My body fat % is below 30, maybe

JeromeBarry1
JeromeBarry1 Posts: 10,179 Member
edited November 2024 in Success Stories
Because it's an impedance method of calculating.

I've been checking my bf% and muscle % occasionally since January. As I've lost weight, the bf% went from as high as 41.4 in February to 27.8 when I checked it tonight. That's something I want to crow about, even though I expect someone to rain on my parade by explaining how impedance measurements are not accurate.

Replies

  • Cheesy567
    Cheesy567 Posts: 1,186 Member
    They're inaccurate, but not that inaccurate! Way to go!!
  • queenliz99
    queenliz99 Posts: 15,317 Member
    Way to go!
  • 75poundstogo
    75poundstogo Posts: 99 Member
    Way to go!!! Youre a perfectionist that gets results
  • JeromeBarry1
    JeromeBarry1 Posts: 10,179 Member
    My November saw very little weight loss and 4 out-of-control overeating days. It was my worst month since beginning in January. Still, I knew I wanted to check my body fat reading today. Big surprise!

    BF% from the same device is 19.0%
    Muscle has increased to 37.5%. It had been 34.1% on September 24.

    I don't have records of what the "visceral fat" reading has been at the intervals of checking this year, but today that number was 9%.

  • JeromeBarry1
    JeromeBarry1 Posts: 10,179 Member
    Does that mean that 43.5% of me is bones and internal organs? Does that make any sense?
  • benevempress
    benevempress Posts: 136 Member
    When you're adding up percentages to get to 100%, you have to consider the "other stuff" in your body too... the contents of your colon, water/blood/other liquids, your skin, etc. Therefore, I would say that 43.5% number is not all bones and organs.
  • JeromeBarry1
    JeromeBarry1 Posts: 10,179 Member
    I didn't get around to checking in January. Here's the numbers today. Same device. Same time of day and hopefully the same level of hydration.

    BF 15.9%
    Visceral fat 9%
    BMI 26.7
    Muscle 39.0%


    I definitely don't look like a dude with 16% body fat.
  • tarothelp
    tarothelp Posts: 167 Member
    How did you check this? And congrats!!!!
  • JeromeBarry1
    JeromeBarry1 Posts: 10,179 Member
    I have been using an Omron scale which measures the electrical impedance of a current up one leg and down the other and it then infers everything using only my height and weight. I read somewhere that these devices are liable to be wrong by 6%, which still has my bf% below 30%.
  • CharlieBeansmomTracey
    CharlieBeansmomTracey Posts: 7,682 Member
    JeromeBarry1 wrote: »
    I have been using an Omron scale which measures the electrical impedance of a current up one leg and down the other and it then infers everything using only my height and weight. I read somewhere that these devices are liable to be wrong by 6%, which still has my bf% below 30%.

    I would say they are off by more than 6%.I would get a dexascan if possible. that at least would be a lot more accurate.
  • tarothelp
    tarothelp Posts: 167 Member
    As long as you are using the same device each time. At least it will give u an idea if the degreee of change. Congrats
  • JeromeBarry1
    JeromeBarry1 Posts: 10,179 Member
    Yesterday I got out and looked for a mythical farmer's market in this small town, and found not it. What I did find was some kind of organized crossfit event. Today I googled 'crossfit mytown' and found my way to signing up for free hystrostatic body fat testing. My appt is June 3.
This discussion has been closed.

Categories

Do you Love MyFitnessPal? Have you crushed a goal or improved your life through better nutrition using MyFitnessPal?
Share your success and inspire others. Leave us a review on Apple Or Google Play stores!