Skip to content
  • Register
    • Viewing the message boards in:

    Sugar sugar

    2»

    Replies

    • Posts: 231 Member
      lemurcat12 wrote: »
      Pineapple is amazing. Oreos are overrated.

      (Ducking and running!)

      I'm in full agreement !!!! Pineapple all the way !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I don't mind the golden oreos but nope...I'll take fruit over cookies any day of the week :) Never been a fan of oreos to begin with
    • Posts: 15,317 Member
      quiksylver296 wrote: »
      show previous quotes

      There, there, @Carlos_421. Have a s'more.

      x7vpv3vlv7qf.jpg

      Drool!
    • Posts: 18 Member
      lemurcat12 wrote: »
      show previous quotes

      I'm actually down on Oreos in part because of all these new flavors. It's wrong. Oreos should have regular and double stuff only, like when I was a kid. ;-)

      Oreos have trans fats.
    • Posts: 30,886 Member
      jquizzle10 wrote: »
      show previous quotes

      Oreos have trans fats.

      How is this relevant to my comment?
    • Posts: 2,468 Member
      I dunno .... being down on oreos is like.... being down .... :/ on life.
    • Posts: 1,475 Member
      jquizzle10 wrote: »
      show previous quotes

      Oreos have trans fats.

      Who cares?
    • Posts: 6,037 Member
      edited May 2016
      lemurcat12 wrote: »
      show previous quotes

      How is this relevant to my comment?

      That, and I don't believe they do anymore..
    • Posts: 5,132 Member
      jquizzle10 wrote: »
      show previous quotes

      Oreos have trans fats.

      Even if they did, they're delicious enough to be worth it.




      But they don't.
      lperp9wau97p.png
    • Posts: 2,468 Member
      Wow, trans fat free oreos!
    • Posts: 5,132 Member
      Gamliela wrote: »
      Wow, trans fat free oreos!

      Aka, all Oreos.

      They're also vegan, for those who care about that sort of thing.
    • Posts: 18 Member
      Carlos_421 wrote: »
      show previous quotes

      Even if they did, they're delicious enough to be worth it.




      But they don't.
      lperp9wau97p.png

      Get informed. Just because it says zero doesn't mean there's none. It only means there's less than 0.5 g per seving.
    • Posts: 5,481 Member
      jquizzle10 wrote: »
      Read - Pure, White, and Deadly: How Sugar Is Killing Us and What We Can Do to Stop It.

      LOL
    • Posts: 5,481 Member
      Still waiting for the sugar to kill me, but my doctor keeps telling me I'm in perfect health!!!
    • Posts: 339 Member
      who cares about trans fats when you are eating empty calories that don't even taste good.
    • Posts: 6,037 Member
      Serah87 wrote: »
      Still waiting for the sugar to kill me, but my doctor keeps telling me I'm in perfect health!!!

      Personally I think avoiding sugar can be harmful. Sugar reduces stress, provides glucose for the brain and readily available energy for the body. As long as you balance your macros and don't eat too many calories overall you're fine...
    • Posts: 5,132 Member
      jquizzle10 wrote: »
      show previous quotes

      Get informed. Just because it says zero doesn't mean there's none. It only means there's less than 0.5 g per seving.

      I am informed. I'm fully aware of the regulations.

      Now, you made a definitive statement that Oreos have trans fats. I offered evidence that they do not (definitive evidence that they at least have less than .5 milligrams).
      Do you have any evidence to defend your claim that Oreos do indeed contain some level of trans fats?
      Or do you just know that surely they must because they're Oreos?
    • Posts: 4,647 Member
      jquizzle10 wrote: »
      show previous quotes

      Get informed. Just because it says zero doesn't mean there's none. It only means there's less than 0.5 g per seving.

      And a food can be advertised as having 0 calories per serving as long as it's under 5. Why? Because it's insignificant.
    • Posts: 10,477 Member
      there's no hydrogenated stuff on the oreos ingredient list.
    • Posts: 30,886 Member
      J72FIT wrote: »
      show previous quotes

      That, and I don't believe they do anymore..

      You are correct -- looks like they removed it at the beginning of '06.
    • Posts: 7,739 Member
      yarwell wrote: »
      there's no hydrogenated stuff on the oreos ingredient list.

      Yeah, but what do you mean, by "no" ... stuff? You mean just a little, right?


      Oh, you actually mean, none?

      ;)
    • Posts: 1,525 Member
      jquizzle10 wrote: »
      show previous quotes

      Get informed. Just because it says zero doesn't mean there's none. It only means there's less than 0.5 g per seving.

      let's get excited about it
    • Posts: 32 Member
      edited May 2016
      For the record I'm 40, female, 5'8" & approx 120lbs. Have always been a bean pole and my family is all tall/thin
    • Posts: 13,454 Member
      edited May 2016
      lemurcat12 wrote: »
      show previous quotes

      I'm actually down on Oreos in part because of all these new flavors. It's wrong. Oreos should have regular and double stuff only, like when I was a kid. ;-)


      50167880.jpg
    • Posts: 30,886 Member
      Heh, I admit it.
    This discussion has been closed.

    Welcome!

    It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.
    Sign In
    Register

    Quick Links

    Categories