Eat more to lose weight...
bekah818
Posts: 179 Member
We're always told to eat less and workout more in order to lose weight, but has anyone ever heard of eating more to lose weight? Of course the foods you eat would be foods that are clean, but instead of the typical 1200 calorie diet (the most recommended calorie plan for women) I'm considering taking my calories up to 1600-1700 a day. What is everyone else doing?
0
Replies
-
It was really popular around here a year or two ago. I don't see it as much but there are definitely a lot of people that would fall into that category. There was a group but I don't know if you can search groups right now.
I believe in eating as much as I can while still maintaining a moderate weight loss and have been pretty successful with it.0 -
This content has been removed.
-
Eat less than you burn
That is latest weight loss craze that has been working pretty well
0 -
I am one of those who can't eat just 1200 cals . I usually eat 1800-2200 a day. But I burn about 700 cals in the gym , daily .0
-
Lol0
-
KittensMaster wrote: »Eat less than you burn
That is latest weight loss craze that has been working pretty well
This is simple scientific fact. You need some kind of smiley for your post.
Eating more = losing less, period. There might be other reasons eating more is a good idea but weight loss isn't one of them.
Osric0 -
Eating clean has nothing to do with weight loss. If you up your calories you will lose less weight it is ALL calories in vs calories out.0
-
I have found that if I eat more one day, it seems to almost jump start a weight loss when I've stalled, but that could be coincidence.
I need to eat at a deficit to lose weight. I'm 5'8", about 160lbs, and eat about 1500-1600 kcal on most days but I do go up to 2200 and down to 900 (on a rare semi fasting day).0 -
-
In a sense, yes. The more you exercise, the more you can eat.
Here's the group: http://community.myfitnesspal.com/en/group/3817-eat-more-2-weigh-less0 -
Be sure to wash ur veggies. ..HAHA0
-
Happyme2009 wrote: »I am one of those who can't eat just 1200 cals . I usually eat 1800-2200 a day. But I burn about 700 cals in the gym , daily .
Same - except I am pretty sure I don't burn 700 calories working out. I ate 1600-1700 calories/day to lose 10 pounds. I eat about 2000 calories/day to maintain.
Bekah818 - when entering your goals did you put 2lbs./week? You can always change it to 0.5 - 1 pound a week.0 -
You have to be in a calorie deficit to loose weight. You will know what your deficit is by your TDEE. If you exercise you can probably create a larger deficit to eat slightly more. I think when people talk about "eating more to loose weight" they are referring to volume. Not more calories. Eg, eating loads of fruit and veg will give you a high volume, nutrient dense, filling meal with fairly low calories compared to having a pack of buscuits which will make you hungry an hour or so later etc. Eat more in volume, calories have to consistently under.0
-
OsricTheKnight wrote: »KittensMaster wrote: »Eat less than you burn
That is latest weight loss craze that has been working pretty well
This is simple scientific fact. You need some kind of smiley for your post.
Eating more = losing less, period. There might be other reasons eating more is a good idea but weight loss isn't one of them.
Osric
And the principle of eat more to lose weight does not contradict that. It is about not starving yourself to lose weight.0 -
slideaway1 wrote: »You have to be in a calorie deficit to loose weight. You will know what your deficit is by your TDEE. If you exercise you can probably create a larger deficit to eat slightly more. I think when people talk about "eating more to loose weight" they are referring to volume. Not more calories. Eg, eating loads of fruit and veg will give you a high volume, nutrient dense, filling meal with fairly low calories compared to having a pack of buscuits which will make you hungry an hour or so later etc. Eat more in volume, calories have to consistently under.
@slideaway1 - no. They aren't talking about volume. It's about eating more calories while still staying under your TDEE and not slashing the, to some arbitrary number like 1200.0 -
3dogsrunning wrote: »slideaway1 wrote: »You have to be in a calorie deficit to loose weight. You will know what your deficit is by your TDEE. If you exercise you can probably create a larger deficit to eat slightly more. I think when people talk about "eating more to loose weight" they are referring to volume. Not more calories. Eg, eating loads of fruit and veg will give you a high volume, nutrient dense, filling meal with fairly low calories compared to having a pack of buscuits which will make you hungry an hour or so later etc. Eat more in volume, calories have to consistently under.
@slideaway1 - no. They aren't talking about volume. It's about eating more calories while still staying under your TDEE and not slashing the, to some arbitrary number like 1200.
Oh ok. Thanks for that. I assumed that everyone just ate 250-500 calories below there TDEE anyway to loose weight instead of picking the lowest number possible to loose weight and just about survive. In that case I would recommend eating as many calories as you can whilst still being in a healthy deficit. Probably more sustainable and will spare muscle loss from aggressive dieting.0 -
honkytonks85 wrote: »
I love those reliable coincidences.0 -
I never really understood the 'eat more to lose more' concept because it just doesn't make sense. But I think the idea was that you don't have to starve yourself to lose weight... because you'll feel less deprived and you'll be more likely to stick to it.
I mean, I've never eaten under 1650 calories (don't eat back exercise calories though because that's just never accurate). I'm pretty much at my goal weight and I've maintained for over a year... and I didn't lose all my muscle mass in the process either.
0 -
Yes, I've heard of it. Though I cannot deny that I often drop weight after eating a big meal the night before, I do not buy into the idea that eating more food is the key to weight loss...because it just isn't. If anyone has investigated why some people drop after eating a bigger meal, I haven't heard about it. It's a bizarre thing. Makes no sense, yet happens. I'd like to know why.
In any event, eating more all day, every day...that's the path to weigh gain, not loss. In general. If you can eat more calories and still lose, though, you totally should!
I do think that eating healthier foods is a great idea. Not only is it more nutritious, but you get to eat a lot more food and stay really full, so it's easier to diet.0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.6K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.3K Health and Weight Loss
- 176K Food and Nutrition
- 47.5K Recipes
- 232.6K Fitness and Exercise
- 431 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.6K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.8K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions