Plateuing so badlyyyy - IF +Keto?
mehreen_xo
Posts: 78 Member
Hey guys so I have already lost 47lbs and I was plateauing really badly for about a month. I was eating right and exersising yet seeing no change on the scale. A few days ago I decided to take up intermittent fasting (16:8) and I have lowered my carb intake to about 70-80g per day as opposed to 120/130g per day. Is this a safe and effective way to drop the pounds and shock my metabolism?? Thank you
0
Replies
-
You said you were "eating right", does that mean you weigh everything you eat and you log every lick, bite, or taste? If not then start there.4
-
This content has been removed.
-
Your metabolism doesn't need "shocking" and meal timing and macro breakdown are pretty irrelevant. Dropping carbs lower than normal will see you drop some water weight...
Have you changed your stats to show your new weight? Your calorie goal will be a lot lower2 -
Yep forgot to mention, I'm having 1200 calories (5'3 female) which I track quite meticulously. And lol not literally but I mean just a diet to switch things up in case my body is now adapting to the same dietary habits.Are you monitoring your calorie level also? That would be the first priority. Other than a lightning bolt, your metabolism can not be shocked.
0 -
A month isn't really a plateau, and it's certainly not a bad plateau and as mentioned above calorie control is important for weight loss - Macros & Meal Timings make absolutely no difference, it's just a personal preference for nutrition and satiety.
Have you re-evaluated your goals as the weight has come off? If not you will have far less room for error in counting food calories and exercise burns.
2 -
mehreen_xo wrote: »Hey guys so I have already lost 47lbs and I was plateauing really badly for about a month. I was eating right and exersising yet seeing no change on the scale. A few days ago I decided to take up intermittent fasting (16:8) and I have lowered my carb intake to about 70-80g per day as opposed to 120/130g per day. Is this a safe and effective way to drop the pounds and shock my metabolism?? Thank you
dropping carbs will result in some water weight loss; however, if you are still eating the same amount of calories you won't drop any additional fat/weight.
You can't "shock" your metabolism, that is internet woo woo stuff.
Switching to IF and consuming the same amount of calories is not going to result in greater weight loss.
When is the last time you reassessed your calorie intake level?
Do you use a food scale?
Log everything accurately?
Also, as you drop more and more weight, it becomes more difficult to lose and weight loss will slow.
4 -
livingleanlivingclean wrote: »Your metabolism doesn't need "shocking" and meal timing and macro breakdown are pretty irrelevant. Dropping carbs lower than normal will see you drop some water weight...
Have you changed your stats to show your new weight? Your calorie goal will be a lot lower
Really? So timing and macros don't matter?! I'm honestly sooo confused I see a so much information online for arguments for and against each side. However, to support what you say I have lost 47lbs solely based on calorie counting and working out, but for the last month it's just incredibly slow if not non existent losses right now!
I thought lowering carbs etc was key because I see so much about it online, ugh maybe I should just stick to calorie counting and see where I go0 -
If you've been dieting a while, it might be worth taking a couple of weeks at maintenance (Diet Break) and then cracking on with the calorie control that clearly worked for you so far. Just be aware that you really will need to weigh and log your food and burns more accurately the closer you get to your target.2
-
There's no such thing as "shocking your metabolism" unfortunately.
It all comes down to calories. With accurate logging, a TDEE deficit and patience, the weight WILL come off. Fluctuations are normal and slow weight loss is normal.
In regards to IF and Keto - which I do BOTH - they don't offer any big advantage over IIFYM for weight loss. I find that they do provide a lot of health benefits and reduced hunger though.
IF: All you're doing here is changing WHEN you eat, not how much you eat. I like skipping breakfast so I can have a larger lunch and dinner. This helps me stick to my calorie goal.
Keto has some nice health benefits for sure. It's great for people with seizures, PCOS and Type 2 Diabetes. It can reduce gas and bloating, give you more energy and a clearer mind, to name a few.
As far as keto compares to IIFYM when it comes to weight loss: you will experience a flush of water weight when starting keto. It's just water and will return if you go back to eating carbs. Most people find protein and fat more filling than carbs, so you can naturally reduce your hunger (and thus calories) with keto compared to IIFYM.
Sooo... that's that. Do them if you want to do them and can stick with them. Otherwise, just keep doing what you're already doing and be patient.0 -
mehreen_xo wrote: »Hey guys so I have already lost 47lbs and I was plateauing really badly for about a month. I was eating right and exersising yet seeing no change on the scale. A few days ago I decided to take up intermittent fasting (16:8) and I have lowered my carb intake to about 70-80g per day as opposed to 120/130g per day. Is this a safe and effective way to drop the pounds and shock my metabolism?? Thank you
dropping carbs will result in some water weight loss; however, if you are still eating the same amount of calories you won't drop any additional fat/weight.
You can't "shock" your metabolism, that is internet woo woo stuff.
Switching to IF and consuming the same amount of calories is not going to result in greater weight loss.
When is the last time you reassessed your calorie intake level?
Do you use a food scale?
Log everything accurately?
Also, as you drop more and more weight, it becomes more difficult to lose and weight loss will slow.
Ok thank you, this info really helped me and I think I will just stick to counting calories. Tbh I may need to be a bit more careful with my calorie counting..2 -
tinkerbellang83 wrote: »If you've been dieting a while, it might be worth taking a couple of weeks at maintenance (Diet Break) and then cracking on with the calorie control that clearly worked for you so far. Just be aware that you really will need to weigh and log your food and burns more accurately the closer you get to your target.
Ok thank you! Yes calorie counting has been great, j didn't know you had to be extra careful towards the end.. why is this may I ask?0 -
Scales dictate weightloss not fat loss. Is that what you're trying to achieve?0
-
There's no such thing as "shocking your metabolism" unfortunately.
It all comes down to calories. With accurate logging, a TDEE deficit and patience, the weight WILL come off. Fluctuations are normal and slow weight loss is normal.
In regards to IF and Keto - which I do BOTH - they don't offer any big advantage over CICO for weight loss. I find that they do provide a lot of health benefits and reduced hunger though.
IF: All you're doing here is changing WHEN you eat, not how much you eat. I like skipping breakfast so I can have a larger lunch and dinner. This helps me stick to my calorie goal.
Keto has some nice health benefits for sure. It's great for people with seizures, PCOS and Type 2 Diabetes. It can reduce gas and bloating, give you more energy and a clearer mind, to name a few.
As far as keto compares to CICO when it comes to weight loss: you will experience a flush of water weight when starting keto. It's just water and will return if you go back to eating carbs. Most people find protein and fat more filling than carbs, so you can naturally reduce your hunger (and thus calories) with keto compared to CICO.
Sooo... that's that. Do them if you want to do them and can stick with them. Otherwise, just keep doing what you're already doing and be patient.
Oh my goodness I can't even explain how useful this info was! Here's me thinking it will accelerate weight loss etc when really it's all about calories. I feel IF and keto don't really work for me as I'm quite miserable on them haha o prefer eating 3x a day but I read about something about eating 3x means your insulin remains high and prevent fat loss... is this true? I mean I haven't found it's true so far but idk about now that I'm nearing my goal0 -
There's no such thing as "shocking your metabolism" unfortunately.
It all comes down to calories. With accurate logging, a TDEE deficit and patience, the weight WILL come off. Fluctuations are normal and slow weight loss is normal.
In regards to IF and Keto - which I do BOTH - they don't offer any big advantage over CICO for weight loss. I find that they do provide a lot of health benefits and reduced hunger though.
IF: All you're doing here is changing WHEN you eat, not how much you eat. I like skipping breakfast so I can have a larger lunch and dinner. This helps me stick to my calorie goal.
Keto has some nice health benefits for sure. It's great for people with seizures, PCOS and Type 2 Diabetes. It can reduce gas and bloating, give you more energy and a clearer mind, to name a few.
As far as keto compares to CICO when it comes to weight loss: you will experience a flush of water weight when starting keto. It's just water and will return if you go back to eating carbs. Most people find protein and fat more filling than carbs, so you can naturally reduce your hunger (and thus calories) with keto compared to CICO.
Sooo... that's that. Do them if you want to do them and can stick with them. Otherwise, just keep doing what you're already doing and be patient.
CICO isn't a type of diet it's an energy balance formula and thus you can't compare it to IF/Keto.
Keto is a type of diet and IF is just meal timing they both still rely on CICO to work for weight loss. If you eat in a calorie surplus using either method you would gain weight.
2 -
tinkerbellang83 wrote: »There's no such thing as "shocking your metabolism" unfortunately.
It all comes down to calories. With accurate logging, a TDEE deficit and patience, the weight WILL come off. Fluctuations are normal and slow weight loss is normal.
In regards to IF and Keto - which I do BOTH - they don't offer any big advantage over CICO for weight loss. I find that they do provide a lot of health benefits and reduced hunger though.
IF: All you're doing here is changing WHEN you eat, not how much you eat. I like skipping breakfast so I can have a larger lunch and dinner. This helps me stick to my calorie goal.
Keto has some nice health benefits for sure. It's great for people with seizures, PCOS and Type 2 Diabetes. It can reduce gas and bloating, give you more energy and a clearer mind, to name a few.
As far as keto compares to CICO when it comes to weight loss: you will experience a flush of water weight when starting keto. It's just water and will return if you go back to eating carbs. Most people find protein and fat more filling than carbs, so you can naturally reduce your hunger (and thus calories) with keto compared to CICO.
Sooo... that's that. Do them if you want to do them and can stick with them. Otherwise, just keep doing what you're already doing and be patient.
CICO isn't a type of diet it's an energy balance formula and thus you can't compare it to IF/Keto.
Keto is a type of diet and IF is just meal timing they both still rely on CICO to work for weight loss. If you eat in a calorie surplus using either method you would gain weight.
Perhaps I could have used a better term, I was just using CICO in lieu of "typical diet where you eat what you want in moderation".
"Keto is a type of diet and IF is just meal timing they both still rely on CICO to work for weight loss. If you eat in a calorie surplus using either method you would gain weight. " - Yes, this is exactly what I said.1 -
mehreen_xo wrote: »There's no such thing as "shocking your metabolism" unfortunately.
It all comes down to calories. With accurate logging, a TDEE deficit and patience, the weight WILL come off. Fluctuations are normal and slow weight loss is normal.
In regards to IF and Keto - which I do BOTH - they don't offer any big advantage over CICO for weight loss. I find that they do provide a lot of health benefits and reduced hunger though.
IF: All you're doing here is changing WHEN you eat, not how much you eat. I like skipping breakfast so I can have a larger lunch and dinner. This helps me stick to my calorie goal.
Keto has some nice health benefits for sure. It's great for people with seizures, PCOS and Type 2 Diabetes. It can reduce gas and bloating, give you more energy and a clearer mind, to name a few.
As far as keto compares to CICO when it comes to weight loss: you will experience a flush of water weight when starting keto. It's just water and will return if you go back to eating carbs. Most people find protein and fat more filling than carbs, so you can naturally reduce your hunger (and thus calories) with keto compared to CICO.
Sooo... that's that. Do them if you want to do them and can stick with them. Otherwise, just keep doing what you're already doing and be patient.
Oh my goodness I can't even explain how useful this info was! Here's me thinking it will accelerate weight loss etc when really it's all about calories. I feel IF and keto don't really work for me as I'm quite miserable on them haha o prefer eating 3x a day but I read about something about eating 3x means your insulin remains high and prevent fat loss... is this true? I mean I haven't found it's true so far but idk about now that I'm nearing my goal
Nope. Most science suggests that it's all about calories. You can graze all day or eat one meal a day and still lose weight at the same rate.2 -
^ Thistinkerbellang83 wrote: »CICO isn't a type of diet it's an energy balance formula and thus you can't compare it to IF/Keto.
Keto is a type of diet and IF is just meal timing they both still rely on CICO to work for weight loss. If you eat in a calorie surplus using either method you would gain weight.
And a month is NOT a plateau.1 -
Food scale.1
-
tinkerbellang83 wrote: »There's no such thing as "shocking your metabolism" unfortunately.
It all comes down to calories. With accurate logging, a TDEE deficit and patience, the weight WILL come off. Fluctuations are normal and slow weight loss is normal.
In regards to IF and Keto - which I do BOTH - they don't offer any big advantage over CICO for weight loss. I find that they do provide a lot of health benefits and reduced hunger though.
IF: All you're doing here is changing WHEN you eat, not how much you eat. I like skipping breakfast so I can have a larger lunch and dinner. This helps me stick to my calorie goal.
Keto has some nice health benefits for sure. It's great for people with seizures, PCOS and Type 2 Diabetes. It can reduce gas and bloating, give you more energy and a clearer mind, to name a few.
As far as keto compares to CICO when it comes to weight loss: you will experience a flush of water weight when starting keto. It's just water and will return if you go back to eating carbs. Most people find protein and fat more filling than carbs, so you can naturally reduce your hunger (and thus calories) with keto compared to CICO.
Sooo... that's that. Do them if you want to do them and can stick with them. Otherwise, just keep doing what you're already doing and be patient.
CICO isn't a type of diet it's an energy balance formula and thus you can't compare it to IF/Keto.
Keto is a type of diet and IF is just meal timing they both still rely on CICO to work for weight loss. If you eat in a calorie surplus using either method you would gain weight.
Perhaps I could have used a better term, I was just using CICO in lieu of "typical diet where you eat what you want in moderation".
"Keto is a type of diet and IF is just meal timing they both still rely on CICO to work for weight loss. If you eat in a calorie surplus using either method you would gain weight. " - Yes, this is exactly what I said.
Just wanted to clarify, particularly for lurkers because what you're referring to is IIFYM not CICO.1 -
tinkerbellang83 wrote: »tinkerbellang83 wrote: »There's no such thing as "shocking your metabolism" unfortunately.
It all comes down to calories. With accurate logging, a TDEE deficit and patience, the weight WILL come off. Fluctuations are normal and slow weight loss is normal.
In regards to IF and Keto - which I do BOTH - they don't offer any big advantage over CICO for weight loss. I find that they do provide a lot of health benefits and reduced hunger though.
IF: All you're doing here is changing WHEN you eat, not how much you eat. I like skipping breakfast so I can have a larger lunch and dinner. This helps me stick to my calorie goal.
Keto has some nice health benefits for sure. It's great for people with seizures, PCOS and Type 2 Diabetes. It can reduce gas and bloating, give you more energy and a clearer mind, to name a few.
As far as keto compares to CICO when it comes to weight loss: you will experience a flush of water weight when starting keto. It's just water and will return if you go back to eating carbs. Most people find protein and fat more filling than carbs, so you can naturally reduce your hunger (and thus calories) with keto compared to CICO.
Sooo... that's that. Do them if you want to do them and can stick with them. Otherwise, just keep doing what you're already doing and be patient.
CICO isn't a type of diet it's an energy balance formula and thus you can't compare it to IF/Keto.
Keto is a type of diet and IF is just meal timing they both still rely on CICO to work for weight loss. If you eat in a calorie surplus using either method you would gain weight.
Perhaps I could have used a better term, I was just using CICO in lieu of "typical diet where you eat what you want in moderation".
"Keto is a type of diet and IF is just meal timing they both still rely on CICO to work for weight loss. If you eat in a calorie surplus using either method you would gain weight. " - Yes, this is exactly what I said.
Just wanted to clarify, particularly for lurkers because what you're referring to is IIFYM not CICO.
Yep that's the one, I had a brain fart.2 -
I was wondering how close to your goal you are. Your 47 lb loss is so good, congratulations for this. You have said you are close to where you would like to be. It is often advised when close to relax your deficit to predict a loss of .5 of a lb. It might help to ensure you are aiming for the middle of the healthy bmi range for your height, going too low, particularly for young women is counterproductive. Hope this helps. As in everything, do what is right for you.1
-
0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.6K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.3K Health and Weight Loss
- 176K Food and Nutrition
- 47.5K Recipes
- 232.6K Fitness and Exercise
- 431 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.6K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.4K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.8K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions