1000 calories a day?

mehreen_xo
mehreen_xo Posts: 78 Member
edited November 18 in Health and Weight Loss
Is it ok to go down to 1000 calories a day? My BMR is ~1500 calories. I've heard you shouldn't go below 1200 but Idk what I should do?
«1

Replies

  • deannalfisher
    deannalfisher Posts: 5,600 Member
    not for prolonged periods - why so low?

    current weight/goal weight/age/height/activity level?
  • Luna3386
    Luna3386 Posts: 888 Member
    You aren't supposed to go below your bmr.

    Enter your stats on mfp. More than 50 pounds to lose? 2 pounds a week. 20-50 or so? 1 pound a week. Less than 20? 1/2 pounds a week.

    Eat all the calories mfp gives you plus half of exercise calories.
  • mehreen_xo
    mehreen_xo Posts: 78 Member
    Why would you? Why wouldn't you want to eat as much as you can and still lose weight?

    Losing weight faster leads to loose skin and lost muscles.

    Just because I wanted to lose the last 10lbs a little faster haha
  • livingleanlivingclean
    livingleanlivingclean Posts: 11,751 Member
    Your BMR is what your body needs to survive if you lay in a coma. Why would you need to eat less than that? (unless perhaps you're lying in bed all day doing absolutely nothing)

    1200 is recommended as an amount that will allow you to also get sufficient macro/micronutrients for good health. You would need a very carefully planned diet to eat less and not have nutrient deficiencies...
  • RoxieDawn
    RoxieDawn Posts: 15,488 Member
    edited May 2017
    Reason for wanting to eat so far below your BMR? Surely you mean TDEE and not BMR?
  • mehreen_xo
    mehreen_xo Posts: 78 Member
    Luna3386 wrote: »
    You aren't supposed to go below your bmr.

    Enter your stats on mfp. More than 50 pounds to lose? 2 pounds a week. 20-50 or so? 1 pound a week. Less than 20? 1/2 pounds a week.

    Eat all the calories mfp gives you plus half of exercise calories.

    What if I'm not really exercising much these few weeks? Surely I'd need to be below BMR for a calorie deficit
  • deannalfisher
    deannalfisher Posts: 5,600 Member
    that last 10lbs is going to be hard to do - don't rush it...do you want to lose the weight and then regain it, or do it slowly

    also consider looking at recomp vs. just losing weight - it may help
  • TeaBea
    TeaBea Posts: 14,517 Member
    mehreen_xo wrote: »
    Is it ok to go down to 1000 calories a day? My BMR is ~1500 calories. I've heard you shouldn't go below 1200 but Idk what I should do?

    Your BMR is calories used if you never got out of bed all day. Unless you are bedridden compare 1200 to something else. TDEE would include all activity including exercise.....that's more fair.

    http://scoobysworkshop.com/calorie-calculator/
  • janejellyroll
    janejellyroll Posts: 25,763 Member
    mehreen_xo wrote: »
    Luna3386 wrote: »
    You aren't supposed to go below your bmr.

    Enter your stats on mfp. More than 50 pounds to lose? 2 pounds a week. 20-50 or so? 1 pound a week. Less than 20? 1/2 pounds a week.

    Eat all the calories mfp gives you plus half of exercise calories.

    What if I'm not really exercising much these few weeks? Surely I'd need to be below BMR for a calorie deficit

    Even people who aren't doing intentional exercise are still generally moving around some. Are you bed-ridden?
  • paperpudding
    paperpudding Posts: 9,304 Member
    mehreen_xo wrote: »
    Luna3386 wrote: »
    You aren't supposed to go below your bmr.

    Enter your stats on mfp. More than 50 pounds to lose? 2 pounds a week. 20-50 or so? 1 pound a week. Less than 20? 1/2 pounds a week.

    Eat all the calories mfp gives you plus half of exercise calories.

    What if I'm not really exercising much these few weeks? Surely I'd need to be below BMR for a calorie deficit

    Even if you are not excercising much, your daily living activity is burning well over what you would burn in a coma.

  • mehreen_xo
    mehreen_xo Posts: 78 Member
    not for prolonged periods - why so low?

    current weight/goal weight/age/height/activity level?

    Weight: 140lbs
    Goal weight around: 130 or 125
    Height: 5'3
    Activity level: active
    And because I'm finding it harder to lose now so thought a greater deficit will benefit me
  • RoxieDawn
    RoxieDawn Posts: 15,488 Member
    edited May 2017
    mehreen_xo wrote: »
    Why would you? Why wouldn't you want to eat as much as you can and still lose weight?

    Losing weight faster leads to loose skin and lost muscles.

    Just because I wanted to lose the last 10lbs a little faster haha

    You will be sadly disappointed by lowering your cals this low will only compound your weight loss efforts instead of losing it faster.

    Its 10 pounds why the hurry? Do yourself and your body a favor, change it to .5, makes transition into maintenance much better too.
  • Chef_Barbell
    Chef_Barbell Posts: 6,644 Member
    mehreen_xo wrote: »
    Why would you? Why wouldn't you want to eat as much as you can and still lose weight?

    Losing weight faster leads to loose skin and lost muscles.

    Just because I wanted to lose the last 10lbs a little faster haha

    At what expense?
  • deannalfisher
    deannalfisher Posts: 5,600 Member
    mehreen_xo wrote: »
    not for prolonged periods - why so low?

    current weight/goal weight/age/height/activity level?

    Weight: 140lbs
    Goal weight around: 130 or 125
    Height: 5'3
    Activity level: active
    And because I'm finding it harder to lose now so thought a greater deficit will benefit me

    does your active include your workouts or not? because above you said you weren't working out much right now...
  • mehreen_xo
    mehreen_xo Posts: 78 Member
    mehreen_xo wrote: »
    not for prolonged periods - why so low?

    current weight/goal weight/age/height/activity level?

    Weight: 140lbs
    Goal weight around: 130 or 125
    Height: 5'3
    Activity level: active
    And because I'm finding it harder to lose now so thought a greater deficit will benefit me

    does your active include your workouts or not? because above you said you weren't working out much right now...

    No that's excluding my workouts :)
  • TeaBea
    TeaBea Posts: 14,517 Member
    RoxieDawn wrote: »
    mehreen_xo wrote: »
    Why would you? Why wouldn't you want to eat as much as you can and still lose weight?

    Losing weight faster leads to loose skin and lost muscles.

    Just because I wanted to lose the last 10lbs a little faster haha

    You will be sadly disappointed by lowering your cals this low will only compound your weight loss efforts instead of losing it faster.

    Its 10 pounds why the hurry? Do yourself and your body a favor, change it to .5, makes transition into maintenance much better too.

    This^

    Fast weight loss means large deficit, with that your body is having a hard time supporting existing lean muscle mass. Do you want weight loss.....or fat loss?
  • deannalfisher
    deannalfisher Posts: 5,600 Member
    yeah 1000 is WAYYY to low

    I ran your stats through the Scooby Calculator:
    http://scoobysworkshop.com/calorie-calculator/

    BMR - 1459
    TDEE - 2006
    Goal Calories for a 10% fat loss (slow and stead) - 1800

    they recommended 135g protein/225g carbs/39g fat - but you can adjust the ratios (I used the 30%P/50%C/20%F split)
  • toxikon
    toxikon Posts: 2,383 Member
    My BMR is 1500 and I eat 1400 cals a day. I don't feel hungry and weight loss is less than 1lbs a week. So take "Don't Eat Below Your BMR" with a grain of salt.

    1200 calories is a weird "One Size Fits All" approach that I don't always agree with. A woman who is 6'2" is going to have much different nutritional needs than a woman who is 5'0".

    I think women of a shorter height who don't have much to lose can play with lower numbers. As long as you're fueling your body, feeling good (not weak, lightheaded, dizzy, tired) and not losing more than 1-2lbs a week, I think it's okay to go with what works for you.

    So from my point of view: go with what works for you. If you start feeling unwell or always hungry, increase your calories. Find the sweet spot where you're not too hungry but you're still losing weight consistently. And that number will be different for everyone.
  • RoxieDawn
    RoxieDawn Posts: 15,488 Member
    toxikon wrote: »
    My BMR is 1500 and I eat 1400 cals a day. I don't feel hungry and weight loss is less than 1lbs a week. So take "Don't Eat Below Your BMR" with a grain of salt.

    1200 calories is a weird "One Size Fits All" approach that I don't always agree with. A woman who is 6'2" is going to have much different nutritional needs than a woman who is 5'0".

    I think women of a shorter height who don't have much to lose can play with lower numbers. As long as you're fueling your body, feeling good (not weak, lightheaded, dizzy, tired) and not losing more than 1-2lbs a week, I think it's okay to go with what works for you.

    So from my point of view: go with what works for you. If you start feeling unwell or always hungry, increase your calories. Find the sweet spot where you're not too hungry but you're still losing weight consistently. And that number will be different for everyone.

    This is all around bad advice. It is never recommended to eat below your BMR with so little to lose. I will give a prime example, per the calculators my BMR is 1149 (I am very short, older). I will never eat 1149 calories or below to lose weight. I will incorporate exercise and activity so I can eat more and lose weight.

    With that said 1200 is never described as a One Size Fits All. Its MFP's bare minimum for healthy and sustainable weight loss for those that fit the stats to do so..
  • mehreen_xo
    mehreen_xo Posts: 78 Member
    yeah 1000 is WAYYY to low

    I ran your stats through the Scooby Calculator:
    http://scoobysworkshop.com/calorie-calculator/

    BMR - 1459
    TDEE - 2006
    Goal Calories for a 10% fat loss (slow and stead) - 1800

    they recommended 135g protein/225g carbs/39g fat - but you can adjust the ratios (I used the 30%P/50%C/20%F split)

    Wow thank you for your help!!!!
  • mehreen_xo
    mehreen_xo Posts: 78 Member
    edited May 2017
    toxikon wrote: »
    My BMR is 1500 and I eat 1400 cals a day. I don't feel hungry and weight loss is less than 1lbs a week. So take "Don't Eat Below Your BMR" with a grain of salt.

    1200 calories is a weird "One Size Fits All" approach that I don't always agree with. A woman who is 6'2" is going to have much different nutritional needs than a woman who is 5'0".

    I think women of a shorter height who don't have much to lose can play with lower numbers. As long as you're fueling your body, feeling good (not weak, lightheaded, dizzy, tired) and not losing more than 1-2lbs a week, I think it's okay to go with what works for you.

    So from my point of view: go with what works for you. If you start feeling unwell or always hungry, increase your calories. Find the sweet spot where you're not too hungry but you're still losing weight consistently. And that number will be different for everyone.

    Yes I agree thank you! But j don't think I'll stay with 1000 calories since I KNOW I'll feel hungry and miserable hhahaha thank you for your response!!!
  • cee134
    cee134 Posts: 33,711 Member
    mehreen_xo wrote: »
    Is it ok to go down to 1000 calories a day? My BMR is ~1500 calories. I've heard you shouldn't go below 1200 but Idk what I should do?

    No, it is not ok. 1000 is much too low. Plus weight loss is not a race. Don't go below 1400 for a male or 1200 for a female.

    More importantly, look at what causes you to gain weight and try to fix that so when you lose the weight, properly, you don't gain it back. Learning a healthy lifestyle is what's important.
  • fitmom4lifemfp
    fitmom4lifemfp Posts: 1,572 Member
    mehreen_xo wrote: »
    Yes I agree thank you! But j don't think I'll stay with 1000 calories since I KNOW I'll feel hungry and miserable hhahaha thank you for your response!!!

    If you knew that, then I wonder why you posted the question? :*
  • deannalfisher
    deannalfisher Posts: 5,600 Member
    someone has posted...the winner is the person who can eat the most and still lose weight...that is my ultimate goal in life :)
  • mehreen_xo
    mehreen_xo Posts: 78 Member
    edited May 2017
    mehreen_xo wrote: »
    Yes I agree thank you! But j don't think I'll stay with 1000 calories since I KNOW I'll feel hungry and miserable hhahaha thank you for your response!!!

    If you knew that, then I wonder why you posted the question? :*

    Well to be honest only because I want the last 10-15lbs to come off quickly then I thought I could just jump to Maintenance calories at my goal weight...and I was prepared to suffer LOL

    Of course I now realise I need to transition myself into the maintenance phase so I won't be doing that! I love the mfp community you all are so educating!
  • toxikon
    toxikon Posts: 2,383 Member
    RoxieDawn wrote: »
    toxikon wrote: »
    My BMR is 1500 and I eat 1400 cals a day. I don't feel hungry and weight loss is less than 1lbs a week. So take "Don't Eat Below Your BMR" with a grain of salt.

    1200 calories is a weird "One Size Fits All" approach that I don't always agree with. A woman who is 6'2" is going to have much different nutritional needs than a woman who is 5'0".

    I think women of a shorter height who don't have much to lose can play with lower numbers. As long as you're fueling your body, feeling good (not weak, lightheaded, dizzy, tired) and not losing more than 1-2lbs a week, I think it's okay to go with what works for you.

    So from my point of view: go with what works for you. If you start feeling unwell or always hungry, increase your calories. Find the sweet spot where you're not too hungry but you're still losing weight consistently. And that number will be different for everyone.

    This is all around bad advice. It is never recommended to eat below your BMR with so little to lose. I will give a prime example, per the calculators my BMR is 1149 (I am very short, older). I will never eat 1149 calories or below to lose weight. I will incorporate exercise and activity so I can eat more and lose weight.

    With that said 1200 is never described as a One Size Fits All. Its MFP's bare minimum for healthy and sustainable weight loss for those that fit the stats to do so..

    Agree to disagree. :) I've tried eating above my BMR and I lose weight at a snail's pace. I am sedentary with a desk job so if I don't stick to 1300-1400 cals per day I just don't see progress. As with OP, I don't have much to lose so it's a lot more challenging if I'm eating higher.
  • deannalfisher
    deannalfisher Posts: 5,600 Member
    I think you have BMR and TDEE mixed up - have you actually had it tested - that should be your base calories absolutely no exercise/activity/walking around - just simply living/breathing

  • Zuzurillo
    Zuzurillo Posts: 80 Member
    Here are my two cents. I am the same height and currently 150. My goal is also 130. My BMR calculation is 1245 cals. My TDEE for maintenance is 1608 cals, for weight loss the calculation is 1108 cals. This calculation is based on "sedentary" lifestyle which I am fine with. I have been sloppy and eating 1200-1300 calories a day for 1 month and have lost only 1 pound. Eating that many calories does not create enough of a deficit to lose. I understand that I could "add" 100 calories per mile of walking if I wanted to. Personally, exercise makes me hungry so is counter productive to my weight loss so I backed off of that - everyone is different. I think it's just different for smaller people, I'm not sure where the generalized 1200 cal is the lowest you can go came from. I'm about to re-set my goal to 1000 calories a day and just buckle down a little. I think you would be fine to do the same.
This discussion has been closed.