Bodyfat

Whats your current bodyfat %? Are you happy with it or do you have a goal to reach?
«1

Replies

  • ladyreva78
    ladyreva78 Posts: 4,080 Member
    Ways too high - currently around 40% , depending on how you measure it (up to 5% variation from the different measurement methods). Not happy with it at all. Trying to get it down to a healthy range with my current target at around 25%.
  • sijomial
    sijomial Posts: 19,809 Member
    No idea - and yes I'm happy with it, whatever it is! :)
  • Vegplotter
    Vegplotter Posts: 265 Member
    I'd advise not to get hung up on body fat. The home scales we use just aren't accurate enough to bother with. Use weight to height tables, eat a varied nutritionally rich diet, keep active and let your body do the rest. (Which it will - supremely efficiently).
  • RoxieDawn
    RoxieDawn Posts: 15,488 Member
    I have no clue. I am very happy with it. :)
  • selina884
    selina884 Posts: 826 Member
    Yeah you folks are probably right.

    I only became curious 2 days ago and it seems to have become a focus for me.
  • TavistockToad
    TavistockToad Posts: 35,719 Member
    edited September 2016
    don't know what it is... but i know there's a bit too much of it!
  • Pretty damn bad, but hey, I'm a work in progress. Mine is 51%.
  • ARGriffy
    ARGriffy Posts: 1,002 Member
    WAS about 20-23%... now about 26% ish boo
  • PJBrice1911
    PJBrice1911 Posts: 2 Member
    No I am not happy with mine. 25% last time I check. I am trying to get it down to 12% and 20lbs also.
  • GottaBurnEmAll
    GottaBurnEmAll Posts: 7,722 Member
    edited September 2016
    I'd advise you to care very much about body fat. While the home scales aren't accurate, if you use the Navy Body Fat Calculator and visual estimates with those online picture sites, you can come pretty close.

    I'm currently 22% on the Navy Calculator (LOL... no) and maybe 25-26% by visual estimates.

    Personally, I'd like some pesky areas to lean out a little bit more.
  • JustMissTracy
    JustMissTracy Posts: 6,338 Member
    I think I'm at about 27%, but that's a rough guess using a measuring tape and online calculator. Higher than I expected, so this has made me decide to work a little harder!
  • trigden1991
    trigden1991 Posts: 4,658 Member
    Around 14%. Little way to go!
  • JustMissTracy
    JustMissTracy Posts: 6,338 Member
    Around 14%. Little way to go!

    Trig...can you tell me...if I'm at 27, and at a nice weight (121)..do I really have to lose more weight to get my bf down?
  • medic2038
    medic2038 Posts: 434 Member
    I'd advise you to care very much about body fat. While the home scales aren't accurate, if you use the Navy Body Fat Calculator and visual estimates with those online picture sites, you can come pretty close.

    BF% is definitely one of those "want to have a ballpark" numbers.
    I use the tape method too, which is quasi accurate. Sometimes doing a pic comparison can be hard due to where someone carries weight.

    I figure I'm somewhere in the 17-22% range.
  • LazSommer
    LazSommer Posts: 1,851 Member
    Around 14%. Little way to go!

    Trig...can you tell me...if I'm at 27, and at a nice weight (121)..do I really have to lose more weight to get my bf down?

    muscle mass helps.
  • sardelsa
    sardelsa Posts: 9,812 Member
    I have no idea. My guess would be 19-20%? I do like it though, but I'd like to be a little bigger with the same BF%
  • neldabg
    neldabg Posts: 1,452 Member
    I have no clue myself. I have a flat tummy. That's mainly all I care for. Haha.
  • JustMissTracy
    JustMissTracy Posts: 6,338 Member
    LazSommer wrote: »
    Around 14%. Little way to go!

    Trig...can you tell me...if I'm at 27, and at a nice weight (121)..do I really have to lose more weight to get my bf down?

    muscle mass helps.

    Thank you! The thought of losing more weight (lost 80 already) is not one I cherish; the loss is really starting to show in my face, so I'd rather not lose any more. I do a fair amount of body resistance workouts and cardio, and a small amount of kettlebell workouts, maybe I'll increase those and see if it helps..
  • Sued0nim
    Sued0nim Posts: 17,456 Member
    Also no idea

    Oh I have a reading on a bio impedence scale

    And I also went for a dexa scan

    But still have no idea

    Turns out even though I firmly believed that dexa would be accurate, that operators can calibrate it in different ways so all the charts and averages I've seen were irrelevant to my readings as the operator told me where I stood in relation to the people he'd scanned and suggested I took off 6-7% to be relevant to the Google charts and images. @tomteboda also explained how they worked to me and how inaccurate they can be

    son, I was disappoint
  • Sued0nim
    Sued0nim Posts: 17,456 Member
    Around 14%. Little way to go!

    Trig...can you tell me...if I'm at 27, and at a nice weight (121)..do I really have to lose more weight to get my bf down?

    No ....recomp

    Protein and progressive resistance
  • JustMissTracy
    JustMissTracy Posts: 6,338 Member
    Sued0nim wrote: »
    Around 14%. Little way to go!

    Trig...can you tell me...if I'm at 27, and at a nice weight (121)..do I really have to lose more weight to get my bf down?

    No ....recomp

    Protein and progressive resistance

    This has been my thinking for the last few months. Except the "progressive" part, maybe I haven't been "progressive" enough!
  • TavistockToad
    TavistockToad Posts: 35,719 Member
    LazSommer wrote: »
    Around 14%. Little way to go!

    Trig...can you tell me...if I'm at 27, and at a nice weight (121)..do I really have to lose more weight to get my bf down?

    muscle mass helps.

    Thank you! The thought of losing more weight (lost 80 already) is not one I cherish; the loss is really starting to show in my face, so I'd rather not lose any more. I do a fair amount of body resistance workouts and cardio, and a small amount of kettlebell workouts, maybe I'll increase those and see if it helps..

    the thing is though, even if you do recomp, its still losing more bodyfat, so you'll see the changes in your body, just not the scales... thats where the saying 'you can have a nice face or a nice bum' comes from....
  • selina884
    selina884 Posts: 826 Member
    neldabg wrote: »
    I have no clue myself. I have a flat tummy. That's mainly all I care for. Haha.

    lol yep, I guess if its flat then I wont truly care either
  • selina884
    selina884 Posts: 826 Member
    Sued0nim wrote: »
    Also no idea

    Oh I have a reading on a bio impedence scale

    And I also went for a dexa scan

    But still have no idea

    Turns out even though I firmly believed that dexa would be accurate, that operators can calibrate it in different ways so all the charts and averages I've seen were irrelevant to my readings as the operator told me where I stood in relation to the people he'd scanned and suggested I took off 6-7% to be relevant to the Google charts and images. @tomteboda also explained how they worked to me and how inaccurate they can be

    son, I was disappoint

    Damn. Youve actually saved me alot of "thinking" and from wasting my money as I have been contemplating a dexa scan for a while. They are ridiculously expensive.

    So thanks, I wont even entertain the idea anymore.
  • JustMissTracy
    JustMissTracy Posts: 6,338 Member
    LazSommer wrote: »
    Around 14%. Little way to go!

    Trig...can you tell me...if I'm at 27, and at a nice weight (121)..do I really have to lose more weight to get my bf down?

    muscle mass helps.

    Thank you! The thought of losing more weight (lost 80 already) is not one I cherish; the loss is really starting to show in my face, so I'd rather not lose any more. I do a fair amount of body resistance workouts and cardio, and a small amount of kettlebell workouts, maybe I'll increase those and see if it helps..

    the thing is though, even if you do recomp, its still losing more bodyfat, so you'll see the changes in your body, just not the scales... thats where the saying 'you can have a nice face or a nice bum' comes from....

    That's ok, I don't want the scale to change any further...and I want a nice face AND bum! (And belly too!)
  • TavistockToad
    TavistockToad Posts: 35,719 Member
    LazSommer wrote: »
    Around 14%. Little way to go!

    Trig...can you tell me...if I'm at 27, and at a nice weight (121)..do I really have to lose more weight to get my bf down?

    muscle mass helps.

    Thank you! The thought of losing more weight (lost 80 already) is not one I cherish; the loss is really starting to show in my face, so I'd rather not lose any more. I do a fair amount of body resistance workouts and cardio, and a small amount of kettlebell workouts, maybe I'll increase those and see if it helps..

    the thing is though, even if you do recomp, its still losing more bodyfat, so you'll see the changes in your body, just not the scales... thats where the saying 'you can have a nice face or a nice bum' comes from....

    That's ok, I don't want the scale to change any further...and I want a nice face AND bum! (And belly too!)

    you said you're already seeing the loss in your face, so you don't want to lose any more weight? you will still lose from your face.
  • JustMissTracy
    JustMissTracy Posts: 6,338 Member
    LazSommer wrote: »
    Around 14%. Little way to go!

    Trig...can you tell me...if I'm at 27, and at a nice weight (121)..do I really have to lose more weight to get my bf down?

    muscle mass helps.

    Thank you! The thought of losing more weight (lost 80 already) is not one I cherish; the loss is really starting to show in my face, so I'd rather not lose any more. I do a fair amount of body resistance workouts and cardio, and a small amount of kettlebell workouts, maybe I'll increase those and see if it helps..

    the thing is though, even if you do recomp, its still losing more bodyfat, so you'll see the changes in your body, just not the scales... thats where the saying 'you can have a nice face or a nice bum' comes from....

    That's ok, I don't want the scale to change any further...and I want a nice face AND bum! (And belly too!)

    you said you're already seeing the loss in your face, so you don't want to lose any more weight? you will still lose from your face.

    Well yes, but i'm also 47....there's a chance some of these wrinkles are normal and not from weight loss, but I suspect a fair amount of them ARE from losing too much (Or was it all the scrunching up while working out and running, maybe?) I'm not too concerned, and am actually really pleased with my success so far, but I was shocked by the bf number I saw, and don't want to lose more weight. If I get more wrinkles still, so be it.. ;)
  • jemhh
    jemhh Posts: 14,261 Member
    edited September 2016
    I had a DEXA scan in August and came in at 36%. That was disconcerting, especially after all other estimates (calculators, reliable people eyeballing me, etc.) had me around 26%. I figured the DEXA would be high 20s, but not mid-30s, putting me in obese range. After talking to the tech and reading a bit more about them, I don't believe that my results were accurate.

    I think that knowing your bf can be interesting but I will caution you that if you struggle with your appearance or hint toward BDD, getting disappointing results can be very difficult.
  • sijomial
    sijomial Posts: 19,809 Member
    selina884 wrote: »
    Sued0nim wrote: »
    Also no idea

    Oh I have a reading on a bio impedence scale

    And I also went for a dexa scan

    But still have no idea

    Turns out even though I firmly believed that dexa would be accurate, that operators can calibrate it in different ways so all the charts and averages I've seen were irrelevant to my readings as the operator told me where I stood in relation to the people he'd scanned and suggested I took off 6-7% to be relevant to the Google charts and images. @tomteboda also explained how they worked to me and how inaccurate they can be

    son, I was disappoint

    Damn. Youve actually saved me alot of "thinking" and from wasting my money as I have been contemplating a dexa scan for a while. They are ridiculously expensive.

    So thanks, I wont even entertain the idea anymore.

    FYI - I went down the BodPod scan route every six months as cheaper than DEXA in the UK - wasn't impressed.
    Had a roughly believable progression although the number seemed to clash with visual estimates but had one scan that was clearly a false reading (bigger arms/legs, smaller waist and better muscle definition but BF% apparently went up - hmmm).

    Gave up trying to measure at that point.
  • trigden1991
    trigden1991 Posts: 4,658 Member
    Around 14%. Little way to go!

    Trig...can you tell me...if I'm at 27, and at a nice weight (121)..do I really have to lose more weight to get my bf down?

    To decrease your bodyfat percentage you have 2 options;

    1) Increase your muscle mass
    2) Decrease your fat mass

    As a woman it is significantly easier to lose fat than it is build muscle. I personally would keep dieting until you're a bit leaner and then increase calories to maintenance/slight surplus to build some muscle.