1,200 Calorie Daily Goal Question

comom23
comom23 Posts: 12 Member
edited November 15 in Health and Weight Loss
Wondering what comments people have heard when sharing with others you are eating 1,200 per day? When I tell people that is my goal through MFP, many seem sure that cannot be enough calories. Based on those reactions, I'm also looking for confirmation I am following this calorie deficit plan correctly. I'm 5'2", currently 169lbs, looking to get to 135-140. I've assumed the lower calorie goal I am assigned is due to my height and the fact I have a desk job (although I do have a daily step goal of 15,000). I am trying to follow 1.200 calories eaten per day on MFP, and 2,200 calories expended, according to Fitbit app. I figure that way if I'm off a little on either calculation, I should still be in deficit? Any thoughts/suggestions appreciated.
«1

Replies

  • bbell1985
    bbell1985 Posts: 4,571 Member
    I'd try to get in a bit of cardio or increase your activity level a bit so you can eat closer to 1400. But 1200 for short, sedentary women is not all that rare.
  • JaydedMiss
    JaydedMiss Posts: 4,286 Member
    iv been on 1200 since 230 pounds, But on days i walk that much you definatly need to eat some more. 1200 is the minimum. At 1200 you need to eat your exercise calories back, 15,000 is not sedentary. When i walk alot ill bump my calories to 1400-1500 allowing for an extra small meal.

    And as for the comments, Yeah people seem to have alot to say over my food. Aparently im starving myself ;)
  • This content has been removed.
  • bbell1985
    bbell1985 Posts: 4,571 Member
    Oh yeah I didn't see your steps. That's not sedentary. Try lightly active. I get 12-14k steps and I fit nicely into the lightly active caterory.
  • comom23
    comom23 Posts: 12 Member
    Thanks for comments! Nice to have a place to ask questions. I stumble to react to people's strong reactions to my calorie consumption:) I just switched my activity level to lightly active and I'm still at 1,200 calories, so sticking with it. Once I got used to weighing and tracking food, it's really not so difficult.
  • bbell1985
    bbell1985 Posts: 4,571 Member
    comom23 wrote: »
    Thanks for comments! Nice to have a place to ask questions. I stumble to react to people's strong reactions to my calorie consumption:) I just switched my activity level to lightly active and I'm still at 1,200 calories, so sticking with it. Once I got used to weighing and tracking food, it's really not so difficult.

    It didn't up your calories?

    Just don't talk about your calorie goal with people. No one gets it and everyone thinks they know it all. Also, I quickly learned that no one cares about your calories or macros. That's why we are all up in here. :) And instagram lol.
  • JaydedMiss
    JaydedMiss Posts: 4,286 Member
    comom23 wrote: »
    Thanks for comments! Nice to have a place to ask questions. I stumble to react to people's strong reactions to my calorie consumption:) I just switched my activity level to lightly active and I'm still at 1,200 calories, so sticking with it. Once I got used to weighing and tracking food, it's really not so difficult.

    yeah nothing wrong with 1200, As i said just have an extra snack especially if your extra hungry as thats alot of steps. Dont shy away from extra few hundred when needed some days!
  • lorrpb
    lorrpb Posts: 11,463 Member
    I don't share my calorie goal with others..
  • Christine_72
    Christine_72 Posts: 16,049 Member
    If you're getting 15,000 steps a day, then surely you can eat more than 1200 calories. Do you have your fitbit synced to mfp?
  • kk_inprogress
    kk_inprogress Posts: 3,077 Member
    Anecdotally...

    I'm 5'2" and 119#, and I lose at 1400 with a sedentary job (4000-5,000 steps per day). 1200 may be okay for you based on your height, but I'm guessing with your steps/day you may be able to eat more.

    I'm also guessing you set to losing at the most aggressive rate (because I sure did at first). Your goals are your goals. I would recommend if it gets tough to up it 100-200 cals with a few high protein snacks because that helped me a ton.

    There is a really nasty stigma on the 1200 number and I'm one of the first people to jump on it normally...but you're my height and I get it. That's where I was at for a while too. Just listen to your body.
  • comom23
    comom23 Posts: 12 Member
    I do have my Fitbit synced, but it is not adding any calories to my total - I must not have something set correctly.
  • bbell1985
    bbell1985 Posts: 4,571 Member
    comom23 wrote: »
    I do have my Fitbit synced, but it is not adding any calories to my total - I must not have something set correctly.

    You don't need to sync it. Just set yourself as lightly active.
  • Christine_72
    Christine_72 Posts: 16,049 Member
    bbell1985 wrote: »
    comom23 wrote: »
    I do have my Fitbit synced, but it is not adding any calories to my total - I must not have something set correctly.

    You don't need to sync it. Just set yourself as lightly active.

    But lightly active still gave her 1200 calories.

  • kk_inprogress
    kk_inprogress Posts: 3,077 Member
    I'm your same height, and whenever I select a goal more aggressive than losing 0.5/wk, it puts me down to 1200, unless my activity level is set really high.

    1200 isn't terrible when you're shorter, but with that said, I was losing (slowly, but losing) on 1400 with 4,000-5,000 steps a day and I'm 119#. I could manage 1200, but to be honest I was never strong or healthy on that high of a deficit. I added some high protein snacks and kept it up around 1300-1400.
  • crackpotbaby
    crackpotbaby Posts: 1,297 Member
    I'm 5'2, lightly active as a baseline (I'm a nurse, on my feet all day but light activity). I log extra exercise which is jogging/walking hilly trails, cycling or mountain biking probably 4 times a week as extra exercise.

    MFP also allocates me 1200.
  • Dee_D33
    Dee_D33 Posts: 106 Member
    I stopped talking to people other than my husband about my diet. I'm 5'4" and started at 145-148 (I would fluctuate). I'm only aiming to lose 15-20 lbs, and because that's such a small amount, I have to cut and count very closely and precisely. I was told by my family and friends that I wasn't eating enough and "look fine." The fact of the matter is that I am 4 months in and a look better, feel better, and I am happy. I am not starving at 1200 calories because I eat low calorie yet filling meals that I enjoy. I am sedentary, I do not have a job as my husband is military and currently in between jobs/locations and I workout 3-4 times a week for an hour, which I log and eat back half of my calories if I'm hungry.

    Just look past the comments. As long as you're satisfied and see your plan as working long term, then you can ignore them.
  • laura2137
    laura2137 Posts: 27 Member
    I'm on 1000 calories and it took me 6 months to loose 16kg (35 pounds), YES, sometime I go over it......but will over try to stay on 1000 most days.
  • elisa123gal
    elisa123gal Posts: 4,333 Member
    My thought has always been to try to lose eating as much as I can. 1200 calories works for weight loss..no doubt. My fear is that ..from my reading on here... when you lose on 1200..you're pretty much stuck with a low maintenance calorie allowance..or regain happens.
  • amusedmonkey
    amusedmonkey Posts: 10,330 Member
    15k steps is usually how much I get to fit the very active setting.For me, lightly active happens to be around 7k steps, active around 11k and very active around 14k.
  • Erotyka
    Erotyka Posts: 82 Member
    I've been on 1200 calories for months - 5'3, fairly sedentary, have gone from 224 to 162 and my calorie goal is still identical. I find telling others about my calorie goals can cause concern - everyone's got the infamous 2000 in their minds - my TDEE is around 1800 so I would outright gain on that!

    If you don't feel comfortable eating that low, maybe adjust your goals on MFP or try working out a more personalised amount from your TDEE.
  • Makeitso39
    Makeitso39 Posts: 51 Member
    15k steps is usually how much I get to fit the very active setting.For me, lightly active happens to be around 7k steps, active around 11k and very active around 14k.

    Where do you find this information please? Does this relate to when your Fitbit steps are given back as exercise calories? Sometimes I'll do 7k steps and be given 0 calories, but I did 15k the other day and was given over 400. Confused.
  • amusedmonkey
    amusedmonkey Posts: 10,330 Member
    edited February 2017
    Makeitso39 wrote: »
    15k steps is usually how much I get to fit the very active setting.For me, lightly active happens to be around 7k steps, active around 11k and very active around 14k.

    Where do you find this information please? Does this relate to when your Fitbit steps are given back as exercise calories? Sometimes I'll do 7k steps and be given 0 calories, but I did 15k the other day and was given over 400. Confused.

    Yes, it's what Fitbit gives me. These are the averages from experience, the average cutoff where fitbit starts giving me extra calories above set activity level. If you have a heart rate model the variance can be high. Generally, depending on my speed of walking/running, very active can be anywhere from 12k to 15k steps, but most days hover at around 14k steps for very active. Faster stepping or doing lots of sprints takes it down a notch.

    If it gives you 0 calories for 7k, this means your current activity level is set up to support 7k steps without giving you extra calories and would need to be lowered to get extra exercise calories on 7k. In other words, those first 7k (if it's a true zero and you have negative adjustment enabled), are already accounted for in activity level and is exactly the amount of steps this activity level expects you to take, and you are likely set as lightly active. Any activity above that gives you extra calories like is the case with 15k.
  • Makeitso39
    Makeitso39 Posts: 51 Member
    Thank you @amusedmonkey that clears up some of the mystery. I don't have negative calories enabled though.
  • amusedmonkey
    amusedmonkey Posts: 10,330 Member
    Makeitso39 wrote: »
    Thank you @amusedmonkey that clears up some of the mystery. I don't have negative calories enabled though.

    Then 7k steps is likely a bit too low for your chosen activity level. As soon as you start getting extra calories, even if it's just one calorie, then you are being active enough for your chosen activity level.
  • Ming1951
    Ming1951 Posts: 433 Member
    Erotyka wrote: »
    I've been on 1200 calories for months - 5'3, fairly sedentary, have gone from 224 to 162 and my calorie goal is still identical. I find telling others about my calorie goals can cause concern - everyone's got the infamous 2000 in their minds - my TDEE is around 1800 so I would outright gain on that!

    If you don't feel comfortable eating that low, maybe adjust your goals on MFP or try working out a more personalised amount from your TDEE.

    I agree I also have been on 1200 c a day since Sept. (5'6") sw 224 cw 169.2
    Just had a checkup and all my numbers are looking great. I rarely hungry but I am always sure to eat 3 meals plus snacks and maybe a shake. If I am hungry on a particular day I will have a snack. I get about 10,000 steps a day, maybe 4-5 of them are active steps. But of course I'm older.
  • bbell1985
    bbell1985 Posts: 4,571 Member
    We've kind of bounced around the important part.

    At 169 lbs, looking to lose 30-35, A TWO POUND PER WEEK RATE OF LOSS IS TOO AGGRESSIVE.
    Dial that back to 1 lb per week and see what the calculator gives you.
    Losing at that rate at your size will mean losing too much lean body mass, and that means losing muscle. Some of it could be very important muscle, you know, like heart muscle.

    If you are burning 2,200 a day, then eat ~1,700 for a safe weight loss.

    Please.

    This is not too aggressive. She is 5'2". And for some, a few weeks of 2lb weight loss can actually help them stick to a diet.
This discussion has been closed.