Hard time staying within calorie goal...

yogaski83
yogaski83 Posts: 17 Member
edited December 3 in Health and Weight Loss
Hey guys,

I'm new on here, and struggling to stay within my daily calorie allowance (1,200). I was just wondering if anyone has any tips on how to be successful with this calorie goal. I know to some, 1200 may sound like a big allowance, but I'm having a very hard time staying at this goal.

I'm 33, no kids, and only looking to lose about 15 - 20 lbs so this should be easy, right?

I'm also pretty active (ski 5+ days a week in the winter; hike, run, yoga in the summer etc), and live at a relatively high altitude so I've typically been able to eat healthy(ish) without counting calories and stay within in the 120-125 lb range, which is a good weight for me, even though I'm only 5'2. However, over the course of the past 6 months, I've put on roughly 15 pounds due to a surgery that had me very sedentary. During this time the only exercise I was able to do besides my PT was very low impact aerobics and walking - which is an incredibly huge drop in my normal activity level. So this 15 lb gain is a loss of muscle and a gain of fat, so I'm ready to get rid of it!

Luckily, now I'm nearly fully recovered, have started working out again, but the weight keeps creeping on, which led me to this site. I've been tracking for the past two or so weeks and have only lost 1 lb, which is incredibly frustrating. I should mention that I do allow myself to eat all the calories I've "earned" by working out. Maybe this is to much?

Anyway, I was just wondering if there is anyone else who has felt these frustrations, and has found a path to success.

Thanks in advance!

Steph

Replies

  • dkabambe
    dkabambe Posts: 544 Member
    Sounds like you're on the right track, but I'd ask how you're tracking your work-out calories. MFP always overestimates exercise calorie burn, (as does most gym equipment) - sometimes as much as double which is why you'll see a lot of people on here advising to only eat back about 50%. Heart rate monitors are generally more accurate (for cardio work), but still have a significant margin of error. I would try cutting your "eat back" calories a bit, (or increasing exercise as you get back into the swing), and see if that makes a difference.

    There are lots of good tips/recipes etc in the forums for low-cal meals/snacks so have a look around at those also, and hopefully others will chip in with some good ideas here. I sometimes struggle with my allowance [1500] on non-exercise days so also looking forward to reading people's thoughts.
  • taraccarter729
    taraccarter729 Posts: 11 Member
    What are you eating? Try going a little higher on protein and a bit more fat so you will stay satisfied longer and reduce your carbs. Give yourself a few more calories too maybe and try intermittent fasting.
  • LivingtheLeanDream
    LivingtheLeanDream Posts: 13,342 Member
    edited August 2016
    Yeah, you don't need to eat as low as 1200, you can choose to lose weight a bit slower - you don't have much to lose so 1/2lb a week will mean you'll get more calories and you'll still lose. And you can eat back some exercise calories too, if you're active you get to eat more and lose as you will be burning more - win win :smiley: .
  • Psychgrrl
    Psychgrrl Posts: 3,177 Member
    I agree with poster #1--you've set your deficit too low and your weight-loss goal is too aggressive. With that little to lose, you should set your goal for .5 lbs per week. If you keep restricting your calories to that extreme, you'll be more likely to binge. A higher calorie goal and a little more protein will also help minimize the loss of lean body mass. Upping the % or protein and healthy fat and fiber will help you stay fuller longer.
  • AmberSpamber
    AmberSpamber Posts: 391 Member
    I'm working at a desk all day. Walk 8000+ steps a day, work out 5 days a week and I could NEVER eat that low. My weight loss stalls when I do anything below 1300 calories, so I have upped my calories to 1700 on the days I work out and now I am loosing again. I would say only do 1200 if you're not active, but since you are you will need a lot more to sustain your body.
  • cpac91
    cpac91 Posts: 7 Member
    I have had a similar hard time and have a similar lifestyle/ amount of weight to lose and I've found 3 major things helpful: 1. Eat really, really slowly. Savor every bite. Put down the fork between bites, take tiny bites at a time, etc. Try to make each meal last 40 minutes to an hour, time allowing. Take the time to eat and enjoy, and the bonus effects of this are better digestion, more enjoyment of eating, a better relationship with your food, and the list goes on. Honestly this one thing unlocked my ability to diet at all. 2. Starving yourself is never a good strategy. If it's between eating 1200 calories while feeling mentally or emotionally unsatisfied and physically hungry, which is unsustainable-and eating 1200 calories plus a small 150 calorie snack, ideally protein, eat the 1350 calories. You'll still be at a deficit, and it's far easier to stick to. (I do find eating protein at meals is satiating while carbs leave me wanting more in an hour and things that taste sweet are hard to put down at all). 3. I'm guessing you know what the macrostructure of a rock climbing location is, and I found this analogy helpful. The macrostructure of losing weight is hard. Make the microstructure-each move, each meal, each decision-as easy as possible for yourself. Don't waste energy in the first third of the route, y'know? You'll need it for the top third of that route. You already have a challenge in front of you. It's hard enough. Therefore, make each small decision as easy as possible. Make small easy moves that conserve your strength. Best of luck to you!!
  • cpac91
    cpac91 Posts: 7 Member
    Also, drink a cup of water mid-meal, every meal. The whole glass. Hydration never hurts!
  • LPflaum
    LPflaum Posts: 174 Member
    I am also at a 1200 calorie goal. I cut out almost all of my refined carbs (pasta, bread, cake, cookies, etc) and I eat very little dairy due to the fact that i'm lactose intolerant. I eat LOTS of veggies (the steamfresh single serve are awesome, and the little 8-10 oz boxes are a great 200 cal snack). I snack mostly on deli meat, surimi, frozen grilled chicken strips (or the thawed purdue ones), and sometimes tuna. I will occasionally snack on fruit, which is low in calories but high in sugar. I substitute all of the rice in things like stirfry with cauliflower rice (all you need is a food pro), and I've become a huge fan of replacing pasta with zucchini noodles. A lot of people swear by greek yogurt and hard boiled eggs, I just can't abide them. I will say that oikos frozen greek yogurt is some fantastic stuff, and there are people here who love halotop (haven't tried it). I also substitute some of my eggs for egg whites. I can't abide a plate of scrambled whites, but I'll use 1-2 eggs and then a 1/2c or more of whites in order to get more calories and protein, but preserve the taste a little bit.

    I find that on days I work out, i sometimes struggle to eat 1200 + half my exercise cals back this way, but I'm consistently getting 100+g of protein, which has been amazing for my body comp and muscle gains.
  • yogaski83
    yogaski83 Posts: 17 Member
    Thanks to all the replies, very helpful information!
  • yogaski83
    yogaski83 Posts: 17 Member
    LPflaum wrote: »
    I am also at a 1200 calorie goal. I cut out almost all of my refined carbs (pasta, bread, cake, cookies, etc) and I eat very little dairy due to the fact that i'm lactose intolerant. I eat LOTS of veggies (the steamfresh single serve are awesome, and the little 8-10 oz boxes are a great 200 cal snack). I snack mostly on deli meat, surimi, frozen grilled chicken strips (or the thawed purdue ones), and sometimes tuna. I will occasionally snack on fruit, which is low in calories but high in sugar. I substitute all of the rice in things like stirfry with cauliflower rice (all you need is a food pro), and I've become a huge fan of replacing pasta with zucchini noodles. A lot of people swear by greek yogurt and hard boiled eggs, I just can't abide them. I will say that oikos frozen greek yogurt is some fantastic stuff, and there are people here who love halotop (haven't tried it). I also substitute some of my eggs for egg whites. I can't abide a plate of scrambled whites, but I'll use 1-2 eggs and then a 1/2c or more of whites in order to get more calories and protein, but preserve the taste a little bit.

    Cauliflower rice sounds awesome, I need to try it!
  • Francl27
    Francl27 Posts: 26,371 Member
    You're supposed to eat back exercise calories.
  • Zedeff
    Zedeff Posts: 651 Member
    capaul42 wrote: »
    With only 15-20lbs to lose, you should probably set your deficit to .5lb per week.

    1200 is not a lot of calories. It's the bare minimum MFP will set for women. There aren't a lot of people that can manage it for long from what I've seen, myself included.

    I could never follow this advice. Calorie restricting for 40 weeks rather than 10 weeks would be brutal. I'd rather "suffer" (it's really not that bad) a few lean weeks than nearly a whole lean year.
  • Bearbo27
    Bearbo27 Posts: 339 Member
    Zedeff wrote: »
    capaul42 wrote: »
    With only 15-20lbs to lose, you should probably set your deficit to .5lb per week.

    1200 is not a lot of calories. It's the bare minimum MFP will set for women. There aren't a lot of people that can manage it for long from what I've seen, myself included.

    I could never follow this advice. Calorie restricting for 40 weeks rather than 10 weeks would be brutal. I'd rather "suffer" (it's really not that bad) a few lean weeks than nearly a whole lean year.

    But if the 1200 is difficult for the OP to stay at, it will take her longer anyway and she'll risk losing lean muscle. Slow and steady wins the race!!
  • hiyomi
    hiyomi Posts: 906 Member
    1200 is NOT a lot of calories. 1200 calories is the minimum amount that you are supposed to eat in a day. Try upping it to maybe 1500-1600 calories and see how that works out for you. :)
  • jo_nz
    jo_nz Posts: 548 Member
    I am in a somewhat similar situation - I had an accident last year, leaving me completely off my feet for around 3 months, and then slowly building up strength and basic fitness again - and by basic fitness I mean being able to walk my kids to school and back which is not much more than 500 metres from my house. In fact just being able to walk was a big thing just a few short months ago! I thought I was doing well at first, but that was just because the pain/drugs were suppressing my appetite and I physically couldn't get to the kitchen to get food. Once I was mobile that was when I put on some weight!!

    I am on 1200 a day at the moment too (sedentary activity level). I have just reshuffled my eating schedule a little which has worked for me. I keep my breakfast and lunch small to leave me a decent amount for dinner and maybe an evening snack as that is my hungriest time of day. I find that more satisfying personally, and have never been a huge breakfast eater (skipped it regularly for many years) so it doesn't feel like a sacrifice. Other than that I just eat what I always ate but measured portions which are a little smaller than before.

    Another thing I have done is look at what my maintenance calories are. It was just good for me to get an idea of what that is - it's a good reminder for me that if I do go over my daily goal by a hundred Cals or so, it's not actually going to make me gain weight as it's still under maintenance.
  • kizanne1
    kizanne1 Posts: 51 Member
    I'm on a 1400 calorie intake. Lots of fiber helps. I have some favorite chips. Millet and Flax chips.
    I try to get some healthy fats. Lots of protein. I keep sugar from any source down. And as much as possible avoid processed foods. I don't 'watch' carbs but I avoid starchy foods like bread, pasta, rice.
  • yogaski83
    yogaski83 Posts: 17 Member
    jo_nz wrote: »
    I am in a somewhat similar situation - I had an accident last year, leaving me completely off my feet for around 3 months, and then slowly building up strength and basic fitness again - and by basic fitness I mean being able to walk my kids to school and back which is not much more than 500 metres from my house. In fact just being able to walk was a big thing just a few short months ago! I thought I was doing well at first, but that was just because the pain/drugs were suppressing my appetite and I physically couldn't get to the kitchen to get food. Once I was mobile that was when I put on some weight!!

    I am on 1200 a day at the moment too (sedentary activity level). I have just reshuffled my eating schedule a little which has worked for me. I keep my breakfast and lunch small to leave me a decent amount for dinner and maybe an evening snack as that is my hungriest time of day. I find that more satisfying personally, and have never been a huge breakfast eater (skipped it regularly for many years) so it doesn't feel like a sacrifice. Other than that I just eat what I always ate but measured portions which are a little smaller than before.

    Another thing I have done is look at what my maintenance calories are. It was just good for me to get an idea of what that is - it's a good reminder for me that if I do go over my daily goal by a hundred Cals or so, it's not actually going to make me gain weight as it's still under maintenance.
    jo_nz wrote: »
    I am in a somewhat similar situation - I had an accident last year, leaving me completely off my feet for around 3 months, and then slowly building up strength and basic fitness again - and by basic fitness I mean being able to walk my kids to school and back which is not much more than 500 metres from my house. In fact just being able to walk was a big thing just a few short months ago! I thought I was doing well at first, but that was just because the pain/drugs were suppressing my appetite and I physically couldn't get to the kitchen to get food. Once I was mobile that was when I put on some weight!! .

    Same thing happened to me, the first two - three months of recovery I was in too much pain and WAY too frustrated to eat. I had shoulder reconstruction surgery after a ski accident (6-8 month recovery). Around month 4 I was able to use my shoulder and the pounds started creeping on. I actually started running 4 months post op but was unable to do any upper body strength training. I think around this time I started snacking, since reaching for a snack wasn't as painful. I thought that once I started working out again, the pounds would melt off, but that had not been the case...

  • Zedeff
    Zedeff Posts: 651 Member
    AnnPT77 wrote: »
    Zedeff wrote: »
    capaul42 wrote: »
    With only 15-20lbs to lose, you should probably set your deficit to .5lb per week.

    1200 is not a lot of calories. It's the bare minimum MFP will set for women. There aren't a lot of people that can manage it for long from what I've seen, myself included.

    I could never follow this advice. Calorie restricting for 40 weeks rather than 10 weeks would be brutal. I'd rather "suffer" (it's really not that bad) a few lean weeks than nearly a whole lean year.

    Too large a calorie deficit leads to unnecessary loss of lean body mass in addition to fat. Your body can only metabolize a certain amount of fat daily from each pound of body fat you have - if I recall correctly, it's around 30-some calories of fat per day per pound of body fat. If your deficit is greater than that, your body will find the extra energy somewhere, such as from muscle tissue.

    Beyond that, too-rapid weight loss increases risk of adaptive thermogenesis, i.e., a long-term calorie burn (even after weight loss is done) that is potentially hundreds of calories less than similar-sized people who never adopted extreme calorie deficits.

    Therefore, the less you have to lose, the slower you should lose it, if you want to stay strong and healthy, plus keep your metabolism robust. Your call, though.

    The OP is around 140 lbs (goal weight 120, trying to lose 20). Assuming a 30% body fat percent, that gives her 42 lbs of fat or 1260 fat-calories per day that can be sustained in a deficit, using your numbers.

    If she is only 25% BF, she still has 1050 fat-calories per day of sustainable deficit.

    A 1000 calorie per day deficit, using the numbers you've provided, is entirely sustainable for her.
  • AnnPT77
    AnnPT77 Posts: 34,600 Member
    Zedeff wrote: »
    AnnPT77 wrote: »
    Zedeff wrote: »
    capaul42 wrote: »
    With only 15-20lbs to lose, you should probably set your deficit to .5lb per week.

    1200 is not a lot of calories. It's the bare minimum MFP will set for women. There aren't a lot of people that can manage it for long from what I've seen, myself included.

    I could never follow this advice. Calorie restricting for 40 weeks rather than 10 weeks would be brutal. I'd rather "suffer" (it's really not that bad) a few lean weeks than nearly a whole lean year.

    Too large a calorie deficit leads to unnecessary loss of lean body mass in addition to fat. Your body can only metabolize a certain amount of fat daily from each pound of body fat you have - if I recall correctly, it's around 30-some calories of fat per day per pound of body fat. If your deficit is greater than that, your body will find the extra energy somewhere, such as from muscle tissue.

    Beyond that, too-rapid weight loss increases risk of adaptive thermogenesis, i.e., a long-term calorie burn (even after weight loss is done) that is potentially hundreds of calories less than similar-sized people who never adopted extreme calorie deficits.

    Therefore, the less you have to lose, the slower you should lose it, if you want to stay strong and healthy, plus keep your metabolism robust. Your call, though.

    The OP is around 140 lbs (goal weight 120, trying to lose 20). Assuming a 30% body fat percent, that gives her 42 lbs of fat or 1260 fat-calories per day that can be sustained in a deficit, using your numbers.

    If she is only 25% BF, she still has 1050 fat-calories per day of sustainable deficit.

    A 1000 calorie per day deficit, using the numbers you've provided, is entirely sustainable for her.

    Yup. Personally, I wouldn't cut it that close, but maybe that's just me.

    I hit 140 for the first time last September 24, with a goal of (what turned out to be) 120, at 5'5". At the time I was eating 1500 net, striving for a 1-1.5 pound deficit at that point, which seemed aggressive enough to me.

    Perhaps I'm too risk averse, but I'm a li'l ol' lady, and don't want to take any chances with muscle loss - muscles are one of the things that stand between me and assisted living, at my age (60). Muscles are darned tough (slow) to regain for women generally, especially so at my age. Adaptive thermogenesis doesn't seem to have reared its ugly head, as I've been maintaining around 2100 net for a few months now, higher than the calculators predict.

    OP is roughly half my age, so her circumstances are different, and of course it's her choice. She did say she was "struggling" at 1200.

    If you feel that 40 weeks rather than 10 weeks is too brutal, I fully support your right to be you & do as you wish. :) Like I said, your call. I'm just laying my opinion out there, as you are.

    For myself, I didn't see what the rush was, didn't find it at all brutal to eat a bit more while losing more slowly, and made it to the goal line strong and healthy, so I'm pretty happy.
  • ernestrodgers82
    ernestrodgers82 Posts: 208 Member
    yogaski83 wrote: »
    Hey guys,

    I'm new on here, and struggling to stay within my daily calorie allowance (1,200). I was just wondering if anyone has any tips on how to be successful with this calorie goal. I know to some, 1200 may sound like a big allowance, but I'm having a very hard time staying at this goal.

    I'm 33, no kids, and only looking to lose about 15 - 20 lbs so this should be easy, right?

    I'm also pretty active (ski 5+ days a week in the winter; hike, run, yoga in the summer etc), and live at a relatively high altitude so I've typically been able to eat healthy(ish) without counting calories and stay within in the 120-125 lb range, which is a good weight for me, even though I'm only 5'2. However, over the course of the past 6 months, I've put on roughly 15 pounds due to a surgery that had me very sedentary. During this time the only exercise I was able to do besides my PT was very low impact aerobics and walking - which is an incredibly huge drop in my normal activity level. So this 15 lb gain is a loss of muscle and a gain of fat, so I'm ready to get rid of it!

    Luckily, now I'm nearly fully recovered, have started working out again, but the weight keeps creeping on, which led me to this site. I've been tracking for the past two or so weeks and have only lost 1 lb, which is incredibly frustrating. I should mention that I do allow myself to eat all the calories I've "earned" by working out. Maybe this is to much?

    Anyway, I was just wondering if there is anyone else who has felt these frustrations, and has found a path to success.

    Thanks in advance!

    Steph

    I have felt these frustrations and you're smart to not "eat" your calories back earned from exercising. However, your maximum calorie intake is probably a lot higher than 1200 calories/day. Try resetting your 'Goals' from your home page. Choose 'active' or 'very active' because you are and then select a goal of no more than 1-2 pounds per week. You can double check the amount calculated by going to the Mayo Clinic Calorie Calculator where you would put in the same information; height, weight, gender, current weight and activity level.

    The one pound loss could be just your body getting back into realignment and gaining muscle while losing weight. Just hang in there and give it a few months. In the meantime look for those NSVs (non-scale victories) like looser fitting clothes and compliments from friends and co-workers on "how thin you look." :-)
  • janejellyroll
    janejellyroll Posts: 25,763 Member
    yogaski83 wrote: »
    Hey guys,

    I'm new on here, and struggling to stay within my daily calorie allowance (1,200). I was just wondering if anyone has any tips on how to be successful with this calorie goal. I know to some, 1200 may sound like a big allowance, but I'm having a very hard time staying at this goal.

    I'm 33, no kids, and only looking to lose about 15 - 20 lbs so this should be easy, right?

    I'm also pretty active (ski 5+ days a week in the winter; hike, run, yoga in the summer etc), and live at a relatively high altitude so I've typically been able to eat healthy(ish) without counting calories and stay within in the 120-125 lb range, which is a good weight for me, even though I'm only 5'2. However, over the course of the past 6 months, I've put on roughly 15 pounds due to a surgery that had me very sedentary. During this time the only exercise I was able to do besides my PT was very low impact aerobics and walking - which is an incredibly huge drop in my normal activity level. So this 15 lb gain is a loss of muscle and a gain of fat, so I'm ready to get rid of it!

    Luckily, now I'm nearly fully recovered, have started working out again, but the weight keeps creeping on, which led me to this site. I've been tracking for the past two or so weeks and have only lost 1 lb, which is incredibly frustrating. I should mention that I do allow myself to eat all the calories I've "earned" by working out. Maybe this is to much?

    Anyway, I was just wondering if there is anyone else who has felt these frustrations, and has found a path to success.

    Thanks in advance!

    Steph

    I have felt these frustrations and you're smart to not "eat" your calories back earned from exercising. However, your maximum calorie intake is probably a lot higher than 1200 calories/day. Try resetting your 'Goals' from your home page. Choose 'active' or 'very active' because you are and then select a goal of no more than 1-2 pounds per week. You can double check the amount calculated by going to the Mayo Clinic Calorie Calculator where you would put in the same information; height, weight, gender, current weight and activity level.

    The one pound loss could be just your body getting back into realignment and gaining muscle while losing weight. Just hang in there and give it a few months. In the meantime look for those NSVs (non-scale victories) like looser fitting clothes and compliments from friends and co-workers on "how thin you look." :-)

    Why is it "smart" to not eat back calories from logged activity when you recommend OP change her activity level to reflect the activity they're doing and . . . eat more calories?
  • robininfl
    robininfl Posts: 1,137 Member
    Zedeff wrote: »
    AnnPT77 wrote: »
    Zedeff wrote: »
    capaul42 wrote: »
    With only 15-20lbs to lose, you should probably set your deficit to .5lb per week.

    1200 is not a lot of calories. It's the bare minimum MFP will set for women. There aren't a lot of people that can manage it for long from what I've seen, myself included.

    I could never follow this advice. Calorie restricting for 40 weeks rather than 10 weeks would be brutal. I'd rather "suffer" (it's really not that bad) a few lean weeks than nearly a whole lean year.

    Too large a calorie deficit leads to unnecessary loss of lean body mass in addition to fat. Your body can only metabolize a certain amount of fat daily from each pound of body fat you have - if I recall correctly, it's around 30-some calories of fat per day per pound of body fat. If your deficit is greater than that, your body will find the extra energy somewhere, such as from muscle tissue.

    Beyond that, too-rapid weight loss increases risk of adaptive thermogenesis, i.e., a long-term calorie burn (even after weight loss is done) that is potentially hundreds of calories less than similar-sized people who never adopted extreme calorie deficits.

    Therefore, the less you have to lose, the slower you should lose it, if you want to stay strong and healthy, plus keep your metabolism robust. Your call, though.

    The OP is around 140 lbs (goal weight 120, trying to lose 20). Assuming a 30% body fat percent, that gives her 42 lbs of fat or 1260 fat-calories per day that can be sustained in a deficit, using your numbers.

    If she is only 25% BF, she still has 1050 fat-calories per day of sustainable deficit.

    A 1000 calorie per day deficit, using the numbers you've provided, is entirely sustainable for her.

    If she's 5'2 and 140, TDEE around 2k to maintain the 140 if moderately active. Reducing by 1k leaves only 1k to eat, can you even get enough nutrition (vitamins, fats, protein, carbs) in 1,000 calories?

    Already she feels crappy eating 1,200 and working out (I would too!)

    OP I think you should try using the TDEE instead of MFP plus exercise? Get a standard amount you can eat each day that's slightly higher than the 1,200 and stick to it. See if that is easier to maintain.

  • ernestrodgers82
    ernestrodgers82 Posts: 208 Member
    @janejellyroll it's not smart because exercise doesn't help you lose weight. That fact was an epiphany for me and backed up by lots of studies like this one. Exercise is good for a whole lot of other reasons, but weight loss isn't one of them. I regularly 'ate back' my calories earned from exercise (still do from time to time) but I realized that since I set my profile as 'lightly active' it's double dipping to "eat back my calories" because the expenditure has already been counted. There are a lot of resources backing up this notion but my favorite is aptly entitled "Okay Don’t Freak Out But Exercising Doesn’t Make You Lose Weight" published on March 22, 2016 in the New York Magazine.
  • janejellyroll
    janejellyroll Posts: 25,763 Member
    @janejellyroll it's not smart because exercise doesn't help you lose weight. That fact was an epiphany for me and backed up by lots of studies like this one. Exercise is good for a whole lot of other reasons, but weight loss isn't one of them. I regularly 'ate back' my calories earned from exercise (still do from time to time) but I realized that since I set my profile as 'lightly active' it's double dipping to "eat back my calories" because the expenditure has already been counted. There are a lot of resources backing up this notion but my favorite is aptly entitled "Okay Don’t Freak Out But Exercising Doesn’t Make You Lose Weight" published on March 22, 2016 in the New York Magazine.

    Exercise, by itself, won't result in weight loss. You're right about that. But if the exercise creates or contributes to a calorie deficit, then that will result in weight loss. If you're including the exercise activity as part of your activity level (which isn't how MFP is set-up), then it is double-dipping to eat the calories back. But if you set-up your activity level the way MFP was designed to be used (your activity level based on your non-exercise activity), then you are not double-dipping when you eat the calories back.

    For people on a very low calorie goal or people doing a lot of exercise, it's important to fuel activity. Not eating exercise calories back can result -- for these people -- in very low net calorie consumption.

    Also, your post references a study but it doesn't indicate which study you are referring to. I don't think there is a study that shows that if someone is in a calorie deficit they won't lose weight if they eat back the calories burned during exercise, but I could be wrong.
  • WinoGelato
    WinoGelato Posts: 13,454 Member
    @janejellyroll it's not smart because exercise doesn't help you lose weight. That fact was an epiphany for me and backed up by lots of studies like this one. Exercise is good for a whole lot of other reasons, but weight loss isn't one of them. I regularly 'ate back' my calories earned from exercise (still do from time to time) but I realized that since I set my profile as 'lightly active' it's double dipping to "eat back my calories" because the expenditure has already been counted. There are a lot of resources backing up this notion but my favorite is aptly entitled "Okay Don’t Freak Out But Exercising Doesn’t Make You Lose Weight" published on March 22, 2016 in the New York Magazine.

    Exercise is not NECESSARY to lose weight, but it absolutely can help with weight loss, in that it helps create a calorie deficit which IS necessary in order to lose weight.

    MFP was designed to set a calorie target excluding exercise, such that if you do none, you will still lose according to the rate of loss you selected during set up. If you do exercise, you are meant to eat some of those back, otherwise you may be creating too large of a deficit, creating unsustainable practices, becoming fatigued, losing lean body mass, etc.

    If you set your profile to lightly active to include exercise calories in your baseline goal, but then were eating them back anyway, that doesn't mean it's not smart for anyone to eat back their calories. It means it wasn't smart for you, because you were using the system incorrectly.

  • JDixon852019
    JDixon852019 Posts: 312 Member
    The subreddit R/1200isplenty on Reddit.com is full of tips and recipes.
This discussion has been closed.