they sure do come in handy, especially if hard earned calories for eating back are desired. I don't need push up stands to do push ups, but I got some. I didn't need a power tower to do pullups, but I got one. I don't need a weighted vest, but I sure as hell WANT one. I think you can succeed without an HRM, but I think you can have better results with an HRM, especially if you are overestimating calorie burns via MFP or a machine.
My two cents...0 -
Something else to keep in mind I read on Web MD... "Some medications (such as beta-blockers) can affect your heart rate during exercise. An exerciser taking beta-blockers may be working at a high intensity but might never reach her target heart rate. Therefore, people on medications that affect heart rate should not measure workout intensity by counting their heart rate."
It was a real eye opener for me, since I am on Beta Blockers, and always wondered why my heart rate would not get up there.0 -
Okay, I've lost 45 lbs since mid to late Dec without one. BUT, I really want one and think that it would be very very handy. You will know exactly what you can eat and exactly how much you've burned and what workouts are better and so on and so on....... I am trying to talk myself into splurging on one. I'd suggest it if you can afford it and want one. If not, just work your body hard. You do know your body better than anyone, so you know if you got a good workout. Like right now, sweat is pouring from my body because Jillian Michaels is a sadistic maniac. lol!!! Good luck0
-
You don't need one, but a HRM with a chest strap is more accurate than the one on most gym equipment or the calories burned value on MFP. I got one because there are workouts I do that aren't included on MFP and I wanted to make sure I was being accurate with my exercise.
I use a Polar FT4 which comes with a chest strap.0 -
At this point in time I will not get one and I'll tell you why. I don't my exercise to be about burning calories. I want to focus on making my heart stronger, replacing lost muscle, increasing my stamina and moving in such a way as to feel great about myself.
I know myself, if I get a HRM it will become all about burning the calories and I will become obsessive about it (this coming from a woman who sadly weighs herself 5-10 times a day).
So I personally don't feel that I need one at this time. I reserve the right to change my mind... but for now, I honestly feel that getting one would cause more harm than good for ME.
While I agree that working out should be about overall fitness, not just calories and weight I think you should reconsider using a HRM if you want to see how your heart is doing.
I use one to see my recovery times and I love to see how stronger it's gotten over the past few months.
The HRM does a great job of telling me if I'm working my heart at max capacity, when to slow down, when to speed up, and how long it goes back to normal after an intense workout. I don't really care about calories either, but my workouts allow me to burn between 800-1400 per 45 minutes, so I can't complain. But I went from having a resting heart rate of 110 (working hard just to lay in bed) to 53 (athletic level).
I say it's an amazing investment if you are looking into overall fitness. I love science and technology. So far I've found the right exercise program (Crossfit) for me, and with the right tools (Google Calendar, HRM with chest strap, OMRON Fat Loss Monitor) it's easier for me to log what I'm doing and better predict my results. It takes the guessing out it when you monitor your work better.
And it's nice to see the accurate calorie count at the end as well.
This is a very good point too! I have recently started running in intervals, and it is a necessity for me to be able to monitor my actual heart rate, so I spend the correct amount of time in the different zones0 -
I say push yourself each and every time you workout, then you don't need a watch to tell you how hard you're working ^_^0
-
For me, I really love having one. I just got it yesterday (Polar FT7) and have worked out a couple times to see what it reads. It gives me peace of mind. I know the theory about eating back your exercise calories...but was always reluctant to do so because I did not know what I was really burning. Now, I am more confident to do so.0
-
I bought a Polar FT4 for about $78 on Amazon, and I absolutely love it. MFP's estimates are off by over 100 calories in comparison, especially when I enter things like Zumba or a combination of cardio and weights. No, you don't absolutely need one, but I really recommend one (and one with a chest strap, or there's no point). I don't check the calories during my workout, but I love how it tells me when I'm in the fatburning zone. I discovered that when I'm really pushing myself on the elliptical, my heart rate is too high, so there's no reason to make myself feel so miserable. And I find that I work out longer this way. Instead of just leaving the gym, I'll do a few more things, just for the reward of seeing my calories burned at the end.0
-
No you do not need one. There are a nice to have. Also I think the whole concept of using one to stay in the supposed "fat burning zone" is wrong headed. It's fine to work at a low intensity, the supposed fat burning zone is very low intensity, if you are just starting an exercise program but keep in mind it is not the best way to workout but rather training wheels for starters.
After you have reached a basic level of fitness, your goal should always be geared towards performance and pushing yourself. I am not suggesting everyone should workout like an professional athlete but you should be pushing your personal level.
Also keep in mind that once you do reach a good level of fitness and are training harder you will have to plan for periodization. you can't train for 52 weeks a year without over training. You will have to schedule days or in some cases weeks of rest between cycles.
So HRMs are good for people starting exercise programs (which could be anywhere between 3-6 months depending your genetics, effort and program, etc) that have not been athletic in the past. It can help them know if they are pushing themselves too hard or too soft but once you reach a basic level of fitness and familiar with what your particular body can do, I think pretty much become useless.0 -
This is an answer I just gave to another post, although that person asked about interval training, and was only using a heart rate monitor to determine intensity.....so I will pass this on to you....Especially pay attention to my third sentence in this response....I don't use a heart rate monitor at all, personally, but if you decide to, here is how to coordinate it to be a better guide.
Also focus on your breathing. Learn RATE OF PERCEIVED EXERTION (RPE) I am a certified trainer. I have worked with clients as old as 96 and as young as 12. The heart rate charts and formula are based on theories, and are OFTEN inaccurate for many people's individual training. For instance, I trained an 82 year old woman, who still worked, swam, played tennis, and did step aerobics. When I tested her, her heart rate easily got to 150 before she even started to breath hard. According to the charts she should be gone. My husband is 52, yet he can get his heart rate up to 190 during his bicycle sprints. And I have worked with people in their 30's who can't safely get their heart rate to 150.
So while the variations in your heart rate are a good indication, you need to know exactly where your exertion level is, to gain the benefit of interval training. You must learn your RPE (Rate of perceived exertion) Bear with me, and I will explain and give some basics.
.
1. True interval training is very taxing on the body, so a longer than normal warmup is vital. You can build to a higher level on that warm up, but it should be about 10 minutes.
2. There are different charts for RPE, but I like the 1-10 method. 10 is the greatest, point of exhaustion. 1 is the lowest, rest. I came up with an easy way to figure this out. I have a client talk to me during different levels of intervals. Simply subtract the number of words said between breaths from the number 10, and this gives a fairly accurate RPE level. For instance, if the client can say 4 words between catching a breath, I know they are at a "6" on the RPE scale. If they can say 3 words, they are probably at a "7". If they say 2, they are at an "8" and so on.
3. The type of interval training you describe should be at an 8 or 9. If you can only do 2 minutes, that is what the exertion level is out. If at the end of 2 minutes, you feel like you can do 5 minutes more at that same speed, it's not hard enough.
4. To coordinate your heart rate readings with this, simply make a note, mental or written later, of what your hr monitor says when you are at these diffferent interval levels. Then you can see where it is the next time.
5. You can use resistance to increase exertion levels too. Don't just pedal fast. Try pushing through higher resistance on the stationary bike, if that's available. A spin type stationary bike also allows you to stand and push, adding a leg/core work element not possible by just sitting the whole time.
6. Make sure your difficulty or numbers of intervals increase each week, to build progression into your program. And try different ratio's.....For instance, maybe you can do a ratio of something that is hard for 5 minutes, recover 2 minutes, then try something hard enough that you can only go 30 seconds with a 1 minute recovery.
I hope this makes sense. Interval training is a great way to increase our fitness level, and ultimately change our metabolism. And it reduces boredom and gets us out of a rut, but only when we understand the different levels of exertion and progress and vary it.
Please feel free to ask me questions. Now I'm getting out the door to do my rolling hill run, another type of interval training. I will not have a hr monitor with me, but I know how hard to push and how to recover by now.
good luck to you.0 -
If you want to buy one, I say it's definitely worth it. If you are on a tight budget and don't feel you need one, I'd say forgo it for now.
FYI - do not go cheap with just the watch. You need to get one with a chest strap or it is worse than useless IMHO --- I like Polar brand - the F6 of F7F.
Exactly. I have the Polar FT7 and LOVE it!0 -
I think I may be even more confused now. lol
I like the idea that I "don't need it". But the comments from people saying they "love" theirs is also appealing.
Oh boy. I don't know what to do. I would love to have a accurate description of calories burned.0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.4K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.2K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 426 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.7K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions