What does everyone do for toning?

2»

Replies

  • mbaker566
    mbaker566 Posts: 11,233 Member
    why is it decieving? i think it's encouraging.
    This whole thread kind of makes me laugh. Sometimes people can get so caught up in the semantics of words. It's like talking to my husband (who talks in a blue language) and I talk pink! LOL We laugh about it all the time.

    But even so...I have gotten a lot of good information.

    good :)
  • arditarose
    arditarose Posts: 15,573 Member
    ninerbuff wrote: »
    moyer566 wrote: »
    @ninerbuff or you could read what it said, which said it likely isn't a real thing but it does give a good definition of what people mean connotatively. or you could be snarky. w/e. and the webster dictionary clearly says "having or showing strength or firmness" so it kinda is denotatively as well
    rather than worrying about semantics, people could say what she needs to hear. which is the same as if she wanted to improve her strength. she just uses a different word. in conversation, it's not a big deal
    Snarky? I just stated that having the correct terminology isn't a bad direction to learn.
    If you didn't know it, "toning" was an invented word by the fitness industry to deceive females that they were doing something other than lifting weights. In other words, they feminized it, when in truth they were still just lifting weights. There's still misinformation being passed around that weight lifting will make females bulky.
    This was done because females spend more than males when it comes to personal improvement. Personally I don't think people have to be deceived to buy into a system if it's merits are good.
    So I'm not cool with a word that that basically insinuates that women weren't smart enough to figure out weight lifting doesn't cause excessive muscle gain.
    Semantics to you, probably, but I don't teach my clients or others that way.

    A.C.E. Certified Personal and Group Fitness Trainer
    IDEA Fitness member
    Kickboxing Certified Instructor
    Been in fitness for 30 years and have studied kinesiology and nutrition

    9285851.png

    Thank you. This is how I feel too. It is nice to clear this up in threads as well, because it CAN hinder women from reaching their goals. To get the look you want, you have to understand that you cannot tone a muscle. Period. You have to establish a goal, and eat and train to meet it.

  • Burt_Huttz
    Burt_Huttz Posts: 1,612 Member
    arditarose wrote: »
    ninerbuff wrote: »
    moyer566 wrote: »
    @ninerbuff or you could read what it said, which said it likely isn't a real thing but it does give a good definition of what people mean connotatively. or you could be snarky. w/e. and the webster dictionary clearly says "having or showing strength or firmness" so it kinda is denotatively as well
    rather than worrying about semantics, people could say what she needs to hear. which is the same as if she wanted to improve her strength. she just uses a different word. in conversation, it's not a big deal
    Snarky? I just stated that having the correct terminology isn't a bad direction to learn.
    If you didn't know it, "toning" was an invented word by the fitness industry to deceive females that they were doing something other than lifting weights. In other words, they feminized it, when in truth they were still just lifting weights. There's still misinformation being passed around that weight lifting will make females bulky.
    This was done because females spend more than males when it comes to personal improvement. Personally I don't think people have to be deceived to buy into a system if it's merits are good.
    So I'm not cool with a word that that basically insinuates that women weren't smart enough to figure out weight lifting doesn't cause excessive muscle gain.
    Semantics to you, probably, but I don't teach my clients or others that way.

    A.C.E. Certified Personal and Group Fitness Trainer
    IDEA Fitness member
    Kickboxing Certified Instructor
    Been in fitness for 30 years and have studied kinesiology and nutrition

    9285851.png

    Thank you. This is how I feel too. It is nice to clear this up in threads as well, because it CAN hinder women from reaching their goals. To get the look you want, you have to understand that you cannot tone a muscle. Period. You have to establish a goal, and eat and train to meet it.

    lol
    There are only four letters standing between women and the body of which they've always dreamed!!
    DAMN YOU TOOOOONE!!!!!!!!!!
  • ninerbuff
    ninerbuff Posts: 48,989 Member
    edited October 2015
    moyer566 wrote: »
    why is it decieving? i think it's encouraging.
    So you think it's okay to for the fitness industry to basically insinuate that females aren't smart enough to distinguish the different between lifting weights and "toning" (which is still lifting weights)? You don't feel that it's a slap in the face of females that the fitness industry is basically laughing behind their back because they know they pulled one over on them?
    This whole thread kind of makes me laugh. Sometimes people can get so caught up in the semantics of words. It's like talking to my husband (who talks in a blue language) and I talk pink! LOL We laugh about it all the time.

    But even so...I have gotten a lot of good information.
    good :)
    There's Mars and Venus talk, but practically every product that promises women that they will lose weight magically, lose cellulite, tighten they thighs, lose wrinkles, etc. are preying on the naivety of some females who aren't given correct information or are using pseudoscience to sway them.
    I just don't feel it has to be that way.

    A.C.E. Certified Personal and Group Fitness Trainer
    IDEA Fitness member
    Kickboxing Certified Instructor
    Been in fitness for 30 years and have studied kinesiology and nutrition

    9285851.png

  • 47Jacqueline
    47Jacqueline Posts: 6,993 Member
    Tone is not a verb. it is an adjective. You cannot tone. You can build or develop your muscles so that they are stronger. Strong, well developed muscles are attractive on a woman. They are also healthy especially in the upper body, where women tend to be less naturally strong than men.

    And then there's that ongoing mythology of female bulking. The odds of a woman becoming a green super hero by lifting heavy weights is so small as to be ludicrous.

    I see the guy posting above agrees with me. I'm saying this from experience. He's talking theory. Nothing wrong with theory, as long as you can translate it to "you can do this". o:):)B)
  • AppetiteControlFreak
    AppetiteControlFreak Posts: 76 Member
    edited October 2015
    Call it what you want

    If it jiggles it isn't a muscle

    So continue to lean down and lift to strategically add some nice shaped muscle that flatter and gets the appearance you want

    Body recomposition is the most rewarding phase of the weight loss fitness quest

    The scale may not move as 5 lbs of fat is exchanged for 5 lbs of muscle, but the look will be amazing
  • ninerbuff
    ninerbuff Posts: 48,989 Member
    Call it what you want

    If it jiggles it isn't a muscle

    So continue to lean down and lift to strategically add some nice shaped muscle that flatter and gets the appearance you want

    Body recomposition is the most rewarding phase of the weight loss fitness quest

    The scale may not move as 5 lbs of fat is exchanged for 5 lbs of muscle, but the look will be amazing
    This. It just has to included that doing it this way is a LONG process and by no means one that will happen in a 90 day span.

    A.C.E. Certified Personal and Group Fitness Trainer
    IDEA Fitness member
    Kickboxing Certified Instructor
    Been in fitness for 30 years and have studied kinesiology and nutrition

    9285851.png

  • JoRocka
    JoRocka Posts: 17,525 Member
    moyer566 wrote: »
    Burt_Huttz wrote: »
    ninerbuff wrote: »
    moyer566 wrote: »
    don't worry about the toning semantics people

    yoga, pilates, body weight, resistance training, barre
    Correct terminology is okay to learn.

    yup, doesn't even exist
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muscle_tone

    really?
    toning

    did you even read that?
  • Sam_I_Am77
    Sam_I_Am77 Posts: 2,093 Member
    JoRocka wrote: »
    moyer566 wrote: »
    Burt_Huttz wrote: »
    ninerbuff wrote: »
    moyer566 wrote: »
    don't worry about the toning semantics people

    yoga, pilates, body weight, resistance training, barre
    Correct terminology is okay to learn.

    yup, doesn't even exist
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muscle_tone

    really?
    toning

    did you even read that?

    Don't be silly @JoRocka reading comprehension and understanding context is not a widely used skill on MFP, have more realistic expectations.
  • JoRocka
    JoRocka Posts: 17,525 Member
    Sam_I_Am77 wrote: »
    JoRocka wrote: »
    moyer566 wrote: »
    Burt_Huttz wrote: »
    ninerbuff wrote: »
    moyer566 wrote: »
    don't worry about the toning semantics people

    yoga, pilates, body weight, resistance training, barre
    Correct terminology is okay to learn.

    yup, doesn't even exist
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muscle_tone

    really?
    toning

    did you even read that?

    Don't be silly @JoRocka reading comprehension and understanding context is not a widely used skill on MFP, have more realistic expectations.

    gosh- what was I think @Sam_I_Am77 I must remove myself with this silly logic. No room for that here!
  • Sam_I_Am77
    Sam_I_Am77 Posts: 2,093 Member
    JoRocka wrote: »
    Sam_I_Am77 wrote: »
    JoRocka wrote: »
    moyer566 wrote: »
    Burt_Huttz wrote: »
    ninerbuff wrote: »
    moyer566 wrote: »
    don't worry about the toning semantics people

    yoga, pilates, body weight, resistance training, barre
    Correct terminology is okay to learn.

    yup, doesn't even exist
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muscle_tone

    really?
    toning

    did you even read that?

    Don't be silly @JoRocka reading comprehension and understanding context is not a widely used skill on MFP, have more realistic expectations.

    gosh- what was I think @Sam_I_Am77 I must remove myself with this silly logic. No room for that here!

    I've learned that if somebody likes the color purple and they claim the sky is purple, don't argue with them even if you're standing at the Grand Canyon looking up at a clear afternoon sky; it's still frickin' purple.
  • RoxieDawn
    RoxieDawn Posts: 15,488 Member
    How about this piece I found on bodybuilding.com

    " When many people talk about being "toned" what they are referring to is a firm body with muscular definition and shape. This is generally a fitness goal that many women have (but also men) with the majority of their emphasis usually on their arms or more specifically their triceps."

    "Mistakenly, due to the media many people (mostly women) think in order to "get toned" all they need to do is very high repetitions and very little resistance with moderate to long rests. They also don't take into account cardiovascular activity or diet in order to get "toned"."

    The Myth Of "Toning"

    Lets dissolve the misnomer of "tone" right now. The firming-up or toning is due to an increase in muscle tissue as well as a low enough bodyfat percentage to see the definition and shape of the muscles and get rid of the "jiggle".

    Muscles do not go from soft to hard or hard to soft - they either shrink or grow in size. Muscles themselves do not "firm-up" or "tone".
  • cafeaulait7
    cafeaulait7 Posts: 2,459 Member
    gia07 wrote: »
    The Myth Of "Toning"

    Lets dissolve the misnomer of "tone" right now. The firming-up or toning is due to an increase in muscle tissue as well as a low enough bodyfat percentage to see the definition and shape of the muscles and get rid of the "jiggle".

    Muscles do not go from soft to hard or hard to soft - they either shrink or grow in size. Muscles themselves do not "firm-up" or "tone".

    See, this is where I start to disagree or get confused, one. You absolutely can have your muscles feel dramatically firmer while on a deficit, after doing weights or bodyweight that are not in the hypertrophy range. I've done it a hundred times by now, probably. Are those all supposed to be newb gains using light weight, then?

    I'd have no problem with hearing that if it fit experience. But I think there must be an in-between stage, where the muscles are filled with glycogen or something? I don't know what that is, but I'd be hesitant to think muscle gaining were that easy, lol. I'll start suggesting Ashtanga as a very quick way to build muscle then, and everyone would really have a fit :grin:

    I'm going to call that 'conditioning' the muscle instead of growing/putting on muscle, and I wish I knew what were really going on in the muscles at that specific point.
This discussion has been closed.