Steps?

I'm not so sure that's right the other day I walked 3000 steps and I was at 42 calories or maybe mine is off

morganinspires wrote: »

Hey everyone! How accurate is the step counter in relation to the calories it accounts for? I walked less than 3,000 steps yesterday.. Yes I'm aware that's not enough. I had class all day, however it recorded that's it's equivalent to 115 calories? Is this accurate? I don't want to eat more if this number isn't correct. Let me know what you think.

You have to keep in mind that your activity level is going to account for steps...how many would depend on your activity level. A sedentary activity level I believe accounts for up to 5,000 steps per day so your calories from those 3,000 steps would already be accounted for in your activity level and included in your targets.

You only are supposed to eat back calories for exercise and activity that is beyond your established activity level on MFP...otherwise you'd be double dipping.

You have to keep in mind that your activity level is going to account for steps...how many would depend on your activity level. A sedentary activity level I believe accounts for up to 5,000 steps per day so your calories from those 3,000 steps would already be accounted for in your activity level and included in your targets.

You only are supposed to eat back calories for exercise and activity that is beyond your established activity level on MFP...otherwise you'd be double dipping.

May I ask where you get this information from? I started a thread basically asking for this information and got 0 response. Would like to know what they consider sedentary, lightly active, etc. in relation to steps.

I don't have MFP's numbers....but here is a general calculator

http://www.fitnessforweightloss.com/rate-your-activity-level-based-on-steps-per-day/

The way a FitBit works is it compares your stated activity level against your actual activity level and then gives more calories for going over.....or takes them away (if negative adjustments are enabled) when you don't reach it.

I believe to some extent, it also matters how much you weigh. A 300 pound person will burn slightly more than a 100 pound person doing the exact same thing because the 300 pound person has to carry more weight. Not sure if its true but I read it somewhere and it makes sense because when I walk a mile, I am pulling a large weight with me every step and my kid who weighs 1/3 my weight as an adult only carries 1/3 the weight with her on her muscles.

morganinspires wrote: »

I did choose a sedentary activity level even though I am relatively active because I want to be smaller faster.

If you chose your goal as losing weight, then you should be honest with the app and set your activity level to mirror your actual level. You're going to lose the weight if you're eating at a deficit and being active.

If you're eating at too much of a deficit, you're going to run into problems both with energy, hunger, and keeping disciplined to your intake.

@morganinspires Seems correct. My garmin recorded me @ 37,840 for my 16mile run up mtns. 2,400cal.