Accuracy??? Need Advice
HakeemTheDream89
Posts: 167 Member
I'm logging in all my food intake calories and calories burned in diary right now. To be accurate is it smart to add a 100 calories to "Calories eaten"' and deduct 300 calories from the calories it listen I burn ? I'm trying to be the most accurate to see how many calories I've eaten and burned and determine the total .
0
Replies
-
I think this is bring too critical. Nothing is linear and your clothes and scales will show you where you are succeeding or not. Just for the record however, I dont eat back the calories burned unless I want a real treat - a cake or dessert sometimes. Otherwise, I let it slide. Works for me.0
-
It's not really accurate to apply a user-defined fudge factor. However, a lot of us do that anyway when we deliberately eat back only a fraction of our exercise calories. We implicitly subtract a few hundred calories from our exercise burn just because we suspect that the exercise database is overly generous with calorie burns.
The way to improve accuracy of logging food is to use a digital scale and learn to note and record your food as you cook it. I use the food diary to plan my ingredients. Then in the midst of my food prep I use pen and paper to note variations from my plan. After my meal, I update the diary with accurate values from my notes.0 -
JeromeBarry1 wrote: »It's not really accurate to apply a user-defined fudge factor. However, a lot of us do that anyway when we deliberately eat back only a fraction of our exercise calories. We implicitly subtract a few hundred calories from our exercise burn just because we suspect that the exercise database is overly generous with calorie burns.
The way to improve accuracy of logging food is to use a digital scale and learn to note and record your food as you cook it. I use the food diary to plan my ingredients. Then in the midst of my food prep I use pen and paper to note variations from my plan. After my meal, I update the diary with accurate values from my notes.
Yes I understand a scale,measuring cup etc is needed to get most accurate measurements. But right now I don't have those instruments. An this post wasn't made to justify anything. It's made for accuracy and to seek other people recommendations.0 -
I think this is bring too critical. Nothing is linear and your clothes and scales will show you where you are succeeding or not. Just for the record however, I dont eat back the calories burned unless I want a real treat - a cake or dessert sometimes. Otherwise, I let it slide. Works for me.
Sir I've being "Too Critical" gets me to reach my goal then I'm all in.0 -
Why would you add that if you didn't eat it or burn it?! I don't understand?0
-
Abney - I don't weigh or measure anything I eyeball everything and use package calorie count (many here have proved its way off sometimes). I walk between 6-8 miles a week and don't eat any of the exercise calories back. I'm set to lose 2 lbs a week. Should I go over because my estimates (studies show people underestimate) my rate of loss will be lower than 2 lbs but still a loss.
The only thing I "pad" is going out to eat. Its hard to know what exactly is in some foods so I make sure to add 1/2 portion to the standard estimate.
Having said all of this... As I get closer to goal weight I will probably weigh my food as my margins will be lower. AND if i feel tired I will begin eating some of my walking calories burned back. Right now I have enough fat storage to fuel my body.
Give yourself a few weeks logging and see what your rate of weight loss is. Long term maintainers (which is our ultimate goal right) swear by a food scale. When your budget allows you should order one Amazon and Walmart have them pretty cheap.
I totally get wanting to get to goal trust me, but so much better getting to goal eating all your calories you can instead of randomly taking some off. Does that make sense?1 -
Abney - I don't weigh or measure anything I eyeball everything and use package calorie count (many here have proved its way off sometimes). I walk between 6-8 miles a week and don't eat any of the exercise calories back. I'm set to lose 2 lbs a week. Should I go over because my estimates (studies show people underestimate) my rate of loss will be lower than 2 lbs but still a loss.
The only thing I "pad" is going out to eat. Its hard to know what exactly is in some foods so I make sure to add 1/2 portion to the standard estimate.
Having said all of this... As I get closer to goal weight I will probably weigh my food as my margins will be lower. AND if i feel tired I will begin eating some of my walking calories burned back. Right now I have enough fat storage to fuel my body.
Give yourself a few weeks logging and see what your rate of weight loss is. Long term maintainers (which is our ultimate goal right) swear by a food scale. When your budget allows you should order one Amazon and Walmart have them pretty cheap.
I totally get wanting to get to goal trust me, but so much better getting to goal eating all your calories you can instead of randomly taking some off. Does that make sense?Abney - I don't weigh or measure anything I eyeball everything and use package calorie count (many here have proved its way off sometimes). I walk between 6-8 miles a week and don't eat any of the exercise calories back. I'm set to lose 2 lbs a week. Should I go over because my estimates (studies show people underestimate) my rate of loss will be lower than 2 lbs but still a loss.
The only thing I "pad" is going out to eat. Its hard to know what exactly is in some foods so I make sure to add 1/2 portion to the standard estimate.
Having said all of this... As I get closer to goal weight I will probably weigh my food as my margins will be lower. AND if i feel tired I will begin eating some of my walking calories burned back. Right now I have enough fat storage to fuel my body.
Give yourself a few weeks logging and see what your rate of weight loss is. Long term maintainers (which is our ultimate goal right) swear by a food scale. When your budget allows you should order one Amazon and Walmart have them pretty cheap.
I totally get wanting to get to goal trust me, but so much better getting to goal eating all your calories you can instead of randomly taking some off. Does that make sense?
Being 100% accurate or closes too 100% makes me accountable. I'm re-educating myself on everything.A most importantly I'm reversing the cycle,removing the curse.
@TavistockToad Because I measure almost everything off estimating and eye test. I would like to have some accuracy to inform me how much I really have consumed.0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.7K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.3K Health and Weight Loss
- 176K Food and Nutrition
- 47.5K Recipes
- 232.6K Fitness and Exercise
- 431 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.6K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8.1K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.4K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.8K MyFitnessPal Information
- 23 News and Announcements
- 1.2K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions