Why women want to lose weight when they weigh only 100-110? Wtf
Replies
-
I think no woman should weight less than 125!0
-
I'm quite short (5'1) and the least amount i would want to weigh is 125. And on my frame, that would probably not look great on me. 130-135 on my frame is what I target/prefer. (i have a ways to get there still lol)
its all depends on frame size and personal preference, I guess.0 -
-
ArmandsBerzs wrote: »I think no woman should weight less than 125!
Women can surely go below 125 and there's nothing wrong with that unless they're pretty tall...0 -
callsitlikeiseeit wrote: »I'm quite short (5'1) and the least amount i would want to weigh is 125. And on my frame, that would probably not look great on me. 130-135 on my frame is what I target/prefer. (i have a ways to get there still lol)
its all depends on frame size and personal preference, I guess.
I am 5'6 and 125 did not look ideal on me when I got to it, so I dropped maybe just 3 lbs more and started lifting.. now at 125 I look pretty okay I did gain a few lbs back : p0 -
I know people who fit that weight range but they are tiiiiny bone structure wise and short. It's just who they are sometimes - every body is different.0
-
ArmandsBerzs wrote: »I think no woman should weight less than 125!
Yep,thick women are more attractive.
0 -
callsitlikeiseeit wrote: »I'm quite short (5'1) and the least amount i would want to weigh is 125. And on my frame, that would probably not look great on me. 130-135 on my frame is what I target/prefer. (i have a ways to get there still lol)
its all depends on frame size and personal preference, I guess.
Yup,I agree.
0 -
DeterminedFee201426 wrote: »callsitlikeiseeit wrote: »I'm quite short (5'1) and the least amount i would want to weigh is 125. And on my frame, that would probably not look great on me. 130-135 on my frame is what I target/prefer. (i have a ways to get there still lol)
its all depends on frame size and personal preference, I guess.
I am 5'6 and 125 did not look ideal on me when I got to it, so I dropped maybe just 3 lbs more and started lifting.. now at 125 I look pretty okay I did gain a few lbs back : p
Gaining 3-4 lbs doesn't make much difference.
0 -
TehLaughingDog wrote: »I know people who fit that weight range but they are tiiiiny bone structure wise and short. It's just who they are sometimes - every body is different.
Not everybody is different.0 -
please don't say some woman are more beautiful than others
body positive is important 0 -
Because some of us are shorter than others. I'm not quite 5 feet, and I want to lose body fat, so forget what the scale says and think %.ArmandsBerzs wrote: »I think no woman should weight less than 125!
I'm fat at 125, really fat. So, um, yeah, you're post is kind of dumb.0 -
farmerpam1 wrote: »Because some of us are shorter than others. I'm not quite 5 feet, and I want to lose body fat, so forget what the scale says and think %.ArmandsBerzs wrote: »I think no woman should weight less than 125!
I'm fat at 125, really fat. So, um, yeah, you're post is kind of dumb.
may I ask how tall you are? and I completely agree with you that people shouldn't judge others on their goals
we should get to decide our goal weights 0 -
Some may be short or petite and can definitely go below 110 lbs without a problem.
Remember the saying - glass houses and all...0 -
I'm only 5ft tall. I'm fluctuating between 115 and 117 but I'd love to be 110. In fact, it is my goal weight. I'm not unhappy at my current weight, but I think I'd look better in my clothes at 110.0
-
I was happiest with my body at 118 and 5'7"0
-
This content has been removed.
-
It just depends on their height. A middle-aged Filipina friend of mine is barely 4'10" and, yes, she's a little plump at 125 or so. Mmmm, she makes some fine chow mein.0
-
At 129lbs I was in the overweight range for my height (I'm only 4ft 11). Plus I have a tiny frame, meaning I should be around 100lbs to be right in the middle of the healthy weight range. However due to my small frame I think I suit a little less, and feel healthiest where I am now. Trying to switch to maintenance but its hard as I am used to eating small amounts now. Everybody is different, some people look better when they weigh more.0
-
I have a sister similarly short who has spent much of her life between 105 and 115, and she wants to get back to that range when she's 125.0
-
SearchingforFitness wrote: »I was happiest with my body at 118 and 5'7"
That's underweight for 5'7", it is a BMI of only 18.5 (the upper limit for underweight but still)0 -
Didn't meant to be offensive,I only meant they should not lose extreme weight.0
-
ArmandsBerzs wrote: »I think no woman should weight less than 125!
I have a friend who is 4'11.5" who would be quite chubby at 125.0 -
thorsmom01 wrote: »Some may be short or petite and can definitely go below 110 lbs without a problem.
Remember the saying - glass houses and all...
Yeah. I'm 5'3 and used to be 120, and I wasn't that thin (although I was fine). My current goal is 118 (and I doubt I will be especially thin there), so if someone is small framed and shorter I can see under 110 being a fine goal.0 -
Because they want to. Simple enough.0
-
I'm only 5ft and I'm a little chubby now at 133, will probably still be a bit so when I get to 125. It's all about the height and frame size as others have said.0
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.3K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.2K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 423 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.7K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions