1200 Cals ??
laur4795
Posts: 9 Member
I just started this journey and when I put in all my info mfp has me at 1200 Cals a day ! Is anyone losing on that ? I feel like I'll starve ? Lol . Sounds kind of low !
0
Replies
-
Im on it for a week now lost 1.7 kg with no exerisise just walking in the park0
-
Did you set your goal at 2 lbs per week? Unless you are obese, 2 lbs per week is too aggressive. Change your goal to 1 lb and eat more. 1200 is the bare minimum most people should eat.0
-
If you are short it is not weird that it put 1200. I'm 5'2, on it, losing weight and not starving at all. I will open my diary if you want to check it out.0
-
It is low. More than likely, you chose a 2 lb/week goal and the required deficit to achieve that falls at or below 1200 calories. Try adjusting your weight loss goal. You may want to lose faster, but you'll likely give up faster if you are starving.0
-
Hi Laur4795, I am using a Garmin Vivofit. I find that as it tracks my steps (I haven't loaded any other exercises yet) MFP will tell me that I have 'earned' so many extra calories for that day. The more steps, the more calories I earn. I am just up to between 10,000 and 11,000 steps and it has given me usually another 250 to 350 (+/-) extra calories each day. I think there is a way to adjust the number of calories in MFP, if you upgrade?
Also, I do find that when focusing on eating nutrient dense foods, and plenty of the right kinds of healthy fats and proteins, I don't really feel hungry at around 1200 to 1300.0 -
Could it be a metabolism thing? I still manage to put weight on at 1200. I only seem to lose weight at between 700 and 900.-1
-
Could it be a metabolism thing? I still manage to put weight on at 1200. I only seem to lose weight at between 700 and 900.
No! There is no one that has such low BMR... eating under 1200 for women and 1500 for men is unhealthy and dangerous. Do not suggest that to others and stop doing it yourself.0 -
It's more likely that you aren't accurately tracking your calorie intake and you are eating more calories than you think you are eating. Are you using a food scale to weigh all solid foods and measuring cups/spoons for liquids? Are you using database entries with accurate nutritional information?Could it be a metabolism thing? I still manage to put weight on at 1200. I only seem to lose weight at between 700 and 900.
I felt hungry all of the time on 1200 but I do fine on 1300-1350. It's amazing the difference that 100 calories can make in your level of satiation.I just started this journey and when I put in all my info mfp has me at 1200 Cals a day ! Is anyone losing on that ? I feel like I'll starve ? Lol . Sounds kind of low !0 -
@laur4795 I hear ya. I too just started MFP last Monday and feel it's a bit too low. Struggling to keep under 1,220 calories. I'm not starving but find myself craving munchies. I work at an office and have a pretty sedentary life except for just started going to the gym a month ago. My goal is to loose 2lbs a day and I currently weight 236 the nice thing Is that calories burned at gym are added so I can eat more but still is a struggle0
-
I've been tracking it for the last six years using various databases and methods. I'm a fulltime baker so MFP recommends 2600, but like I said even as low as 1200 I'm still putting on weight. I'm not recommending it to anyone, but the only way I've been able able to lose weight is below 1000. Currently using MFP's own database for the figures and at around 1400-1500 a day I've put on 2lbs in the last month.0
-
OP, since you haven't come back to clarify, I wanted to expand on my post:
If you are set to 2 lbs per week, and have less than @ 75 lbs to lose, lower your weekly goal, it is too aggressive.
If you are relatively short (like 5'3 or under) and sedentary, 1200 MIGHT be an appropriate goal. If it is, you can start off setting yourself to a half-lb per week to get used to a slightly higher calorie goal and then lower your calories further when you feel ready. It's not a race - you don't have to start off at full speed.
Remember that MFP expects you to eat back your exercise calories. So log your exercise and eat back 50%-75% of them (MFP tends to overestimate calorie burns).
If you would like more specific suggestions, you would need to provide your stats.0 -
There are many inaccuracies in the MFP database. Most items are entered by users. You need to double-check everything.I've been tracking it for the last six years using various databases and methods. I'm a fulltime baker so MFP recommends 2600, but like I said even as low as 1200 I'm still putting on weight. I'm not recommending it to anyone, but the only way I've been able able to lose weight is below 1000. Currently using MFP's own database for the figures and at around 1400-1500 a day I've put on 2lbs in the last month.
This flowchart has many good suggestions to try:
0 -
I've been tracking it for the last six years using various databases and methods. I'm a fulltime baker so MFP recommends 2600, but like I said even as low as 1200 I'm still putting on weight. I'm not recommending it to anyone, but the only way I've been able able to lose weight is below 1000. Currently using MFP's own database for the figures and at around 1400-1500 a day I've put on 2lbs in the last month.
Your profile says you are male. There are two possibilities:- You are not using a food scale and are grossly underestimating your calories.
- You are some kind of medical miracle and need to see a doctor immediately.
Either way, your experience has nothing to do with this OP's thread. You should start your own thread, rather than confuse this one.0 -
KorvapuustiPossu wrote: »Could it be a metabolism thing? I still manage to put weight on at 1200. I only seem to lose weight at between 700 and 900.
No! There is no one that has such low BMR... eating under 1200 for women and 1500 for men is unhealthy and dangerous. Do not suggest that to others and stop doing it yourself.
You shouldn't make statements like this as you are obviously not that person's doctor. There are people with metabolism's that are significantly different from the norms (though rare). If a person is finding difficulty losing weight with the "normal" methods they should be advised to discuss their weight loss goals and eating habits with a medical professional that can assess that person's health conditions and provide professional, educated advice on how to proceed.
Due to a medical condition, my mother is (per doctor's orders) on a meal plan that only includes 700 calories to maintain her current weight (not lose weight, to maintain it).
While it is unlikely that the average person has a medical condition that would necessitate such usual dietary needs, none of us is the physician for a random person from the internet that we've never met.0 -
1200 calories... It is only enough if you have to stay in bed 24/7... I recommend you to calculate your TDEE (Total Daily Energy Expenditure) based on your lifestyle. Then measure everything you eat in a day and track it here. Low calories might seem like a quick fix but they do more harm than good.0
-
Your profile says you are male. There are two possibilities:- You are not using a food scale and are grossly underestimating your calories.
- You are some kind of medical miracle and need to see a doctor immediately.
Either way, your experience has nothing to do with this OP's thread. You should start your own thread, rather than confuse this one.
Being male doesn't automatically mean I don't use scales or underestimate calories. I have been a professional baker for 12 years so I understand the importance of appropriately measuring food and ingredients.
The doctor hasn't found anything yet aside from a knackered back.
I posted due to the OP's query on 1200 being too little. It fit in a way.0 -
I just started this journey and when I put in all my info mfp has me at 1200 Cals a day ! Is anyone losing on that ? I feel like I'll starve ? Lol . Sounds kind of low !
I thought it was crazy low too, until I realized that MFP doesn't include exercise calories (even though it asks what you are planning to do) and so when you exercise you eat that back (or back of it, to avoid overestimating). This includes calories from walking around if you chose sedentary (beyond a minimum amount).
I did 1250 + exercise calories and found it pretty reasonable. Then I got tired of eating so low on my rest day, so switched to a method that averages exercise calories over the week and ate 1600 (or so, I changed it various times).0 -
I've been on 1200 calories for about three or four months now. It's not as hard as you think, especially if you exercise (I know people say not to eat back your exercise calories, but I eat back some). I have a fried egg and toast for breakfast, half a ham and cheese sandwich and salad for lunch, and some sort of chicken based dinner dish. I've lost about 21lbs doing this so far.0
-
I dunno, I've lost 80lbs with 1200 cals so far.0
-
I've been on it 34 days and I've lost 14lbs it wasn't easy at first but now I am always under the 1200 and don't usually feel hungry0
-
KorvapuustiPossu wrote: »Could it be a metabolism thing? I still manage to put weight on at 1200. I only seem to lose weight at between 700 and 900.
No! There is no one that has such low BMR... eating under 1200 for women and 1500 for men is unhealthy and dangerous. Do not suggest that to others and stop doing it yourself.
You shouldn't make statements like this as you are obviously not that person's doctor. There are people with metabolism's that are significantly different from the norms (though rare). If a person is finding difficulty losing weight with the "normal" methods they should be advised to discuss their weight loss goals and eating habits with a medical professional that can assess that person's health conditions and provide professional, educated advice on how to proceed.
Due to a medical condition, my mother is (per doctor's orders) on a meal plan that only includes 700 calories to maintain her current weight (not lose weight, to maintain it).
While it is unlikely that the average person has a medical condition that would necessitate such usual dietary needs, none of us is the physician for a random person from the internet that we've never met.
If we take extreme and highly unlikely scenarios out of equation we can safely say that adult female needs 1200 as a minimum and adult male 1500 as a minimum. 5 month old baby needs about 600 kcal...1 year old about 850 and 3 year olds 1300...just to put things in perspective.0 -
KorvapuustiPossu wrote: »KorvapuustiPossu wrote: »Could it be a metabolism thing? I still manage to put weight on at 1200. I only seem to lose weight at between 700 and 900.
No! There is no one that has such low BMR... eating under 1200 for women and 1500 for men is unhealthy and dangerous. Do not suggest that to others and stop doing it yourself.
You shouldn't make statements like this as you are obviously not that person's doctor. There are people with metabolism's that are significantly different from the norms (though rare). If a person is finding difficulty losing weight with the "normal" methods they should be advised to discuss their weight loss goals and eating habits with a medical professional that can assess that person's health conditions and provide professional, educated advice on how to proceed.
Due to a medical condition, my mother is (per doctor's orders) on a meal plan that only includes 700 calories to maintain her current weight (not lose weight, to maintain it).
While it is unlikely that the average person has a medical condition that would necessitate such usual dietary needs, none of us is the physician for a random person from the internet that we've never met.
If we take extreme and highly unlikely scenarios out of equation we can safely say that adult female needs 1200 as a minimum and adult male 1500 as a minimum. 5 month old baby needs about 600 kcal...1 year old about 850 and 3 year olds 1300...just to put things in perspective.
^^this is general too. There are other factors. Gender, age, activity level, genetics, health issues. I lost on 1200. I lost over 1/2 of my current body weight and have been maintaining for over 2 years on 1600 calories. Anything more than 1600 and I begin to gain. General guidelines are just that, general. As with most things related to weight, most people have to experiment a little to find what works for them, with a health care professionals direction and involvement.
Eating less calories than you burn results in weight loss for most people, the numbers are individual.
0 -
I've been tracking it for the last six years using various databases and methods. I'm a fulltime baker so MFP recommends 2600, but like I said even as low as 1200 I'm still putting on weight. I'm not recommending it to anyone, but the only way I've been able able to lose weight is below 1000. Currently using MFP's own database for the figures and at around 1400-1500 a day I've put on 2lbs in the last month.
0 -
I have read on a few sites (Mayo being one) that a general rule is, calories to lose weight is 10x your goal weight, ie: 1400 for 140 pounds?
thoughts?0 -
Your profile says you are male. There are two possibilities:- You are not using a food scale and are grossly underestimating your calories.
- You are some kind of medical miracle and need to see a doctor immediately.
Either way, your experience has nothing to do with this OP's thread. You should start your own thread, rather than confuse this one.
Being male doesn't automatically mean I don't use scales or underestimate calories. I have been a professional baker for 12 years so I understand the importance of appropriately measuring food and ingredients.
The doctor hasn't found anything yet aside from a knackered back.
I posted due to the OP's query on 1200 being too little. It fit in a way.
Sorry, I forgot to type part of what I meant, which is as a male, you should be eating a bare minimum of 1500 cals, even if you are very small for a man or very sedentary. Not that because you are male you can't log properly.
Regardless, we can't really tell the OP much more unless she comes back and provides her stats. Just because some people have done well on 1200 doesn't mean she will. I am a woman in my 40's, on the short side, and at a healthy weight, and I am eating 1800 cals to maintain my weight with light exercise. I would starve on 1200 cals and probably lose an unhealthy amount of weight.0 -
jamiewilldo wrote: »I have read on a few sites (Mayo being one) that a general rule is, calories to lose weight is 10x your goal weight, ie: 1400 for 140 pounds?
thoughts?
I would disagree with that. Maybe if you sit on the couch all day that would be true, But I am maintaining at 130 lbs eating 1,800 cals with only light exercise. It is really easy to either use MFP or a TDEE calculator to get a good estimate of the right calories. Variables like gender, height, age, activity level all affect your calories.0 -
Thanks
Did you eat back any exercise calories back?0 -
jamiewilldo wrote: »I have read on a few sites (Mayo being one) that a general rule is, calories to lose weight is 10x your goal weight, ie: 1400 for 140 pounds?
thoughts?
It really depends on how much you exercise. I'm currently doing 1700 to lose even though my goal is 118.0 -
jamiewilldo wrote: »Thanks
Did you eat back any exercise calories back?
Yep, anywhere from 50% to 100% depending on how hungry I am
. When I was trying to lose, I tried to keep close to eating back 50% just to be on the safe side. 0
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.3K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.2K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 424 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.7K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions