Netting at around 1000 cals

Whitney133
Whitney133 Posts: 6 Member
edited November 2024 in Health and Weight Loss
One question. Is it okay?
«1

Replies

  • ValerieMartini2Olives
    ValerieMartini2Olives Posts: 3,024 Member
    One answer.
    No.
  • KrisiAnnH
    KrisiAnnH Posts: 352 Member
    No, unless you're on a medically supervised low calorie diet (eg. assigned by a doctor and monitored)- it's too low. The minimum calorie intake for a woman is 1200 and for a man is 1500. If you regularly eat below that then you risk causing your body serious damage, including losing LBM. It's not worth putting your long term health at risk for the sake of losing weight that fractional amount faster.
  • 3dogsrunning
    3dogsrunning Posts: 27,167 Member
    How much are you actually eating?
    How do you estimate your calorie burns?
  • quiksylver296
    quiksylver296 Posts: 28,439 Member
    Do you weigh and log using a food scale, so that you know you are truly at 1000 cals?
  • quirkytizzy
    quirkytizzy Posts: 4,052 Member
    edited December 2015
    Going that low will screw with your body's ability to process anything above that, which could lead to quick and massive weight gain as soon as you start eating like a regular human being. Just an endless roller coaster. Why don't you try boosting it to 1,200 - 1,400? You will be surprised how much more satisfied you'll feel and and surprised that you can still lose the weight just as easily at a higher calorie count.

    Checking your friends list, you have some ana/mia friends. Try to resist going down that road, please. Try searching on the forums for friends who might have a healthier goal and approach. The intro section is great for that. You can both eat and lose weight. You and your body are worth waaay more than 1,000 calories a day.
  • auddii
    auddii Posts: 15,357 Member
    How much are you actually eating?
    How do you estimate your calorie burns?

    These are good questions. I thought I was in a pretty good calorie deficit, but then I realized I grossly underestimated portion sizes once I bought a food scale and started weighing my foods. And my MFP calculated burns were ridiculously high (I ended up just overriding the calorie burn with 2/3 or what it told me.
  • 3dogsrunning
    3dogsrunning Posts: 27,167 Member
    auddii wrote: »
    How much are you actually eating?
    How do you estimate your calorie burns?

    These are good questions. I thought I was in a pretty good calorie deficit, but then I realized I grossly underestimated portion sizes once I bought a food scale and started weighing my foods. And my MFP calculated burns were ridiculously high (I ended up just overriding the calorie burn with 2/3 or what it told me.

    Yes.
    I wouldn't be as concerned about someone eating 2500 calories and netting 1000 as someone eating 1200 and netting 1000. Chances are the first one is probably going wrong somewhere along the lines.
  • Fursian
    Fursian Posts: 573 Member
    auddii wrote: »
    How much are you actually eating?
    How do you estimate your calorie burns?

    These are good questions. I thought I was in a pretty good calorie deficit, but then I realized I grossly underestimated portion sizes once I bought a food scale and started weighing my foods. And my MFP calculated burns were ridiculously high (I ended up just overriding the calorie burn with 2/3 or what it told me.

    Yes.
    I wouldn't be as concerned about someone eating 2500 calories and netting 1000 as someone eating 1200 and netting 1000. Chances are the first one is probably going wrong somewhere along the lines.

    @3dogsrunning, in these two examples, they're both only netting 1000. Shouldn't they both be a concern? I'm still just figuring out net calories really, so some things still confuse me.
  • 3dogsrunning
    3dogsrunning Posts: 27,167 Member
    Fursian wrote: »
    auddii wrote: »
    How much are you actually eating?
    How do you estimate your calorie burns?

    These are good questions. I thought I was in a pretty good calorie deficit, but then I realized I grossly underestimated portion sizes once I bought a food scale and started weighing my foods. And my MFP calculated burns were ridiculously high (I ended up just overriding the calorie burn with 2/3 or what it told me.

    Yes.
    I wouldn't be as concerned about someone eating 2500 calories and netting 1000 as someone eating 1200 and netting 1000. Chances are the first one is probably going wrong somewhere along the lines.

    @3dogsrunning, in these two examples, they're both only netting 1000. Shouldn't they both be a concern? I'm still just figuring out net calories really, so some things still confuse me.

    I mean in that case a person is likely not burning 1500 calories.

    My point is "netting 1000 calories" isn't enough information.
  • Fursian
    Fursian Posts: 573 Member
    Fursian wrote: »
    auddii wrote: »
    How much are you actually eating?
    How do you estimate your calorie burns?

    These are good questions. I thought I was in a pretty good calorie deficit, but then I realized I grossly underestimated portion sizes once I bought a food scale and started weighing my foods. And my MFP calculated burns were ridiculously high (I ended up just overriding the calorie burn with 2/3 or what it told me.

    Yes.
    I wouldn't be as concerned about someone eating 2500 calories and netting 1000 as someone eating 1200 and netting 1000. Chances are the first one is probably going wrong somewhere along the lines.

    @3dogsrunning, in these two examples, they're both only netting 1000. Shouldn't they both be a concern? I'm still just figuring out net calories really, so some things still confuse me.

    I mean in that case a person is likely not burning 1500 calories.

    My point is "netting 1000 calories" isn't enough information.

    Ah. Thanks! :)
  • jennifer_417
    jennifer_417 Posts: 12,344 Member
    Newp.
  • abatonfan
    abatonfan Posts: 1,120 Member
    edited December 2015
    It depends.
    1. How accurate is your logging? Are you weighing solids with a food scale and liquids with liquid measuring cups? How often are you not weighing/measuring what you consume? For instance, if you are constantly eating out or do not weigh your food, you may be consuming more food than what you are logging (in which case, you would be netting more than 1000 calories).
    2. How accurate are your calories burned? Are you using MFP's entries? A HRM? Fitbit or other fitness tracker? Are you eating back your exercise calories? MFP's exercise estimates are hugely overestimated.
  • dhimaan
    dhimaan Posts: 774 Member
    Better question than is it okay, is it necessary ? IMO no.
  • strong_curves
    strong_curves Posts: 2,229 Member
    No but... you're probably eating more than 1000 calories.
  • Whitney133
    Whitney133 Posts: 6 Member
    How much are you actually eating?
    How do you estimate your calorie burns?

    Well I go back and forth from eating like 1,300 to 800 minimum. Though there are times I eat about 500 or less, rarely. As far as burning.. I'm not exactly sure I understand your second question. I burn about 600 or 700 a day. I use some of the equipment in this little gym near my town house. I think the treadmill is pretty accurate, but as for the elliptical and stationary bike thingy I don't think those are that accurate.
  • Alyssa_Is_LosingIt
    Alyssa_Is_LosingIt Posts: 4,696 Member
    Whitney133 wrote: »
    How much are you actually eating?
    How do you estimate your calorie burns?

    Well I go back and forth from eating like 1,300 to 800 minimum. Though there are times I eat about 500 or less, rarely. As far as burning.. I'm not exactly sure I understand your second question. I burn about 600 or 700 a day. I use some of the equipment in this little gym near my town house. I think the treadmill is pretty accurate, but as for the elliptical and stationary bike thingy I don't think those are that accurate.

    Why would you ever purposely eat 500 - 800 calories in a day?

    THAT is never okay.
  • Whitney133
    Whitney133 Posts: 6 Member
    Going that low will screw with your body's ability to process anything above that, which could lead to quick and massive weight gain as soon as you start eating like a regular human being. Just an endless roller coaster. Why don't you try boosting it to 1,200 - 1,400? You will be surprised how much more satisfied you'll feel and and surprised that you can still lose the weight just as easily at a higher calorie count.

    Checking your friends list, you have some ana/mia friends. Try to resist going down that road, please. Try searching on the forums for friends who might have a healthier goal and approach. The intro section is great for that. You can both eat and lose weight. You and your body are worth waaay more than 1,000 calories a day.

    Yes, I'm trying to do better about eating. Disordered eating habits started about two years ago, I was diagnosed with EDNOS, and I can't find a healthy balance with food and I've gained lots of weight back. It's annoying. So I'm trying to slowly, slowly get back to eating like a normal healthy person. And you're right about looking for different friends on here. Lol I'm just confused and going in circles.
  • Whitney133
    Whitney133 Posts: 6 Member
    abatonfan wrote: »
    It depends.
    1. How accurate is your logging? Are you weighing solids with a food scale and liquids with liquid measuring cups? How often are you not weighing/measuring what you consume? For instance, if you are constantly eating out or do not weigh your food, you may be consuming more food than what you are logging (in which case, you would be netting more than 1000 calories).
    2. How accurate are your calories burned? Are you using MFP's entries? A HRM? Fitbit or other fitness tracker? Are you eating back your exercise calories? MFP's exercise estimates are hugely overestimated.

    I use food scales on and off. Usually with things that have higher calories or that are unhealthy. Never really measure liquids. Just drink water. I haven't eaten out in a couple of months, being a college student/babysitting being my only job.

    As far as accuracy, I don't know. I don't use Mfps estimates. I agree about their estimates. I just go by whatever the treadmill/ elliptical / whatever says. It's probably not accurate. I'm not eating back calories? I don't think. I work out in the morning and kind of base my meals on that.
  • Whitney133
    Whitney133 Posts: 6 Member
    Whitney133 wrote: »
    How much are you actually eating?
    How do you estimate your calorie burns?

    Well I go back and forth from eating like 1,300 to 800 minimum. Though there are times I eat about 500 or less, rarely. As far as burning.. I'm not exactly sure I understand your second question. I burn about 600 or 700 a day. I use some of the equipment in this little gym near my town house. I think the treadmill is pretty accurate, but as for the elliptical and stationary bike thingy I don't think those are that accurate.

    Why would you ever purposely eat 500 - 800 calories in a day?

    THAT is never okay.

    Yes. I've been told. 500 calories in one day is kind of rare for me now. It's more of a coping mechanism I have yet to let go of and that's only on days where things are not..okay.
  • One answer.
    No.

    Huh? How could you know that. What if she's 150lbs overweight? That's different than if she's trying to lose 5lbs. There's not just one answer.
  • auddii
    auddii Posts: 15,357 Member
    Whitney133 wrote: »
    Whitney133 wrote: »
    How much are you actually eating?
    How do you estimate your calorie burns?

    Well I go back and forth from eating like 1,300 to 800 minimum. Though there are times I eat about 500 or less, rarely. As far as burning.. I'm not exactly sure I understand your second question. I burn about 600 or 700 a day. I use some of the equipment in this little gym near my town house. I think the treadmill is pretty accurate, but as for the elliptical and stationary bike thingy I don't think those are that accurate.

    Why would you ever purposely eat 500 - 800 calories in a day?

    THAT is never okay.

    Yes. I've been told. 500 calories in one day is kind of rare for me now. It's more of a coping mechanism I have yet to let go of and that's only on days where things are not..okay.

    It sounds like you might be recovering from an eating disorder from this comment. If you are working with a recovery team, I'd recommend talking to them about this. If you are not working with a team, I would highly recommend seeking out a therapist who specializes in eating disorders.

    http://www.nationaleatingdisorders.org/resource-links
  • kshama2001
    kshama2001 Posts: 28,055 Member
    Whitney133 wrote: »
    Going that low will screw with your body's ability to process anything above that, which could lead to quick and massive weight gain as soon as you start eating like a regular human being. Just an endless roller coaster. Why don't you try boosting it to 1,200 - 1,400? You will be surprised how much more satisfied you'll feel and and surprised that you can still lose the weight just as easily at a higher calorie count.

    Checking your friends list, you have some ana/mia friends. Try to resist going down that road, please. Try searching on the forums for friends who might have a healthier goal and approach. The intro section is great for that. You can both eat and lose weight. You and your body are worth waaay more than 1,000 calories a day.

    Yes, I'm trying to do better about eating. Disordered eating habits started about two years ago, I was diagnosed with EDNOS, and I can't find a healthy balance with food and I've gained lots of weight back. It's annoying. So I'm trying to slowly, slowly get back to eating like a normal healthy person. And you're right about looking for different friends on here. Lol I'm just confused and going in circles.

    Where are you with your treatment for EDNOS?
  • allenpriest
    allenpriest Posts: 1,102 Member
    One answer.
    No.

    Huh? How could you know that. What if she's 150lbs overweight? That's different than if she's trying to lose 5lbs. There's not just one answer.

    If the OP were needing to lose 150 lbs it would be even less ok to net 1000 because then the OPs TDEE would be far higher due to the extra weight so the lower calorie levels would be even worse.
  • Christine_72
    Christine_72 Posts: 16,049 Member
    Going that low will screw with your body's ability to process anything above that, which could lead to quick and massive weight gain as soon as you start eating like a regular human being. Just an endless roller coaster. Why don't you try boosting it to 1,200 - 1,400? You will be surprised how much more satisfied you'll feel and and surprised that you can still lose the weight just as easily at a higher calorie count.

    Checking your friends list, you have some ana/mia friends. Try to resist going down that road, please. Try searching on the forums for friends who might have a healthier goal and approach. The intro section is great for that. You can both eat and lose weight. You and your body are worth waaay more than 1,000 calories a day.

    And not a single one of them is currently active. OP you need more reliable and healthier friends list.

  • arditarose
    arditarose Posts: 15,573 Member
    One answer.
    No.

    Huh? How could you know that. What if she's 150lbs overweight? That's different than if she's trying to lose 5lbs. There's not just one answer.

    If the OP were 150 lbs overweight she would have quite a high TDEE and her BMR would be much much higher than that. It would really not be okay then.
  • Lovee_Dove7
    Lovee_Dove7 Posts: 742 Member
    I would hate life!
  • pineygirl
    pineygirl Posts: 322 Member
    I often net less than 1000 calories. Fitbit says I burn way more than I think I burn. For example...Fitbit says I'm going to burn 2450 caloies. I eat 1650 calores that day. I have about 300 calories left but it's too late in the day and I'm just not hungry. By not eating that 300 calories I'm only netting 900.

    Why....well I didn't burn 2450 calories. Fitbit doesn't know I have PCOS and hypothyroidism.

    I'm losing slightly more than 1lb per week. It's hard to tell because of water weight fluctuations from hormone fluctuations. I've lost 12 lbs in about 11 weeks.

    I feel fine. I'm not that hungry and I have a decent amount of energy. I still can get through my workouts and all my daily activity...even on less than 6 hours of sleep.
  • allenpriest
    allenpriest Posts: 1,102 Member
    Yiu aren't netting 1000 based on your story because you aren't burning that much.
  • pineygirl
    pineygirl Posts: 322 Member
    I have no idea what I'm actually "netting" Because I have no idea what I'm actually burning. According to MFP I frequently net around 800 to 1000. But in reality....how am I supposed to know?

    I figured that I could estimate it from my rate of weight loss. At losing around 1.1lbs per week, I'd say my TDEE is around 250 less that what my Fitbit Charge HR calculates it to be. Which makes sense with my low metabolism due to my medical conditions.

    So I could be "netting" closer to 1200 or even 1400...since my metabolism is so slow.

    Without having my RMR tested there really isn't any way for me to know. So I just pay no attention ton of my net calories since it's sort of meaningless.

    I'm 5lbs away from my goal. So I'll see what happens when I gradually up my calories to maintenence.
  • biggsterjackster
    biggsterjackster Posts: 419 Member
    Whitney133 wrote: »
    One question. Is it okay?

    According to some new Australian studies it is OK. You lose weight faster but at the end its all about maintaining.
This discussion has been closed.