Losing weight. Knowing your BMR.

Judymnelson
Judymnelson Posts: 16 Member
edited December 3 in Success Stories
I finally figured out how to lose weight. The secret is going to the Apps link and finding the BMR link. Fill that out and eat approx 100 calories less a week to lose 1 lb a week. I've even doing it for several months now and have lost 24 lbs. Good luck all.

Replies

  • skinnymom258
    skinnymom258 Posts: 13 Member
    What of I want to lose2pounds a week
  • TavistockToad
    TavistockToad Posts: 35,719 Member
    I finally figured out how to lose weight. The secret is going to the Apps link and finding the BMR link. Fill that out and eat approx 100 calories less a week to lose 1 lb a week. I've even doing it for several months now and have lost 24 lbs. Good luck all.

    No

    You don't need to eat under bmr , you need to eat under tdee.
  • rissasu
    rissasu Posts: 19 Member
    I finally figured out how to lose weight. The secret is going to the Apps link and finding the BMR link. Fill that out and eat approx 100 calories less a week to lose 1 lb a week. I've even doing it for several months now and have lost 24 lbs. Good luck all.

    No

    You don't need to eat under bmr , you need to eat under tdee.

    What's tdee? BMR is what your body burns naturally, doing absolutely nothing else. 1lb equals 3500 calories. So for 2 lbs a week you would wanna cut back 7000 a week/ 1000 a day. So your BMR plus what you burn off-1000 calories would be equal to 2 lbs a week.
  • TavistockToad
    TavistockToad Posts: 35,719 Member
    edited August 2016
    rissasu wrote: »
    I finally figured out how to lose weight. The secret is going to the Apps link and finding the BMR link. Fill that out and eat approx 100 calories less a week to lose 1 lb a week. I've even doing it for several months now and have lost 24 lbs. Good luck all.

    No

    You don't need to eat under bmr , you need to eat under tdee.

    What's tdee? BMR is what your body burns naturally, doing absolutely nothing else. 1lb equals 3500 calories. So for 2 lbs a week you would wanna cut back 7000 a week/ 1000 a day. So your BMR plus what you burn off-1000 calories would be equal to 2 lbs a week.

    But unless you're in a coma you are burning more than your BMR to start with....
  • Hornsby
    Hornsby Posts: 10,322 Member
    You shouldn't eat below your BMR. This thread is incorrect.
  • quiksylver296
    quiksylver296 Posts: 28,439 Member
    BMR = Basal Metabolic Rate = the very lowest amount of calories your body needs just to survive, if you were bedridden or in a coma

    TDEE - Total Daily Energy Expenditure = your BMR plus the calories you burn doing life...walking, chasing kids, exercising, etc.
  • oolou
    oolou Posts: 765 Member
    edited August 2016
    Hornsby wrote: »
    You shouldn't eat below your BMR. This thread is incorrect.

    There is nothing wrong with going below your BMR, especially if a person is sedentary and exercises little. Just got to watch that you dont go below the recommended daily minimums for calorie intake.
  • TavistockToad
    TavistockToad Posts: 35,719 Member
    oolou wrote: »
    Hornsby wrote: »
    You shouldn't eat below your BMR. This thread is incorrect.

    There is nothing wrong with going below your BMR, especially if a person is sedentary and exercises little. Just got to watch that you dont go below the recommended daily minimums for calorie intake.

    there is no way you should never take 500-1000 cals off your BMR, that's completely unnecessary to lose weight.
  • Hornsby
    Hornsby Posts: 10,322 Member
    oolou wrote: »
    Hornsby wrote: »
    You shouldn't eat below your BMR. This thread is incorrect.

    There is nothing wrong with going below your BMR, especially if a person is sedentary and exercises little. Just got to watch that you dont go below the recommended daily minimums for calorie intake.

    No
  • oolou
    oolou Posts: 765 Member
    edited August 2016
    oolou wrote: »
    Hornsby wrote: »
    You shouldn't eat below your BMR. This thread is incorrect.

    There is nothing wrong with going below your BMR, especially if a person is sedentary and exercises little. Just got to watch that you dont go below the recommended daily minimums for calorie intake.

    there is no way you should never take 500-1000 cals off your BMR, that's completely unnecessary to lose weight.

    Who said to do that? The Op is taking 100 less a week...

  • seska422
    seska422 Posts: 3,217 Member
    edited August 2016
    Hornsby wrote: »
    oolou wrote: »
    Hornsby wrote: »
    You shouldn't eat below your BMR. This thread is incorrect.

    There is nothing wrong with going below your BMR, especially if a person is sedentary and exercises little. Just got to watch that you dont go below the recommended daily minimums for calorie intake.

    No
    There's no problem with eating below BMR as long as you have enough excess fat to get your available energy up to your TDEE. Only so much fat can be freed up to burn per day so you do need to eat at least the minimum recommended calories.

    BMR isn't a cutoff point for intake. It's just a part of the picture when you are looking at TDEE.
  • TavistockToad
    TavistockToad Posts: 35,719 Member
    oolou wrote: »
    oolou wrote: »
    Hornsby wrote: »
    You shouldn't eat below your BMR. This thread is incorrect.

    There is nothing wrong with going below your BMR, especially if a person is sedentary and exercises little. Just got to watch that you dont go below the recommended daily minimums for calorie intake.

    there is no way you should never take 500-1000 cals off your BMR, that's completely unnecessary to lose weight.

    Who said to do that? The Op is taking 100 less a week...

    This person did:
    rissasu wrote: »
    I finally figured out how to lose weight. The secret is going to the Apps link and finding the BMR link. Fill that out and eat approx 100 calories less a week to lose 1 lb a week. I've even doing it for several months now and have lost 24 lbs. Good luck all.

    No

    You don't need to eat under bmr , you need to eat under tdee.

    What's tdee? BMR is what your body burns naturally, doing absolutely nothing else. 1lb equals 3500 calories. So for 2 lbs a week you would wanna cut back 7000 a week/ 1000 a day. So your BMR plus what you burn off-1000 calories would be equal to 2 lbs a week.

  • rankinsect
    rankinsect Posts: 2,238 Member
    BMR is basically a meaningless number in terms of weight loss or biology, as long as you're not comatose. Its only real use is in calculating more meaningful numbers like TDEE.
  • oolou
    oolou Posts: 765 Member
    oolou wrote: »
    oolou wrote: »
    Hornsby wrote: »
    You shouldn't eat below your BMR. This thread is incorrect.

    There is nothing wrong with going below your BMR, especially if a person is sedentary and exercises little. Just got to watch that you dont go below the recommended daily minimums for calorie intake.

    there is no way you should never take 500-1000 cals off your BMR, that's completely unnecessary to lose weight.

    Who said to do that? The Op is taking 100 less a week...

    This person did:
    rissasu wrote: »
    I finally figured out how to lose weight. The secret is going to the Apps link and finding the BMR link. Fill that out and eat approx 100 calories less a week to lose 1 lb a week. I've even doing it for several months now and have lost 24 lbs. Good luck all.

    No

    You don't need to eat under bmr , you need to eat under tdee.

    What's tdee? BMR is what your body burns naturally, doing absolutely nothing else. 1lb equals 3500 calories. So for 2 lbs a week you would wanna cut back 7000 a week/ 1000 a day. So your BMR plus what you burn off-1000 calories would be equal to 2 lbs a week.

    Oooohhh ... well, quote that person then, not me, if you want to respond to what they wrote :)

  • TavistockToad
    TavistockToad Posts: 35,719 Member
    oolou wrote: »
    oolou wrote: »
    oolou wrote: »
    Hornsby wrote: »
    You shouldn't eat below your BMR. This thread is incorrect.

    There is nothing wrong with going below your BMR, especially if a person is sedentary and exercises little. Just got to watch that you dont go below the recommended daily minimums for calorie intake.

    there is no way you should never take 500-1000 cals off your BMR, that's completely unnecessary to lose weight.

    Who said to do that? The Op is taking 100 less a week...

    This person did:
    rissasu wrote: »
    I finally figured out how to lose weight. The secret is going to the Apps link and finding the BMR link. Fill that out and eat approx 100 calories less a week to lose 1 lb a week. I've even doing it for several months now and have lost 24 lbs. Good luck all.

    No

    You don't need to eat under bmr , you need to eat under tdee.

    What's tdee? BMR is what your body burns naturally, doing absolutely nothing else. 1lb equals 3500 calories. So for 2 lbs a week you would wanna cut back 7000 a week/ 1000 a day. So your BMR plus what you burn off-1000 calories would be equal to 2 lbs a week.

    Oooohhh ... well, quote that person then, not me, if you want to respond to what they wrote :)

    I was replying to you because you agreed with the other horrifically bad advice...
  • oolou
    oolou Posts: 765 Member
    oolou wrote: »
    oolou wrote: »
    oolou wrote: »
    Hornsby wrote: »
    You shouldn't eat below your BMR. This thread is incorrect.

    There is nothing wrong with going below your BMR, especially if a person is sedentary and exercises little. Just got to watch that you dont go below the recommended daily minimums for calorie intake.

    there is no way you should never take 500-1000 cals off your BMR, that's completely unnecessary to lose weight.

    Who said to do that? The Op is taking 100 less a week...

    This person did:
    rissasu wrote: »
    I finally figured out how to lose weight. The secret is going to the Apps link and finding the BMR link. Fill that out and eat approx 100 calories less a week to lose 1 lb a week. I've even doing it for several months now and have lost 24 lbs. Good luck all.

    No

    You don't need to eat under bmr , you need to eat under tdee.

    What's tdee? BMR is what your body burns naturally, doing absolutely nothing else. 1lb equals 3500 calories. So for 2 lbs a week you would wanna cut back 7000 a week/ 1000 a day. So your BMR plus what you burn off-1000 calories would be equal to 2 lbs a week.

    Oooohhh ... well, quote that person then, not me, if you want to respond to what they wrote :)

    I was replying to you because you agreed with the other horrifically bad advice...

    Nope. If you read up, I quoted the person to whom I was responding.

    I would however agree with the scientific fact that to lose two pounds a week, one needs to create a calorie deficit of a thousand calories less than their TDEE. Whether I support doing so would really depend on the individual circumstances of the person in question. For many it would be too aggressive a goal.
  • TavistockToad
    TavistockToad Posts: 35,719 Member
    oolou wrote: »
    oolou wrote: »
    oolou wrote: »
    oolou wrote: »
    Hornsby wrote: »
    You shouldn't eat below your BMR. This thread is incorrect.

    There is nothing wrong with going below your BMR, especially if a person is sedentary and exercises little. Just got to watch that you dont go below the recommended daily minimums for calorie intake.

    there is no way you should never take 500-1000 cals off your BMR, that's completely unnecessary to lose weight.

    Who said to do that? The Op is taking 100 less a week...

    This person did:
    rissasu wrote: »
    I finally figured out how to lose weight. The secret is going to the Apps link and finding the BMR link. Fill that out and eat approx 100 calories less a week to lose 1 lb a week. I've even doing it for several months now and have lost 24 lbs. Good luck all.

    No

    You don't need to eat under bmr , you need to eat under tdee.

    What's tdee? BMR is what your body burns naturally, doing absolutely nothing else. 1lb equals 3500 calories. So for 2 lbs a week you would wanna cut back 7000 a week/ 1000 a day. So your BMR plus what you burn off-1000 calories would be equal to 2 lbs a week.

    Oooohhh ... well, quote that person then, not me, if you want to respond to what they wrote :)

    I was replying to you because you agreed with the other horrifically bad advice...

    Nope. If you read up, I quoted the person to whom I was responding.

    I would however agree with the scientific fact that to lose two pounds a week, one needs to create a calorie deficit of a thousand calories less than their TDEE. Whether I support doing so would really depend on the individual circumstances of the person in question. For many it would be too aggressive a goal.

    And your response was that eating below bmr is ok...
  • oolou
    oolou Posts: 765 Member

    And your response was that eating below bmr is ok...

    Yup. My full response, for context, was:

    There is nothing wrong with going below your BMR, especially if a person is sedentary and exercises little. Just got to watch that you dont go below the recommended daily minimums for calorie intake.

    I guess you disagree. *shrugs*
  • TavistockToad
    TavistockToad Posts: 35,719 Member
    oolou wrote: »

    And your response was that eating below bmr is ok...

    Yup. My full response, for context, was:

    There is nothing wrong with going below your BMR, especially if a person is sedentary and exercises little. Just got to watch that you dont go below the recommended daily minimums for calorie intake.

    I guess you disagree. *shrugs*

    Where's a flogging a dead horse gif when you need it...
This discussion has been closed.
Do you Love MyFitnessPal? Have you crushed a goal or improved your life through better nutrition using MyFitnessPal?
Share your success and inspire others. Leave us a review on Apple Or Google Play stores!