Lunchtable for the nerdy (warning: only nerdy people allowed)
Options
Replies
-
zachbonner_ wrote: »solve for the unknowns v, w, x, y, z
w=17 because (180- (132+31))
v=48 because (180-132)
x=58 because (180-122)
y= (180-(43 + 58)) = 79
y + z + w = (180-(43 + 31))
79 + z + 17 = 106
Thus z = 10
Checking z + v + 122 = 10 + 48 + 122 = 180. True.
Is that all they're teaching in post-grad math these days?0 -
I'm gonna stick with...
https://youtu.be/0Vyj1C8ogtE?t=31s
https://youtu.be/pDcz43pt6r4
https://youtu.be/uAmINmjpQxw
https://youtu.be/KtypSRcwIhA
https://youtu.be/VGRxmYXi4Io
https://youtu.be/BiaF9iDHW_w
Headphones engaged....0 -
0
-
browneyedgirl749 wrote: »Motorsheen wrote: »
Since someone asked, I will shamelessly plug some of my current Canadian favourites!
- Kandle, love her
- mother mother
- the new pornographers
Kinda all indie music I guess
No Beiber? LOL
Is he your favourite?
Motorsheen wrote: »Motorsheen wrote: »
Since someone asked, I will shamelessly plug some of my current Canadian favourites!
- Kandle, love her
- mother mother
- the new pornographers
Kinda all indie music I guess
Haha, Kids in the Hall, right?Motorsheen wrote: »
Since someone asked, I will shamelessly plug some of my current Canadian favourites!
- Kandle, love her
- mother mother
- the new pornographers
Kinda all indie music I guess
I saw Mother Mother a few years ago and after the show I couldn't stop laughing because this old woman went up to the male singer and went, "that was just lovely, dear. You are so talented."
Thanks, Grandma
This is priceless! Adorable!0 -
So they used a large ring so that the depth of field is actually rather large. With a standard sized ring you'd need a macro lens to get that much detail on the ring that close to the camera. Doing so would make you unable to get anything resembling focus at infinity. Instead they scaled up the ring so they can place it further from the camera, while still appearing large and keeping the background somewhat in focus. This wouldn't be possible with a standard ring.
1 -
Negative!! LOL! We just got stuck with him. I'm sure there are groups that tried to deport him back to Canada. Too bad they didn't succeed.
0 -
So they used a large ring so that the depth of field is actually rather large. With a standard sized ring you'd need a macro lens to get that much detail on the ring that close to the camera. Doing so would make you unable to get anything resembling focus at infinity. Instead they scaled up the ring so they can place it further from the camera, while still appearing large and keeping the background somewhat in focus. This wouldn't be possible with a standard ring.
You don't have to tell me - I watched ALL the appendices.
One hula hoop to rule them all.0 -
I'm just going to sit over here in musical ignorance.0
-
I must confess I was expecting something different from this thread...
Guess I'm not a nerd... I'm just a dork... Lol0 -
JstTheWayIam wrote: »I must confess I was expecting something different from this thread...
Guess I'm not a nerd... I'm just a dork... Lol
Don't buy the hype...
1 -
Just realized the last 9 books added to my Goodreads queue....graphic novels and comics0
-
Historical Rationale:
By 2001-2002, Napster; Kazaa/Limewire; early, pre-bittorrent P2P; and the resultant RIAA suits made available to even casual observers that year over year record sales were either stagnant or in decline. The only genres to experience year to year sales growth were country and CCM. Jazz and classical were flat. Everything else had been in decline for at least the previous four years.
Conjecture:
If you liked R&B, the 1990s was YOUR decade. R&B and soul did very well: Mariah Carey, Boyz II Men, TLC, Janet Jackson, R Kelly, etc etc etc
My issue with the decade was the (even more egregious than previous decades) shameless trend pushing-- grunge (Seattle "garage" sound) the most prevalent (looking at YOU MTV and Rolling Stone). There was also the punk, ska, and swing revivals. Rapcore appeared. In the middle of the decade seems like every record executive was looking for the "next" Morrisette, Apple, McLachlan. The CCM side was pumping out "worship" albums every day, it seems. And for rock, excluding the Seattle bands, the top selling of the decade being already well established-- Metallica, Aerosmith, U2-- not really breaking new ground. Not to say any of this wasn't good, but for every one worthwhile act there were 9 copycats pushed by executives trying to capture a piece of an ever shrinking pie.0 -
I'm extremely fairly new to the whole DM setting, but for now I've shot a few encounters at my PC's. I had previously went to my DM for help and got some good tips, but what I really need is what our party calls... "Nagranda". She is a Duskblade, level 10 with a some sort of *kitten* sword that obliterates anything magic, is sheathed within her, and deals d20's for damage. Point is, I need some advice on where to look to make some Meeseeksanddestroy is a thespian hero that's destroying gods in the background that my PC's will look up to on their adventures. I have some base stats of a hero called Gideon (pretty much lost 3 hero's in this setting and revived them all as this OP cannon of fire): Duskblade-4, Fighter-4, Swordsage-4 Str-17 Dex-17 Con-13 Int-16 Wis-14 Cha-13 Mostly looking for weapons, curses, items, or the-like. Anything for DM advice also helps, Thanks.2
-
Gimsteinn1 wrote: »OK ok.. I'll step out of the Nerd closet.
I've got an Ironman Bob Head.. I bought for me but gave my SO cause he's the one in an open relationship with his nerdiness.
I've got a R2D2 statue I also bought for me but gave him
I've got a Darth Vader led lamp I also gave him but is really mine
I've Cosplayed and no, I'm not sharing pics.
I've played dungeons&dragons
I've been to not 1 but 6 gaming conventions.
I've played WOW for more than 300 days in total.
I've read almost every Orson Scott book
I've read almost every Star Wars book
I've watched Star trek so many times I can't even count it
I've read almost every Douglas Adams book
I actually own a bloody gaming company and we've released 2 mobile games so far. The third one is on it's way and I'm currently trying to find the motivation to finish the story for the fourth.
And I bloody hell know that the answer to the life, the universe and everything is 42
So there.. I'm out.
You've read the star wars books?
What's your favorite series?0 -
Historical Rationale:
By 2001-2002, Napster; Kazaa/Limewire; early, pre-bittorrent P2P; and the resultant RIAA suits made available to even casual observers that year over year record sales were either stagnant or in decline. The only genres to experience year to year sales growth were country and CCM. Jazz and classical were flat. Everything else had been in decline for at least the previous four years.
Conjecture:
If you liked R&B, the 1990s was YOUR decade. R&B and soul did very well: Mariah Carey, Boyz II Men, TLC, Janet Jackson, R Kelly, etc etc etc
My issue with the decade was the (even more egregious than previous decades) shameless trend pushing-- grunge (Seattle "garage" sound) the most prevalent (looking at YOU MTV and Rolling Stone). There was also the punk, ska, and swing revivals. Rapcore appeared. In the middle of the decade seems like every record executive was looking for the "next" Morrisette, Apple, McLachlan. The CCM side was pumping out "worship" albums every day, it seems. And for rock, excluding the Seattle bands, the top selling of the decade being already well established-- Metallica, Aerosmith, U2-- not really breaking new ground. Not to say any of this wasn't good, but for every one worthwhile act there were 9 copycats pushed by executives trying to capture a piece of an ever shrinking pie.
After 96 it really became about how to sell the music rather than what sounds good...
And thus Boy Bands (not even really bands) were shamelessly crammed down everyone's throat...
Rap music lost its edge
Rock music lost any hint of blues influence and just became a whiny emo genre...
I started exploring other decades0 -
MeeseeksAndDestroy wrote: »JstTheWayIam wrote: »Gimsteinn1 wrote: »OK ok.. I'll step out of the Nerd closet.
I've got an Ironman Bob Head.. I bought for me but gave my SO cause he's the one in an open relationship with his nerdiness.
I've got a R2D2 statue I also bought for me but gave him
I've got a Darth Vader led lamp I also gave him but is really mine
I've Cosplayed and no, I'm not sharing pics.
I've played dungeons&dragons
I've been to not 1 but 6 gaming conventions.
I've played WOW for more than 300 days in total.
I've read almost every Orson Scott book
I've read almost every Star Wars book
I've watched Star trek so many times I can't even count it
I've read almost every Douglas Adams book
I actually own a bloody gaming company and we've released 2 mobile games so far. The third one is on it's way and I'm currently trying to find the motivation to finish the story for the fourth.
And I bloody hell know that the answer to the life, the universe and everything is 42
So there.. I'm out.
You've read the star wars books?
What's your favorite series?
My current
It's like I've known you my whole mfp life lol...
Your favorite, just current or both?0
https://youtu.be/gypAjPp6eps
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 391.7K Introduce Yourself
- 43.5K Getting Started
- 259.8K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.6K Food and Nutrition
- 47.3K Recipes
- 232.3K Fitness and Exercise
- 395 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.4K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 152.7K Motivation and Support
- 7.8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.3K MyFitnessPal Information
- 23 News and Announcements
- 960 Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.3K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions