Too much protein? Too little? I could really use some help/guidance, please.
nomadic_frau
Posts: 25 Member
I'm always hungry, like eat and 15mins later hungry. Well today I'm not hungry, but I took in approximately 92g of protein, yikes! That's way too much. Besides protein how can I control hunger? According to my calculations I should only be eating like 45g of protein, but when I do, that's when I feel like I'm starving. With the exception of today's excessive protein, my diary remains pretty consistent. I tried going through the forums, but everyone suggest increasing protein. I'm so lost right now. Here's an example of my diet and I drink about 1-2L of water/green tea(without anything) a day. In case you're wondering pute is turkey. Any feedback is appreciated.
0
Replies
-
Maybe look at more fiber where you can? You are also eating a very small amount (1250~cals) which for some people is too drastic of a cut given their activity levels and body.0
-
92 grams of protein isn't a whole lot of protein. Unless maybe you weigh less than 92 pounds. You should probably be getting somewhere around 0.8 grams to 1 gram of protein per pound of bodyweight, which helps maintain and/or build lean body tissues whether you're on a cut, maintaining, or trying to bulk. Protein is also good for satiety, so it comes with an added bonus.0
-
92 is definitely not too much.0
-
What are you talking about ?
Protein is a MINIMUM macro to hit
If in defecit and following a decent progressive resistance programme then the MINIMUM is somewhere between 0.64-0.8 g per lb bodyweight
If you find it sating that's an even better bonus0 -
I eat 225 grams of protein per day... and while my goals are probably very different from yours, my point is that, when part of a balanced diet, it's not too much. Some people have health issues that high protein diets don't agree with, but by and large, when properly hydrated, it's hard to get too much protein.0
-
lol! just reading your diet example makes my stomach growl in hunger.....to each their own but I'm leaning out at the moment (c'mere little abs...i know you're in there somewhere **looking down at my belly**) on 1600 cal and 160g of protein....but then again, I lift heavy in the gym 5-6 days a week....and my own diet has my stomach growling....hmmm.....
me like to eat!!!! haha0 -
If you are an active person, 92 g is not enough! Carbs are the ones making you hungry. Definitely need more protein and fat in your life :-)0
-
I'm no math genius, but 56kg(0.8) = 44.8/45g of protein. So can someone please explain how and why I'm wrong? If I'm active how am I supposed to account for that?0
-
56kg? That's 123 pounds. So you should be getting around 98.4 to 123 grams of protein.0
-
nomadic_frau wrote: »I'm no math genius, but 56kg(0.8) = 44.8/45g of protein. So can someone please explain how and why I'm wrong? If I'm active how am I supposed to account for that?
Your weight in POUNDS...not kg
56 kg = 123 lbs x 0.8 = 98g of protein.
Actually sounds like you're pretty close to right on target.0 -
juggernaut1974 wrote: »nomadic_frau wrote: »I'm no math genius, but 56kg(0.8) = 44.8/45g of protein. So can someone please explain how and why I'm wrong? If I'm active how am I supposed to account for that?
Your weight in POUNDS...not kg
56 kg = 123 lbs x 0.8 = 98g of protein.
Actually sounds like you're pretty close to right on target.
Forgive, but the information that I continue to find is kg(0.8) or lb(0.36) which both would be 45g. This is why I have been calculating this way due to multiple sources.0 -
That's the minimum recommended for nutrition. There's no harm in eating more.
In fact, for certain goals -- like building muscle, athletic performance, and (most relevant to many on MFP) maintaining muscle while losing weight, there are proven benefits up to at least about .65-.85 g per lb of normal bodyweight (i.e., if you are obese, which you are not, you'd use goal weight).
So 92 g isn't unhealthy, and there might be benefits to aiming for a range of 80 to 105 (with no harm coming from being a bit over). I'm 5'3, 125, and aim for at least 95 g, but am over quite often since I too find eating protein more satiating and I happen to feel good when eating around a 30-30-40 balance (40% carbs).0 -
nomadic_frau wrote: »juggernaut1974 wrote: »nomadic_frau wrote: »I'm no math genius, but 56kg(0.8) = 44.8/45g of protein. So can someone please explain how and why I'm wrong? If I'm active how am I supposed to account for that?
Your weight in POUNDS...not kg
56 kg = 123 lbs x 0.8 = 98g of protein.
Actually sounds like you're pretty close to right on target.
Forgive, but the information that I continue to find is kg(0.8) or lb(0.36) which both would be 45g. This is why I have been calculating this way due to multiple sources.
That is minimum amount for someone eating maintenance that is sedentary. If you are in a deficit, or are active you need more. If you are active and in a deficit you need much more.0 -
nomadic_frau wrote: »juggernaut1974 wrote: »nomadic_frau wrote: »I'm no math genius, but 56kg(0.8) = 44.8/45g of protein. So can someone please explain how and why I'm wrong? If I'm active how am I supposed to account for that?
Your weight in POUNDS...not kg
56 kg = 123 lbs x 0.8 = 98g of protein.
Actually sounds like you're pretty close to right on target.
Forgive, but the information that I continue to find is kg(0.8) or lb(0.36) which both would be 45g. This is why I have been calculating this way due to multiple sources.
What sources?
I read The China Study. I liked it. The author advocates low protein levels for health reasons, most notably as cancer protection. I think it makes intuitive sense, since a lack of protein (or very low levels) would make it harder for cancer cells to reproduce. If I had cancer I think I'd consider following his recommendations, which are to keep protein under 10% of your calories.
This next part is anecdotal, but I've read vegan and vegetarian advice stating that you don't need much protein. (FWIW I tried going vegan for 3 months.) I think the advice is self serving though. Or maybe I should say that it's a rationalization. It's hard to get "enough" protein when you're not eating meat, and harder yet when you also exclude dairy products.
Anyway, there are plenty of other sources telling you that you should be getting more protein.
0 -
I eat 150+ grams of protein daily. I don't think too much protein is the case in your situation. You're probably hungry b/c you ate 1250 calories, and your goal is 1500+.
Eat more calories, eat more protein, eat more fiber.0 -
nomadic_frau wrote: »juggernaut1974 wrote: »nomadic_frau wrote: »I'm no math genius, but 56kg(0.8) = 44.8/45g of protein. So can someone please explain how and why I'm wrong? If I'm active how am I supposed to account for that?
Your weight in POUNDS...not kg
56 kg = 123 lbs x 0.8 = 98g of protein.
Actually sounds like you're pretty close to right on target.
Forgive, but the information that I continue to find is kg(0.8) or lb(0.36) which both would be 45g. This is why I have been calculating this way due to multiple sources.
That is minimum amount for someone eating maintenance that is sedentary. If you are in a deficit, or are active you need more. If you are active and in a deficit you need much more.
^^ Yep
IIRC, if you read the full text it is emphasized that recommendation (based on kg) essentially amounts to the bare minimum necessary to maintain essential body functions.0 -
nomadic_frau wrote: »juggernaut1974 wrote: »nomadic_frau wrote: »I'm no math genius, but 56kg(0.8) = 44.8/45g of protein. So can someone please explain how and why I'm wrong? If I'm active how am I supposed to account for that?
Your weight in POUNDS...not kg
56 kg = 123 lbs x 0.8 = 98g of protein.
Actually sounds like you're pretty close to right on target.
Forgive, but the information that I continue to find is kg(0.8) or lb(0.36) which both would be 45g. This is why I have been calculating this way due to multiple sources.
What sources?
I read The China Study. I liked it. The author advocates low protein levels for health reasons, most notably as cancer protection. I think it makes intuitive sense, since a lack of protein (or very low levels) would make it harder for cancer cells to reproduce. If I had cancer I think I'd consider following his recommendations, which are to keep protein under 10% of your calories.
This next part is anecdotal, but I've read vegan and vegetarian advice stating that you don't need much protein. (FWIW I tried going vegan for 3 months.) I think the advice is self serving though. Or maybe I should say that it's a rationalization. It's hard to get "enough" protein when you're not eating meat, and harder yet when you also exclude dairy products.
Anyway, there are plenty of other sources telling you that you should be getting more protein.
NO
The only thing to like about the china study is that it has been roundly debunked for years.0 -
Here you go...read Mingers analysis http://rawfoodsos.com/the-china-study/0
-
Here you go...read Mingers analysis http://rawfoodsos.com/the-china-study/
Thanks, but I've read that before. Not that I put as much faith in blogs as you do, but I started looking for views contradicting Campbell's because his theories just didn't quite make complete sense. That's when I found your linked blog. I think the blog has some flaws as well. In the end I decided to disregard Campbell's advice and veganism in general because it felt unnatural.0 -
It doesn't mean that I can't still like The China Study, though.0
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 392.9K Introduce Yourself
- 43.7K Getting Started
- 260.1K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.8K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 415 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 152.9K Motivation and Support
- 7.9K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.6K MyFitnessPal Information
- 23 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.5K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions