Fast Food Greater Than 1000 Calories

cee134
cee134 Posts: 33,711 Member
Found this interesting. I don't eat any of it anymore... but it just goes to show you that there are way more calories in the food we eat than we may think.


p5mcq4nxx19e.jpg

http://idealbite.com/fast-food-greater-than-1000-calories/
«134

Replies

  • ninerbuff
    ninerbuff Posts: 48,982 Member
    Which is why calorie consumption is the main reason people gain/lose/maintain weight. Exercise helps to offset some of those calories, but the average person can't out exercise just one of these foods in an hour.

    A.C.E. Certified Personal and Group Fitness Trainer
    IDEA Fitness member
    Kickboxing Certified Instructor
    Been in fitness for 30 years and have studied kinesiology and nutrition

    9285851.png
  • carmkizzle
    carmkizzle Posts: 211 Member
    I used to love Del Taco's taco salads...so sad they closed down in my area :( .
  • TavistockToad
    TavistockToad Posts: 35,719 Member
    I'll take the peanut butter shake!
  • CrabNebula
    CrabNebula Posts: 1,119 Member
    I don't think that is a picture of a meatball sub? :p
  • hlltwin
    hlltwin Posts: 55 Member
    The point of this...? Fast food is bad for us. We know this. Sitting down to eat a 32 oz shake is a bit excessive. I couldn't finish it, myself (not that I've tried but in the past the shakes I got were small 12 oz ones not the huge ones that are nearly 3X the size) The large fries are usually something I split with someone too, not try to eat by myself.

    And CrabNebula is right... that's not a meatball sub.
  • cee134
    cee134 Posts: 33,711 Member
    I expect my meals to be less then 1000 calories a sitting...
  • 3dogsrunning
    3dogsrunning Posts: 27,167 Member
    None of those calorie counts are particularly shocking to me.
  • mdonsbach
    mdonsbach Posts: 102 Member
    I still eat fast food I just work it into my calorie count.
  • hlltwin
    hlltwin Posts: 55 Member
    cee134 wrote: »
    I expect my meals to be less then 1000 calories a sitting...

    Me too but those aren't meals. Those are pieces of meals which is even worse, but it's also like the worst thing off each menu. A Burger King Quadruple Stacker? Of course it's a sandwich/burger over 1000 calories. It's not 1 burger. It's 4 burgers. The Outback Fries up there... I'm pretty sure that those are on their appetizer menu (if a recent ad I saw is to be believed.) You can eat an appetizer by itself as your meal but most people split them with other people at the table (at least that's how my family works apps).

    I also eat at most of those places. You can find meals for under 1000 calories (whole meals not just pieces of meals) and if you plan your day correctly, you can even eat them.
  • Lounmoun
    Lounmoun Posts: 8,423 Member
    I eat fast food once a week and get food that is closer to 500 calories which is what I normally eat for that meal. You can get lower calorie food if you choose.

    The lesson is check nutritional info and have a sense of what calories are in foods. If something is fried, has a pound of meat, cheese, bread, gravy, a pile of fries bigger than a cat, basically a pint of ice cream with peanut butter the calories are going to be up there. Don't act shocked that it adds up to 1,000+ calories.
    You can be shocked about salads. Fast food salads can be sneaky.
  • Sabine_Stroehm
    Sabine_Stroehm Posts: 19,263 Member
    cee134 wrote: »
    I expect my meals to be less then 1000 calories a sitting...

    Ditto. And some of those are sides, desserts, appetizers. It really puts things in perspective.
  • Need2Exerc1se
    Need2Exerc1se Posts: 13,575 Member
    I don't find any of that surprising. But I eat a meal >1000 calories almost every day.
  • cee134
    cee134 Posts: 33,711 Member
    edited August 2016
    I don't find any of that surprising. But I eat a meal >1000 calories almost every day.

    How many meals a day to you eat? I'm betting 2 or a large one and alittle small ones.
  • 3dogsrunning
    3dogsrunning Posts: 27,167 Member
    cee134 wrote: »
    I expect my meals to be less then 1000 calories a sitting...

    Sure but I don't expect deep fried food topped with high calorie food and large portions to fit my idea of a regular meal.
  • hlltwin
    hlltwin Posts: 55 Member
    On the weekends I'll sometimes eat two meals. Then one of them will be over 1000 or at least in that ballpark. That's just math. We also went to a trampoline park one day, so we needed to eat back a lot of calories after trampolining for 2 hours. It was fun but quite a workout.
  • hmltwin
    hmltwin Posts: 116 Member
    In fairness... at one restaurant I went to, when the appetizer was more than 1000 calories, they expected 4-6 people to split the thing. Looking at the Aussie cheese fries... that's more like 8-12 people enjoying them.

    I think some of these grossly huge things - like the Heart Attack Grill's Quaruple Bypass Burger - are meant to be shockingly huge. It's like they're thumbing their noses at all the people who say fast food is unhealthy. It's like they're saying, "You wanna see unhealthy? This is unhealthy!"

    Also... Dairy Queen's Chicken Strip Basket is on their twice and the one with more strips has LESS calories. (1340 cal for the 4 piece, 1270 cal for the 6 piece). How does that even work?
  • Need2Exerc1se
    Need2Exerc1se Posts: 13,575 Member
    cee134 wrote: »
    I don't find any of that surprising. But I eat a meal >1000 calories almost every day.

    How many meals a day to you eat? I'm betting 2 or a large one and alittle small ones.

    Usually 2, one small, one large.
  • hmltwin
    hmltwin Posts: 116 Member
    I also wonder how many of them are still on menus. I know you can't get the Quad Stacker at most BKs anymore. They only do Double Stackers (a more reasonable 420 calories).
  • crabbybrianna
    crabbybrianna Posts: 344 Member
    When I go out to eat with my husband to one particular restaurant, I always get the same meal (because I don't really like anything else on the menu), and it's a 1200 calorie salad. I just plan for it and adjust my calories. I've made many 1000+ calorie homemade meals as well.
  • cee134
    cee134 Posts: 33,711 Member
    No... this was not suppose to be surprising other then companies are making smaller meals with more calories. If I ate a hamburger and milkshake I would of expected it to be less then 1000 kcal. Now it can be over 2000.
  • Gallowmere1984
    Gallowmere1984 Posts: 6,626 Member
    The fun part is, just wrapping any of those burgers in lettuce instead of bread will shave off an absurd amount of calories. A really fun example, that I often eat:
    Jimmy John's Gargantuan on French Bread: 1063 kcals.
    Jimmy John's Gargantuan Unwich (lettuce wrap): 744 kcals.

    That's with absolutely nothing about that hunk of salami, mayo, cheese, and oils changed, except what's containing it.
  • 3dogsrunning
    3dogsrunning Posts: 27,167 Member
    edited August 2016
    cee134 wrote: »
    No... this was not suppose to be surprising other then companies are making smaller meals with more calories. If I ate a hamburger and milkshake I would of expected it to be less then 1000 kcal. Now it can be over 2000.

    The examples here are of the largest size milkshake which are HUGE and the huge burgers.
    You can get a small milkshake (500 calories) and a number of burgers, including a bacon double cheeseburger, for under 1000 calories.
    Eta - at BK for this example.
  • WinoGelato
    WinoGelato Posts: 13,454 Member
    At my hairdresser's, she always has those "Eat This Not That' books to peruse. While many of them have some shockingly high food items and a fairly reasonable substitute, one of my pet peeves is when they display something like the total calorie count for an item that is likely meant to be shared (like a plate of Cheese Fries or Bloomin Onion at Outback) compared to an item which is clearly an individual serving.

    Eat This! Coconut Shrimp (640 cals)
    Not That! Aussie Cheese Fries (2,140 cals) - although the Outback website now says 1,100 cals for the cheese fries, probably reduced the size because of the shock value of these type of infographics...

    Now it is likely that even if you split the cheese fries 4 ways, you are still getting a salad and an entree too, so the total meal may end up still being high... But it doesn't seem like a fair comparison to put something that four people could easily share against something that if two people split it, they would be grouchy and hungry.



  • Alluminati
    Alluminati Posts: 6,208 Member
    cee134 wrote: »
    No... this was not suppose to be surprising other then companies are making smaller meals with more calories. If I ate a hamburger and milkshake I would of expected it to be less then 1000 kcal. Now it can be over 2000.

    If I ate a hamburger and milkshake that I made, sure. But restaurants, fast food or otherwise, are notorious for having a lot of calories in their foods. There is no expectation of anything except expecting a lot of calories.
  • deluxmary2000
    deluxmary2000 Posts: 981 Member
    The 5 Guys meal is totally worth it - the rest, not so much.
  • kristen6350
    kristen6350 Posts: 1,094 Member
    The BF and I went to Arby's for lunch one day last week. I researched calories, got a 3 piece Chicken Strips (about 400 calories) and a Diet Coke. Filled me up...He on the otherhand got a Small Curly Fry and a Chicken Cordon Bleu Sandwich...1060 calories. Now, he can eat more (he's 6'3 and 190), but still. You wouldn't think a sandwich and fries would be that much. Knowledge is power...and so is nutritional info on websites.