How many calories does pan frying add?

courtney_0597
courtney_0597 Posts: 2 Member
edited November 13 in Recipes
One of my favourite side dishes to make is potato thins (basically a baked potato cut into thin slices and rubbed with seasonings). I can't bake them because my oven is whack, so I always pan fry them with one of two teaspoons of oil (usually vegetable) and then drain them off on some paper towels to stop more oil from soaking in. How many calories does this method of cooking add? Also, is one type of oil generally better for a diet, or are they all about the same? :#

Replies

  • Wheelhouse15
    Wheelhouse15 Posts: 5,575 Member
    edited November 2016
    Frying replaces the water in a starchy food with oil so it depends on what you are frying. Meats will be minimally effected by frying unless they are breaded, in which case you can add up to 3x the calories to the breading if you fry. Potatoes are about 1cal/g when baked but about 3cal/g when deep fried. Pan frying will probably be a bit better but I would say 2 to 2.5 cal/g would be a decent estimate.
  • trigden1991
    trigden1991 Posts: 4,658 Member
    Weigh the oil you use and add those calories. A tbsp of olive oil is around 90 cals so potentially 180cals but it is best to weigh it for accuracy.
  • sllm1
    sllm1 Posts: 2,130 Member
    I fry corn tortillas regularly because I'm GF and they're just awful without frying. I am really just guessing at how much oil is absorbed. I really wish I knew how to get a better number.
  • cheryldumais
    cheryldumais Posts: 1,907 Member
    sllm1 wrote: »
    I fry corn tortillas regularly because I'm GF and they're just awful without frying. I am really just guessing at how much oil is absorbed. I really wish I knew how to get a better number.
    Don't know if this is any help but I don't add oil to the pan. I spray them lightly with Pam. The food log has a calorie count for Pam per second of spray. I find it takes very little and they are delicious. No more hard taco shells for me. Plus they are lower in calories so the little bit of added oil per spraying is well worth it.

  • atjays
    atjays Posts: 797 Member
    edited November 2016
    Anything I cook in the frying pan I just measure the oil I use and divide it among each meal portion for an approximation. You aren't going to magically have the food gain calories from thin air so whatever goes in the pan should be logged. For example I fried 4 chicken breasts in 1 tablespoon of oil. So for each chicken breast meal I'd log the weight of the chicken breast prior to cooking and 0.25 tablespoons of oil with it. Yeah it's only about 20 calories and could be written off and "minor" but that sort of thinking can also easily add up to a couple hundred calories which makes a difference
  • ibboykin
    ibboykin Posts: 97 Member
    Being from the South, when you say fry my mind always go to deep frying such as chicken, chicken fried steak etc.
    I sauté meats and veggies all the time using olive oil. I enter the amount of oil I use and I don't find it effects in any measurable amount.
  • jamieparadis20
    jamieparadis20 Posts: 129 Member
    I've heard that coconut oil is the best because something unique about its composition makes it so your body doesn't store it as fat but instead burns it like carbs!
  • sgt1372
    sgt1372 Posts: 3,997 Member
    I know it matters to others but I don't bother measuring the oil I use to pan fry meat (or anything else). Failing to log those cals that stick to the food doesn't seem to affect my weight whatsoever. I'm just lucky that way, I guess.
  • courtney_0597
    courtney_0597 Posts: 2 Member
    ibboykin wrote: »
    Being from the South, when you say fry my mind always go to deep frying such as chicken, chicken fried steak etc.
    I sauté meats and veggies all the time using olive oil. I enter the amount of oil I use and I don't find it effects in any measurable amount.

    I think that might just be a dialect difference, since I'm from England. We usually just say pan fry instead of sautéed, but your way sounds much fancier
  • ibboykin
    ibboykin Posts: 97 Member
    edited November 2016
    I think that might just be a dialect difference, since I'm from England. We usually just say pan fry instead of sautéed, but your way sounds much fancier

    Hahahah. That is very possible. That is why I prefaced with being from the south. Here, it seems everything is battered and fried. If you go to a "seafood" restaurant, everything is battered and deep fried so you can see why my mind goes there. When I do salmon, I just coat the bottom of a cast iron skillet and either sauté stovetop or bake it but I never fry it.
  • Jeannie3099
    Jeannie3099 Posts: 61 Member
    I have had to change my methods. I use a ceramic pan and a touch of water.
  • I have had to change my methods. I use a ceramic pan and a touch of water.

    WOW! This sounds like the way to go! What is the brand of ceramic pans that you use? I have been planning to change to ceramic because I keep birds and it is safer; if using ceramic anc also allow me to eliminate some of the oils I use for cooking, then EVEN better!
  • Wheelhouse15
    Wheelhouse15 Posts: 5,575 Member
    edited November 2016
    I've heard that coconut oil is the best because something unique about its composition makes it so your body doesn't store it as fat but instead burns it like carbs!

    You are thinking MCT, that's not going to help anyway since you just stop burning carbs and other fats. You don't get free calories or more expensive calories, you just get calories. Alcohol is another example of something you won't store as fat but you'll get fat off of it if you drink a lot and don't reduce calories elsewhere to compensate.
  • Wheelhouse15
    Wheelhouse15 Posts: 5,575 Member
    ibboykin wrote: »
    Being from the South, when you say fry my mind always go to deep frying such as chicken, chicken fried steak etc.
    I sauté meats and veggies all the time using olive oil. I enter the amount of oil I use and I don't find it effects in any measurable amount.

    I think that might just be a dialect difference, since I'm from England. We usually just say pan fry instead of sautéed, but your way sounds much fancier

    Pan fry, shallow fry, and sauté are all the same cooking technique. I like sauté but I also speak French so to me it feels more natural.
  • Mary_Anastasia
    Mary_Anastasia Posts: 267 Member
    I prefer pan frying with roasted hazelnut oil- it has more good fats/less bad fat than olive oil, and has a high smoke point, and adds a rich flavor to stirfry especially (I like green beans, sweet potato, mushroom, onion, and tempeh, stirfry in hazelnut oil with a teaspoon of brown sugar and a splash of balsamic vinegar + salt/pepper/spices)
  • ChristopherLimoges
    ChristopherLimoges Posts: 298 Member
    edited November 2016
    For around 4 ounces of meat, you can get away with 1 tablespoon, or 0.5 tablespoons of butter and oil if you're cooking at your right temperature.
  • PAV8888
    PAV8888 Posts: 14,240 Member
    I guess it depends on whether what you fry has any water and how much of the water (or even oil) burns off at high temperatures.

    You might get a closer approximation by doing the following (assuming the oil is clean and doesn't contain added debris).

    Weight the oil you're using.
    When you're done frying and removing your food, get a wad of paper towels and weight it.
    Blot off the oil from the pan using the towels.
    Weight the paper towels again.
    Deduct the difference from the original amount of oil you added to the pan.

    You will still be slightly over-estimating the oil your food has absorbed because some oil gets burned during the cooking process.
    You will still be slightly under-estimating the oil your food has absorbed because your food may have contributed some water or other detritus that you are weighing in the end.

    How all that will balance out for you, I don't know :smiley:

    I just use pam :smile:
  • JaydedMiss
    JaydedMiss Posts: 4,286 Member
    I use a non stick pan with just a bit of water and it works fine for potatoes. Doesnt make it as crispy unless i burn it slightly...but it tastes good a little burned XD
  • tlanger251
    tlanger251 Posts: 86 Member
    I'm eating a very low carb/high fat diet and I'm having a hard time eating enough fat so I guess frying is the way to go. I just want to know if I'm making my goal or not, helpful suggestions. In particular the "weigh it before and after you fry it' makes the most sense in my brain. Thanks for the suggestion Speziface! I've done a lot of research on what kind of oil to fry in and I've been using grapeseed oil for several years now. It cooks at a high temp without changing into a bad fat and has a lot of other benefits also. If anyone knows anything about the ketogenic please respond. Some research says you need to eat 5% carbs and 60% fat but other research just says you have to eat under 50 grams of carbs..
  • tlanger251
    tlanger251 Posts: 86 Member
    FYI the tortilla weighed more before I fried it.. .84 ounces and now after frying .74 ounce.
  • RuNaRoUnDaFiEld
    RuNaRoUnDaFiEld Posts: 5,864 Member
    I weigh the oil before and after frying, once the pan has cooled down.
  • Jthanmyfitnesspal
    Jthanmyfitnesspal Posts: 3,522 Member
    tlanger251 wrote: »
    FYI the tortilla weighed more before I fried it.. .84 ounces and now after frying .74 ounce.

    D'oh! I guess some of the water in the tortilla evaporated. That's a problem!
  • pinuplove
    pinuplove Posts: 12,871 Member
    I weigh the oil before and after frying, once the pan has cooled down.

    I would do this if frying with a significant amount of oil. If I'm just lightly sauteing something, I count all the oil and figure if I'm over it just goes into my calorie 'slush fund,' as I like to call it!
  • Lounmoun
    Lounmoun Posts: 8,423 Member
    I would just log all the oil you add to the pan.
    If you want to you could weigh the oil, potatoes, pan, paper towel before and after and subtract anything that didn't make it onto the potato at the end. That is more of a pain to me than just logging a few calories I won't consume.
This discussion has been closed.