Try this exercise

«1

Replies

  • rainbowbow
    rainbowbow Posts: 7,490 Member
    ok but why
  • singingflutelady
    singingflutelady Posts: 8,736 Member
    100 crunches? No thank you have better things to do lol
  • rempejeff
    rempejeff Posts: 46 Member
    Why NOT.
  • singingflutelady
    singingflutelady Posts: 8,736 Member
    There are tons of way more efficient ab exercises lol
  • rempejeff
    rempejeff Posts: 46 Member
    True....BUT this one is awesome
  • rainbowbow
    rainbowbow Posts: 7,490 Member
    edited June 2016
    rempejeff wrote: »
    Why NOT.

    Because the weight loss claim is bogus. I am not looking to increase my endurance. I am not looking to tire myself out when i could be doing more effective exercise. etc. I can go on...

    I was more-so asking why this is special and needs to be tried.
  • singingflutelady
    singingflutelady Posts: 8,736 Member
    The rest of it is ok :)
  • Chef_Barbell
    Chef_Barbell Posts: 6,646 Member
    Uhh. no. I will stick to lifting.
  • diannethegeek
    diannethegeek Posts: 14,776 Member
    10 pounds in two weeks?
  • singingflutelady
    singingflutelady Posts: 8,736 Member
    Didn't see that part, um no that is not true
  • usmcmp
    usmcmp Posts: 21,220 Member
    I like how they mention nothing about calorie intake. As if you magically lose weight through exercise alone.
  • BZAH10
    BZAH10 Posts: 5,710 Member
    rempejeff wrote: »
    Why NOT.

    Is this the routine you follow? If so, glad that it works for you, but I refuse to do crunches, planks are more effective but it takes more than ONE. Also, I prefer much more volume for my squats and lunges while holding heavy weights.

    I mean, this routine would suffice if I was traveling and stuck in a hotel room with no gym. For one day. Body weight exercises can be effective but this is certainly not a long-term plan. Nor can it promise ANY lost pounds.

    Sorry, OP. Just saying this looks like one of those Pintrest workouts.
  • sijomial
    sijomial Posts: 19,811 Member
    rempejeff wrote: »
    Why NOT.
    Because it makes your cap slide forward?
    :)

    More seriously I have an aversion to ridiculous tag lines of "drop 10lbs in just 2 weeks". That just destroys any credibility that a workout might have.
  • rempejeff
    rempejeff Posts: 46 Member
    Ok ok ok. This is not the workout that I do I have done it but not the one I do.
  • BZAH10
    BZAH10 Posts: 5,710 Member
    Well, I'd omit the 100 crunches and it would be a good warm-up anyway!
  • RoxieDawn
    RoxieDawn Posts: 15,488 Member
    10 Pounds in 2 weeks? HAHAHAHAHAHA... Try again OP!
  • Carlos_421
    Carlos_421 Posts: 5,132 Member
    maxresdefault.jpg
  • Carlos_421
    Carlos_421 Posts: 5,132 Member
    rempejeff wrote: »
    Ok ok ok. This is not the workout that I do I have done it but not the one I do.

    Then...why should we?
  • Carlos_421
    Carlos_421 Posts: 5,132 Member
    rempejeff wrote: »
    True....BUT this one is awesome

    Not really...I see this as a warm up. Or morning calisthenics at summer camp.
  • jessef593
    jessef593 Posts: 2,272 Member
    To lose 10 pounds in 2 weeks you'd have to be at a daily caloric deficit of 2500 calories. That's literally starving yourself to the point of an eating disorder. No thanks. I'm happy with my 1lb a week for 12 weeks while not ended up in the hospital. I do my standard strength and hypertrophy lifting with zero cardio and still lose weight eating at 2600 calories a day. So I'm more than happy with my current system.

Categories