really dumb question...
syousaf571
Posts: 46 Member
when it says "if you were to eat like this everyday...you'd weigh #" If it says it in red...does that mean that's bad? lol and whats weird is that my total calories weren't even over that maximum amount of calories i should have. stupid question but thx in advance
0
Replies
-
It means you will weigh that if you continue to eat at that amount of calories every day for the next 5 weeks2
-
It's a mathematical calculation, nothing more. If you're seeing it, it means you've eaten the minimum calories for the day (or it would be scolding you for not eating enough instead). There's no judgment on it.4
-
It's also really, really inaccurate, so I wouldn't trust it too much.2
-
It's also really, really inaccurate, so I wouldn't trust it too much.
A.C.E. Certified Personal and Group Fitness Trainer
IDEA Fitness member
Kickboxing Certified Instructor
Been in fitness for 30 years and have studied kinesiology and nutrition
3 -
It gives you a time when you'll be at a certain weight, but apparently weight loss isn't linear or something.
Well anyway, hasn't been accurate for me. I use Libra instead.0 -
There are no dumb questions. That feature has been having issues lately. Do you have a fitness tracker linked and negative adjustment enabled? If you do and are getting negative adjustments, it might be that your actual activity is under what the app expects you to burn. Other than that, I don't know. I haven't used that feature in years.0
-
I could be wrong, but I believe she's talking about MFP's prediction itself - which assumes that every day for the next five weeks would be exactly identical to today in terms of caloric intake and expenditure, and excludes the possible extenuating circumstances (water/glycogen/sodium fluctuations, hormonal fluctuations, etc.) and the fact that weight loss isn't a linear process.
In other words, the five-week prediction is about as accurate as throwing a dart at a dartboard or writing down ten numbers and pulling one out of a hat.6 -
I could be wrong, but I believe she's talking about MFP's prediction itself - which assumes that every day for the next five weeks would be exactly identical to today in terms of caloric intake and expenditure, and excludes the possible extenuating circumstances (water/glycogen/sodium fluctuations, hormonal fluctuations, etc.) and the fact that weight loss isn't a linear process.
In other words, the five-week prediction is about as accurate as throwing a dart at a dartboard or writing down ten numbers and pulling one out of a hat.
Yes thanks, that's exactly what I meant. The CICO equation is obviously correct, it's the "in 5 weeks" prediction I have issues with.2 -
It's not inaccurate if you are not HONEST. Completely honest. There isn't any judgement, we do that to ourselves. The program is merely suggesting eating "that way" everyday for 5 weeks, or it's trying to be encouraging when it suggests that perhaps what you ate that day needs some work. If the data you type in is HONEST in foods, water and exercise, it's going to give you honest feedback. The suggestions are like "guidelines" on how to improve, how to scale back or good job. Try to use "serving size" portion(s) [look at the labels], drink at least 64oz of water. These are important. Find new ways [recipes], simple ways to make the foods you eat different from how you always eat them. These things help change everything up. This program takes what you type in, and gives you feedback. Similar to losing weight, how honest you are in eating and exercise determines how much or how little you'll lose.0
-
Totally agree that is is meant to be encouraging. I only mentioned it because when you're new it can be frustrating if you are depending on a certain weight in 5 weeks and don't know about the other factors that AnvilHead mentioned above that can mess up that prediction (water/glycogen/sodium fluctuations, hormonal fluctuations, etc.).
I agree with you that if you follow the calorie suggestions and are accurate and honest eventually you will reach that weight. It just might not happen in exactly 5 weeks.1 -
sabrinafaire2 wrote: »It's not inaccurate if you are not HONEST. Completely honest. There isn't any judgement, we do that to ourselves. The program is merely suggesting eating "that way" everyday for 5 weeks, or it's trying to be encouraging when it suggests that perhaps what you ate that day needs some work. If the data you type in is HONEST in foods, water and exercise, it's going to give you honest feedback. The suggestions are like "guidelines" on how to improve, how to scale back or good job. Try to use "serving size" portion(s) [look at the labels], drink at least 64oz of water. These are important. Find new ways [recipes], simple ways to make the foods you eat different from how you always eat them. These things help change everything up. This program takes what you type in, and gives you feedback. Similar to losing weight, how honest you are in eating and exercise determines how much or how little you'll lose.
It's still not an accurate representation, though. You could be logging even pieces of gum and spices to the fraction of the gram, but if your calorie intake and activity level are not exactly the same to the calorie every single day for 5 whole weeks (or averages to that number), plus other factors like water weight and individual metabolic rate, that feature can be inaccurate. It's basically there for motivation of some sorts and is not in any way there to accurately represent what your weight will be doing 5 weeks from now. It basically tells you "keep what you did today up, and you will get so and so results", so seeing a predicted gain may motivate you to rein in your calories and seeing a predicted loss may motivate you to continue doing what you are doing.
To know your own practical weight loss predictions, using your own data over time to see how your weight behaved is a better way.3 -
It's also really, really inaccurate, so I wouldn't trust it too much.It's also really, really inaccurate, so I wouldn't trust it too much.
A.C.E. Certified Personal and Group Fitness Trainer
IDEA Fitness member pop
Kickboxing Certified Instructor
Been in fitness for 30 years and have studied kinesiology and nutrition
0 -
Do you always lose exactly 1kg in exactly two weeks when you have a 500 calorie deficit?
I think people are misunderstanding what I was saying. I'm not questioning that you would lose 1kg, only suggesting that it may not show up on the scale in exactly 2 weeks. It's the timeframe given that I've found to be inaccurate.4 -
I could be wrong, but I believe she's talking about MFP's prediction itself - which assumes that every day for the next five weeks would be exactly identical to today in terms of caloric intake and expenditure, and excludes the possible extenuating circumstances (water/glycogen/sodium fluctuations, hormonal fluctuations, etc.) and the fact that weight loss isn't a linear process.
In other words, the five-week prediction is about as accurate as throwing a dart at a dartboard or writing down ten numbers and pulling one out of a hat.
0 -
I could be wrong, but I believe she's talking about MFP's prediction itself - which assumes that every day for the next five weeks would be exactly identical to today in terms of caloric intake and expenditure, and excludes the possible extenuating circumstances (water/glycogen/sodium fluctuations, hormonal fluctuations, etc.) and the fact that weight loss isn't a linear process.
In other words, the five-week prediction is about as accurate as throwing a dart at a dartboard or writing down ten numbers and pulling one out of a hat.
Yes thanks, that's exactly what I meant. The CICO equation is obviously correct, it's the "in 5 weeks" prediction I have issues with.
Yea I agree it is very inaccurate since I believe it is based on MFP's calorie calculations for you based on the stats you enter. I enter my own cal goal based on my TDEE and it always says I'm gaining no matter what. The best was when it told me I would be 10lbs heavier in 5 weeks.. hahaha... Ya ok MFP1 -
Yes thanks, that's exactly what I meant. The CICO equation is obviously correct, it's the "in 5 weeks" prediction I have issues with.
Agreed. I don't think it has ever accurately predicted my "5 week" mark. If it did I would have been at my goal 4 months ago or based on last night, not until this coming December.1 -
It means MFP is assuming your are a robot and will eat/move/live/behave/sleep/think/talk/exist the exact same way as you did today, for the next 5 weeks. Ignore it in exchange for a weight-trend app.1
-
That number, at least what I've noticed, is your current weight minus your caloric deficit for that day multiplied by 35 and divided by 3500. So if you're 200 pounds, had a 1000 calorie deficit for the day, it would tell you your weight in 5 weeks should be 190. 200-((35×1000)/3500)->200-(35000/3500)->200-10->190. It's over simplified, but a useful tool for you to see if you need/want to adjust your deficit.1
-
There are no dumb questions, only dumb people.0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.6K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.3K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.5K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 431 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.6K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.8K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions