MFP exercise calories lower than HRM
![Jen58473](https://d34yn14tavczy0.cloudfront.net/images/no_photo.png)
Jen58473
Posts: 24 Member
I keep reading how MFP way overestimates exercise calories, and people keep recommending to eat back 50-75%. I recently got a HRM and have been using it for cardio, which for me is biking and fast walking. But my HRM calorie estimates are significantly higher than MFP's, which seems to be a different experience than the general population on this site.
I understand I'll have to make adjustments along the way, so I'm looking to see how other people handle this situation, to give me a starting point.
Does this happen to anyone else? Which number do you use? Lower, higher, split the difference?
I understand I'll have to make adjustments along the way, so I'm looking to see how other people handle this situation, to give me a starting point.
Does this happen to anyone else? Which number do you use? Lower, higher, split the difference?
0
Replies
-
I have had that happen at times. I use a chest strap heart rate monitor, and I always log the amount of calories my heart rate monitor says. Now if your HRM is a Fitbit worn on the wrist, I would use the MFP calories. I have read that Fitbit are not accurate at calculating heart rates when the heart rate is elevated (during cardio exercise).0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 394.2K Introduce Yourself
- 43.9K Getting Started
- 260.4K Health and Weight Loss
- 176.1K Food and Nutrition
- 47.5K Recipes
- 232.6K Fitness and Exercise
- 437 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.6K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153.1K Motivation and Support
- 8.1K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.4K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.9K MyFitnessPal Information
- 15 News and Announcements
- 1.2K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.7K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions