Anyone else found MFP goals and lbs lost to be way off?
ninjachicken4000
Posts: 26 Member
MFP seems to think I have a ridiculously low TDEE or something, because when I am eating 500 calories below my TDEE (calculated on another site) a day MFP seems to think I'll only lose 2lbs every 5 weeks. When actually I should be and do lose on average 1lb per week.
Anyone else had this probably with MFP? Have a problem with the goals as well, tell it I want to lose 1lb a week and it tells me how much to eat to lose 0.4lbs in 6 weeks. Doesn't work at all.
Love this site for the food logging as it's easy to use. But the rest of it has been nothing but hassle or completely wrong for me.
Anyone else had this probably with MFP? Have a problem with the goals as well, tell it I want to lose 1lb a week and it tells me how much to eat to lose 0.4lbs in 6 weeks. Doesn't work at all.
Love this site for the food logging as it's easy to use. But the rest of it has been nothing but hassle or completely wrong for me.
1
Replies
-
Mfp goes by the NEAT method and so doesn't include exercise calories, you have to add them in manually0
-
Yup, MFP uses NEAT rather than TDEE. When I eat some, but not all, of my exercise calories, I lose as expected.1
-
I'd never heard of NEAT before, if that basically basal metabolic rate? As in coma levels of calories? Because even at doing little to no exercise a day (except for basic daily activities such as showering, making food, walking 2 minutes to the bus stop etc) My calorific expenditure is still higher than what MFP is targeting (around 1600).nosebag1212 wrote: »Mfp goes by the NEAT method and so doesn't include exercise calories, you have to add them in manuallykshama2001 wrote: »Yup, MFP uses NEAT rather than TDEE. When I eat some, but not all, of my exercise calories, I lose as expected.1
-
My MFP has been off lately.... The calculations are weird and don't add up..not sure what's going on3
-
OP, read the stickies at the beginning of each forum.
For exercise calories, NEAT, EAT, TEF, TDEE, BMR, etc.. read this link.
http://community.myfitnesspal.com/en/discussion/818082/exercise-calories-again-wtf/p10 -
Also OP, how tall are you? MFP will give you the bare minimum to loose weight. So if you put in 2 pounds, and it basically tells you that you will loose .5 or .6 pounds in five weeks, it is giving you the bare min recommended regardless if you chose 2, 1.5, or 1 pounds a week.
So to be clear if you want to loose 1 pounds and it still says .5 or .6 MFP will not allow you go under the 1200 recommended calories for woman, or 1500 calories for a man.
You can choose to use your own TDEE custom method and not use MFP NEAT setup if you choose.
The app is working as designed, if you have a particular issue with your account, all you have to do is log your issue with MFP Customer/Technical Support. They do respond to open support cases.1 -
you can also change your "activity level", which should help mfp be more accurate2
-
OP, read the stickies at the beginning of each forum.
For exercise calories, NEAT, EAT, TEF, TDEE, BMR, etc.. read this link.
http://community.myfitnesspal.com/en/discussion/818082/exercise-calories-again-wtf/p1
Thanks, I had not seen that. I'd always assumed MFP used TDEE.0 -
Also OP, how tall are you? MFP will give you the bare minimum to loose weight. So if you put in 2 pounds, and it basically tells you that you will loose .5 or .6 pounds in five weeks, it is giving you the bare min recommended regardless if you chose 2, 1.5, or 1 pounds a week.
So to be clear if you want to loose 1 pounds and it still says .5 or .6 MFP will not allow you go under the 1200 recommended calories for woman, or 1500 calories for a man.
You can choose to use your own TDEE custom method and not use MFP NEAT setup if you choose.
The app is working as designed, if you have a particular issue with your account, all you have to do is log your issue with MFP Customer/Technical Support. They do respond to open support cases.
Thanks, it seems it not letting me choose 1lb per week because it uses NEAT and I'm not inputting exercise as I am sedentary. So basically NEAT is not a good system for me. But I don't mind so much, I was just wondering why this was happening. I'll still be using the food log as it's great.0 -
errollmaclean wrote: »you can also change your "activity level", which should help mfp be more accurate
This is not entirely true, the activity level is still for calculating calories using NEAT. So for increasing the activity level, you would do this if you have a very active job, or very active outside of exercise. This activity level tells MFP that you work on your feet, highly active in general, etc.. but it still wants you enter exercise separately
http://community.myfitnesspal.com/en/discussion/819055/setting-your-calorie-and-macro-targets/p10 -
ninjachicken4000 wrote: »Also OP, how tall are you? MFP will give you the bare minimum to loose weight. So if you put in 2 pounds, and it basically tells you that you will loose .5 or .6 pounds in five weeks, it is giving you the bare min recommended regardless if you chose 2, 1.5, or 1 pounds a week.
So to be clear if you want to loose 1 pounds and it still says .5 or .6 MFP will not allow you go under the 1200 recommended calories for woman, or 1500 calories for a man.
You can choose to use your own TDEE custom method and not use MFP NEAT setup if you choose.
The app is working as designed, if you have a particular issue with your account, all you have to do is log your issue with MFP Customer/Technical Support. They do respond to open support cases.
Thanks, it seems it not letting me choose 1lb per week because it uses NEAT and I'm not inputting exercise as I am sedentary. So basically NEAT is not a good system for me. But I don't mind so much, I was just wondering why this was happening. I'll still be using the food log as it's great.
I am assuming that you are getting the min 1200 or 1500 (i do not know your gender) calorie goal?
You can use the custom setting and run your stats using for example the IIFYM calculator to get your TDEE, etc.. and set it up that way. There are many folks here on MFP that do not like to use NEAT at all.0 -
ninjachicken4000 wrote: »Also OP, how tall are you? MFP will give you the bare minimum to loose weight. So if you put in 2 pounds, and it basically tells you that you will loose .5 or .6 pounds in five weeks, it is giving you the bare min recommended regardless if you chose 2, 1.5, or 1 pounds a week.
So to be clear if you want to loose 1 pounds and it still says .5 or .6 MFP will not allow you go under the 1200 recommended calories for woman, or 1500 calories for a man.
You can choose to use your own TDEE custom method and not use MFP NEAT setup if you choose.
The app is working as designed, if you have a particular issue with your account, all you have to do is log your issue with MFP Customer/Technical Support. They do respond to open support cases.
Thanks, it seems it not letting me choose 1lb per week because it uses NEAT and I'm not inputting exercise as I am sedentary. So basically NEAT is not a good system for me. But I don't mind so much, I was just wondering why this was happening. I'll still be using the food log as it's great.
I am assuming that you are getting the min 1200 or 1500 (i do not know your gender) calorie goal?
You can use the custom setting and run your stats using for example the IIFYM calculator to get your TDEE, etc.. and set it up that way. There are many folks here on MFP that do not like to use NEAT at all.
I actually eat 1100 (and yes this is totally fine for me and my doctor has OK'd it, I am a very small in height woman so don't need as much) to lose 1lb per week as TDEE is 1600. But even at 1200 it doesn't show me losing weight at the rate it should because of the whole using NEAT system (which I don't understand at all why MFP uses NEAT and not TDEE)
Yeah I use my own method anyway of how much I should eat anyway and keep track of my weight, it would just be nice if MFP would let you use TDEE so it could be altogether in one place. Oh well.1 -
I was confused how this site worked as well. I just use TDEE and eat 80% of my TDEE calories which factors in my activity level. If I track my calories accurately it's spot on. Much easier to me to do that, but everyone is different.
I like using MFP to log exercise activity and stay motivated, but I've never used the diary or calorie side of the site.1 -
ninjachicken4000 wrote: »ninjachicken4000 wrote: »Also OP, how tall are you? MFP will give you the bare minimum to loose weight. So if you put in 2 pounds, and it basically tells you that you will loose .5 or .6 pounds in five weeks, it is giving you the bare min recommended regardless if you chose 2, 1.5, or 1 pounds a week.
So to be clear if you want to loose 1 pounds and it still says .5 or .6 MFP will not allow you go under the 1200 recommended calories for woman, or 1500 calories for a man.
You can choose to use your own TDEE custom method and not use MFP NEAT setup if you choose.
The app is working as designed, if you have a particular issue with your account, all you have to do is log your issue with MFP Customer/Technical Support. They do respond to open support cases.
Thanks, it seems it not letting me choose 1lb per week because it uses NEAT and I'm not inputting exercise as I am sedentary. So basically NEAT is not a good system for me. But I don't mind so much, I was just wondering why this was happening. I'll still be using the food log as it's great.
I am assuming that you are getting the min 1200 or 1500 (i do not know your gender) calorie goal?
You can use the custom setting and run your stats using for example the IIFYM calculator to get your TDEE, etc.. and set it up that way. There are many folks here on MFP that do not like to use NEAT at all.
I actually eat 1100 (and yes this is totally fine for me and my doctor has OK'd it, I am a very small in height woman so don't need as much) to lose 1lb per week as TDEE is 1600. But even at 1200 it doesn't show me losing weight at the rate it should because of the whole using NEAT system (which I don't understand at all why MFP uses NEAT and not TDEE)
Yeah I use my own method anyway of how much I should eat anyway and keep track of my weight, it would just be nice if MFP would let you use TDEE so it could be altogether in one place. Oh well.
MFP is giving you the bare min it will allow you to setup which for female that is 1200. I too am a very short woman and have the same issues with MFP only giving me ounces to loose.
MFP will let you setup 1 pound or 2 pounds in the entry field when setting up your stats and goals, but what it will NOT do is allow you to go below 1200 calories. SO regardless if you enter 2, 1.5 or 1 pounds, this too many pounds to loose for your height, weight, and age that puts you in what MFP call unhealthy weight loss (too aggressive) and will only allow you 1200 calories a day, so this is going to put you at the 1200 REQUIRED min it will allow to you eat. This is setup by design.
So with doctor approval and supervision using the TDEE for setting up a 1100 calorie goal is certainly fine.
edited to add: MFP will allow you to use TDEE method, this why the custom entry is available to all users. This allows a user to customize their goals and plan accordingly.0 -
ninjachicken4000 wrote: »ninjachicken4000 wrote: »Also OP, how tall are you? MFP will give you the bare minimum to loose weight. So if you put in 2 pounds, and it basically tells you that you will loose .5 or .6 pounds in five weeks, it is giving you the bare min recommended regardless if you chose 2, 1.5, or 1 pounds a week.
So to be clear if you want to loose 1 pounds and it still says .5 or .6 MFP will not allow you go under the 1200 recommended calories for woman, or 1500 calories for a man.
You can choose to use your own TDEE custom method and not use MFP NEAT setup if you choose.
The app is working as designed, if you have a particular issue with your account, all you have to do is log your issue with MFP Customer/Technical Support. They do respond to open support cases.
Thanks, it seems it not letting me choose 1lb per week because it uses NEAT and I'm not inputting exercise as I am sedentary. So basically NEAT is not a good system for me. But I don't mind so much, I was just wondering why this was happening. I'll still be using the food log as it's great.
I am assuming that you are getting the min 1200 or 1500 (i do not know your gender) calorie goal?
You can use the custom setting and run your stats using for example the IIFYM calculator to get your TDEE, etc.. and set it up that way. There are many folks here on MFP that do not like to use NEAT at all.
I actually eat 1100 (and yes this is totally fine for me and my doctor has OK'd it, I am a very small in height woman so don't need as much) to lose 1lb per week as TDEE is 1600. But even at 1200 it doesn't show me losing weight at the rate it should because of the whole using NEAT system (which I don't understand at all why MFP uses NEAT and not TDEE)
Yeah I use my own method anyway of how much I should eat anyway and keep track of my weight, it would just be nice if MFP would let you use TDEE so it could be altogether in one place. Oh well.
MFP is giving you the bare min it will allow you to setup which for female that is 1200. I too am a very short woman and have the same issues with MFP only giving me ounces to loose.
MFP will let you setup 1 pound or 2 pounds in the entry fields when setting up your stats and goals, what it will NOT do is allow you to go below 1200 calories. SO regardless if you enter 2, 1.5 or 1 that is too many pounds that put you under the 1200 REQUIRED min it will allow to you eat. This is setup by design.
So with doctor approval and supervision using the TDEE for setting up an 1100 calorie goal is certainly fine.
Like I said, even if I'm inputting 1200 calories it is still projecting the wrong weight loss goals because it is using NEAT (so it thinks I'm burning way below what I am). NEAT is system I have never used that just seems like a complete hassle to me. TDEE is much better as it's all inclusive and no fuss.
I've just changed my activity level to very active (even though I'm sedentary) on here to more accurately represent my actual TDEE. So at least I can see somewhat of a normal weight loss goal, even if not perfect.0 -
ninjachicken4000 wrote: »ninjachicken4000 wrote: »ninjachicken4000 wrote: »Also OP, how tall are you? MFP will give you the bare minimum to loose weight. So if you put in 2 pounds, and it basically tells you that you will loose .5 or .6 pounds in five weeks, it is giving you the bare min recommended regardless if you chose 2, 1.5, or 1 pounds a week.
So to be clear if you want to loose 1 pounds and it still says .5 or .6 MFP will not allow you go under the 1200 recommended calories for woman, or 1500 calories for a man.
You can choose to use your own TDEE custom method and not use MFP NEAT setup if you choose.
The app is working as designed, if you have a particular issue with your account, all you have to do is log your issue with MFP Customer/Technical Support. They do respond to open support cases.
Thanks, it seems it not letting me choose 1lb per week because it uses NEAT and I'm not inputting exercise as I am sedentary. So basically NEAT is not a good system for me. But I don't mind so much, I was just wondering why this was happening. I'll still be using the food log as it's great.
I am assuming that you are getting the min 1200 or 1500 (i do not know your gender) calorie goal?
You can use the custom setting and run your stats using for example the IIFYM calculator to get your TDEE, etc.. and set it up that way. There are many folks here on MFP that do not like to use NEAT at all.
I actually eat 1100 (and yes this is totally fine for me and my doctor has OK'd it, I am a very small in height woman so don't need as much) to lose 1lb per week as TDEE is 1600. But even at 1200 it doesn't show me losing weight at the rate it should because of the whole using NEAT system (which I don't understand at all why MFP uses NEAT and not TDEE)
Yeah I use my own method anyway of how much I should eat anyway and keep track of my weight, it would just be nice if MFP would let you use TDEE so it could be altogether in one place. Oh well.
MFP is giving you the bare min it will allow you to setup which for female that is 1200. I too am a very short woman and have the same issues with MFP only giving me ounces to loose.
MFP will let you setup 1 pound or 2 pounds in the entry fields when setting up your stats and goals, what it will NOT do is allow you to go below 1200 calories. SO regardless if you enter 2, 1.5 or 1 that is too many pounds that put you under the 1200 REQUIRED min it will allow to you eat. This is setup by design.
So with doctor approval and supervision using the TDEE for setting up an 1100 calorie goal is certainly fine.
Like I said, even if I'm inputting 1200 calories it is still projecting the wrong weight loss goals because it is using NEAT (so it thinks I'm burning way below what I am). NEAT is system I have never used that just seems like a complete hassle to me. TDEE is much better as it's all inclusive and no fuss.
I've just changed my activity level to very active (even though I'm sedentary) on here to more accurately represent my actual TDEE. So at least I can see somewhat of a normal weight loss goal, even if not perfect.
OP, this is working as designed. I have tried to explain this and obviously failing miserably.. LOL
The weight loss goal it not wrong. It is correct. And MFP can use TDEE.. I am not sure what you wanting to have the software do that it already does. Weight loss is a numbers game, and MFP is not limiting the way you can figure the numbers for your goals.
The stickies at the very beginning of the forums gives you all the instructions on how to setup your account when you create your account.0 -
ninjachicken4000 wrote: »ninjachicken4000 wrote: »ninjachicken4000 wrote: »Also OP, how tall are you? MFP will give you the bare minimum to loose weight. So if you put in 2 pounds, and it basically tells you that you will loose .5 or .6 pounds in five weeks, it is giving you the bare min recommended regardless if you chose 2, 1.5, or 1 pounds a week.
So to be clear if you want to loose 1 pounds and it still says .5 or .6 MFP will not allow you go under the 1200 recommended calories for woman, or 1500 calories for a man.
You can choose to use your own TDEE custom method and not use MFP NEAT setup if you choose.
The app is working as designed, if you have a particular issue with your account, all you have to do is log your issue with MFP Customer/Technical Support. They do respond to open support cases.
Thanks, it seems it not letting me choose 1lb per week because it uses NEAT and I'm not inputting exercise as I am sedentary. So basically NEAT is not a good system for me. But I don't mind so much, I was just wondering why this was happening. I'll still be using the food log as it's great.
I am assuming that you are getting the min 1200 or 1500 (i do not know your gender) calorie goal?
You can use the custom setting and run your stats using for example the IIFYM calculator to get your TDEE, etc.. and set it up that way. There are many folks here on MFP that do not like to use NEAT at all.
I actually eat 1100 (and yes this is totally fine for me and my doctor has OK'd it, I am a very small in height woman so don't need as much) to lose 1lb per week as TDEE is 1600. But even at 1200 it doesn't show me losing weight at the rate it should because of the whole using NEAT system (which I don't understand at all why MFP uses NEAT and not TDEE)
Yeah I use my own method anyway of how much I should eat anyway and keep track of my weight, it would just be nice if MFP would let you use TDEE so it could be altogether in one place. Oh well.
MFP is giving you the bare min it will allow you to setup which for female that is 1200. I too am a very short woman and have the same issues with MFP only giving me ounces to loose.
MFP will let you setup 1 pound or 2 pounds in the entry fields when setting up your stats and goals, what it will NOT do is allow you to go below 1200 calories. SO regardless if you enter 2, 1.5 or 1 that is too many pounds that put you under the 1200 REQUIRED min it will allow to you eat. This is setup by design.
So with doctor approval and supervision using the TDEE for setting up an 1100 calorie goal is certainly fine.
Like I said, even if I'm inputting 1200 calories it is still projecting the wrong weight loss goals because it is using NEAT (so it thinks I'm burning way below what I am). NEAT is system I have never used that just seems like a complete hassle to me. TDEE is much better as it's all inclusive and no fuss.
I've just changed my activity level to very active (even though I'm sedentary) on here to more accurately represent my actual TDEE. So at least I can see somewhat of a normal weight loss goal, even if not perfect.
OP, this is working as designed. I have tried to explain this and obviously failing miserably.. LOL
The weight loss goal it not wrong. It is correct. And MFP can use TDEE.. I am not sure what you wanting to have the software do that it already does. Weight loss is a numbers game, and MFP is not limiting the way you can figure the numbers for your goals.
The stickies at the very beginning of the forums gives you all the instructions on how to setup your account when you create your account.
Yeah the software may be working as planned, but it is wrong for me because I don't use NEAT, never have. So it is not projecting my weight loss accurately, BECAUSE it is using NEAT and nothing else. Not sure how I can make that clearer? Not saying NEAT is wrong, saying I don't use it and so it is wrong for me as I'm not adding other calorie expenditure on top of NEAT because find that a ridiculous hassle and don't really get what I should be adding. Don't understand why TDEE is not the default, it is miles simpler than having to calculate 4 different things and add them all together
I've gone through all the setting and can't seem to find anything that will let me change it to TDEE rather than NEAT and can't find an explanation on the sticky's either.0 -
OP the reason MFP uses NEAT is so that an individual can calculate a calorie goal that would allow them to lose weight even if they do no exercise whatsoever. If a person does exercise, and they add those calories back in, the numbers should be similar to what you are calculating as a TDEE (which has exercise built in) minus a deficit.
You can set a custom goal which would be Your TDEE less 500 cals, and then if you log 1 calorie when you exercise, the estimates of weight loss should be similar.
Regardless, all of these are just estimates, no matter which one you choose, and the weight loss prediction is an estimate as well. The best solution is to just pick one method and stick with it, log your calories in as accurately as possible, track your calories out if you can, and then monitor the results over a period of time.0 -
WinoGelato wrote: »OP the reason MFP uses NEAT is so that an individual can calculate a calorie goal that would allow them to lose weight even if they do no exercise whatsoever. If a person does exercise, and they add those calories back in, the numbers should be similar to what you are calculating as a TDEE (which has exercise built in) minus a deficit.
You can set a custom goal which would be Your TDEE less 500 cals, and then if you log 1 calorie when you exercise, the estimates of weight loss should be similar.
Regardless, all of these are just estimates, no matter which one you choose, and the weight loss prediction is an estimate as well. The best solution is to just pick one method and stick with it, log your calories in as accurately as possible, track your calories out if you can, and then monitor the results over a period of time.
That's the thing though. I do no exercise whatsoever yet my TDEE is still 1600 whereas my NEAT is apparently 1250 ish. And I know my TDEE is right because I lose weight at a steady 1lb a week by eating 500 less than it.0 -
ninjachicken4000 wrote: »WinoGelato wrote: »OP the reason MFP uses NEAT is so that an individual can calculate a calorie goal that would allow them to lose weight even if they do no exercise whatsoever. If a person does exercise, and they add those calories back in, the numbers should be similar to what you are calculating as a TDEE (which has exercise built in) minus a deficit.
You can set a custom goal which would be Your TDEE less 500 cals, and then if you log 1 calorie when you exercise, the estimates of weight loss should be similar.
Regardless, all of these are just estimates, no matter which one you choose, and the weight loss prediction is an estimate as well. The best solution is to just pick one method and stick with it, log your calories in as accurately as possible, track your calories out if you can, and then monitor the results over a period of time.
That's the thing though. I do no exercise whatsoever yet my TDEE is still 1600 whereas my NEAT is apparently 1250 ish. And I know my TDEE is right because I lose weight at a steady 1lb a week by eating 500 less than it.
Did you try putting in a goal in MFP of "maintain my current weight" with a sedentary activity level? What number does that give you? Because if you do zero exercise, then your NEAT and your TDEE would be very similar.
The 1250 that MFP is giving you is your calorie target at a deficit goal of 1 lb/week, right? If that's the case, MFP estimates your non exercise maintenance cals to be 1750. If you truly do no exercise, that means MFP thinks your TDEE is 1750 and higher than what you've calculated.1 -
WinoGelato wrote: »ninjachicken4000 wrote: »WinoGelato wrote: »OP the reason MFP uses NEAT is so that an individual can calculate a calorie goal that would allow them to lose weight even if they do no exercise whatsoever. If a person does exercise, and they add those calories back in, the numbers should be similar to what you are calculating as a TDEE (which has exercise built in) minus a deficit.
You can set a custom goal which would be Your TDEE less 500 cals, and then if you log 1 calorie when you exercise, the estimates of weight loss should be similar.
Regardless, all of these are just estimates, no matter which one you choose, and the weight loss prediction is an estimate as well. The best solution is to just pick one method and stick with it, log your calories in as accurately as possible, track your calories out if you can, and then monitor the results over a period of time.
That's the thing though. I do no exercise whatsoever yet my TDEE is still 1600 whereas my NEAT is apparently 1250 ish. And I know my TDEE is right because I lose weight at a steady 1lb a week by eating 500 less than it.
Did you try putting in a goal in MFP of "maintain my current weight" with a sedentary activity level? What number does that give you?
It gives me 1450, which is 150 lower than my actual TDEE. But is higher than what makes sense for the calculation projections (under daily log) when I'm eating 1000-1100 calories a day (0.4lbs in 5 weeks) makes no sense.
0 -
dancingonstarz wrote: »If you go to "My Home", then click on the "Goals" tab, where it says, "Daily Nutrition Goals", you can click the green "Edit" button and you can manually set your calorie goal to 1100.
If you do any extra exercise outside of your normal TDEE, you might consider logging that and eating back at least some of those exercise calories if it's a significant burn to make sure you're eating enough.
The NEAT method usually works best for people whose activity level is quite varied from day to day. If your activity level is pretty consistent, then the TDEE method works well.
Hi, you don't seem to understand what the problem is.
I know I can set my own calorie limits for the day.
The problem is the daily projections it is giving me.
My TDEE is 1600, if I input 1100 calories into my log it isn't projecting my weight loss correctly (as it is apparently using NEAT and not TDEE) so instead of it showing me losing 1lb per week (which I should be at with a calorie deficit of 500 per day) it is showing that I should be losing 0.4lbs per 5 weeks. Which obviously makes no sense. So it must think my NEAT is really low, even though I've inputted all my stats correctly and I can't find an option to change it from NEAT to TDEE.0 -
ninjachicken4000 wrote: »WinoGelato wrote: »ninjachicken4000 wrote: »WinoGelato wrote: »OP the reason MFP uses NEAT is so that an individual can calculate a calorie goal that would allow them to lose weight even if they do no exercise whatsoever. If a person does exercise, and they add those calories back in, the numbers should be similar to what you are calculating as a TDEE (which has exercise built in) minus a deficit.
You can set a custom goal which would be Your TDEE less 500 cals, and then if you log 1 calorie when you exercise, the estimates of weight loss should be similar.
Regardless, all of these are just estimates, no matter which one you choose, and the weight loss prediction is an estimate as well. The best solution is to just pick one method and stick with it, log your calories in as accurately as possible, track your calories out if you can, and then monitor the results over a period of time.
That's the thing though. I do no exercise whatsoever yet my TDEE is still 1600 whereas my NEAT is apparently 1250 ish. And I know my TDEE is right because I lose weight at a steady 1lb a week by eating 500 less than it.
Did you try putting in a goal in MFP of "maintain my current weight" with a sedentary activity level? What number does that give you?
It gives me 1450, which is 150 lower than my actual TDEE. But is higher than what makes sense for the calculation projections (under daily log) when I'm eating 1000-1100 calories a day (0.4lbs in 5 weeks) makes no sense.
As I said, these are all calculators based off of algorithms and averages. They are not going to be perfectly accurate for every individual. The weight loss estimate of "if every day were like today" in particular is notoriously inaccurate because most people don't have identical days every single day.
Go with the MFP goal of 1200 and give it 4-6 weeks. If you do start to exercise you should eat some of those calories back. Track your weight loss and if it's on track great, and if not, then adjust accordingly. It's really not necessary to over complicate this.0 -
ninjachicken4000 wrote: »dancingonstarz wrote: »If you go to "My Home", then click on the "Goals" tab, where it says, "Daily Nutrition Goals", you can click the green "Edit" button and you can manually set your calorie goal to 1100.
If you do any extra exercise outside of your normal TDEE, you might consider logging that and eating back at least some of those exercise calories if it's a significant burn to make sure you're eating enough.
The NEAT method usually works best for people whose activity level is quite varied from day to day. If your activity level is pretty consistent, then the TDEE method works well.
Hi, you don't seem to understand what the problem is.
I know I can set my own calorie limits for the day.
The problem is the daily projections it is giving me.
My TDEE is 1600, if I input 1100 calories into my log it isn't projecting my weight loss correctly (as it is apparently using NEAT and not TDEE) so instead of it showing me losing 1lb per week (which I should be at with a calorie deficit of 500 per day) it is showing that I should be losing 0.4lbs per 5 weeks. Which obviously makes no sense. So it must think my NEAT is really low, even though I've inputted all my stats correctly and I can't find an option to change it from NEAT to TDEE.
Just ignore those estimates when you close out your diary. Problem solved.
4 -
WinoGelato wrote: »ninjachicken4000 wrote: »dancingonstarz wrote: »If you go to "My Home", then click on the "Goals" tab, where it says, "Daily Nutrition Goals", you can click the green "Edit" button and you can manually set your calorie goal to 1100.
If you do any extra exercise outside of your normal TDEE, you might consider logging that and eating back at least some of those exercise calories if it's a significant burn to make sure you're eating enough.
The NEAT method usually works best for people whose activity level is quite varied from day to day. If your activity level is pretty consistent, then the TDEE method works well.
Hi, you don't seem to understand what the problem is.
I know I can set my own calorie limits for the day.
The problem is the daily projections it is giving me.
My TDEE is 1600, if I input 1100 calories into my log it isn't projecting my weight loss correctly (as it is apparently using NEAT and not TDEE) so instead of it showing me losing 1lb per week (which I should be at with a calorie deficit of 500 per day) it is showing that I should be losing 0.4lbs per 5 weeks. Which obviously makes no sense. So it must think my NEAT is really low, even though I've inputted all my stats correctly and I can't find an option to change it from NEAT to TDEE.
Just ignore those estimates when you close out your diary. Problem solved.
Haha, I have been doing. It's just a little irritating.0 -
ninjachicken4000 wrote: »WinoGelato wrote: »ninjachicken4000 wrote: »dancingonstarz wrote: »If you go to "My Home", then click on the "Goals" tab, where it says, "Daily Nutrition Goals", you can click the green "Edit" button and you can manually set your calorie goal to 1100.
If you do any extra exercise outside of your normal TDEE, you might consider logging that and eating back at least some of those exercise calories if it's a significant burn to make sure you're eating enough.
The NEAT method usually works best for people whose activity level is quite varied from day to day. If your activity level is pretty consistent, then the TDEE method works well.
Hi, you don't seem to understand what the problem is.
I know I can set my own calorie limits for the day.
The problem is the daily projections it is giving me.
My TDEE is 1600, if I input 1100 calories into my log it isn't projecting my weight loss correctly (as it is apparently using NEAT and not TDEE) so instead of it showing me losing 1lb per week (which I should be at with a calorie deficit of 500 per day) it is showing that I should be losing 0.4lbs per 5 weeks. Which obviously makes no sense. So it must think my NEAT is really low, even though I've inputted all my stats correctly and I can't find an option to change it from NEAT to TDEE.
Just ignore those estimates when you close out your diary. Problem solved.
Haha, I have been doing. It's just a little irritating.
I don't even look at them anymore. I don't know anyone who relies on them.
3 -
those things are wrong you would have to eat the same things and burn the same amount of calories every day for it to probably be close. I never lose what it says I will,if I did I would have been at goal long ago lol dont worry about that stupid thing. they need to remove it anyway its basically pointless1
-
OP, you do not have to change any settings to use TDEE instead of NEAT. Just calculate your TDEE, deduct your deficit, then enter that number as your calorie goal and do not log exercise. Mfp will then work to your TDEE figure.
Loads of people do this.
2 -
The projections always been off in the short term, but fairly accurate in the larger picture. Week to week will be off, but look at it in months and it is pretty close.
I also have to say that I had to add exercise to get the numbers moving. At first it was great alone, but not long after I wasn't losing that fast so I had to add walking a few times a week. I eat back most of those calories and it kept kicked things into motion.0 -
Don't close your diary
The only thing that does is give you the spurious "in 5 weeks time" bollocks
Nothing else
So don't close your diary at the end of the day
Problem solved1
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.2K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.2K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 421 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.7K MyFitnessPal Information
- 23 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions