What happens to fat when strength training?
Bchlvr64
Posts: 89 Member
I started SL5x5 5 weeks ago. I'm progressing nicely. I feel stronger, clothes a little loose, and I'm a little less jiggly in areas. I have a lot of weight to lose still, and haven't been in a consistent calorie deficit. I'm even up 3 lbs the last two weeks. My question, where has some of the fat gone??
0
Replies
-
Strength training doesn't do anything to fat, a calorie deficit does. Strength training builds muscle as long as your body has the resources to build it during the repair phase (extra calories and protein). More muscle = more calorie burn. So the end result might be fat loss, but the strength training itself doesn't really do it directly.4
-
Pretty much nothing.
Fat is lost when eating at a calorie deficit.1 -
I know calorie deficit to lose weight/fat. I'm wondering why would I be the same weight, even up a little, yet clothes looser?0
-
It went to a farm. Don't worry. They'll take good care of it8
-
mgalovic01 wrote: »It went to a farm. Don't worry. They'll take good care of it
Thanks, helpful.0 -
Muscle burns more calories than fat. So as you build muscle, your body is becoming more efficient at burning fat.
"For example, muscle tissue has been observed to burn roughly seven to 10 calories per pound per day, compared to two to three calories per pound per day for fat. Therefore, if you replace a pound of fat with a pound of muscle, you can expect to burn only approximately four to six more calories a day."
I recommend reading the New Rules for Lifting series. Extremely informative, based on medical facts, and yet easy to read. So yeah, something is happening to your fat. You are burning it more efficiently. Congrats on your progress!6 -
redheaddee1974 wrote: »Muscle burns more calories than fat. So as you build muscle, your body is becoming more efficient at burning fat.
"For example, muscle tissue has been observed to burn roughly seven to 10 calories per pound per day, compared to two to three calories per pound per day for fat. Therefore, if you replace a pound of fat with a pound of muscle, you can expect to burn only approximately four to six more calories a day."
I recommend reading the New Rules for Lifting series. Extremely informative, based on medical facts, and yet easy to read. So yeah, something is happening to your fat. You are burning it more efficiently. Congrats on your progress!
Thank you very much. I will get that book.0 -
You're 5 weeks in to a new exercise regime.
The associated water retention is masking fat loss.
It's nice to think that in 5 weeks and eating at a calorie deficit you've created enough muscle mass to be making an appreciable difference in calories burnt, but I'm afraid you haven't.1 -
-
Not a damn thing. Fat is a non contracting tissue so it sees no effects from contraction based workouts.1
-
redheaddee1974 wrote: »Muscle burns more calories than fat. So as you build muscle, your body is becoming more efficient at burning fat.
"For example, muscle tissue has been observed to burn roughly seven to 10 calories per pound per day, compared to two to three calories per pound per day for fat. Therefore, if you replace a pound of fat with a pound of muscle, you can expect to burn only approximately four to six more calories a day."
I recommend reading the New Rules for Lifting series. Extremely informative, based on medical facts, and yet easy to read. So yeah, something is happening to your fat. You are burning it more efficiently. Congrats on your progress!
Thank you very much. I will get that book.
Don't buy them, my library had them!!0 -
You're 5 weeks in to a new exercise regime.
The associated water retention is masking fat loss.
It's nice to think that in 5 weeks and eating at a calorie deficit you've created enough muscle mass to be making an appreciable difference in calories burnt, but I'm afraid you haven't.
This is the right answer.1 -
I know calorie deficit to lose weight/fat. I'm wondering why would I be the same weight, even up a little, yet clothes looser?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muscle_tone
i know everyone here has a fit if you use the word tone but there it is. it does have nothing to do with how much fat is in your body composition, but the deal with me was: working muscles gained more elasticity and a greater tensile tone - or whatever the right terminology is - even when they're at rest.
less slack in my muscles tightened a couple zones up, noticeably my midriff where it was suddenly harder for my guts to spill out in any direction they liked because my abs were keeping them under better control.
there's no such thing as spot reduction of fat. but your dimensions can still change in spite of that ime.
2 -
Thanks for replying everyone . I understand a bit more.0
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.4K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.2K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 426 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.7K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions